Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Captain B.R.K

Gear Question

20 posts in this topic

I'm looking to purchase a new pair of hunting pants this fall before I hit the fields. I'd like to hear what some of you guys would recommend. I'm interested in staying plenty dry and hopefully burr free!

I did a quick search, went back 4-5 pages and couldn't find anything on this subject. I appreciate the information guys!

Gore-tex vs. Cabela's Dry Plus.....your thoughts on this too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

L.L. Bean makes excellent hunting pants. Another option is plain jeans with chaps over the top. I use Wick chaps and Filson also comes highly recommended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i use filson chaps and love them the reason i went with the chaps is because if you do multiple days hunting in a row you don't have to wear the same pants every day. never had a problem with getting wet or burrs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few questions regarding the Filson Chaps.

1) I only know what Gore-tex can do for you. How do the Filson Chaps work for wicking & keeping you dry underneath?

2) Are these heavy pants so do you get hot in them?

3) How durable are these pants?

I know you throw these are chaps, so what kind of pant do you wear under them?!

This will be the 2nd year I'll be out with my father-in-law who is a pretty avid hunter. I'd ask him the question, but he still hasn't found a pant he is happy with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

filson's do a pretty good job of keeping you dry if you keep them waxed, but they arent Gore-Tex. I would invest in a pair of gore-tex gators (sp?) as well. Seldom do you need truly waterproof stuff above your knees and they are a lot cooler. Plus, with any waterproof pant or chap, you will get wicking up from your cuffs. Gators solve that problem.

I wear jeans under my chaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Chaps of any type generally don't wick. They prevent your pants from getting shredded by thorns and other such stuff. They help keep you a little more warm when it's cold and some will keep water out. They generally don't wick or breath.

2) You can get hunting pants in heavy and light versions. Obviously the heavy version will last longer and give better protection. Some will get warm depending on the material and the weave. I believe Gore-tex would make you even more warm. If you bird hunt like I do you are moving alot and working hard so you build up alot of heat & some sweat. The gore-tex in my mind will prevent that from evaporating as fast as possible. I see that L.L. Bean added gore-tex to the pant I was referring to. Not sure if I like that or not.

3) They were pretty durable for me.

4) I wear jeans under my chaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We've come to a conclusion that we get hot while we walk the fields. My biggest concern is that I want something that "will do the job.".

For you guys that wear jeans, don't they get wet from your sweet? Especially if you said the chaps don't wick or breath? I would think the jeans, when you get them wet (sweaty) they stay wet and are uncomfortable.

I'm sorry it sounds like I'm beating a dead horse to death, but I'm very interestd in being happy with my hunt come October. I'll be in North Dakota for 1 week. Last year I wasn't real happy with the pant I had. The did the job, but it would be nice to have something that kept me a little more dry with the dew, wet fields and sweat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is the only way i can answer your question, i don't ever remember my jeans being wet with sweat after a hunt wearing chaps. i don't think your legs sweat as much as say arms. as for gore tex, gore tex is great if you are worried about moisture because gore tex allows yourselg to breath.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they can get a little clammy when it's warm (60s and up). Wick chaps can be unzipped all the way to the top for added ventilation. I do this quite a bit when it's warm out. They still hang over the front relatively well when unzipped. I don't know about Filsons as I've never owned them but they get good recommendations too.

The bottom line is nothing will be completely perfect. Synthetic fabric pants generally breath a little better, dry quickly and won't get heavy from being wet but can rub you raw after several days of hunting in warm weather. Jeans get very heavy and unweildy when wet but generally won't rub you raw and are more comfy when you are dry or hunting in cooler weather. Chaps will keep the pokies out and allow you to wear jeans underneath. They get a little warm in the warmer weather and you might get clammy/soggy from sweating.

