Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Macattak1

Best 2-Strokes? Rude or Merc? Longevity, Cost, technology

Recommended Posts

Macattak1

Greetings,

I have been looking at fishing boats and OBs. Lund or Alumacraft. I have been looking at used and new pricing. I am really only interested in an Evinrude or a Mercury OB. I would also like to stay 2-stroke. I am hearing some opinions about the Rudes v/s the Mercs. A dealer that sells both and more really likes the Evinrude Etecs over the Merc 2-strokes. He says they just have the technology jump as they never went 4-stroke and their 2-stroke is probably the best on the market. That is just his opinion that I asked for.

I am very interested in personal opinion and experience.

I am not interested in Yamas, Hondas, Suzukis, etc.

Thank you very much.

Peace and Blessings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PierBridge

They are both extremely good.

Where you buy your engine will the most important decision, after sale support and a good service department are key.

Popcorn ordered.... grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Macattak1

Greetings,

Agreed. I was impressed with the local dealer I visited. He showed me several boats, gave me info and the different OBs, and priced two different boats for me. Not once did he go into the 'are you buying today' or 'how soon will you be buying' or 'our boats are way better then the other competitor boats', etc. Very nice.

Peace and Blessings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
caseymcq

I have a subscription to Bass & Walleye Boats magazine. In most of their "shoot outs" the Merc Optimax usually does the best overall and is usually the cheapest. I was really supprised when the Opti's have done better on fuel economy than everything including 4-strokes. I have been impressed with what I have read about them.

I have a Yamaha 4-stroke so I am pretty unbiased on this topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Macattak1

Greetings,

Thanks. Opinions count. I also found Mercs page where they claim to beat out Rude in basically everything that Rude claims to be #1 at....

I will probably go Merc. But I sure wish there were others around here to speak up...???

Peace and Blessings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DTro

I really don't think you can go wrong with either. It's really more about how you take care of it. One of the most bashed motors is the Force outboard, but I know of plenty that are still going strong with proper care.

That's not saying you can't have problems, but just a general statement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TUMBLEWEED

My 2004 Opti is everything I wanted in a main motor.

Cold or hot weather, it starts right up every time.

No more choking and flooding out. I was initialy

concerned over the price of that synthetic 2 stroke

Mercury oil @ 26 bucks a gallon!! My fears have

since been laid to rest, as I have not gone thru

as much as I thought I would. In fact, I have yet to go

through the two gallons I did buy. As for MPG, the Opti

will beat anything out there. A trip up to Ottertail

in June, highlights this pretty well. We were based out of a resort on one end of the lake, but fished the opposite

end for most of the trip. This meant a high speed run from one end to the other. Plus we used a 9.9 Merc Pro Kicker

for constant trolling while on the hot spots,and for locating the active fish. When it came time to gas it up on the road for home, it took 11 gallons!! A few trips up

to Mille Lacs,Big Sandy, and other large bodies of water have born out with similar results. My OPTI came with the

"Smart Guage" system. This system consists of a digital

guage that is on your dash. There is all kinds of things you can monitor on your OPTI. Things like MPG,MPG for trip,

voltage,oil PSI,Temp,RPM,etc. Quite handy at times

There are other things you can do and monitor, but

I listed the ones I use most. Anyways, my vote is for a Merc!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Northlander

Im not a Evinrude fan at all. I had 3 of them and none of them were impressive so I went Yamaha. In your case though I would go Opti. Guys I know that have them seem to be happy with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Macattak1

Greetings,

Thanks for the info! Does you system monitor fuel flow? I mean, we can not trust the MPG read out in our diesel trucks. How accurate is the Merc system? I know you dont have an odomitor to know your exact mileage. So, I guess I am asking how accurate it is? What it measures?

Thanks

Peace and Blessings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Macattak1

Greetings,

Thanks for your input. What year and HP rudes have you had? Last one I had was probably an 1979 15hp. I loved it. But I know that my buddies 9.9 Merc was not as fast, but close to it. He had a 12' boat that was lighter v/s my 16' Alumacraft with a console so...

Any way. Thanks.

Peace and Blessings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sutty

I have a 2000 40 horse 4 stroke Evinrude. I have not had any problems with it. I am looking at upgrading my boat next year and am thinking about getting the evinrude e-tec.

