Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
USDA3

Infrared VS. Conventional Flash Trail Cameras

Recommended Posts

USDA3

I'm in the market for a trail cam and have noticed most of the new technology is converting to infrared lighting for low/no light picture taking. Just looking for a few comments on what people have expereinced with the new cameras, maybe the price isn't worth the Infrared? I will be mainly using it for deer, but also moose, bear, and any other interesting critters which may wander through. Also I know the higher the mega-pixels the quality will increase, but is it necessary to get a 6.0mp camera when just using it for scouting and not to hang on the wall, or will a 2 or 3 mp work just fine? comments, brands, and tips all welcome!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
USDA3

Tough crowd, I guess the 14 pages of trail cam pics on this forum came from people with no opinion, and the 65 thread views in one day came from those individuals also looking at buying a new cam! wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gissert

Good question. I am looking to add another camera, and I have questions on the infrared as well.

I think most of the guys here are running motion detector/35m units.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bobb-o

I have a 2.3 Mp digital camera with a flash, if i could have afforded it i would have definitely bought the infrared. The quality of pictures i get with mine are still very excellent, the only problem i have with the camera is that i think the triggering speed is a little slow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

No infrared cams for me.

I like a pic that looks decent.

The flash doesnt seem to bother the deer at our place, since I have many pics of the same bucks over and over again.

I dont like the look of IR pics. But for the guy that is worried about flashes spooking deer, then IR is a good reason for those people to buy it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
archerystud

I have a 3.0 Mpixel Cuddeback.

I think a 2.0 Mpixel is good enough for trail cams. I would just have a mineral lick close to the camera that way it isn't necesary to need more pixels for a sharper image.

I'm not sure about other cameras but I got about 2.5 months of battery life out of 4 D cell batteries over the summer. I thought that was pretty awesome compared to my old cheaper cameras.

As far as the "flash" issue. I see multiple shots of the same large deer so I don't think the flash scares them. At least in the summer anyways. I suppose it may spook bucks during hunting season when they become more wary. However, I plan on not having my camera in the woods during hunting season. I want to scout what deer are "living" on my property. I'm sure that I'll see other bucks moving through the property once the rut approaches but for scouting I'm only concerned with the deer that are living there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bobb-o

My main concern with the flash is that i have heard that it will spook bear, i no that it wont spook deer, as i have seen a lot of people having mulitple night shots of the same deer. If you're only going to use the camera for deer a flash shouldnt be a big deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
USDA3

AStud, It sounds like cuddeback is kind of the cadillac of trail cameras, but one thing I have not seen is a viewer on the cam itself. We would like a viewer on the cam so we can check to see the activity when we go out in the field (to hunt), I know there are external viewers you can buy but it just one more thing to haul into the woods, what do these external viewers run?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

One of my Leaf Rivers has the internal viewer and I never use it because early in the season, when the mosquitoes and horse flys are bad, the last thing I want to do is sit there and get eaten. Plus the screen is small, 1.25 inches by 1.25 inches, on the marginal pictures, you wouldn't see a thing. Lots more convenient to have two memory cards per camera, swap them out, and sit at my computer and view them. Plus sometimes, after a week, I can have 120 pictures!!! That would take awhile at the camera!! And if I have one I like, I can save it. Viewing at your computer is the way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
archerystud

USDA3,

The external viewer is extra. I do software development for a living so I have a few laptops.

I don't view the photo's out in the woods. I have 2 512MB flash cards to store pictures. So when I go in the woods, I just swap the cards out. I believe I paid $30 per memory card.

I really like the Cuddeback, I would recommend saving a few bucks and going for the 2.0 Megapixel. I think it would be plenty but the wife bought me their best for a present so I'm not going to complain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DooWap

My birthday is in 5 days, I hope I get a present like that smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gofishleech

I do not have an infraid yet be will soon. Las tyear I placed my camera on several srcapes and only got a bucks picture one time, several bucks but they only tolerated the flash once. Now there may be other factors to only one buck picture but I will not take the chance any more. My cmeras that are out now get mutible shots of the same deer so it is not bothering them on the salt licks but on scrapes I would be carefull.

A dissapointment was I just got the wildlefe eye vedio system. I placed it where I had a still camera and it cut way down the number deer that visited that site. The sound or the infer-red is scaring them. I would see them backing away from it so it will not go on a scape eaither.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Canuck

Archerystud: I really need your help on the cuddeback. I see U have the cuddeback and are into softwear development. I tried to email U my problems but don't seem to be able to send it. My email address is jstinson@mts.net. I posted my problems under another post on this same field so MAYBEEEEEEEEEE U can tell what I am doing wrong. THANKSSSSSSSSSSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • JIvers
      Thanks for the reply. Ya, McNally's gets pounded right away. I looked at the ice in front of Schafer's in Onalaska yesterday; there was about 3.5" of ice near the docks, and then it got thinner in a hurry. Apparently someone got wet feet there earlier in the day.  I ended up at Lawrence Lake Marina just north of Brownsville yesterday. There was probably 4" of good clear ice, much better than what I found in  La Crosse. Will post pictures later, but I got one nice largemouth on a tip up at the Marina, one 10" perch, and a couple small perch.  Today I drove around Winona, and fished the backwater pond east of Latsch Island on the west side of the road. The ice there was...not real good.  I stuck close to shore on 3" of not-real-clear ice after my spud bar saved me from a cold bath a little farther out.  I caught a few small perch there, and a bunch of small bluegills. Nothing worth keeping, and nothing on the tip-up. Was expecting the ice to be a little better than what I found, but what do you do?    
    • leech~~
      No Lake Trout in the lake?
    • leech~~
      Thanks Guys.  Starting to feel better about may be getting the sled and porty out there.
    • kelly-p
      Miss the old days too shaky, we had some fun didn't we.  I don't miss working on the lake tho.
    • kelly-p
      Westwind, Roger's and JR's that I know of. Not sure of the cost.
    • Rick G
      Roughly 11inches... there were a few brave people who drove mini vans out
    • Wanderer
      @leech~~ There was all of 10 inches where I was but I’d say it was a tick more.
    • MNoutdoors99
      Thanks for your input, I got myself setup with braid and a fluoro leader and its working great!
    • MNoutdoors99
      Hey all, I am looking to catch a decent perch in the 7" or bigger range and soon because in my class at school we get to taxidermy a fish and I would like to do a yellow perch, I have fished little Pulaski for 2 days and Buffalo for one and caught nothing on Buffalo lake and some bluegills and bass on little pulaski. Anyone got advice on spots in little Pulaski or Buffalo lake or just another lake near by Buffalo as well for perch? Thanks - jim
    • tview
      Thanks Moose  Fun meeting up with the Group today Fun Day . Good times.. i