I've tried'em all and none are perfect for me. You may have to spend some $$$ and go through a few different setups to find whats best for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the Gore-Tex vs. Dry Plus, I would strongly advise against the DryPlus. It is not at all waterproof unless your exposure to moisture is VERY minimal. It's one of those deals, like many, where you get what you pay for. I have a pair of DryPlus bibs I bought last year that are great in the cold as long as you're not sitting on or walking through anything wet.

Another idea is Columbia's Omni-Tech. In my opinion it is better than Gore-Tex. I have their quad parka and I sat out in a 3 hr. downpour duck hunting and I was bone dry. Again it's not cheap, but good gear is priceless up here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be entirely honest, I have only ever wore the Wrangler pants with the ripstop material on the fronts, and have stayed dry, unless it is raining to no end. I have been happy with those pants and they have lasted many years of hunting. I grouse hunt, and get off the beaten trail a lot, no matter what, you are always going to get a little moisture, even with gore-tex. Just my two cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is dew or it's otherwise wet I wear a pair of Cabelas Gore-tex jeans. If it's dry I was wearing Cabelas canvas upland pants. When it's cold/snowy I wore the lighter weight Filson pants. Now I just got the Filsons last December and I expect this year it will be either those, or if it's raining, the Gore-tex.

Regardless of the pants I always wear gaiters. I have not found much advantage to having Gore-tex in a gaiter except maybe in snow. The best ones I found come from Battle Lake Outdoors and are 1000 denier Cordura, they sell them at Game Fair but also do mail order. Very tough and not very expensive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For both grouse and pheasants in mild weather I like Cabelas microtex pants under their cordura chaps. This combo is a little warm as the chaps are coated nylon but they turn aside torns and briars with ease and the microtex dries out in minutes. As the weather gets colder I add polypro longies to keep warm. I vote for chaps as you can take them off in a minute or as is often the case for us put them on when we see pheasants fly across the duck slough and don't want to chase after them in waders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chaps are the way to go. I bought a "lightweight" pair from cabelas 10 years ago. Now evey pair of pants I own are huntin pants (except for the ones that "shrunk" in the wash!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate to make the mistake of spending to much $$$ when I can ask those that have demo'd the products that are out there on the market. Like you said gspman, I'll need to bite the bullet and spend a little $$$ before I finally find out what it is that will work for me.

I did activate my Cabela's Grand Opening card the other day and got $150 to use towards my new pants that I will be buying. After a pair of bino's and 2 digital wildlife cam's, the bill put me into the $150 card!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

B.R.K. I purchased a pair of gander mountain guide series chaps last year for about $20. They are a little warm if the weather is above 60 but they are an inexpensive way to go. They also sell a pair of denim hunting pants there that will work. Let us know if you find the perfect hunting pants. I recommend the chaps for ease of removal and convenience. Good luck hunting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure you've heard plenty by now, but here's my 2 cents.

My first pair of pants were an old Cabela's upland bib with 1000 denier cordura facing. I got them when I was 12 and I used those for about 15 years. I still have them, yhey are in good shape. I stopped using them because as I grew taller and filled out I couldn't let the shoulders straps out anymore so they creeped up on me when I bent over, plus you can't were a belt so no Leatherman. My dad still uses his pair and it's been almost 20 years.

A coulple of years ago I bought a pair of Cabela's Upland tradition pants with a 330 denier cordura facing. They have three gashes in the facing from a barb wire incident. They were great a coupld of years ago when it was about 80 degrees out on the opener, nice and light weight.

I also have a pair of the Cabelas Gore Tex, but I only use those when it is raining with a super light pair of poly pros underneath to help wick moisture or in the late season when it is cold and blustery with a heavier set of poly pros on. The 330 denier facing is pretty light weight and with the cost of those pants I'm not a big fan of wearing them all the time.

My favorite pair has been Cabela's Six Pocket upland pant. They have a heavy 1000 denier facing and will push through just about anything without me getting a scratch. I did cut the weed guard out of the bottom though, I found that it cut down on air flow plus caused my pants to twist from the knees down. Since I have removed the weed guard I have been happy with those pants.

