Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
DigitalFisherman

My First Deer

11 posts in this topic

Shot my first deer at the end of shooting time on Saturday; it looked like a good shot to the sweet spot and the deer jumped sideways, crashed about thirty yards into the bush and dropped (or so I thought). I climbed down a while later and started working my way towords her but ended up pushing her off her bed and deeper into the bush so I headed back to the house figuring on giving her the night and dragging her out in the morning; it was well after dark. Got out there the next morning, found a lot of blood and some bone (I must have hit a little forward in the shoulder)and followed the trail a couple hundred yards to all that was left of her; a gut pile. For the past two months i have been moving cameras around, scouting, hanging stands, clearing shooting lanes and putting in the time and legwork to put the guys in my party on deer only to have someone happen upon the fruit of my labor and help themselves. I didn't see another deer while hunting and needless to say, that expereance was pretty discouraging.

We ended up going 2 for 4 with one being a decent 8 pointer (my buddies first deer, shot it on his birthday) and had a great time and I will be back out there this weekend; I just needed to vent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, atleast someone took it home! You're lucky you didn't return that morning to find your deer chewed to pieces by the coyotes.

Don't be discouraged, go out and shoot another this weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That stinks for you, but think of it from the other guy's side. And of course we don't know if this is what happened or not, but maybe just maybe this guy was trying to do the right thing here.

Suppose you happen upon a deer that has been shot and you can't find any indication of anyone tracking it or looking for it. You even try to follow its tracks back a ways to see if anyone is coming and maybe you even yell something like "Hey I got your deer here" to see if anyone responds. Would you a) leave it to rot, or B) tag it and put the animal to good use. Hopefully no one lets that deer go to waste.

Also the same goes for if you have an obviously wounded deer walk by. Shoot it and wait for someone to come tag and if they don't show up take it, or do you just let it keep walking???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Public or Private land?? If it was public i wouldn't be too shook up about it....if it was my own land and someone did this..I guess i would really be mad as well! Just depends on the circumstance is all!

Just my 2 cents

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lawdog,

Great comments about doing the deer and the other hunter a favor if possible. Last year we knocked down a young buck and after waiting almost an hour we headed out to track. Sure enough it crossed and laid down in sight of another hunter's stand---he said it wasn't as big as he wanted to shoot and until it stood up again he wasn't entirely sure that it really was wounded (although there were shots less than a minute before it reached him).

It took two of us 90 minutes of tracking until we finally pushed that deer into another hunter who finished it off. We were lucky enough that at least somebody finally got a shot at it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how long did you wait...you gotta wait...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes it's tough to tell that a deer is wounded. I had a little fork come past me and bed down 50 yards from me. The deer was breathing hard and looked a bit distressed. No signs of injury otherwise. I that that he just got his butt kicked by a bigger buck which I was willing to wait for. About 15 minutes later I so orange down the ridge and talked to my father in law who asked if I'd seen a wounded fork they were tracking. I let him know I had and that it was still there. I then fisnished the deer off. The buck was hit low in the brisket and didn't limp or have any noticeable blood on it's hide.

Then two years ago my daughter shot a wounded doe on opening morning. The deer had a leg wound and was limping badly. The party who shot it did eventually show up tracking the deer in the snow. But not until Sunday afternoon. He must of not followed up his shot and then saw blood later.

It all worked out in the end though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our private land (20a) is bordered on the south by county land (300a), mostly thick woods;the county land has no public access. I shot the deer on public land near our southern property line and tracked it NE across our land and onto the neighbors land. When the blood trail headed in the direction of the neighbors land I called them to ask if I could continue onto their land, of course they said yes. It looked like the deer paused on one of their trails, leaving a big pool of blood then went about 20 yards into the woods and fell. My guess is that one of the guys hunting with the neighbors saw the blood while heading out to sit on Sunday and that was that. I could have raised a stink but it's my father in laws place and a deer isn't worth creating any bad blood with the neighbors. For me it's a matter of principle; had I found a deer I would have asked the partys hunting to the east and to the west of us if they lost track of a wounded deer. I'm new to this game but it just seems like the ethical thing to do. My wife sugested that "perhaps they needed the meat"... that could be and if that were the case I would have gladly given them the deer; like I said, it's simply a matter of principle.

