Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
IFallsRon

Preseason college hockey ratings

5 posts in this topic

Preseason USCHO.com/CSTV Division I Men's Poll

September 25, 2006

Team (First Place Votes) Record Points Last Poll

1 Wisconsin (17) 30-10-3 688 2

1 Boston College (10) 26-13-3 688 9

3 Minnesota ( 5) 27- 9-5 666 3

4 Boston University ( 3) 26-10-4 595 1

5 Michigan State ( 1) 25-12-8 587 4

6 North Dakota ( 1) 29-16-1 581 6

7 Michigan ( 2) 21-15-5 539 11

8 Miami 26- 9-4 520 5

9 Denver 21-15-3 407 16

10 New Hampshire 20-13-7 397 13

11 Maine 28-12-2 395 10

12 Harvard 21-12-2 346 7

13 Cornell 22- 9-4 317 8

14 Colgate ( 1) 20-13-6 271 20

15 Colorado College 24-16-2 257 12

16 St. Cloud State 22-16-4 205 14

17 Ohio State 15-19-5 169 NR

18 Dartmouth 19-12-2 151 17

19 Northern Michigan 22-16-2 110 18

20 Clarkson 18-17-3 98 NR

Others Receiving Votes: Nebraska-Omaha 83, Providence 61, Minnesota-Duluth 59, Vermont 45, Bemidji State 34, St. Lawrence 31, Holy Cross 28, Notre Dame 18, Lake Superior 11, Niagara 11, Mercyhurst 7, Quinnipiac 7, Massachusetts 5, Ferris State 4, Alaska 3, Sacred Heart 3, Alaska-Anchorage 2, Mass.-Lowell 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

October 6th at Xcel energy center it's Maine vs Minnesota!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t buy into those preseason polls at all. How can Minnesota be ranked 3rd when they are starting 9 freshmen? Sure they’re supposed to be good freshmen, but they’re still freshmen. I also don’t know how they can rank Wisconsin 1st when they lost their top six point producers from last year. Didn’t they lose their goalie as well? I can’t remember.

All I care about is that the Gophers are there in the end. If I had to pick a WCHA favorite right now I would be leaning toward St. Cloud State. They didn’t lose any top players and Motzko really had those guys clicking at the end of last season.

I just can’t wait for college hockey to start up again. The off-season is waaaaaaay to long in hockey! Go Gophers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

I don’t buy into those preseason polls at all. How can Minnesota be ranked 3rd when they are starting 9 freshmen? Sure they’re supposed to be good freshmen, but they’re still freshmen. I also don’t know how they can rank Wisconsin 1st when they lost their top six point producers from last year. Didn’t they lose their goalie as well? I can’t remember.

All I care about is that the Gophers are there in the end. If I had to pick a WCHA favorite right now I would be leaning toward St. Cloud State. They didn’t lose any top players and Motzko really had those guys clicking at the end of last season.

I just can’t wait for college hockey to start up again. The off-season is waaaaaaay to long in hockey! Go Gophers.


I agree with all of the above except the last line, Go Holy Cross..errr I mean Go Sioux!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Elliot is still in Wisconsin. He was so good last year it was easy for me to pick them as the national champs when he was injured and the Goph's were on top of the world. Going to be a lot tougher though without those upper classmen skaters.

Gophers will be good again, even after losing Kessel, Irmen, and Potulny. They are getting the number one pick afterall; hometown guy too. Still the Gophers have Briggs, and I just don't see them winning deep into the playoffs with this guy.

I went to Duluth, so I'm going to carry the lone torch for the 'Dogs. We've got a lot of Sophmores now and some Juniors. Maybe at least compete for 4th or 5th. Picked up some tickets for UM vs UMD today, I'm psyched.

I agree that SCSU looked tough late last year. Then of course you still have UND and the 2 CO schools. It's no wonder the national championship ALWAYS comes from the WCHA now!

--Also I'm looking forward to some clumsy Woog-er deliveries. I love that guy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • SupraFishin
      Actually, I believe that the mercury in the water has to do with the taconite mining:   http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/lands_minerals/mercuryandmining.pdf
    • papadarv
      @KirtH I believe you spend a lot of time on Marion. Any insight to the accuracy of the Navionics Sonar chart on Marion in Lakeville?   The left Navionics map contour (left map) is basically the 1958 DNR chart with 1 ft. Contours calculated to the chart with minimal updates to some of the contours and yes, is quite inconsistent and inaccurate to the (right map) SonarChart.  http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/data/lakemaps/b0117010.pdf   Bathymetric metadata originated in 2009 where SorarCharts are derived from. "SonarChart™ (right contour map) is produced starting from the Nautical Chart and other regional or local sources offering additional data, as well as Navionics surveys. We then validate and integrate sonar logs recorded by end users and contributed from both plotter and mobile devices, adjusting for tide correction and filtering out “bad” data. A new SonarChart is published with updated contours on a daily basis.
      Navionics generates a new SonarChart every day. After a user submits sonar logs for processing, the updated SonarChart will normally be available after about one week, with some exceptions. For example, processing may take from three up to eight weeks when sonar logs are submitted for an uncharted area, because a coastline correction is typically required and Navionics will first source new coastline information for the area."   SonarChart Live from users are usually collected is small areas. I can't really visualize a person running a boat east to west than north to south every 25 feet over an entire lake are the size of Marion to record depth. This is the daily data in the above note from Navionics on how this user captured data is added to the map. I do not believe it is possible to rife the data with depth errors as the only measurement from a sonar is the distance form the transducer and lake bottom which is not adjustable on any sonar. Minimal GPS errors may occur but only a few feet depending on the quality of the Smart Phone GPS. Extreme dense weed areas in shallow areas that effect depth are included in the "bad" data filtering.
       
    • Mracekvb23
      Anyone have an update on ice after all the 60 degree weather and blizzard?  Is it gone?
    • Horseshoe_Don
      Ice is freezing up.  Shore lines are now frozen up where they were open.  Ice is honeycombed but firm.   River is open past the 22 access by 100 yards.   I might just take out my small wheeler and do a walleye fishing on shoe this weekend.   Don
    • Mike89
      too funny!! studded tire too??