I know a lot of guys like chaps but I have a dog and have yet to have to hop into a slough for a bird. I used to wear pants under my bibs but the cuffs of my pants got pretty muddy and dirty so I stopped doing that.

As far as wetness and breathability go I look for a pant that is cotton with a heavy nylon facing, nylon repels water quite well and dries fast and cotton breathes well. Whether you chose pants or chaps, I would definately suggest getting a 600 denier or heavier on the pair you plan to wear the most.

I only use gore-tex in the worst conditions. There are several good options out there in the under 70 dollar range (I think the six pocket panst are about $50), with your card you could get the gore-tex for extreme conditions and pick up a different pair for regular duty. Good Luck with the pants and the hunt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as Gore-Tex vs. Dry-Plus, a couple of years ago I read in an outdoor magazine (don't remeber with one) that Dry Plus was rated second only to Gore-Tex. I have had both in Rain Jackets and both have kept me dry at times and both have left me feeling clamy at times. Good Luck with the Hunt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really appreciate the tips everyone!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a little more researching and took your comments and went to Cabelas this last weekend. Ended up with a pair of gore-tex jeans in Seclusion 3-D for general hunting.

I debated between the gore-tex and dry plus pheasant hunting pants. I went with the dry plus because of cost and #'s of times I am in the field. I'll be out in the field a week from Wednesday and will report then how the dryplus holds up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • going4it
      I'd go with 112 if you have the room more power and I believe last longer on the water. I pilot is worth it. Spot lock to fan cast an area or to stay outside the dock that you just got broke off of are two benifits. I pilot link links up with your hummingbird unit if that's what you have for a depth finder. Let's you follow depth contours. Good luck with the purchases 
    • ANYFISH2
      sure odd to see the timberwolves mentioned in trade possibilities with the likes of a Kyrie Irving.
    • ANYFISH2
      I just dont believe that to be a Esox bite at all. Too much space between the Major wounds, IMHO!
    • delcecchi
      That is a strong possibility...
    • Hoey
      Here is a photo of the foot.  Looks like a toothy gator.  
    • BringAnExtension
      http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2017/07/21/fish-injury-island-lake/   DULUTH, Minn. (AP) — An 11-year-old girl has undergone surgery to repair damage to her foot which might have been caused by a fish in a northeastern Minnesota lake. Maren Kesselhon suffered nine deep lacerations and tendon damage when she was injured while sitting on a paddleboard on Island Lake north of Duluth Wednesday. Maren’s dad, Ryan Kesselhorn, says his daughter told him she could feel her foot in the mouth of a fish and kicked at it with her other foot to free herself. The Dickinson Press reports doctors at Essentia Health, where Maren had surgery, say the razor-sharp cuts, some down to the bone, probably were caused by a fish. Island Lake is home to large muskies and northern pike. A Duluth fisherman caught and released a 47-inch long muskie Wednesday.
    • RoosterMan
      Captain Acorn, I fish Jiggin Raps quite a bit on Vermilion, have for several years now.  I Cast em, fish them vertical and move around and cover ground at a good pace with them.  I am not sure there is any key to getting snagged less, other than knowing your spots. They are certainly an effective and a great way to catch fish.  I personally do not remove either the front or the back hook.  Believe me if you fish these your going to donate a few to the depths, just part of the game.    Good luck! - Roosterman
    • Rick
      Walleye fishing on Mille Lacs Lake will remain closed until Aug. 11 to protect the walleye fishery, and ensure its long-term health and sustainability into the future To extend the walleye fishing season through Labor Day, the state will allow for an additional 11,000 pounds of walleye harvest on Mille Lacs New solutions are being sought to rebuild and sustain a healthy Mille Lacs walleye fishery New fisheries data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources show the total safe harvest allocation for walleyes on Mille Lacs Lake (44,800 pounds) has already been exceeded this season. To protect the fishery and ensure the long-term sustainability of Mille Lacs Lake’s walleye population, the DNR announced today that walleye fishing will remain closed until Friday, Aug. 