Live and learn; if I had it to do over I would go back out on Saturday night with a few more sets of eyes and continue tracking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be glad someone got it. Its way worse to wound a deer and then lose it. You still have your tag, now go back out and try again grin.gif.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could be alot worse. A friend of my brother had a pretty scary situation when a guy threatened to kill them if they did not give him a Big Buck that he had shot at but missed. They gave him the deer in there words there is no Buck no matter how big that is worth getting shot over. They are talking to the local CO to see what he can do about it. there were a few witnesses that saw everything and heard the threat

I will post what happens as I find out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought, but could it be the deer made it to the trail and one of your neighbors shot it? If there was a significant blood/hair loss there, that may explain it. In my neck of the woods, he who stops it, gets it. Sheer speculation, but that may make it a bit easier to take?

Craig

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • delcecchi
      Vermilion is less than 20 miles... Or eagle nest 3 (and 1 and 2) are right next door.   You might check them out.
    • rundrave
      Love seeing guys out training dogs but you can really do  some serious damage to your dogs neck if it runs hard for a long distance before being stopped suddenly when the check cord is attached to a collar. I would suggest a harness instead that has attachment at the back that you can clip your check cord to. It will also flow off the back and less likely to get tangled up in the legs and belly which can also be dangerous especially when in the water.   It doesnt look deep where you are but you never know whats under the water that could snag your check cord. Sorry dont mean to preach but I have seen it first hand where a dog has been seriously injured from this. I know the prey drive and hard charge these dogs have, but you got to keep them safe.   good luck
    • Chill62
      Can you keep smallies from the Ottertail?  Thought there was a restriction on them in there.
    • Chill62
      If I go on an infected water I get it cleaned regardless.  Granted 99% of the time I fish a non-infected lake but still get it cleaned just incase.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed a report of zebra mussels in Comfort Lake, near Wyoming in Chisago County.  The DNR confirmed reports from a lake resident who found individual zebra mussels in two different areas of Comfort Lake. The resident had previously attended a volunteer aquatic invasive species identification training conducted by the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District. A follow-up survey by local partners and the DNR confirmed dispersed zebra mussels, indicating a possible reproducing population. Signs at lake accesses have been updated to alert boaters to the presence of zebra mussels. The DNR encourages all lake users to watch for zebra mussels and other invasive species and to contact the DNR if they find a suspected species that would be new to the lake. This confirmation is an important reminder to follow the state’s invasive species laws: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport. Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Zebra mussels are an invasive (non-native) species that can compete with native species for food and habitat, cut the feet of swimmers, reduce the performance of boat motors, and cause expensive damage to water intake pipes. Less than two percent of Minnesota’s 11,842 lakes are listed as infested with zebra mussels. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed a report of zebra mussels in Rush Lake in Otter Tail County, near several other lakes where zebra mussels were previously confirmed. DNR invasive species specialists confirmed two adult zebra mussels in separate locations about 75 feet from the public access. Signs at lake accesses have been updated to alert boaters to the presence of zebra mussels. The spread of invasive species is not inevitable, even when lakes are near others where zebra mussels and other invasive species have been confirmed. It’s an important reminder to follow the state’s invasive species laws: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species, Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport. Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Zebra mussels are an invasive (non-native) species that can compete with native species for food and habitat, cut the feet of swimmers, reduce the performance of boat motors, and cause expensive damage to water intake pipes. Less than two percent of Minnesota’s 11,842 lakes are listed as infested with zebra mussels. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Thousands of common carp died last month in Waseca County’s Lake Elysian because of a virus likely introduced to Minnesota waters by the release or escape of ornamental koi or pet goldfish.  Decomposing carp A joint effort by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the University of Minnesota have determined koi herpesvirus (KHV) was the main cause of the late-June fish kill in southern Minnesota. It is the state’s first documented case of the virus in a wild fish population. KHV does not affect humans and is not believed to affect other fish species. First documented in the United Kingdom in 1996, the virus has since been documented worldwide, mostly in countries that culture koi or common carp. This virus can cause disease in koi and common carp. Goldfish can be carriers of the virus but typically do not show signs of the disease. “The virus can be present in a lake without causing a fish kill, at least not until the right conditions are present,” said DNR fisheries pathology lab supervisor Ling Shen. “KHV is highly contagious, and as we’ve seen, very capable of causing large-scale die-offs of common carp.” Initially, DNR pathology lab analysis indicated the fish kill was caused by columnaris disease, which is spread by a particular bacterium. But further testing of common carp samples by the University of Minnesota’s Dr. Nicholas Phelps identified KHV as the primary cause of the fish kill. Columnaris now is considered a secondary contributor. “Many people don’t realize that koi are essentially just colorful carp so ultimately they are the same species and not native to Minnesota,” said Craig Soupir, DNR’s Waterville area fisheries supervisor. “What this incident tells us is the virus can be introduced by human action – a goldfish or koi was likely released from a home aquarium or pond into Lake Elysian or a connecting waterway.” The disease also can be transported through the moving of infected water, by migration of infected carp or on various surfaces. The DNR reminds the public that releasing ornamental fish into the wild has consequences and is illegal. Residents looking to dispose of exotic species are urged to contact their area DNR fisheries or wildlife office or local humane society. To prevent the spread of diseases such as KHV and invasive species, anglers and boaters need to clean their watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species; drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport; and dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. In Minnesota, compliance with aquatic invasive species laws in Minnesota has increased to 96 percent, based on more than 417,000 watercraft inspections in 2016. The DNR provides training to watercraft inspectors employed by local units of government and tribes. Last year, the DNR trained a record 857 non-DNR inspectors across the state. More information, including a 30-second public service announcement about preventing the spread of aquatic invasive species, is available on the aquatic invasive species page. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      It took citizen input and lots of planning, but it’s open, it’s beautiful, and it needs visitors. A celebration of the 940-acre La Salle Lake State Recreation Area in Hubbard County will be from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturday, Aug. 12.  La Salle Lake The Minnesota state parks and trails celebration includes activities ranging from a pontoon boat ride on La Salle Lake to guided tours of the facilities and a host of activities and presentations. Visitors can check out the picnic pavilion, expanded parking area, nature play area and River Overlook interpretive hiking trail that leads to the confluence of the Mississippi River and La Salle Creek. Those feeling especially energetic, can head off to hike the narrow, rugged, 6.5-mile Challenge Trail that circles the lake. Events include: 10 a.m. and 11 a.m. – Pontoon Tours
      Ride on the pontoon to hear about the unique qualities of La Salle Lake, the deepest lake (213 feet) entirely within the state. Meet at the boat ramp. 10 a.m. – Scientific and Natural Area Tour
      Learn about the jack pine blow down and current resource management, and walk to the confluence of the Mississippi River and La Salle Creek. Meet at the River Overlook Trailhead at the SNA (north side of County Road 9). 10 a.m. – Facilities Walking Tour
      Walk through the picnic area, cabin area and campground to view current facilities and hear a bit of site history. Meet at the picnic shelter. 10 a.m. – noon (ongoing) – Archery
      Try shooting an arrow with a youth bow. Ages 8 and up. (Young children may like to play at the nearby Nature Play Area.) Meet at the picnic shelter/parking lot area. 11:30 a.m. – Refreshments
      Meet at the picnic shelter. Noon – Speakers
