Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
DTro

US federal judge declares boating illegal in all US navigable waters

Recommended Posts

DTro

I can't believe this is true:

By IBI Magazine

In a rather bizarre ruling that has marine industry officials worried, Judge Robert G. James of the United States District Court, Western Division of Louisiana, has said that it is criminal trespass for the American boating public to boat, fish, or hunt on the Mississippi River and other navigable waters in the US.

In the case of Normal Parm v. Sheriff Mark Shumate, James ruled that federal law grants exclusive and private control over the waters of the river, outside the main shipping channel, to riparian landowners. The shallows of the navigable waters are no longer open to the public. That, in effect, makes boating illegal across most of the country.

"Even though this action seems like a horrible pre-April fools joke, it is very serious," said Phil Keeter, MRAA president, in a statement. "Because essentially all the waters and waterways of our country are considered navigable in the US law, this ruling declares recreational boating, water skiing, fishing, waterfowl hunting, and fishing tournaments to be illegal and the public subject to jail sentences for recreating with their families."

Last month, James rejected the findings of the Magistrate judge who found earlier that the American public had the right under federal law and Louisiana law to navigate, boat, fish, and hunt on the waters of the Mississippi river up to the normal high water line of the river. Judge James Kirk relied on the long established federal principles of navigation that recognized the public navigational rights "…entitles the public to the reasonable use of navigable waters for all legitimate purposes of travel or transportation, for boating, sailing for pleasure, as well as for carrying persons or property for hire, and in any kind of watercraft the use of which is consistent with others also enjoying the right possessed in common."

"MRAA is working with the Coast Guard, state boating law administrators, and NMMA to fight this onerous ruling," said Glen Mazzella, MRAA chairman, in the statement.

Is it true??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PierBridge

Nothing suprises me anymore.....

I would think this would be overturned somehow.....it's not going to effect my boating..... crazy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Zzapp

This fits neatly into my theory that the judicial branch of our government is trying to foment a new revolution. remember the Supreme Court ruling on eminent domain?

ZZapp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

It just doesnt suprise me as with the power of some people and no common sense or regard for the general public.I cannot believe this wont be overturned.Some of our judges are nuts. frown.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim43

Even if it were true, law enforcement is already stretched so

thin, it would be impossible to enforce such a law. The river

is so vast, no way could they patrol the entire Mississippi.

The system is self destructing. frown.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hartner62

All I can say is good luck. I'll be on the river no matter what! As far as I have heard it was because some farmer in LA didn't want people fishing where the water had flooded over his property and I really don't think this has anything to do with us up here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ghotierman

did a bit of digging....it is true. and the issues involved have been heard hear in minnesota recently ( some fish farmers complaining of public use of a private rearing pond...water had flooded and could be accessed by the road right of way)...

this case is similar...private land owner trying to restrict access to hunters/anglers reaching part of property during high water...

i did a bit of digging and found some more information:

U.S. District Court Judge Robert G. James rules much of Mississippi River off-limits to anglers.

U.S. Magistrate James Kirk had earlier this year recommended that the arrests of the anglers involved in the case be thrown out. James requested the recommendation.

“(T)he sheriff did not have probable cause to arrest the plaintiffs because the sheriff should have known that the plaintiffs were legally authorized to be upon the waters,” Kirk wrote in April. “The sheriff was required to know that the Mississippi River is a navigable river and that federal and state law … has long recognized that the public has a right to use those waters to their full extent.

“Because the arrests were without probable cause to believe an offense had been committed, the sheriff violated the Fourth Amendment rights of the plaintiffs and is answerable to them for any damages they have sustained.”

Kirk admitted in his ruling that federal law (U.S. Code 33, Chapter 1, Section 10) doesn’t explicitly provide for the right to recreationally hunt and fish, but cited Congressional acts in 1811 and 1812 to back up his final recommendation.

“A condition of its admission (to the Union) was that the Mississippi River and all navigable rivers and waters leading into it ‘shall be common highways and forever free,’” he wrote. “This court takes judicial notice that the Mississippi River was navigable in 1812 and remains so today.”

However, James came to the opposite conclusion, hanging his hat on Kirk’s admission that U.S. Code 33 doesn’t actually mention hunting or fishing.

“(T)he court adopts (Kirk’s) recommendation to the extent that 33 U.S.C. (Chapter) 10 and the federal navigational servitude do not provide the plaintiffs with the right to fish and hunt on the Mississippi River,” James wrote in his ruling. “However, … the court denies to adopt Magistrate Judge Kirk’s recommendation that the plaintiffs have a federal common-law right to fish and hunt on the Mississippi River, up to the high-water mark, when it floods privately owned land.”

In seeming contradiction, however, James also ruled that the “Walker Cottonwood Farms’ property (where the arrests were made) is a bank of the Mississippi River and subject to public use to the ordinary high-water mark, as defined by Louisiana law.”