11. In order to extend the walleye fishing season through Labor Day, the state will allow for an additional 11,000 pounds of walleye harvest. Catch-and-release walleye fishing will run from Friday, Aug. 11, through Monday, Sept. 4, for the Labor Day weekend. Walleye fishing will then be closed from Tuesday, Sept. 5, through Thursday, Nov. 30. As these regulation changes were announced, Minnesota DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr reiterated the state’s commitment to rebuilding and sustaining a healthy walleye fishery in Mille Lacs Lake. “Improving the walleye population in Mille Lacs is a top priority for the DNR,” Landwehr said. “We deeply regret the hardships these new regulations will cause for anglers and business owners. But they are essential to protect and enhance the future of walleye fishing in the lake for future generations. We will continue doing everything we can to understand the challenges facing the walleye fishery, and take whatever actions we can to resolve this very difficult situation.” Landwehr and DNR fisheries chief Don Pereira noted that allowing for additional catch-and-release fishing in August is essential for area anglers, businesses, and Mille Lacs area communities. The decision to allow for this additional harvest was made with input from the Mille Lacs Fisheries Advisory Committee. “We want to allow as much walleye fishing on Mille Lacs as possible,” Pereira said. “So even though state anglers already have caught their quota of fish, the DNR will dip into the allowed conservation overage to reopen the season on Aug. 11.” Through the closure, anglers on Mille Lacs Lake may fish for all other species in the lake including bass, muskellunge and northern pike. When fishing for other species, only artificial baits and lures will be allowed in possession, except for anglers targeting northern pike or muskie, who may fish with sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. A prohibition on night fishing will remain in place from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. through Nov. 30. However, anglers may fish for muskie and northern pike at night, but may only use artificial lures longer than 8 inches or sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. Bowfishing for rough fish also is allowed at night but possession of angling equipment is not allowed and only rough fish may be in possession. Understanding walleye fishing quotas on Mille Lacs this year, and why that quota was reached earlier than predicted
      The DNR and the Chippewa bands that cooperatively manage Mille Lacs Lake agreed this year to harvest quotas of 44,800 pounds for state anglers and 19,200 pounds for tribal fishing. They also agreed that up to 75,000 pounds of walleye could be harvested from the lake from Dec. 1, 2016 to Nov. 30, 2017. That agreement allows the state to use a built-in buffer – the 11,000 pounds difference between the 75,000 pounds conservation cap and the 64,000 pounds combined harvest quotas – in an attempt to allow catch-and-release walleye fishing through Labor Day, following the mid-summer closure. Bi-weekly creel surveys show that state anglers already have reached their quota. “The DNR is using its full allotment to maximize opportunities to fish for walleye on Mille Lacs without violating our agreement,” Pereira said. “The DNR, just like area businesses, would greatly prefer to not have fishing restrictions in place. But sustaining and stabilizing Mille Lacs’ walleye population is our primary obligation and public responsibility.” Continuing the walleye fishing closure will reduce the number of fish that die after being caught and released, a condition known as hooking mortality. The likelihood of fish suffering hooking mortality increases as water temperatures warm. High walleye catch rates on Mille Lacs have increased DNR fishing projections. A hot walleye bite attracted more anglers to the lake, resulting in angler effort that is about double what it was in 2016. “Cooler than normal temperatures kept hooking mortality rates low, but more anglers fished Mille Lacs, particularly catching walleye longer than 20 inches,” Pereira said. “That increased the poundage of fish caught and put us over our walleye quota.” According to the DNR, bigger fish are biting, in part, because there is a shortage of food for larger walleye. Last fall’s assessment showed that larger walleye were thinner than average. Mille Lacs’ hot bite also reflects the findings of studies done in many other fisheries that show catchability actually increases when fish population drops. In Mille Lacs, walleye congregate in preferred spots rather than disperse evenly throughout the lake. Fewer fish in the lake means there is more room in the preferred spots for fish to gather, creating a situation where a larger percentage of the population is in position to be caught rather than gathering in a less preferred but less fished area. More information about Mille Lacs Lake, the regulation adjustments and management of the fishery is available on the DNR website at www.mndnr.gov/millelacslake. New solutions are being sought to improve and sustain a healthy walleye fishery