I am not a fan of Mercs but it is mainly political. I don't like the fact they bought out Lund/Crestliner and are making it tough to have a choice on what motor you buy. They also don't make motors anymore anyway just the housing and lower unit. I think the power heads are suzuki but someone else can correct me here.

According to Evinrude the new E-tecs perform better in all the tests.

I would say both companies are probably both right and wrong when it comes to the marketing. Companies always find "Statistics" to back up a marketing claim.

I would say you are safe which ever Evinrude you buy wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TUMBLEWEED

I'm not really sure of the accuracy of the smart-craft

system? It does read current consuption of fuel, ie

gallons per hour XXX. A dealer would know more about

such specifics. There are things like "press of a

button winterzation". The motor will double the oil

used, same for the initial break-in. The only down

side as I see it now, would be learning some of the

maintenance steps so I can do them on my own. One example

is that the OPTI's use a water seperator. The book

says once a year to drain it. I haven't done it myself

yet, but my dealer's wrench guy is going to show me how.

I hear one of the plugs is a bear too,plus they

are quite a bit more $$$ than a standard plug.

Ah well, when you wanna play with the big boys

you want the newest stuff....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cold one sd

Quote:

I have a 2000 40 horse 4 stroke Evinrude. I have not had any problems with it. I am looking at upgrading my boat next year and am thinking about getting the evinrude e-tec.

I am not a fan of Mercs but it is mainly political. I don't like the fact they bought out Lund/Crestliner and are making it tough to have a choice on what motor you buy. They also don't make motors anymore anyway just the housing and lower unit. I think the power heads are suzuki but someone else can correct me here.

According to Evinrude the new E-tecs perform better in all the tests.

I would say both companies are probably both right and wrong when it comes to the marketing. Companies always find "Statistics" to back up a marketing claim.

I would say you are safe which ever Evinrude you buy
wink.gif


According to Mercury the Optimax outperforms Evinrude. I don't know or care. Merc is now making all their own outboards from 75 hp and up. I don't know about the smaller ones. I have a Merc 15 4 stroke that has a Yammy powerhead and a 9.9 Pro Kicker that is a Tohatsu. I also have a merc Verado that is all Merc. I haven't had anything but Mercs since 1980 and have no problems at all. I don't think there are any bad outboards out there anymore and you can have a problem with any of them. I have looked at a Lund catalog the other day and you can still get a Honda on a Lund. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
solbes

I can't comment on the newer motors, though I hope to be able to in a few years. For now I'm running with an '84 Evinrude 90 Hp. That thing is a beast! I've had it for 5 years now and not a single problem.

Unfortunately OMC has been gone for quite some time now. My father in law had problems dealing with Bombadier on his newer Johnson O/B. Not positive they still own both Evinrude/Johnson though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RK

Hiya -

I really think you have a great problem, so to speak: choosing between two pretty appealing options.

I've run Optis for the last several years and have loved them. Other than one defective part, which was quickly fixed by Mercury, they've been pullet proof. Last fall my Opti started on the first turn when it was 9 degrees... Fuel consumption at cruising speeds is very good, and they have a nice power curve - good out of the hole for sure, which is important to me when I'm in big waves. I'd buy another in a second.

I've heard lots of good things about Etecs as well and actually got a chance to run one this summer. Hard to get too thorough an opinion in a couple days, but perforamance was impressive. They're quieter than an Opti, and offer some nice features like easy winterizing and no break-in period.

About the Mercury guages - once you get them calibrated for fuel consumption, they're very accurate. Once you see how much your gas consumption goes up when you firewall it, you'll be really inclined to back off and run at cruising speeds... Watching your MPG can get addictive smile.gif

Good luck with your choice.

cheers,

Rob Kimm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
78cj5

I have a 2001 Merc 40 (Lund, cabin), a 2004 E-Tec 40 (Pontoon, cabin) and a 2006 E-Tec 90 (Mr Pike in the cities).

I currently favor the E-Tec's, but I have never had an issue with either Merc or Yami. The real reason I favor the E-tec's not only because of the performance, but more importantly it is a motor that the "masses" do not have.

