Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ccarlson

Suggestions for new semi auto 30-06

22 posts in this topic

I'm intersted in a new semi auto 30-06. Looked today at the Browning BAR Stalker. Felt very nice and the weight felt good.

Also would consider the Remington for a couple hundred less although it was a little heavier. One question on the remingtons is with what I think was the woodsmaster version. Is it the same action, different look? Looking for input on either one.

I'm looking for any places I can see a comparison of these two or other similar semi auto's. Any hunting magazine comparisons that would be good to read?

Also looking at putting a leopold VX I or VXII 3-9 on it. Should I look at something different (like the Nikon) for something in the $200-$300 range?

Thanks for any help in the decision and fact finding mission.

ccarlson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sporter style auto rifles do not have a very high standard, especially on accuracy, but the browning would be worth the money, another one to consider is the new benelli's... they've been getting pretty good ratings in the past few months. The Rem is said to jam up, and is less accurate than the Browning and Benelli

For the scope, look through as many as you can before you buy, leupold may be the higher quality, but for some people, they're eyes like another brand and it may be a cheap model, but have a more crisp immage just due to that ideviduals eyes, and the coatings on the lenses.

3-9 is a good level for deer, but if your taking longer shots, the ranging reticles are worth the money.(balistidots, boone&crocket, varminter, tac-dot) they make the ranging much easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my old man has an older Browning Bar II Safari 270. Loves it except one little problem. It weighs about 12 pounds it feels like. He loves it other then the weight but my buddy is looking for a nice semi aut and Remington makes one also that he is looking at I think it's a woodsmaster? don't quote me on that one but something like that and he likes the feel better with the remington then the browning. But brownings are a very dang good gun and if your looking for a scope may I suggest a Scheels 3.5-10X42 I have two of them, my cousin has acouple and my dad has one now too. It is a very clear gun and for the price of 200 bucks its very very hard to beat and it comes with a lifetime warranty. There waranty is something is wrong you bring it to Scheels with it still attached they remove it replace it with a new one and get back bore sighted and your done. Just my suggestion for a scope if your looking. I was looking at 300 dollar scopes and nothing really compaired for the price and quality of that scope so take a look before purchasing.

Code-man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not much of a fan of autoloading rifles, I prefer a bolt or even a lever.

If an auto is you passion go with the Browning. It is worth the extra $$ for a much higher quality rifle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The BAR is the better of the two autos you talk of.

Not a fan of auto's myself, but all my gun porn

mags have had good things to say of the Browning.

I know someone who has a Remington, and has had some

extractor issues in the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've honestly never been able to understand the love affair with autoloaders. Personally, most of us gain nothing by the action and really lose because of the weight. Some of the earlier models also sacrificed some accuracy or so I have been told although I think the accuracy issue is more related to second, third, fourth, shots. All I know is that while hunting I can't help but laugh to myself every time I hear what is obviously someone using an autoloader on a deer when I hear 4 or 5 reports from the gun in rapid succession. My only hope is that the shots aren't aimed my way as they are probably progressively aimed higher and higher which means those bullets are potentially traveling further and further. Aren't too many that can shoot that fast in succession with any hint of real accuracy. It's a wonder there aren't more wounded deer out there than there are.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with everyone on forgetting the auto. Besides when you get used to a bolt you can be quite fast. More accurate and less likely to jam up if you need that second shot. Ive seen more deer get away from a jammed auto than anything else. Plus you save a little money from the bolt and could put that towards a higher quality scope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input so far but please don't hijack my post into a bashing of semi auto loaders. I've been hunting every type of non semi auto loaders for years and I just want some simple advice on a comparison of these auto loader guns. Thanks for sticking to that topic unless someone wants to start a new post wink.gif

Was in again today looking and am now leaning towards the new longtrac Browning design. Have pretty much decided to go Browning over Remington I guess at this point. It comes in at 6 pounds 15 ounces in the 30-06. The problem is that I really want the synthetic stock mainly because that is what comes with the matte finish barrel and they won't be available until later October at the earliest from what Browning customer service told me.