But he then reversed course, ruling that the group of anglers did not “have a right to fish and hunt on the Mississippi River up to the ordinary high-water mark when it periodically floods Walker Cottonwood Farms’ property.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ghotierman

some more background information on this case...

still trying to find the exact ruling or a transcript:

Fishermen's rights fray persists

By Elizabeth Fitch

efitch@thenewsstar.com

Fishermen will continue to fight a decade-long battle over public access to the Mississippi River, Monroe attorney Paul Hurd said Friday.

Despite a recent ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Robbie James essentially forbidding hunting and fishing on associated waterways, Hurd said the legal dispute is not over.

"The civil code says everyone may fish the river," Hurd said. "I cannot find a case that says the river does not include the natural rise and fall up to the normal high. It's not what we expected."

The decision stems from a federal lawsuit against East Carroll Parish Sheriff Mark Shumate for arresting fishermen on the river's tributaries. The lawsuit also alleged the plaintiffs have the right to fish and hunt on the Mississippi River between the high and low water mark, despite private ownership of the property located between the waters. Walker Cottonwood Farms LLC, formerly Walker Lands Inc., has long maintained fishermen cannot access Gassoway Lake north of Lake Providence because they actually own the land.

Hurd said he has already filed a motion for rehearing asking James to reconsider the decision he handed down last month. On Aug. 29, James rejected part of an earlier recommendation from Magistrate Judge Jim Kirk in Alexandria that federal common law and state law allow hunting and fishing on certain waterways because the Mississippi River periodically flows over the dry land.

"The Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Kirk's finding to the extent that Walker Cottonwood Farms' privately owned property is subject to public use because it is a bank of the Mississippi River," James wrote. "Such public use, however, is limited to activities that are incidental to the navigable character of the Mississippi River and its enjoyment as an avenue of commerce. The Court finds that fishing and hunting are not included in these rights."

The dispute started 10 years ago when fishermen began complaining Walker was blocking access to Gassoway Lake. A group of fishermen filed suit in state district court in 1999 to prevent Walker from obstructing access to the body of water. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeal in Shreveport later ruled Walker owns the land.

Walker attorney Constance Willems of New Orleans said James' ruling is not only correct, it also echoes the previous state decision. Willems said they will oppose Hurd's motion for reconsideration.

Hurd said James' ruling could have lasting effects for fishermen across the country. He said fishing groups from around the nation have added their support to the suit.

"He held under federal law there is no protected right to fish," Hurd said. "This is one more national opinion out of Louisiana that will have to be explained ... We used to be the sportsmen's paradise."

Not so, Willems said.

"I know that the fishermen interpreted the application that they can't fish on the Mississippi River," Willems said. "But that's not correct. The judge never made a decision on the bed of the Mississippi River. Those rights that you have under state law are not effected."

Hurd said James has advised he will rule by late November. Hurd said if James does not reconsider his decision, he will appeal the ruling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ghotierman

more information...this is an important ruling as it affects angling and anlger access:

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/bassmaster/conservation/news/story?page=b_con_news_fishing_private_property_ruling

This article is a nice summary of the issue. Parm and his friends were arrested for trespassing while fishing between the normal high and low water mark. The ruling, in effect says that hunting and fishing do not fall with in the definition of a navigable use of the waterway. "Only those "activities that are incidental to the navigable character of the Mississippi River and its enjoyment as an avenue of commerce" are permitted."

Keep an eye on this issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Northlander

I guess this farmer should put up a 10' fence so the boats cant get to his land during high waters. This is stupid and will be tossed out. Cant control what mother nature does every once in a while. Shouldnt be the fishermans problem to know where that "High water" line may be. Should be the farmers to make sure his land is posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim43

This case will be hung up in litigation for so long, typical

of our judicial system. Cost us all millions and only make

civil matters far worse off. How can they physically stop us

from fishing the river. The enforcers will be embarrassed to

try enforce such a ruling, since many love to fish the river

themselves. The entire case is purely a waste for all

taxpayers. The high and mighty that rule this land will have

problems when election time comes around. mad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

Incredible. Simply incredible.... confused.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wade Joseph

I too am not surprised. Some of you can't see the forest for the trees. The Judical branch of our government has been trying to govern our country for some time now. Too many judges trying to govern from the bench.

Yes this is un-enforcable but it still could set precidence that could eventually give the liberal PETA freaks amunition they need to stop a huge amount of hunting and fishing all over this country.

The law in Wi just reverted back to the "feet wet" rule when fishing small rivers and streams this year. We were allowed to walk on the bank up to the high water mark, but no more, its back to where you must be standing in the water to not be tresspassing.

The day is coming where we are gonna have to really stand up united to continue to enjoy hunting and fishing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ely Lake Expert

Quote:

In a rather bizarre ruling that has marine industry officials worried, Judge Robert G. James of the United States District Court, Western Division of Louisiana, has said that it is criminal trespass for the American boating public to boat, fish, or hunt on the Mississippi River and other navigable waters in the US.


The part of the quote that says "other navigable water in the US" to me sounds me like he is trying to make it illegal to go on any water in the US.

umm, wow. Am I the only one that reads it that way?

