Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
PikeTipper

Making the switch - AMSOIL

Recommended Posts

PikeTipper

After dealing long enough with different mixes on my 2 stroke motors I am really considering making the switch to AMSOIL and going with 100:1 on everything. Anyone had any problems that have done this? Is there a specific kind of AMSOIL I'll need?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 inch Crappie

There is only one you can mix 100:1 I think it is Sabor oil or something like that. I use it at a 80:1 mix just because I do not want to rune a $300 auger or a $400 lawn mower. But it seems to work good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jwhjr

It's the Saber Professional. I've used it for about a year now on all of my 2 strokes. It's nice to just have one can for everything. I run it at 100:1, but everything was broken in using it's normal ratio (40:1 etc.). I've noticed a lot less smoke/smell, but just enough so you still know it's a 2 stroke grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LwnmwnMan2

Here's my take, and you can take it for what it's worth.

I've been running a lawn maintenance business for 18 years now.

My dad's a HUGE Amzoil guy, always has been.

This year I went back to OEM oil, because I was always burning up my trimmers. I'd get about a year out of them, and that'd be it. Either it'd burn up, or the screen on the exhaust would plug up, seemed like I was always fine tuning the mixture.

Anyways, I'll put about 1000 hours on a mower in the summer, roughly 500-600 on a trimmer. Yes, that's 1600 hours of time, not including drive time or rain days in a season that lasts about 24 weeks, you do the math.

Anyways, most guys, will probably run a 2 stroke trimmer or other motor MAYBE 1 hour / week, so at that rate, your trimmer will last about 20 years. grin.gif

Now, we also ran Amzoil in our '86 Suzuki 85hp on the boat. We NEVER had any problems, and with the hours that I work in the summer, hardly ever did it get a chance to be winterized.

We never have had a problems with pistons being stuck, bad rings, lack of starting, NOTHING in 20 years, so.... good. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

I also switched away from Amsoil. Used to use it in an EFI outboard until a couple mechanics talked me out of it. I never had any problems with it, but I also never noticed any benefit from it either. Now I have an Opti and I use oil specifically made for DFI motors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PierBridge

No chance I'm running 100-1 on anything.......my Amsoil dealer runs 50-1 in his Outboard......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME

the outboard oils from Amsoil aren't mixed at 100:1 if I remember right. That is their sabre mix for small 2 stroke motors. There are specific oils from Amsoil for each and every different kind of motor. You have to make sure you are applying the right oil to the right motor at the recommended ratio. I used the Amsoil injection oil in my last outboard for many years and the motor injected it at the same rate as any other oil... just a better grade. Better mileage, less smoke, better idling, easier starting... those were the reasons I went to Amsoil. Never had a problem. Remember 100:1 with a synthetic is a whole different bear than 40:1 with an petroleum based oil... apples and oranges and not comparable.

I also keep a gallon or two around of the 100:1 mix for all my small equipment... never had a problem with any of those either...

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Northlander

I run the sabre in all my small equipment and the 4 stroke marine in my 4 stroke yamaha and I havent had any troubles at all. I know my auger and mowers run a lot cleaner with it than my friends who dont use amsoil.

I also run amsoil in my lower unit. I know guys who race sleds and bikes and they swear by Amsoil. If its good enough for the abuse they put it threw its good enough for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stmichael

Quote:

the outboard oils from Amsoil aren't mixed at 100:1 if I remember right.


ATO Saber Outboard 100:1 Pre-Mix

I have been running this mix (100:1) for the second year in my outboard. (75 h.p. Evinrude) I have not had any problems. I cannot recall how many tanks of gas with this mix went through the motor.

I also have been running the saber professional at 100:1 in my other 2 strokes as well, that is two stihl chainsaws, strikemaster auger, and generator. I have been running these for the second year, also. Made the switch at the same time.

I am very happy with the performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChuckN

I use AMSOIL in all 2 strokes and 4 stroke oil in my ATV. I especially like it in my 175 efi Mercury (HP injector) and snowmobiles (Power valve injector).

Expensive oil, but it performs so much better (NO fouling, carbon build up, easy starting, idling, less smoke, etc...)

I've torn into sled engines that had used conventional oil compared to one with Amsoil, and it's an amazing difference in how clean and less wear the engine had with the Amsoil synthetics. I'm no expert, just my experience and observations. grin.gif

However, I can't bring myself to 100:1 if it requires a richer mixture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PikeTipper

So for leaf blower/ auger and such I need the Saber Professional? Any idea where I can find it in the NW Metro?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
McGurk

Red Rooster Auto Parts stores, I switched over and am much happier now that there aren't black oil lines on the fish house walls and a 10 min. smokeout time in the house. Blowers and chainsaws run better too, and only 1 mix for them all; easy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wade Joseph

I have run Amsoil HP injector oil in my 2001 Evenrude 75 ficht from the 50 hr mark till now. Not sure the hours on it now but it has over 3000 miles on it. It doesn;t smoke and I just filled the resevoir with the 5th gallon of oil in 4.5 years. My motors never get "winterized" as I go down to La Crosse and fish walleyes with my Dad in the winter months. No problems yet. Although its an injected engine, if it were premix, I'd still stick with the MFG recommended mix ratios, I just think Amsoil is better oil.