Compared Nikon Monarch scopes today with the Leopold VX series. Actually leaning towards the VX I which was so close to the VX II that I couldn't justify the extra $100 and both were optically better than the Nikon although the nikon had function features I liked better such as the smoothness of the variable dial and focus ring.

thanks again and keep the reviews coming if you have any.

ccarlson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I shot a Remington 742 for years. I got a lot of deer with it too. I grew to really dislike the trigger on it. Creepy, draggy, not pecrise at all. It was a good faithful gun, and never let me down. From shooting varmint rifles, I could not take the trigger feel anymore.

The 742 shot well, for the most part, grouping 1.5 inches at 100 yards off sandbags. With handloads, it would shoot even beter. Most of my deer were one shot kills, the farthest being 190 yards. On a couple of occasions, I was able to shoot two deer with a quick follow up shot. The biggest drawback was that doggone trigger.

I loved it as a still hunting gun. Nice short barrel, quick pointing, and not real heavy.

About 10 years ago, I switched to a bolt and could not be happier. The trigger is crisp and percise, which makes for better accuracy. One of my auto-loading friends warned me that my days of being able to shoot two deer at once were gone. I proved him wrong a couple years later. I can cycle the bolt fairly quickly and be back on target. If the deer are not spooked, and don't know you are there, they often stand still, trying to figure out what is going on.

If I had to go to a semi auto, I would choose the BAR. My brother has shot one for years, and it has been an excellent gun. More accurate than my Remington, with a MUCH better trigger feel. The newer Browning models are good looking rigs, having slimmed down a bit from the old classic blocky look.

Benelli has a nice looking rig too, but $$$$$! If I am gonna spend that kind of money, I'd rather get a nice bolt gun.

My wife wants to get a semi auto, and I will oblige her. She shoots a bolt now, but just is not that good at cycling the bolt. She is very fussy about her shot selection. A couple times she has short stroked the bolt, and been left wanting. For that reason, I agree with her wish for a semi auto, and can understand others wanting one too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used a Browning BAR (Belgian) in 30-06 last fall for my moose hunt, and have a few thoughts for you. The gun came to me after sitting unfired in a cabinet for about 30 years. Obviously, a thorough cleaning was the beginning!

I pulled off the old Weaver straight 6X, and put on a Burris 2-7 - and that's when the fun started.... The first round or two would go just dandy, and then the shots would start "walking" low and to the left - up to 7 inches!

There was some contact between the forearm and the barrel, so I carefully reamed out the forearm, varnished the barrel channel, and put things back together.

About that time the Burris 2-7 crapped out. (Thank goodness for lifetime warranties!) Unfortunately, I was now only a month out from season, so I pulled a Burris Fullfield II 3-9 off one of my varmint rigs and started over....

After much experimentation with various bullets/weights/manufacturers I found a couple of brands that shot extremely well. By "extremely well" I mean sub-MOA out of a cold barrel. The round I settled on was Winchester Supreme 180 gr. Fail-Safe. The silver casing and charcoal bullet look pretty cool - always a bonus. Just a bit spendy, but in the overall grand scheme of things what's a few extra bucks for ammo?

The BAR is fun to shoot, and I was tossing some pretty serious rounds downrange but didn't suffer too much from the recoil. The weight of the gun and the autoloader function suck up a bit of the recoil, meaning I shot in shirtsleeves without a problem. Loading up the magazine in the field (with wet fingers and muddy conditions) is a pain in the rear, but that's the one downside I found.

I had heard the stories of horrid inaccuracy, and when I started out with the BAR I was ready to toss it aside, but stuck with it. Glad I did. I wouldn't hesitate to take a poke out to 400 yards with a good rest and a stationary target. Maybe the one in my cabinet is an exception, but the accuracy issue appears to be overblown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey I love my auto, I shoot once and automaticly break it open take the emty out and put a new round in. Works every time, I think, never have shot the secound round well hunting. oupss, I did miss my bigest buck the first shot and he mistakenly gave me a secound chance. I have no faith in auto's but if that is what you realy want then go for it because you will never be happy with anything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carlson-

I may be in the minority but I own and have for about 15 years a Rem 7400 semi-auto woodsmaster. I have never (knock on wood) had a issue with loading, ejecting, or hitting the bulls eye. I think it is a very solid and reliable gun that I've used for everything for whitetails to bear to mule deer and antelope in montana. I have rapped thru multiple clips more than once. I do clean very thoroughly as I would with any gun. I would buy another. Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the input. It is all very helpful.