This is such a joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Black_Bay

How about we just let Louisiana become it's own country?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim43

Quote:

How about we just let Louisiana become it's own country?


grin.gif No worries there, Global warming will reclaim most of

it within the next 20 years. About the same time it takes for

a judicial decision these days. laugh.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RobertELee

Well I guess that I and about a million others are criminals. So what, are they gonna arrest us all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

Quote:

grin.gif
No worries there, Global warming will reclaim most of

it within the next 20 years. About the same time it takes for

a judicial decision these days.
laugh.gif


Which is why we have frost warnings for tonight? wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Smoker
      I will check it out a little latter. It looks like a good idea. I do a small diamond wrap on a lot of my ice rods.
    • gimruis
      I'm gonna go but not before some of these crops get harvested.  It may not be until Thanksgiving but at least I'll increase my odds if I wait for a better chance of success.
    • monstermoose78
      I have not seen a bird during season yet but I will get one or two I hope
    • monstermoose78
      Looks like you got one woodcock and a snipe but I could be wrong but great job shooting.
    • walleye29us
      This is the insulated model. 8x8. If anyone wants it this week I'll let it go for 240.00. Won't  find a better deal!   
    • JB18
      Saw over 10 birds on opener....all before legal shooting hour....Only 1 after before the rain started.
    • JB18
      i went out for a couple hours yesterday looking for grouse.  The buddy i was with never has been hunting for grouse or woodcock.  We only saw 1 grouse with no chance for a shot but got both woodcock that flushed. 
    • Stick in Mud
      As MB said, high water tends to spread fish out and push them tighter to the banks in any slower water they can find.  A "normal" year with low water in October can be ridiculously, almost unfairly good in the river when you find the smallies. There's a reason it's mandatory catch and release now, as they pile up in deeper, slower water and can be quite vulnerable if/when you find them.   That being said, the difference in high vs. low water is not as pronounced above the dams (either the 10th St, Sartell, Little Falls, Blanchard, etc.) as it is below them.  At least in my experience, anyways.  
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has produced six new, state-of-the-art maps that will make it easier and safer for people to explore, hunt, and recreate in state forests.   “The DNR has updated six state forests with 53 more to go,” said Forrest Boe, director of the DNR Forestry Division. “This five-year effort will include updating maps for all of Minnesota’s state forests.” State forest users now have two maps options. A geoPDF map will allow users to download a map onto a mobile device using a variety of map apps and then track their location as a blue dot on the screen. The new user-friendly, paper maps highlight the unique recreation features of each forest and include pop-out maps for popular campgrounds and day-use areas. “The little blue dot that appears on the map on my phone goes with me whether I’m on or off-trail,” said Laura Duffey, DNR state forest map project coordinator. “This feature lets people know exactly where they are in a state forest—no more getting lost.” The maps are also more detailed than previous versions and highlight the endless recreation opportunities in state forests, such as hiking, mountain biking, birding, berry picking, cross-country skiing, hunting, and horseback, ATV and snowmobile riding. Many state forests also offer campgrounds, fishing piers, boat launches, swimming beaches, and picnic areas. The six new maps are available in time for fall hunting and cover more than 240,000 acres of state forest land and thousands of miles of trails. New geoPDF and paper maps are now available for: Paul Bunyan State Forest in Cass and Hubbard counties Badoura State Forest in Cass and Hubbard counties Croix State Forest in Pine County Huntersville State Forest in Cass, Hubbard and Wadena counties Lyons State Forest in Wadena County. Chengwatana State Forest in Pine and Chisago counties The Paul Bunyan and Badoura state forests are popular spots for hunters. Combined, they contain two campgrounds and day-use areas, four off-highway vehicle trails, five wildlife management areas (WMA), two ruffed grouse management areas, and four state game refuges. They also have hiking, biking, snowmobiling and skiing trails. The Huntersville and Lyons state forests are popular with hunters. Each state forest contains four WMAs and several miles of trails and roads for off-highway vehicles. Additionally, the Huntersville State Forest offers two campgrounds, a horse campground, and 24 miles of designated horse trails. The St. Croix State Forest offers a variety of year-round recreation opportunities. It has 20 miles of horseback trails and a horse campground with 56 campsites. In the winter snowmobilers can enjoy 42 miles of trails while in the summer mountain bikers can cruise 25 miles of trails. The Boulder Campground and day-use area has 22 secluded campsites and access to Rock Lake for swimming, fishing and boating. The Chengwatana State Forest contains the Snake River Campground and several miles of off-highway motorcycle and all-terrain vehicle trails. Three state water trails run through the forest: Kettle River, Snake River, and St. Croix River. Snowmobliers also use the Matthew Lourey State Trail, which runs through the forest. The new maps also shows locations of National Park Service campsites along the St. Croix River.Digital, geoPDF maps are available on the state forest’s webpage at www.mndnr.gov/stateforests. People can get a free paper map at a local DNR office or the DNR Info Center by sending an email to info.dnr@state.mn.us or calling 888-646-6367, Monday-Friday 8 a.m.-8 p.m. and Saturdays 9 a.m.-1 p.m. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • smurfy
      sheez................noone's going up this way to chase tree chickens, fishin, or scoutin for deer hunting??????? headed up friday and be up there for the better part of 9-10 days!!!!! some hunting some work!!!!