Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Andrewsdad

Baiting for deer

Recommended Posts

Andrewsdad

Deer baiting is becoming a much bigger problem. I hunted an area last year that was completely devoid of deer when just the weeks before it was full. Found out later that some guys with Potlatch land next to the public land had place a huge pile of corn. The tracks around the feeder told the whole story. The deer were hanging out around there and not moving like they were prior to the season. Oh yeah, they also had built a four season tower blind right above the corn pile. Some real sportsman! What do you propose should happen to these guys? Seems to me they are destroying deer hunting in northern Mn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

Contact the local CO and let him know and they will take care of the problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sachem longrifle

Deer baiting is out of control in wisconsin. That is the main reason why I hung up the deer rifle. Its not just they use a small pile of corn or apples, they will bring huge truckloads of bait. So the competition was who could have the biggest bait pile and draw all the deer from whose land and make them nocturnal mad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
love to hunt

I agree with Harvy. Let your local conservation officer know about it. There are very specific rules that cover this and if they are tuely hunting over the pile that is poaching.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Riverratpete

Turn em in! mark it with a gps give the local co the coord's. Only way were going to get control of this growing problem is by ethical hunters not allowing it(baiting) to occur and thats by reporting it everytime you see it...sooner or later once some of the unethical hunters get pinched hard the word will get out to the other goof balls that could go either way...If they want to hunt over bait piles go to Wisc, Mich or Texas, then they can go brag to their bar buddies about what GREAT hunters they are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sportfish1850

Quote:

Found out later that some guys with Potlatch land next to the public land had place a huge pile of corn.


First of all be sure you know this actually did happen. A lot of "a guy did this" factual stories start out as "some guy probably did this" guesses by a guy far removed from the person who ends up taking action. But if you know for sure this did happen then in addition to calling the DNR, also call the Potlatch land lease manager as feeding is a direct violation of the Potlatch lease agreement. Guys like that have no pla ce in the woods so get their access to the woods revoked. If you go to the potlatch land lease site you should be able to find the tract number on which the violation occured. However, without any proof (pictures or something) its just your word against theirs so I doubt anything will happen the first time. But once the same group of guys on that lease has several reports against them or a DNR violation its will build up some credibility and Potlatch will likely revoke their lease.

Potlatch is doing what it can to make sure its lease holders are good stewards of the woods and game animals. Baiters and those who artificially feed (linked to Chronic Wasting) are not people they want in the woods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
deerhuntr8

Please read forum policy again prior to posting. FM in no way supports illegal activity. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Buckslayer

Ahh.. the old Deer baiting argument....Happens every year here at FM. I'm sure we'll see the same agruements as last year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Powerstroke

Baiting is totally legal up until 10 days before the season. Then the area must be completely devoid of any food stuffs.

Last year I turned in a group for baiting on the property I had permission to hunt. I realize that I kinda put myself in jeapordy by doing so, but the law is the law.

They were caught and the CO found 2 other bait piles on the property. All of them had to be cleaned up in 24hrs and they wree still fined. I was kicked off the property by the landowners for getting them tickets. Oh well. I received a nice reward in the mail from the TIP hotline, but thats not the point.

If everyone turns in the baiters when you find them, you can do your little part to discourage baiting in your area.

The worst part was the CO said he had to fine the dad in front of his two sons. Nice learning experience. Now the dad will badmouth the CO to his kids further teaching them the wrong things about hunting and ethics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2thepointsetters

I tried to turn in some hunters baiting two days before last years deer season and when I called the local CO's office they didn't even care. So I took care of it on my own which probably would have been bad if the people with the bait would have caught me destroying it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

If they didnt care then I would have called the main office in St. Paul.Then the CO could have explained why he didnt care,it is his job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

What leads you to believe they didn't care? I find it hard to believe, although not impossible, but hard nonetheless.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2thepointsetters

When I called the CO's office I was told by the person who answered the phone that there was nothing they could do about it. Which I thought was really weird myself. Now I know a couple of CO's up here and I will contact them directly if it happens again this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

Nothing they can do if it is before the season.You cannot hunt over bait in Minnesota unless some new laws were passed.Yes,Wisconson I believe and North Dakota you can hunt over a bait pile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ddsbyday

Who do you ticket? The dealer or the addict. In northern minnesota for the recreational baiter they buy the corn at the local gas station, grocerey store. They are selling a legal drug. Make the buyers sign off. I am sure that with a little announcement that the DNR will be following up on corn buys that stand out you might weed out the recreational baiter. Just a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

People could be buying corn for squirrels or other critters.If I was a CO and caught someone hunting by a bait pile he would either have to do alot of explaining or he would get a ticket.The states you cannot hunt by a bait pile.If you didnt put it there but you were hunting by it,you may be in trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rippinlips

What do you guys consider baiting, hunting right on top of it. hunting the trail to it (what) be specific on what you consider baiting, just because there's corn, apples and what not around the area does not mean it's baiting you have to take a good look around the area. I could hunt a farmers pasture where he feeds his livestock and that is not considered baiting. Somebody could have a bird feeder in the yard and you might not know it and you might be 200 yards from there yard hunting the trail that leads right to it and not even know it. There are gray lines when it comes to baiting. By any means do I in any why approve of baiting it's unsportmen like. Just make sure for certain before you turn someone in that they are indeed baiting. That's all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

From the pages of the regulations for 2006:

Quote:

"Bait" is defined as grain, fruit, vegetables, nuts, hay, or other food that is capable of attracting or enticing deer and that has been transported and placed by a person...

Hunters are not allowed to use bait or hunt in the vicinity of bait that the hunter knows about or has reason to know about or hunt in the vicinity where bait has been placed within the previous ten days.


It seesm that this rule is somewhat of a judgement call on the part of the CO. Basically, it's best to avoid the situation.

I do not believe it is unlawful to feed deer but it is unlawful to hunt where you have been feeding them within the last 10 days.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      Applications due by Saturday, Dec. 16  The Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are seeking qualified applicants to serve on the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.  “The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee plays a critical role in helping us achieve the vision Minnesotans have for use of the Parks and Trails Legacy Funds and creates an accessible and equitable, integrated system of state and regional parks and trails in Minnesota,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. The purpose of the committee is to promote and coordinate implementation of the 25-Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Funding recommendations for individual projects is not a part of this committee’s work. The plan can be found at on the parks and trails legacy plan page. 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment by Minnesota voters. The committee is planning a series of regional events during the year to celebrate Legacy accomplishments and engage Minnesotans on the question, “Why Parks and Trails Legacy Matters.”  Information about the events will be available in January on Facebook (/PTLegacyMN) and on the committee website (www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac). The deadline for applications is Saturday, Dec. 16. The committee is made up of 17 members, including, to the practical extent possible, diverse geographical and demographic representation. The committee has a mixture of park and trail professionals and Minnesota residents. Committee members should have expertise in two or more of the four strategic pillars of the plan: Connect people and the outdoors. Acquire land and create opportunities. Take care of what we have. Coordinate among partners. Terms are two years with the option of being reappointed for a maximum of three terms. Meetings are scheduled every two months around the state, with an option to attend remotely. Interested individuals may complete the application form online at www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac/member-application or print it out and return it to Paul Purman, Department of Natural Resources, Box 39, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. Anyone with questions can contact Paul via phone at 651-259-5643 or email at paul.purman@state.mn.us. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Big bay did not look to be completely frozen over yesterday afternoon. Broken up and refrozen by McKinley Landing. Cliff
    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • opsirc
      Any new ice reports?  Looking For s something about Nicholas or strand
    • rundrave
      what if you pull a wheel house to Mn from out of state or are a non resident?