DeepSinker,

I know what you are saying about the Remington. I have friends that have the same gun you are talking about and they shoot great and have not been a problem.

As a matter of fact, what I am shooting right now is a Remington 30-06 pump and it has been a great gun. I simply want to make the switch to the semi auto because I shoot a lot of upland and waterfowl with a Benelli semi auto 12 guage so I am just more used to a semi auto. When the big buck comes out, I want to have an action I am used to dealing with in my hands so I can focus on shot placement and getting back on target if I need to. There are times, no matter how careful we are, that a second shot can mean a lost deer versus a found deer. Besides, my experience from observation with semi auto's is that most people exagerate the accuracy and reliability issues semi autos have.

The main reason I am going with the Browning is that I really like the way it feels (balance, weight etc.) when I shoulder it and it just seems to fit me better. Something I feel is the most important no matter how much a gun costs.

It seems now that I am down to either buying the wood stock with the blued barrel now or waiting and maybe not getting it until next year if I decide to wait for the synthetic stock with the matte barrel. Tough decision for me.

thanks again,

ccarlson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the accuracy difference between semi-auto and bolt is significant enough for the average joe blow hunter however, there is definitely a difference. There are very few competitive shooters that use semi-autos for a reason although for some events it is virtually impossible to compete without a semi-auto.

My dad used a Remington 742 all his life and I don't recall him ever having problems. What I believe he liked about that one was the short barrel.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I shoot a Remington 7400 and have never had any trouble with it. In Wisconsin we have all kinds of tags and I sat on a drive one day with instructions to fill as many as possible. I had four deer come out together and three were on the ground when gutting time came. No bolt could have done it and I don't think my accuracy was too darn bad...

Its all a matter of knowing your weapon and choosing the right shot. The difference in accuracy between a bolt and an auto in the field is a complete non-factor!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, my Browning A-bolt can and did. It wasn't a drive but four showed up and let just say 1 bullet, 1 kill (3 bullets loaded). Had I remember to load one more after chambering a round, it would had been 4 dead deer. My A-bolt cycle so fast that the noise from the cycling can not be distinguish from the shot itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that I omitted one word in my previous post and I'd like to make the following correction in my statement.

Quote:

I agree that the accuracy difference between semi-auto and bolt is
not
significant enough for the average joe blow hunter however, there is definitely a difference.


Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ccarlson,

My fault for bring up the auto over bolt issue. I should know by now that it can be a touchy subject.

To each his own and personnel preferances vary.

On the scope issue you may also want to look at a Burris. They are considerably less $$ then the Nikon and Leopod and I absolutly love them. I have signature scopes on several guns and they are tough as nails.

Food for thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of years ago I hunted with my cousins husband, and he had a Browning semi-auto in .308. I am for the most part a bolt action guy, but I would of taken his Browning, if he gave it to me, in a heartbeat.That was one sweet rifle.I may have to go and get me one of those Brownings autos, one of these days.Nothing wrong with an auto. Both my shotguns are autos(SX2's).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a 7400 Rem Weathermaster (the synthetic stock) and she works pretty well for me! knock on wood, no jam ups yet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 20 yr old Rem 7400 as does my bro. my dad and grandpa have 740 and 742's. they can be jammie if not kept clean, and do have the remington drag trigger, but of my last 18 deer I've used 19 shells. Same with my bro's 7400.

In fact, he hunts exclusively in Wyoming and the rancher there now prefers he use his 7400 auto over his Ruger bolt because he downed 2 elk with 2 shots a few years back.

It ain't how big the hole is, it's where the hole is that counts.