      The DNR announced in June that a new external review team of scientists will take a fresh look at Mille Lacs Lake’s walleye fishery, using all of the best science available to gain a better understanding of the lake. This new review, led by walleye expert Dr. Chris Vandergoot of the U.S. Geological Survey, will provide additional recommendations to improve fisheries management of the lake, and contribute to a long-term solution to improving and sustaining a healthy walleye fishery for future generations. The group’s report is expected in time to help guide and inform fisheries management decisions for the 2018 season. DNR encourages Minnesotans to fish for other abundant species on Mille Lacs Lake
      As today’s walleye fishing regulation changes were announced, the DNR encouraged all Minnesotans to visit Mille Lacs Lake to fish the other abundant species that the lake has to offer. Mille Lacs Lake’s other opportunities for top-notch fishing will not be affected by the regulation adjustment. Bassmaster Magazine named Mille Lacs the nation’s best bass lake in June and will send 50 of the country’s best anglers to the lake In September for its Angler of the Year tournament. Northern pike abound in Mille Lacs, along with muskellunge. In early July, a woman from southern Minnesota caught and released in Mille Lacs what may have been Minnesota’s largest-ever muskellunge. To learn more about Mille Lacs Lake and its many great fishing opportunities, visit the DNR website. To plan visit to the Mille Lacs area, visit the Mille Lacs Area Tourism Council website. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Q: What is happening with the walleye season this summer on Mille Lacs Lake? A: The closure that began July 8 and was set to end July 28 is being extended by two weeks. That means walleye fishing will reopen at 6:01 a.m. on Aug. 11 for catch-and-release only through Labor Day. A night fishing closure also will remain in place from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. through Nov. 30. Q: How does this affect fishing for other species? A: Fishing regulations for other species such as smallmouth bass, muskie and northern pike remain the same. During the night closure, there is an exception for muskie and northern pike anglers using artificial lures and sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. Q: Why did the DNR extend the closure? A: While the DNR wants to allow as much walleye fishing on Mille Lacs as possible, the state is also required to abide by cooperative agreements made with eight American Indian Chippewa bands. The two weeks of additional closure allows the state to abide by a harvest quota set earlier this year with the bands. The DNR and the bands agreed to harvest quotas of 44,800 pounds for state anglers and 19,200 pounds for tribal fishing. They also agreed that up to 75,000 pounds of walleye could be sustainably harvested from the lake from Dec. 1, 2016 to Nov. 30, 2017 in order to conserve the population That agreement allows the state to use a built-in buffer – the 11,000 pounds difference between the conservation cap of 75,000 pounds and the combined harvest quota of 64,000 pounds – in an attempt to allow catch-and-release walleye fishing through Labor Day, following the mid-summer closure. The latest creel survey data shows that state anglers reached their quota of 44,800 pounds of walleye caught from Mille Lacs in early July. Even though state anglers already have caught their quota of fish, the DNR is dipping into the allowed conservation reserve in order to reopen the season on Aug. 11. Q: Why has the walleye population in Mille Lacs declined? What is the DNR doing in the long-term to try to conserve the population? A: The vast majority of walleye that hatch do not survive to their third autumn in the lake. Walleye numbers have declined to the point that it has become important to protect spawning-sized walleye, particularly the class of walleye that hatched in 2013. It is important to protect the large 2013 year class to replenish aging spawning stock. Most males from the 2013 class are now mature, but females will not start to contribute in large numbers until next spring. The state is committed to conserving the population of walleyes born in 2013 to improve and rebuild a sustainable population for