      Meet at the picnic shelter. These activities are free, but vehicles must have a permit ($7/day or $35/year) to enter Minnesota state parks and recreation areas. La Salle Lake SRA is managed cooperatively by the Department of Natural Resources Parks and Trails, Fish and Wildlife, Forestry and Ecological and Water Resources divisions, and is a satellite unit of Itasca State Park, which is located about 8 miles away. Established in 2011, La Salle Lake SRA offers hunting, fishing, hiking, snowshoeing and wildlife viewing. It includes La Salle Lake Scientific and Natural Area, which supports numerous rare plant and animal species. The forested landscape features red and jack pine forests and woodlands, large white pine, balsam fir and white spruce forests, and a high quality old-growth northern white cedar forest. In addition to La Salle Lake and La Salle Creek, it also features more than one-half mile of Mississippi River Headwaters shoreline. The Trust for Public Land, a national, nonprofit, land conservation organization, partnered with the DNR to transfer the property to public ownership. The property was purchased with funds dedicated to environmental projects. The majority of the $8.49 million in funding came from the 2008 Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment Act – specifically the Outdoor Heritage Fund through a grant from the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council. Additional funding was provided by the Parks and Trails Fund and the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources. Driving directions La Salle Lake State Recreation Area is 233 miles northwest of the Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area and 8 miles northeast of Itasca State Park. From the north: From Shevlin, take Clearwater County Road 2 south 13.5 miles to Clearwater County Road 40 and continue east on Hubbard County Road 9 for 2.5 miles. From the south: From the north entrance of Itasca State Park, take Clearwater County Road 2 north 6 miles to Clearwater County Road 40 and continue east on Hubbard County Road 9 for 2.5 miles. From the east: From Highway 71, take Hubbard County Road 9 west for 12 miles to Becida, then continue west for 4 miles. For more information, contact the DNR Information Center at info.dnr@state.mn.us or 888-646-6367 (8 a.m.-8 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.-1 p.m. Saturday). Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Agency employees from 3 states prepare for international assignment The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is sending 10 firefighters to Canada to help fight wildfires. Together with firefighters from Wisconson and Michigan, they will be part of a three 20-member crew assisting British Columbia firefighters in the southeastern portion of their province. Ontario firefighters will fill in the crew vacancies.  The firefighters departed from the Minnesota Interagency Fire Center in Grand Rapids on Tuesday, July 25, for a briefing in Dryden, Ontario. A day later, they then flew to British Columbia and headed to their staging area in Kamloops. Firefighters commit to a 14-day assignment, though the specific fire has not been assigned at this time. “Helping fight fires in British Columbia is a great opportunity for Minnesota wildland firefighters to learn new procedures, form new partnerships and see new country,” said Rebekah Luedtke, Minnesota Incident Command Systems coordinator. “This will benefit Minnesota by providing training and experience that can be used at home.” Due to dry and humid conditions, numerous fires and personnel shortages, British Columbia requested assistance from their partners in the Pacific Northwest, Canadian and national interagency fire centers. Ontario, also facing limited resources, enacted the Great Lakes Forest Fire Compact (GLFFC) to seek support from their partners in the United States. The partnership allows for cooperation and collaboration across international borders as well as learning and training experiences for staff to hone their skills and expertise. Crews work together toward a common purpose and leverage resources for maximum effectiveness. Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin, along with Ontario and Manitoba, are members of GLFFC to promote effective prevention, pre-suppression and forest fire control in the Great Lakes region of the United States and adjacent areas of Canada. The partnership allows for sharing ideas, technology, tools, personnel and resources. Most of the time equipment resources are shared. It has been several years since human resources have been shared. For more wildfire information, visit the wildfire page. Learn more about GLFFC at www.glffc.com. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Gimp
      Fisherjmb - After I posted that, I looked into any news on Beanie's being sold. Here's what I found: http://www.stcroix360.com/2016/09/new-owners-of-lakeland-boat-landing-seek-to-celebrate-god-on-the-st-croix/ The article is from a year ago and I couldn't find anything more recent. Interesting to say the least.