Gadget

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Rem. 7400 O6 and a Browning A Bolt .270. I like both of them and they both have there strong points. My bolt is more accurate I can consistently shoot a group of 3 shells in the size of a quarter. But the O6 isn't to bad either not as tight of a pattern but still with in 2" groupings. A 2" grouping should get you a deer and if it doesn't I would say the problem is more of a user problem than a equipment problem. I use both alot though out the season. When I am doing drives I usually carry my O6 so that I have the speed of a auto loader and on more than one occation it has made the difference. If I am posting or am in a area where I expect a long shot then I carry my bolt. If I were to buy another auto loader I think it would be either the Browning Bar or the Benelli. My dad has hunted with a Model 742 and that gun has shot more deer with one shot than any I know of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • fishingstar
      I use a big zip tie that will slide on and off.
    • OhioVike
      Nice catch Cliff. Were you rigging or bobbering?
    • hayseed
      Probably not what your wanting to hear,  but I bit the bullet for an LX High speed transducer a couple years ago for my LX-6. Run it a couple times before removing it from my boat and going with a Lowrance. I found that on plane I frequently lost sonar and hard to see in bright sun. Hard to eliminate the excess noise as well. Ended up taking a real hard beating on getting rid of it also. Just my opinion, but I recommend checking out the Garmin Strikers or comparable Lowrance instead for the money. Love my LX for the ice, but it will remain my ice unit. 
    • ZachD
      How did you do?
    • ZachD
      So I am torn I want to put a graph in my smaller boat.. I love my lx 6 flasher and am thinking about getting the high speed transducer for it and just going with that but I don't get why they charge $199 for it when bird and lowrance ducers are far less   I almost pulled the trigger on the lowrance hook 4 with down scan and chart plotter at gander for $179  I don't care about the chart plotter really as I have a big hand held gps that I use in that boat and that screen is larger than the hook 4 when you have it split plotter and graph they only had the display model left and wouldn't go lower price so I passed   If I can find the hook 4 at another gander that doesn't have the chart plotter for cheaper I may go with that   Does any one have experience with the lx on open water I hear it is at par with an lowrance elite 5 I am kind of wanting to go with that but don't know   What would you do run the lx open water or go with hook 4 with down scan  
    • bmc
      We survived our trip!  LOL   Fishing was steady.   We caught 30 walleyes in 3 days of fishing.  Usually fished from 11 am to 4 pm.  The 'eyes were running small, lots of 11 to 13 3/4" fish, but we did get 3 keepers.  We also kept a few nice perch and crappies.  We also caught a few snake northerns.   Jigging w/ chubs produced the best, but I did catch a few 'eyes on the crawler lindy rig combo.  Mid lake structure and underwater points off of islands all produced fish.  Mayflys were hatching, but the fish were still hungry. I did catch a 4-5 lb channel cat in the Savanna River one evening.   We stayed in the south loop of the Army Corp campground.  We liked that we were w/in about 30 yds of our boat which we kept at the dock.  The river on the north side of us and the lake on the south side offered a nice breeze to keep things cool and the bugs away for the most part.  Con's were the campsites are small and were too close together.  Also no turn around at the end of the south loop road.  The north loop was beautiful, spacious campsites, but surrounded by swamp and we heard the skeeters were bad at dusk.  Definitely want some thermacells or a screen tent to enjoy the evening by the sounds of things.  Also the docks aren't close/in view of the campsites.   We would definitely stay there again, on the north loop, in May or Sept. after the skeeters have died down a bit.   Staff was friendly, shower houses were nice, boat landings were nice.     Brian
    • MedicineMan
      Went out Thursday for a few hours. Caught a 28" Walleye along with a handful of nice sized Bass.
    • knoppers
      thanks for the report.
    • JBMasterAngler
    • JBMasterAngler
