Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
oldguide

Mississippi River- Re: Special Smallmouth Regs

10 posts in this topic

For all you brown fish anglers! I'm trying to get a petition going to extend the Special Regs up to the Brainerd, MN dam. I have it all typed up and ready to go but need signatures. If anyone or their club is interested in signing on e-mail me at smileyfacetwo@yahoo.com and I will make arrangements to meet with you. We need to protect the BIG Smallmouth and this may be the way to do it.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in....I don't have the details, but...it might be easier to set up a on line petition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wont sign it.

I fish the tourney in Sartell every year, and with this reg, that tourney goes away. I absolutely love fishing in that.

And for anyone in clubs or leagues that bring fish in to weigh or measure, they too would be done.

You may think thats selfish sounding, but is it in need of help today? Is it that bad, that drastic changes are needed?

In my honest opinion, the fishing is outstanding the way it is today in the stretch that doesnt contain special regs.

Vast majority of people are not keeping smallmouth anyway. The few that do, are only fishing small sections of the river in most cases. There are many miles of river with very little pressure.

Can the reg hurt? Absolutely not. I do agree there. But I don't think its needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

I wont sign it.

I fish the tourney in Sartell every year, and with this reg, that tourney goes away. I absolutely love fishing in that.

And for anyone in clubs or leagues that bring fish in to weigh or measure, they too would be done.

You may think thats selfish sounding, but is it in need of help today? Is it that bad, that drastic changes are needed?

In my honest opinion, the fishing is outstanding the way it is today in the stretch that doesnt contain special regs.

Vast majority of people are not keeping smallmouth anyway. The few that do, are only fishing small sections of the river in most cases. There are many miles of river with very little pressure.

Can the reg hurt? Absolutely not. I do agree there. But I don't think its needed.


Didn't think 'bout the tourney aspect. I wonder if we can get a waiver for the tournie?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same reason the reg stops at the Crow River. Because of the Anoka tourney.....

Something about waivers don't fly. I think someone in the know will speak up soon on this one. cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Same reason the reg stops at the Crow River. Because of the Anoka tourney.....

Something about waivers don't fly. I think someone in the know will speak up soon on this one.
cool.gif


Actually the organization in Anoka was offered an arrangement to have the tourney through 2009. The DNR just wanted access to the data, but that apparently did not come across in their meetings... confused.gifconfused.gifconfused.gif

As far as a reg up above ST Cloud Dam: The biggest benefit we have seen in the current regulated area is an increase in density due to an increase in spawning stock. Basically we have more fish and less variable recruitment of young smallmouth. However, the river does change considerably above Sartell. It is not the same beast as in St. Cloud to Anoka. Habitat is far different, Flow regime is different, the muskies are more prevelant and channel catfish are not nearly as abumdant. Just factors to consider. Personally, I would think the reg could have the potential to improve spawning stock somewhat, but the area near Brainerd only has substantial year classes one out of every five years or so!!! So the benefits may be a long way off. There are never easy solutions. Just my .02

BTW KT there have been similar cases where temprary "exemptions" were allowed but I have not heard of them very often....

Hope this helps... grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I'd like to hear what the real benefits (or negatives) of this proposal might be. No offense but I don't think a tournament is a reason to negate a possible gain for smallmouths. I'd also hope that the DNR could figure out a tournament if it's not going to be too harmful to the smally population. I get bummed thinking about people killing smallmouth, but my guess is it doesn't happen too often

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fish out there. I would be all for the slot, let the tournaments carry on with the six fish limits. I fish live bait blush.gif, but never keep smallies. I don't think that alot of other people do either. The thing about it is that certin people who fish out there, I think don't understand the regs [language barrier]. That being said, I still dont think that it has much an affect on the river as a whole. Most people with skill to catch the big smallies [myself not included] would release them anyway.

Should be about that time that the Walleyes start biting wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FM

I understand your concerns about the tournaments. I fished them for years but knowing what I do now I'm sorry for doing so. Let me explain. NO ONE puts small fish in a livewell!!!!! The fish that suffer most from delayed mortality are the BIG Fish!!!!! Case in point. The Sartell to Blanchard stretch of river used to contain numerous 18" - 20" fish. Look back at the weights of the tourney and you will see that very few were brought in by some of the best smallmouth anglers in the state. I don't even fish that area anymore. Yes tournaments are fun but bag weigh-ins are death to a wonderful resourse. The only other way to have the tourney would be by having a "draw partner paper tournament". This way the fish would be put back immediately. The smallmouth is alive in well in the Mississippi but we need to protect the BIG FISH. Thank you all for responding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Oldguide

Any updates on the petition status?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • White-tips
      Thank you very much Outy22! 
    • TNtoMN_HuntFish
      In no way am I trying to fire up a catch and release vs catch and grease fight.  Admins, please delete any comments like that. I am curious about everyone's thoughts and knowledge on mercury in fish.    It seems Walleye are always the riskiest fish to eat via DNR and MDH surveys but I know the fishing for eyes is such a tradition up here. A lot of walleye are eaten in Minnesota every year as well as Pike and Bass which also can be high in mercury because they are high on the food chain. Does anyone worry about it or is this something that is overhyped? I'm a bit careful where I fish because my wife is pregant and I don't want her eating too much mercury. I'm still kinda new to the state so I trust the knowledge of locals more so than DNR in a lot of situations.    For example, in TN (where I moved from) our DNR says do not eat ANY fish from the Mississippi river. I'd say it's pretty nasty by the time it gets that far south but there are river rats as far down as Louisiana eating catfish and bass all year long and you don't hear of them dying from mercury poisoning or having other effects of it. At least not thay I've heard or read.    I'm very curious to know your opinions on the matter. I don't catch many walleye anyway but I do love eating Pike and other fish. It's so satisfying to work hard for a fresh meal but do I have to continue to be super cautious of what lakes I eat a Pike from? Seems like the closer to the metro, the more dangerous it can be...or is it? Some of the huge lakes up North are full of mercury too. 
    • Mossy19
      Well it end up being 2 broken live well pumps being broken.  The pumps would pump water into the live wells but also be spraying water into the back compartment of the boat.  That's where my water was coming from.  I would like to thank those that replied suggestions back.
    • HugeHogChaser
    • BringAnExtension
    • h8go4s
      This one? http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/lake.html?id=31065300   Everything you need to know, paid for by your tax dollars.
    • Juan Grande
      What's the flow like on the Rum, Moose?
    • Avid Angler
      Hi guys and gals,   Does anyone know much about this lake? I don't fish this area of the state. We are looking to stay at Cedar Point Resort for a week. Just want to get to know the lake for what it is.   Is it a bass, northern, pan fish or walleye lake? Or all of the above? The surveys don't look that impressive.   Any good guides in the area?   Thanks.   Avid
    • portageguy
      The bite is on in Trout lake. Remote lake walleye fishing has been good. A leech or crawler has  been producing nice fish. This last week Trout lake has been good for lake trout, walleye and bass. A camper had caught and released a 44 inch pike. Bass fishermen reported 100 fish days.   The Y-store is looking into taking on BWCA permits. Please encourage and support them to do so. 
    • delcecchi
      On many lakes it is possible to rent a boat for a reasonable price.  Or to hire a guide who knows the area and the lakes.