Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
chucker34

Steep shots

Recommended Posts

chucker34

How many of you take shots at deer from your treestand of 10 yards or less? The reason I ask is that I was reading an article in a bowhunting magazine discussing shot placement and the guy said you stand should never be any closer than 15 yards to a major trail to ensure your arrow passes through the deer at an appropriate angle and even went so far as to say taking a very close shot - anything much less than 15 yards from a stand - could lead to a questionable hit.

I took a deer at 20 yards last year from a stand and 25 yards from a grounblind, but it's conceivable I could take a shot at 10 yards or less from a stand this year given my one of my stand placements near an intersection of trails and a mini-food plot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deitz Dittrich

because of the angle, if you take a shot at 10 yards you will probably only hit 1 lung, this really does depend on the height of the stand as well..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

Deitz, I'm at about 12-13 feet on my stands. I'm not saying there's a high likelihood of me taking a shot at that close, but the opportunity might present itself and I want to do what's right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GerrySchoolcraft

Chucker, My wife never goes higher that 10 to 15 feet and she has shot all of her deer from 5 to 15 yards and has had no problem getting a double lung shot, infact most have been heart (she is a better shot than I am)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deitz Dittrich

Chucker at that low a height, you should have no problems at all takeing that shot... Now if you were 20feet or more.. again, it becomes marginal...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HateHumminbird

While we should all strive for double-lung/heart shots, I've recovered several bow-killed animals on single lung shots. Sooner or later, a shot that's slightly off it's mark is bound to happen, due to a number of confounding variables. The trick is to back off on that animal, and let it bed. If night-time temps permit, let it bed up overnight and come back in the morning to trail it.

Good discussion about shot angles, and I don't mean to hijack, just think that holding back your excitement a bit post-shot can be a very wise thing to do.

Joel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

Thanks for the replies guys and I agree jnelson. The first deer I got last year went just out of sight into some brush. I thought I had made a good hit. So I waited on stand for half an hour before I climbed down and as I slowly crept toward the doe, it started moving around in the leaves a little so I backed up and left for an hour before coming back. It was a double lung shot but she was still capable of bolting I believe. I'm glad I froze instantly the second I saw movement and left her alone for awhile!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jeremiah Johnson

my 1st bow deer last year was a single lung, no blood at all. Luckily I heard her fall about 30yds away. I was alittle high, and she was only 10yds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks

I've shot at least 5 deer that I can think of at less than 10 yards, I'd say 5-7 yards. They've all been from that 15-16' range. You want to hit them a little higher to get both lungs. The ones I hit high enough were toast & didn't go far at all. I've hit a couple too low & too much on the shoulder & got neither lung. I had a lot of trouble recovering one of them, although I did, but it wasn't dead. If I hadn't broken one shoulder & the other leg I doubt I'd have recovered it. It's better to hit them high from close range than low. Shooting over them is a harmless miss & a spine shot seems pretty effective...

On another note I was reading in a magazine last night about the effectiveness of the true quartering away shot for deer with the bow. It's amazing how much more effective that can be over the broadside & according to surveys how many bowhunters shy away from it as opposed to the broadside. I have no problem with a broadside shot, but they're right that 45 degree angle shot's a slam dunk, you just need to make sure you aim farther back, like for the off shoulder not the close one. If you get that arrow angled way up in there inside the chest cavity/rib cage it doesn't matter if it passes through or not, that deer's not going far at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FarByondDrivn

Last year, I shot a doe that was directly underneath my stand and I was 20' plus up. It was a tricky proposition (I hit the top of one lung and barely grazed the bottom of the other). Deitz is right about the nasty angle. A couple of things that work for me are be sure not to drop the bow arm; bend at the waist. And, for the quartering away shots, aim through the body on line with the front leg on the far side of the deer. Seems to always work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

bigbucks, I got out this weekend at noon one day to one of my stands and quickly took some practice shoots at varying yardages. I thought about what you said - hitting them a little higher at very close yardages - i.e., 5 to 10. That makes a lot of sense as I looked at the angle of the arrow through the vital area of the 3d I brought along. Looks like you would have a much more lethal shot that way. Again, I was shooting from approximately 13 foot up the tree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks

Good job, way to do your homework. Trust me that's the best way to figure that stuff out. Hitting a deer bad is a great learning experience, but it's a lot more painful for you & the deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Studer

I am sure most of you have seen the shot that Don Kiske takes in Monster Bucks VII. UNBELIEVABLE!!! I am sure he is an awesome Archer but man I sure wouldn't have taken that shot. Taking a shot from directly over the top of the deer is what some would consider extremely unethical. He also claimed that it was not the shot he was hoping for but was going for a "One Lung Liver" Pretty wild to see that shot taken on video. Has anyone else seen it??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • papadarv
      Yesterday the MN DNR announced a license requirement change effective NOW for this ice season. All Wheel House and other fishing structures which cannot be folded / collapsed must be licensed even if you remove the house when you get off the ice. 
    • Rick
      Harvest climbs 16 percent from 2016 Minnesota firearms hunters registered 161,057 deer through the third weekend of deer season, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  Preliminary results through the third weekend show that the number of deer registered was up 16 percent from 2016. Of the deer harvested, 53 percent were bucks, compared to 63 percent during the same period in 2016. In Zone 1, in northeastern Minnesota, total firearms harvest was up 36 percent. In Zone 2, which covers the majority of the state and runs from Canada to Iowa, harvest was up 10 percent and Zone 3, in southeastern Minnesota, was down 5 percent. “The conditions were generally good for hunters participating in the last week of the Zone 1 season and for the start of the 3B season in the southeast,” said Erik Thorson, acting big game program leader, “which provided a boost to the statewide firearms harvest.” Based upon the number of antlerless permits available and the number of permit areas that allow multiple deer to be taken, the DNR is projecting the 2017 total deer harvest to be around 200,000. The 2016 total harvest was 173,213 and to date firearms and archery hunters have harvested about 180,000 deer this year. In much of Minnesota, the firearms deer season ended Nov. 12, and the northern rifle zone season ended Nov. 19. The late southeast firearms deer season is open through Sunday, Nov. 26. The muzzleloader season begins Saturday, Nov. 25, and continues through Sunday, Dec. 10. More information on deer management can be found at mndnr.gov/deer. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Applications due by Saturday, Dec. 16  The Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are seeking qualified applicants to serve on the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.  “The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee plays a critical role in helping us achieve the vision Minnesotans have for use of the Parks and Trails Legacy Funds and creates an accessible and equitable, integrated system of state and regional parks and trails in Minnesota,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. The purpose of the committee is to promote and coordinate implementation of the 25-Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Funding recommendations for individual projects is not a part of this committee’s work. The plan can be found at on the parks and trails legacy plan page. 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment by Minnesota voters. The committee is planning a series of regional events during the year to celebrate Legacy accomplishments and engage Minnesotans on the question, “Why Parks and Trails Legacy Matters.”  Information about the events will be available in January on Facebook (/PTLegacyMN) and on the committee website (www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac). The deadline for applications is Saturday, Dec. 16. The committee is made up of 17 members, including, to the practical extent possible, diverse geographical and demographic representation. The committee has a mixture of park and trail professionals and Minnesota residents. Committee members should have expertise in two or more of the four strategic pillars of the plan: Connect people and the outdoors. Acquire land and create opportunities. Take care of what we have. Coordinate among partners. Terms are two years with the option of being reappointed for a maximum of three terms. Meetings are scheduled every two months around the state, with an option to attend remotely. Interested individuals may complete the application form online at www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac/member-application or print it out and return it to Paul Purman, Department of Natural Resources, Box 39, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. Anyone with questions can contact Paul via phone at 651-259-5643 or email at paul.purman@state.mn.us. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Big bay did not look to be completely frozen over yesterday afternoon. Broken up and refrozen by McKinley Landing. Cliff
    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.