BTW, I use it in my trucks too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stmichael

Quote:

if it were premix, I'd still stick with the MFG recommended mix ratios


.

Please understand I am not trying to be offensive here. The Amsoil products we are talking about, are recommended to be mixed at 100:1. otherwise it would not say 100:1 (Saber professional, and Amsoil outboard). That is fine if you think that it needs to be mixed at the Equipment MFG rate this is your opinion, I will stick to the facts. My point is Amsoil, makes the product, obviously, they have tested this theory and made it possible to run it so lean, they would not be in business if everybodies machines were blowing up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PierBridge

Don't beleive everything you read...... grin.gif

Again my Amsoil dealer runs 50-1 Amsoil in his outboards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wade Joseph

No worries, you have to try harder to get under my skin. Its your equipemnt, run it as you seefit. You asked for opinions, I gave you mine. I do believe in Amsoil and think it is an outstanding product, I am not ready to trust their testing in my motors and go 100:1. I just run their synthetic 2 cycle oil that matches the mixture for my MFG recommendations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • papadarv
      Yesterday the MN DNR announced a license requirement change effective NOW for this ice season. All Wheel House and other fishing structures which cannot be folded / collapsed must be licensed even if you remove the house when you get off the ice. 
    • Rick
      Harvest climbs 16 percent from 2016 Minnesota firearms hunters registered 161,057 deer through the third weekend of deer season, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  Preliminary results through the third weekend show that the number of deer registered was up 16 percent from 2016. Of the deer harvested, 53 percent were bucks, compared to 63 percent during the same period in 2016. In Zone 1, in northeastern Minnesota, total firearms harvest was up 36 percent. In Zone 2, which covers the majority of the state and runs from Canada to Iowa, harvest was up 10 percent and Zone 3, in southeastern Minnesota, was down 5 percent. “The conditions were generally good for hunters participating in the last week of the Zone 1 season and for the start of the 3B season in the southeast,” said Erik Thorson, acting big game program leader, “which provided a boost to the statewide firearms harvest.” Based upon the number of antlerless permits available and the number of permit areas that allow multiple deer to be taken, the DNR is projecting the 2017 total deer harvest to be around 200,000. The 2016 total harvest was 173,213 and to date firearms and archery hunters have harvested about 180,000 deer this year. In much of Minnesota, the firearms deer season ended Nov. 12, and the northern rifle zone season ended Nov. 19. The late southeast firearms deer season is open through Sunday, Nov. 26. The muzzleloader season begins Saturday, Nov. 25, and continues through Sunday, Dec. 10. More information on deer management can be found at mndnr.gov/deer. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Applications due by Saturday, Dec. 16  The Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are seeking qualified applicants to serve on the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.  “The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee plays a critical role in helping us achieve the vision Minnesotans have for use of the Parks and Trails Legacy Funds and creates an accessible and equitable, integrated system of state and regional parks and trails in Minnesota,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. The purpose of the committee is to promote and coordinate implementation of the 25-Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Funding recommendations for individual projects is not a part of this committee’s work. The plan can be found at on the parks and trails legacy plan page. 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment by Minnesota voters. The committee is planning a series of regional events during the year to celebrate Legacy accomplishments and engage Minnesotans on the question, “Why Parks and Trails Legacy Matters.”  Information about the events will be available in January on Facebook (/PTLegacyMN) and on the committee website (www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac). The deadline for applications is Saturday, Dec. 16. The committee is made up of 17 members, including, to the practical extent possible, diverse geographical and demographic representation. The committee has a mixture of park and trail professionals and Minnesota residents. Committee members should have expertise in two or more of the four strategic pillars of the plan: Connect people and the outdoors. Acquire land and create opportunities. Take care of what we have. Coordinate among partners. Terms are two years with the option of being reappointed for a maximum of three terms. Meetings are scheduled every two months around the state, with an option to attend remotely. Interested individuals may complete the application form online at www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac/member-application or print it out and return it to Paul Purman, Department of Natural Resources, Box 39, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. Anyone with questions can contact Paul via phone at 651-259-5643 or email at paul.purman@state.mn.us. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Big bay did not look to be completely frozen over yesterday afternoon. Broken up and refrozen by McKinley Landing. Cliff
    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.