Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Johnny_Namakan

Resale of tax forfeit lands

Recommended Posts

Johnny_Namakan

This sort of ties in a little with the thread on perm. stands on public lands. I was wondering what your thoughts are on the resale of tax forfeit lands. We have 80 acres up around Orr, in St. Louis Cty. Nobody owns any land anywhere near us. The closest private land to our shack is probably 5 miles, as the crow flies. That didn't used to be the case though. We bought this land 7 years ago, and of course we bought a plat map of the area around us. There are somewhere around 5 or 6 different 80 acre parcels that are listed as "tax forfeit" around our land. This is land that used to be private but has since become public lands. But because of it's location, nobody can get back to this area. We have access through a forestry gate that allows us to get within a mile of our property. We have to ATV the rest of the way in. But we travel 10 miles past the gate to even get there. Without gate access, nobody can get back there. Unless you want to walk! I think this land should be available to the public for purchase. It's not that we want/need any additional land, but somebody should be able to own it. It's not like I'm saying they should sell of parts of National Forests and National Parks. But I am saying that this land should be returned to the general public. More and more people are wanting to buy hunting land, but can't find any. We looked for years. It had nothing to do with money at all, we just simply couldn't find any in the areas we wanted. I say return these tax forfeit lands to the public and allow us to manage the property. I'm in the forest industry and have been for 7 years now. I even graduated from the U of M with a Wood and Paper Science Engineering Degree. That being said, private landowners have proven themselves time and time again to be some of the best forest stewards there are. We do a magnificant job of maintaining our forests for us and future generations. We also, "protect", our lands from over harvesting, which cause even aged forest conditions and the influx of pioneer species of trees, i.e. Aspen. Don't get me wrong, logging is a necessity, and my livelihood depends on it. But, nobody likes to see clearcuts everywhere you look either. We do plan on having our property select cut in the upcoming years, but that is something we will monitor closely. Anyway, I'm rambling. What are your thoughts on forfeit lands?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Powerstroke

I owuld support something like this if there were certain restrictions placed on the property similar to conservation easements. If somrthing like this became commonplace I would not like to see million dollar manions pop up on land that had a purpose of hunting. As well I would hope that there aren't huge paved driveways into these areas. Inorder for this to work I htink there would need to be lots of rules.

Although I agree for the most part that landowners are pretty good stewards of the land, it is also the land owners that fill in swamps, regrade watershed areas and hire loggers to strip their land simply for the financial gains. I do agree that selective timber harvest is critial (I'm in Forestry too!!) but the public in general isn't smart enough to manage large tracts of land on their own. People like to think that owning land means they can do whatever they want with it.

I would support the idea.....that way an average guy like me might have a chance of buying land for less than $2500/acre.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

Tax forfeited lands are owned by the county. Some counties sell them, some counties don't sell them. Even the counties that sell them usually sell only a few of the tax forfeit lands they hold.

Sales are usually once per year, auction sales. Most parcels put up for sale are ones that will generate lots of bidding, ie. road access, lots of neighboring private land owners, etc. The huge blocks with no road access and no private land owners won't sell for much and won't generate much tax revenue for the county, better for the county to hang onto them, let them appreciate, let the timber value grow, etc.

Call the county courthouse and ask about tax forfeit sales. If it's a good property, be prepared to bid against realtors for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

Why not leave it as tax forfeit land but open it up for public hunting? That way everybody can use it, not just one owner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Johnny_Namakan

Perch,

I checked with my county a few months ago regarding the auctions of the forfeit lands. They are once in the Spring and once in the Fall. They said they list the lands that are up for auction one month before the auction on their website. As you mentioned, the lands that are listed are almost all in the Duluth area and seam to be pretty much residential.

I agree with powerstroke, I don't want these lands to become residential either. I'm talking about these 80 acre parcels in the middle of nowhere that for the most part would only be hunting lands. I know Forest Segmentation is another consideration by the county. They don't like to see a couple parcels of private land stuck in the middle of state/county/federal lands. More difficult to manage (is the short answer)! Still, it would be nice for these to be returned to the public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Johnny_Namakan

Blackjack,

In some cases I agree. If it is currently being used by the public then fine. The 400 acres I used as my example, is not being used by the general public. It's ten miles down a locked forestry gate. I don't want to get political here, I'm pretty much middle of the road, but the Dems want a roadless forest. All gates are currently locked. The current administration has been trying to get the forest open to the public. We had to fight for months to get gate access. The only reason they granted it to us is because we own land beyond the gate. The general public can't even reach this land. We've had our land for 7 years, and not one single deer season has anybody been on these lands. It's a shame. We actually would like to see some people back there to help move the deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
snapcrackpop

Conservation groups like Pheasants Forever, or rather MN Deer Hunters Association have a lot of buying power. They then turn the land over to the DNR to be a WMA.

Is this an option up there?