      Just got back from our 34th annual Grand Marais trip. Weather, and how bad it was, was the theme. At one point or another, it rained every single day we were there! The wind was miserable he last couple days as well. Really affected our fishing plans, as we had to cancel out on some of our normal lakes, and fish some less than desirable backup lakes.   As per tradition, we left in the middle of the night and pulled up to the Lester River just a few minutes before sunrise. Didn't catch anything there. Also got skunked at the Talmadge and French rivers. I got free admission at Tom's logging camp on account it was Father's Day  and as always, kids had fun feeding the animals. I did catch a few little rainbows out of sucker, knife, and Stewart rivers. Had our traditional "fisherman's breakfast" at McDonalds in Two Harbors. We stopped at the silver creek tunnel, and that was the first time I've been at the overlook since it was actually part of the highway back in '94. We rolled into Grand Marais at about 3:30 and had to wait out a rain storm before putting the boat out on Kimball Lake. We lost several trout, and in the end, only my 6 year old son caught 2 rainbows.   Monday we fished Greenwood Lake, and as was the case with my 2 older kids, my 3 year old daughter caught her very first fish here...a smallmouth bass! Between all of us, we caught about 130 bass, all of which were pretty small. Unfortunately no lake trout. However, a big surprise occurred...while casting for bass, I caught a herring! Then a few minutes later, my son caught one also! Never would have guessed I'd ever catch one in the summer, let alone 2!   Fished a "secret lake" on Tuesday and caught quite a few northerns. They were all either 5 pounds, or 6 inches long, nothing in between. My son caught an 8 pound, 33 incher, which ended up being the biggest fish of the trip. We was screaming, and excited, and wanted me to take his fishing pole. But after about 10 minutes he finally got it in so I could net it. He's still bragging about it. My 3 year old also caught her 2nd ever fish, a perch, which ended up being the only one of the trip.   Went up to Saganaga on Wednesday. I spent I don't know how many hours trying to catch lake trout, but didn't find any!  Finally gave up and ventured deep into red rock bay for the first time ever. Really nice back there, wish I would've went there first. Fishing was ok, considering the weather was starting to get bad. Caught the biggest bass of the trip, a hair over 18 inches. On the drive back we seen a bear. Ironically it was walking down the road to black bear lodge at Poplar Lake.   Biggest disappointment came on Thursday. The plan was to fish both Hungry Jack and West Bearskin lakes. The wind was terrible, and coming straight from the west. Had hungry jack not had the reputation as a big bass producer, I wouldn't have went here. Unfortunately the big bass weren't around, nor any bass for that matter. Only caught 4 small bass. Kids caught about a dozen or so sunnies from the dock at the resort, some of which were decent size. We didn't even bother with bearskin. There's no way we would be able to launch our boats in that wind. We went to Loon Lake instead. In the limited time we were there, we caught about 30 tiny bass. My 9 year old daughter also caught her first rock bass. I tried for lakers, and marked a lot of them, but didn't catch any.    So since we didn't fish West Bearskin as planned, we penciled it in for Friday. Knowing the weather was going to be bad, we picked Poplar Lake as our backup. I drove up to Mayhew Lake to start, because I wanted to check out the launch. I was able to get my boat down the launch, but it was a real tight fit. Nice little lake. We saw a mommy moose with 2 babies laying right on the shoreline. I got sick of trolling, so I decided to cast cranks along the drop offs of the one small stretch of shoreline that was out of the wind (relatively speaking). Hooked into a big fish! Got excited because I thought I finally had a lake trout! It was a northern!  never thought I'd be disappointed in catching a 5.5 pound pike, but that's what I was. Didn't bother going to Bearskin, as I knew the wind was too bad again. Went to Poplar, which is a lake I do not like! As is typical, the fishing was no good! He weather was bi polar! It would be bright and sunny, then rain for 20 minutes. Did that the whole rest of the day! Only caught 1 little pike and  1 little bass. Got excited for a minute, as whitefish started surfacing around my boat in the evening. I was hoping I could catch 1 or 2, but nope!    Saturday we were supposed to fish Two Island for a few hours before going home. But it was pouring rain. We didn't even bother driving around to different boat launches. So the trip ended on a sour note, but we still had lots of fun, seen a moose, had our donuts (I highly recommend the bacon maple longjohn by the way), and went to Sven & Ole's. I was going to go camping in Ely in July, but I think we'll come back to Grand Marais instead, and try to make up for what we missed out on due to the weather. IMG_6122.MOV