I like new, innovative, different gear. I like the fact that people are consistently commenting or asking questions about my E-Tec. I enjoy the gear as much as the fishing.

In general, I have no brand loyalty...Period.

I am currently looking at Kawasaki, Honda, and Yamaha ATV's. I ruled out the Can-Am (BRP) because I did not like the chassis design at all.

Next year, I will probably buy a 3/4 ton diesel. Chevy, Ford, Dodge...(Evinrude, Yami, Merc). They all all good products, so In this case, I am going to buy the best deal.

I do not like the fact you are basically locked into buying Merc if you buy Lund (at least Brunswick is making difficult to do otherwise). I am glad I got my Lund this year with the E-Tec.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Macattak1

Greetings,

Thanks. I am kind of leaning towards Evenrude as that is what I have had and had good luck. They have excellent technology and the market is not flooded with them. That last one is kind of a double edged sword. However, it appears that they have a premium price?

I have seen Merc's response to the Rude claims. But I have not seen Rude's claim in writing how they tested it to be better than Merc's. So kind of makes me think of the king with no clothes on...

I prefere not to follow the masses either. Not that they did anything bad, but more that I like to be a little different. Just not at the cost of my wallet or repairs.

Peace and Blessings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      The commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has appointed 11 Minnesotans to three-year terms on citizen oversight committees that monitor the agency’s fish and wildlife spending.  The appointees are responsible for reviewing the DNR’s annual Game and Fish Fund report in detail and, following discussions with agency leaders and others, prepare reports on their findings. Appointed to the Wildlife Oversight Committee are Garry Hooghkirk, Duluth; Amanda Leabo, Fergus Falls; Mark Popovich, Welch; John Schnedler, Richfield; and Martha Taggett, Golden Valley. Appointed to the Fisheries Oversight Committee are Karl Anderson, Greenbush; Jess Edberg, Ely; Nicole Hertel, Shoreview; Benjamin Kohn, Hudson; Mark Owens, Austin; and Craig Pagel, Duluth. The new appointees join other members whose terms are continuing. The committees will resume work after the mid-December publication of the DNR’s Game and Fish Fund report for fiscal year 2017. “We look forward to working with these citizens,” said Dave Schad, DNR deputy commissioner. “The appointments continue our commitment to share detailed budget information, bring new participants into the oversight process and ensure revenue generated by hunting and fishing license sales is used appropriately.” The Fisheries and Wildlife oversight committees continue a citizen oversight function first created in 1994. Sixty people applied for oversight committee positions this time. Factors in choosing the new appointees included geographic distribution, demographic diversity and a mix of interests. In the weeks ahead, committee chairs and four members will be selected by each committee to serve on an umbrella Budgetary Oversight Committee chaired by another appointee, John Lenczewski. The committee will develop an overall report on expenditures for game and fish activities. Those recommendations will be delivered to the DNR commissioner and legislative committees with jurisdiction over natural resources financing for further consideration. Minnesota’s Game and Fish Fund is the fiscal foundation for much of the state’s core natural resource management functions. About $110 million a year is deposited into this fund from hunting and fishing license sales, a sales tax on lottery tickets, and other sources of revenue including a reimbursement based on a federal excise tax on certain hunting, fishing and boating equipment. Past DNR Game and Fish Fund expenditure reports and citizen oversight committee reports are also available at mndnr.gov/gamefishoversight. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Conservation grants awarded by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources will help restore, enhance and protect habitat throughout the state.  This latest round of 73 conservation grants is funded by the agency’s Conservation Partners Legacy (CPL) grant program. Now in its ninth year, the program has awarded over $50 million to nonprofit organizations and government entities for conservation projects. The DNR recently received $9.9 million in grant requests from 86 applicants during round one of the application cycle. The DNR has funded $7.5 million of these requests. “Projects include habitat improvements that benefit deer, turkey, pheasants and a wide variety of species,” said Jessica Lee, DNR conservation grants coordinator. “Oak savanna, wetlands and pollinator habitat are restored through this grant program, to give a few examples.” Conservation groups and others interested in applying in the future are encouraged to plan in the coming months so they can apply when funds are again available. The DNR’s CPL program provides grants ranging