the future. Q: Why do we count hooking mortality during a closed walleye season? A: The amount that state anglers can kill (as spelled out in state-bands agreements) also must include fish that die as a result of hooking mortality, the fish that die after being caught and then released back into the water. During the closure, some anglers still catch walleye incidentally and some of those fish die after being released. Under the state-band agreements, those dead fish must be calculated and counted against the state’s allocation. Q: How did this cooperative management between the state and the bands of Mille Lacs Lake come to be? A: Recall that in 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld lower-court decisions that allowed the Mille Lacs band and seven other Chippewa bands to exercise off-reservation fishing and hunting rights. The lower federal court also set up guidelines, known as stipulations and protocols, for both sides to follow. These stipulations and protocols provide a framework for how the bands and the state must work cooperatively to manage shared natural resources, including Mille Lacs fish. In their agreements, the DNR and the bands are required to annually establish the number of walleye that can safely be harvested from Mille Lacs while ensuring sufficient remaining walleye in the lake for a healthy fishery. Q: If the walleye population is in decline, why are anglers catching so many? A: Fish are biting for two reasons. First, there is a shortage of food for larger walleye. Last fall’s assessment showed that larger walleye were thinner than average. Second, studies in many fisheries show that catchability actually increases when fish population decline. In Mille Lacs, walleye congregate in preferred spots rather than disperse evenly throughout the lake. Fewer fish in the lake means there’s more room in the preferred spots for fish to gather, and anglers find these spots where they can catch a larger portion of fish. Finally, while the walleye population has decreased considerably (by half or more), the amount of fishing pressure has declined by a lot more. This means that there are more walleye per angler fishing Mille Lacs today. Q: How is the DNR using science and research to help the walleye population? A: Mille Lacs Lake is the most studied lake in Minnesota. It is also a complex and changing system. The agency conducts a large number of surveys on the lake annually. These surveys include assessing the abundance of young walleye; setting 52 nets to assess adult abundance; using fine-mesh nets each summer to determine abundance of food (prey fish) for walleye; and using interviews with anglers around the lake (called creel surveys) to estimate the number of fish anglers are catching. The DNR also periodically tags walleye and other species to provide actual population estimates. We are tagging bass this year in cooperation with angling groups, and will be tagging walleye in 2018 and 2019 when the 2013 year class will be reaching full maturity. Q: What is the purpose of the external review the DNR has initiated? A: The DNR has asked Dr. Chris Vandergoot to lead an independent review of the DNR’s scientific approaches to manage Mille Lacs Lake. Vandergoot is a key member of the international team that co-manages a very significant walleye fishery in Lake Erie. He works for the U.S. Geological Survey in the Sandusky Lake Erie Biological station in Ohio. His review report will be available to the public in early 2018 and will help inform fisheries management decisions for the 2018 season. Q: What does the future look like for Mille Lacs walleye? A: It is unlikely that Mille Lacs walleye production will return to the levels that state anglers enjoyed over 20 years ago. The ecosystem of Mille Lacs is going through extreme change, starting with increased water clarity in the mid-1990s, to impacts today from aquatic invasive species such as spiny water flea and zebra mussels. Longer growing seasons are also helping some species such as smallmouth bass but may be hurting others. While walleye will still be abundant, the future fishery will be more diverse, offering angling opportunities for a greater variety of fish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • bucketmouth64
      Thanks for the suggestions. I believe I'll be going with the 150 hp. My next question is trolling motor, 24/36 volt? I have a 24 volt now with a MK maxxum. I would like to get the MK Ultrex, but that has a 80lb thrust and the 36 volt comes at 112 lb. Is there a noticeable difference between the two? I noticed they come in ipilot and ipilot link. What's the difference? Not sure if I would utilize ipilot since I don't walleye fish. I use the trolling motor a lot while fishing.