Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
IFallsRon

Fish hog fined

Recommended Posts

IFallsRon

BACKUS - A Minnesota angler faces a large fine and possible restitution for taking 26 northern pike over his limit on Sanborn Lake near Backus.

On Aug. 12 DNR Conservation Officer Tim Collette of Longville got information from Turn-In-Poachers that a man staying at a local resort was keeping many pike over his limit. Collette was given a description of the angler's truck, boat and camper.

Henry W. Cram, 61, of Wyoming, Minn. has been charged with possessing 26 northerns over the limit. The legal northern possession/daily limit is three per angler with not more than one fish over 30 inches in the daily bag. Crams faces a possible fine and restitution of $1,400. His fishing license was seized.

Collette began to monitor Cram's fishing activities shortly after getting the TIP call. On Aug. 18 Collette saw Cram catch a pike on Sanborn Lake and put it in his boat's livewell. Cram left the lake, but returned later and caught eight more pike. Collette said Cram was "double-tripping, " meaning he took fish home and returned to catch more.

Collette approached Cram at his campsite and asked him how the fishing had been. Cram admitted to catching fish but told Collette that he had released them. Collette got more suspicious when Cram said he had caught a limit earlier and given the fish away, but could not identify the person to whom he gave them.

After checking Cram's fishing license Collette asked to inspect Cram's livewell. Collette found the eight northern pike that Cram had taken. Collette then asked for consent to search the camper, but Cram refused. While other conservation officers watched the site, Collette got a search warrant from the Cass County attorney's office. The subsequent search turned up 17 packages of fish fillets in the camper. Cram said some of the fish belonged to his wife and son, who had left the campsite to return home. The packages of fish, and the eight northerns from the boat were seized.

"With the eight he had in the boat and the 27 in the camper it came to 35 northerns," Collette said. "I allowed him a limit for his wife and son and wrote him up for 26 fish over the limit. I'm glad we were able to follow up and catch him."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
candiru

I would like to give a big thank you to the person that called TIP on this one. It is nice to see somebody do something instead of just complaining about what they saw on an outdoor forum. Thank You!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
deepportage01

When we people stop? I'm very close to sanborn and fish it on a regular basis and this type of blatent disregard for our lakes just plain has to stop...

Henry W.Cram[poacher], did you learn your leson? not only did you get a fine but you lost my respect as an angler and sportsman

The fine faced is not steep enuff for me this guy should loose his licence for 5 five years and $1.000 per fish over and have to ask use real sportsmen for his licence back after the five years is up, IMO.

Thank you Tim Collette and TIP caller

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gator Slayer

I'm sorry $1400 doesn't seem enough. This SOB knew exactly what he was doing. Take his boat, "truck", gear, and everything he has and then tack on about $500/fish. Post his name and picture in the papers (especially in his home town). I hate these type of slobs. I can forgive an accident like A (1) fish out of the slot or maybe shooting a hen instead of a rooster but the slobs I want out of the outdoors. To the anti-fishing or hunting crowds they paint those of us who believe in fair chase and "conservation" with an ugly brush. There rant is over

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PERCHJR

They were only slimmers!!! grin.gif Just kidding, nice job catching him that's for sure!!!

Perchjr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Koldfront Kraig

Should have taken his boat too.

This state needs to get tougher on extreme cases like this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CatManLee

I recently talked with a DNR Officer out of the main office in the twin cities about this same situation. I was upset about the small fines issued for the over harvest of Catfish on the Red River of the North this spring by some individuals from Warroad, MN.

He basically said, "A judge sets the fines as he/she see's fit"! If we want the law changed, or fines increased we need to contact our local congressman and try to get it changed. Obviously the Judge that set the fine amounts doesn't think it's that big of a deal to break these laws?

If you want to do something about it, you know what you need to do. It's just like the comment made earlier, "It's nice to see someone actually called TIP about this instead of just complaining about seeing it"...It would also be nice to see a bunch of anglers talking to their local congressmen about these low fine amounts, rather than complaining about it on a forum!! I have talked with a few individuals about this already, but it's probably going to take more people than just me to get this changed in the near future. Everybody call your local congressman and bring it up...the more calls the better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
irvingdog

I think I'm going to do this every time I read poaching stories on the web:

Quick everybody!! Grab your cel phone and program this in!!

Turn in Poachers (TIP)

Statewide toll-free: 1-800-652-9093

24 hours a day, 365 days a year

not gonna stop til you all agree to do it.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sandmannd

Thanks irvingdog, I was going to ask what the TIP number was. I agree with the poster that says a small fee for one or so over. I was out fishing with a couple of buddies just nailing blue gill. We had our limit and went home. When we got home, I counted them and was one over. I was upset that we mis-counted. I'm sure this happens, but for me, I went out and bought a couple of tac-counters so I could keep track of a certain kind of fish. When it's something that doesn't have a big limit like pike or eyes it's not a big deal. But gills and crappies you can miscount pretty easy. I think for these big cases you should loose your whole rig and never be able to fish in the state again. He was over on purpose, no question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hawkeye43

DONE, just double check the number in my phone.I used it three times in 8 months. cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ebiz

The number is also on the back of your fishing license.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • opsirc
      Any new ice reports?  Looking For s something about Nicholas or strand
    • rundrave
      what if you pull a wheel house to Mn from out of state or are a non resident?
    • Hoey
      I am noodling this same concept over.  I am thinking either a dedicated (portable) battery, since I may be pulling on shore to the ice with the 4-wheeler or a hand, boat-type winch, not always hooked up to the truck.  
    • Hoey