Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
FrontenacPike

Coyote calibers

Recommended Posts

FrontenacPike

Hey guys I really want to get into coyote hunting and don't know what gun to buy. I really want a gun that can reach out and touch them at long distance with accuracy. I'm on a budget and don't have tons of money to spend, I'm hoping to get a scope and gun for under a grand. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
picksbigwagon

I bought an Olympic Arms K8, AR-15 1:9 twist, .223, 20" stainless steel bull barrel, button rifled. I put a burris scope on it. I am very confident out to 200 yards, but have never taken shots past that at the range. I spent under 1000 for all of the above. A lot of guys use a 22-250 for distance. .243 WSSM and regular .243's can get dialed in like a laser beam as well. How long are we talking? Do you hand load? Get some calls, secure some land, and go have some fun....I just bought a Minaska M1 Bandit caller. awesome little unit, but still haven't spilled any blood yet. Of course time would be nice to chase the song dogs, but it is early in the season too.

Good luck, keep us posted and post pictures of your set up when you decide.

The guy I bought my gun from is located near Bemidji, Mike Milli is his name. He would be able to help steer you in the right direction too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HunterLee

Id get a 204 or 22-250 or even the 25-06 for coyotes. The 204 and the 250 arent to terrible on fox and are good enough to kill them out as far as you can hit them. I personally got a savage 204 with the bull barrel and left handed for bout $475 and then put a 4-12 leapold on it for 250 bucks. Shot fox off their holes at 300 plus. Plus numerous varmits at 200 to 400 yds. Biggest thing is good glass to put on them and if you want ease of finding bullets go witht the 22-250. 204 are only found at the bigger places so far. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FarByondDrivn

I agree wholeheartedly with the 22-250 idea. I would also recommend the .223 mainly for the cost of the shells. As far as gun type; definitely a bolt. I would recommend a Savage as far as brand. They shoot very well and are priced decent. One word of advice no matter which way you go; don't skimp on the scope. I think you apend at least half of what the gun cost on a good quality piece of glass. Good luck to you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JEV

I shoot a .223 for coyote. A Remington 700 VLS to be exact. It's been more then enough for them. I've shot a couple coyotes in the last couple years and each was shot at a quarter mile. It's surprising how accurate those little bullets are. I also picked up a DPMS 16" Bull barrel .223 AR-15 this spring. I slapped a Leupold 4-12X scope on it and it's been a good shooter so far. I hope to get some coyotes in it's crosshairs yet this winter. Weight wasn't and issue for me, but if your doing a lot of walking you might want to consider that. Both my rifles are a bit on the heavy side. But for the price a .223 is hard to beat.

JEV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FrontenacPike

Thanks for all the responses. I've actually looked at the savage .223 a couple times and have been kinda leaning in that direction. After reading your posts I think I want to find out a little about the 22-250 before making my purchase. Blastically what is the difference between the two calibers. I know in price you can't beat the .223 but does anyone have advise in variables like wind, distance, accuracy ect between the two... Thanks again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HunterLee

I feel the 22-250 is a flatter shooting gun. All four of us had one until i got a 204. We do alot of long range coyote hunting. My cousing had the 223 for 4 or so years. He was pretty darn good shot out to 300yds but after that. The 22-250 has made him pretty deadly. Both my uncle and dad have the 22-250's and every year the shoot one farther than most people would shoot. I've personally saw a few at 1/2 mile bite the bullet and stay there. My dad also has a ruger mini 14 223, but that seems to drop quite abit after 200yds so that is basically his night calling gun. But remember good scope and good trigger set up will help you shoot straighter farther. The price per box of shells is quite a bit. 223 ive seen for 4 to 5 bucks for 20, and 22-250 is usually 10-14 for 20. or you can get some hollow points for $20 for 50. I'd go with the 250 if your not considered about the price of shells.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FarByondDrivn

From what I understand, the difference between the .223 and 22-250 is velocity and, therefore, trajectory. The 22-250 is a necked down .308 shell (I think) and has a lot more oomph. As far as variables like wind, these are light bullets and will be pushed a lot by the wind. Godd shooters (not talking about me here!) learn to compensate for the wind and can still dial them right in there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JEV

Actually the 22-250 is a necked down 250 Savage case. But, as stated, the big gain with the 250 is the velocity. With some handloads a person could really make those little pills scream right along...

JEV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FarByondDrivn

Thanks JEV. Knew it was a necked down something or other! Thanks for the info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Muddog

The savage .223 will knock them over as well as the 22-250. If you are calling them in, it has more range then you need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FrontenacPike

Thanks for all the info, I'll let you know what I end up getting. Thinking of making a buy this weekend. smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jackpine Rob

Take a serious look at the .204. Several manufacturers are making rifles and cartridges for this round, and by and large the reports are extremely good.

Personally I shoot a .17 Rem, and while some consider this a bit light for yotes, I really like it. The gun writers are calling the .204 a "17 Rem on steroids", so you are getting a real flat trajectory and plenty of horsepower to take down yotes.

In comparing calibers its a good idea for you to use one of the comparison tables like you can find on Remington's website. You could plug in a .223, 22-250 and .204 at the same time, and see what type of speed, trajectory and hitting power you get in each one. Just a little basic research before you commit your hard-earned $$$.

As others have noted, the .223 is an extremely popular load, and is definitely the easiest and cheapest to find rounds for. The .223 and 22-250 are also for legal for deer in some states.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eric Wettschreck

Just to throw more options your way. A lot of guys I yote hunt with use either 22-250 or a 223. Myself, I use a 7.62 Mauser and I absolutely love it.

Just another choice for you to chew on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BigWadeS

I use my 22-250 with full metal jackets works perfect, even have one with a target barrel for mass yotes or if I ever go prarie dog hunting again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
End of the Line

I have a .17 Remington and my buddy that I hunt with uses his all the time. We usually call them in. I usually use my .223, but I also have a 220 swift. Any of these calibers would make a fine gun. I have never shot the .204 & 22-250 at coyotes but would like too. I think that any of these calibers would do you just fine if your calling them in. If your shooting long range alot the 22-250 would be my choice for an all around varmint rifle for cost. As suggested ealier for price and quality go with the Savage and put some good money into the scope. I think you could look into a Burris Fullfield II. Very reasonable and has high light transparency. I own a few, as well as Nikon Monarch series. Both are excellent and cheaper than a Leupold. Lots of good advice above that I would agree with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • opsirc
      Any new ice reports?  Looking For s something about Nicholas or strand
    • rundrave
      what if you pull a wheel house to Mn from out of state or are a non resident?
    • Hoey
      I am noodling this same concept over.  I am thinking either a dedicated (portable) battery, since I may be pulling on shore to the ice with the 4-wheeler or a hand, boat-type winch, not always hooked up to the truck.  
    • Hoey
    • Hoey
      Wow that is great to know.  Thanks for sharing.  Nothing like learning the laws from a CO on the lake.