from $5,000 to $400,000 to conservation nonprofit organizations and government to help fund projects to restore, enhance or protect fish and wildlife habitat in Minnesota. The Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council recommended the grant program, which was approved by the Minnesota Legislature and has been in place since 2009. Funding has been provided annually from the Outdoor Heritage Fund, which is part of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment and funded by a voter-approved statewide sales tax of three-eighths of 1 percent. Round one of the proposals for fiscal year 2017 included the traditional grant cycle, the metro grant cycle and the expedited grant cycle. The expedited cycle for standard types of projects is currently open for another funding round, with the maximum grant award being $50,000. Applications are due online by 4 p.m. Friday, Jan. 19. More information on the program’s grant cycles, and a complete list of the most recent grant applications and past awarded projects are on the DNR website at mndnr.gov/cpl. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Sherburne County Geologic Atlas-Part B was recently published by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Part B covers groundwater conditions and sensitivity to pollution. It expands on Part A, the geology atlas previously published by the Minnesota Geological Survey. The atlases are a valuable resource for groundwater management and land-use planning. Sherburne County is characterized by sandy surface and subsurface conditions. This type of geology creates extensive and productive aquifers that are relatively sensitive to pollution. In addition to maps of pollution sensitivity, groundwater chemistry data are shown, highlighting areas with elevated concentrations of chloride and nitrate. The deeper bedrock aquifers of the eastern part of the county are less sensitive to pollution. The atlas can be acquired through the following sources: Online: PDFs of the report and maps, GIS files and program information are available by searching “Sherburne County Geologic Atlas, Part B.” The GIS folder includes GIS files and associated metadata for the water table, wells, and maps for groundwater flow and pollution sensitivity. The ArcMap file displays the data as shown on the published maps and includes hyperlinks to image files of the published cross sections. Paper copies: Part A and B atlases can be purchased from Minnesota Geological Survey Map Sales, 612-626-2969. Prices for each atlas package range from $12–$15. County geologic atlases provide geologic and hydrogeologic information to support regional planning and water resource management and protection. Partial funding for this project was provided by the Clean Water Fund and the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • IceHawk
      Good Advice Don . You are correct there was a wheeler on Horseshoe back by Krons bay.  Saw him Sunday when I was out on the ice. How he didn't go through is hard to believe.  The chain  is very spotty at best. Finding areas of open water to 4 1/2 5  inches tops. A lot of guys r pushing the envelope out there on Sunday there was at least 10 guys out on mud and the ice is 3-3 1/2 inches thick in that area, also saw a group out near Camerons Island, A lot of these areas were completely open on Thursday so be very very cautious. Tom is right you could see the different shades of freeze up before this snow now its a guessing game. Remember u put others at risk that have to try and rescue you if you break through so use common sense. On a side note there is a pocket of open water on the N end of Big, swans are keeping it open and it just froze over yesterday in front of the golf course on Schneider.  Shaumans bay has 5-6 inches on Rice main lake 2-3 inches.  Koronis is still open was fishing in the boat two weeks ago out there so it may be a while for that beast!
    • eyeguy 54
      can hardly see 3 pound test and tie on the 3mm let alone 1.5 mm and 3/4 pound test. yowzer!
    • leech~~
      Not really, I had that shock a year or so ago when I went out for a day fishing with a Ice Tournament guy. His rods had very light ends, as in you could almost blow on them and they would move. He bought them all on-line for some good cash $80-$100 each. But he did have on all his rods that little cheap in-line reels with like 1-2 lb line on them all! I had to actually borough one of his rods and reels just to keep up with him!
    • eyeguy 54
      zapped HT a note to see if the rod is available anywhere with bigger guides. Nope. 
    • iiccee63
      Sunday am. 3 inches of ice 12/9 with people fishing a few hundred yards out towards the west shore.
    • iiccee63
      Let me rephrase the topic.... Am looking for current ice conditions on this lake. Well aware how things were weeks ago. Any info on current conditions would be appreciated. Thanks
    • Lotharski
      Thanks for the report, Chill!  I went out for a few hours Saturday afternoon and set up on the first break in about 15 fow.  I had the camera down and only saw pike.  Not one gill or eye...  I had 7-7.5" ice where I checked.