Personally I would vote to preserve whatever wildlife lands we have left for our future generations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tealitup

Be careful with this issue. If tax forfeited lands come up for sale and it had trees on them the paper companies will usually outbid anyone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bela0023

County Land Departments have very good professional foresters who manage the tax forfeited lands. They balance managing the lands for timber production and wildlife habitat. And unless posted closed for a specific reason, tax forfeit lands are open to public hunting.

Revenue earned form tax forfeit managed lands are given back to the school districts in which the timber is harvested to help fund schools.

We also need to preserve some of these larger publicly owned parcels of land for everybody to hunt on. Without public hunting grounds, we would lose a huge number of our hunting population! I know many people who like to hunt miles back from the main access road and get away from the crowds.

So all in all, I say enjoy the situation you've got, it sounds like you've got a great big hunting area to enjoy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Powerstroke

I doubt you'll have competition from the paper companies. They are selling off most of their land right now too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WalleyeWeasel

most of these remote areas were forfieted by lumber companies and mining companies, and if it goes for public bids the average Joe still wont be able to afford it. Because these same companies will buy it back , especially if they know there are minerals in the area.

And there are alot of minerals in Minnesota. This is why the state and counties wont sell it. This is going to be "THE TOURIST STATE" and we dont want mines and barron land here!!

So enjoy this public land, all to yourself, while you can,

Cuz the tourists are a commin !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Fishing Frenzy
      Yeah looks like the 2nd weekend in December if we're lucky before you can ice fish this area. Going to be another late year on the ice.
    • PRO-V
      Next year you will have to buy one for wearing long underwear or pac boots.
    • fish_hunt_guy
      Love the reports Smuts. Looks like another great season. Keep it going!
    • slammer
      It just never ends in this state.  Tax, tax, tax.  Where does this money go?  Whats next?   A tag for your vehicle to drive on the ice?
    • leech~~
      Fun for some folks that went exploring early ice from a few years ago. 
    • tfin
      Hi Cookie,  a buddy and I are going up this weekend.  Will they bite much after dark or is the water too mucky this early.  I appreciate any info.  Thanks
    • papadarv
      Yesterday the MN DNR announced a license requirement change effective NOW for this ice season. All Wheel House and other fishing structures which cannot be folded / collapsed must be licensed even if you remove the house when you get off the ice. 
    • Rick
      Harvest climbs 16 percent from 2016 Minnesota firearms hunters registered 161,057 deer through the third weekend of deer season, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  Preliminary results through the third weekend show that the number of deer registered was up 16 percent from 2016. Of the deer harvested, 53 percent were bucks, compared to 63 percent during the same period in 2016. In Zone 1, in northeastern Minnesota, total firearms harvest was up 36 percent. In Zone 2, which covers the majority of the state and runs from Canada to Iowa, harvest was up 10 percent and Zone 3, in southeastern Minnesota, was down 5 percent. “The conditions were generally good for hunters participating in the last week of the Zone 1 season and for the start of the 3B season in the southeast,” said Erik Thorson, acting big game program leader, “which provided a boost to the statewide firearms harvest.” Based upon the number of antlerless permits available and the number of permit areas that allow multiple deer to be taken, the DNR is projecting the 2017 total deer harvest to be around 200,000. The 2016 total harvest was 173,213 and to date firearms and archery hunters have harvested about 180,000 deer this year. In much of Minnesota, the firearms deer season ended Nov. 12, and the northern rifle zone season ended Nov. 19. The late southeast firearms deer season is open through Sunday, Nov. 26. The muzzleloader season begins Saturday, Nov. 25, and continues through Sunday, Dec. 10. More information on deer management can be found at mndnr.gov/deer. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Applications due by Saturday, Dec. 16  The Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are seeking qualified applicants to serve on the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.  “The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee plays a critical role in helping us achieve the vision Minnesotans have for use of the Parks and Trails Legacy Funds and creates an accessible and equitable, integrated system of state and regional parks and trails in Minnesota,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. The purpose of the committee is to promote and coordinate implementation of the 25-Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Funding recommendations for individual projects is not a part of this committee’s work. The plan can be found at on the parks and trails legacy plan page. 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment by Minnesota voters. The committee is planning a series of regional events during the year to celebrate Legacy accomplishments and engage Minnesotans on the question, “Why Parks and Trails Legacy Matters.”  Information about the events will be available in January on Facebook (/PTLegacyMN) and on the committee website (www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac). The deadline for applications is Saturday, Dec. 16. The committee is made up of 17 members, including, to the practical extent possible, diverse geographical and demographic representation. The committee has a mixture of park and trail professionals and Minnesota residents. Committee members should have expertise in two or more of the four strategic pillars of the plan: Connect people and the outdoors. Acquire land and create opportunities. Take care of what we have. Coordinate among partners. Terms are two years with the option of being reappointed for a maximum of three terms. Meetings are scheduled every two months around the state, with an option to attend remotely. Interested individuals may complete the application form online at www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac/member-application or print it out and return it to Paul Purman, Department of Natural Resources, Box 39, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. Anyone with questions can contact Paul via phone at 651-259-5643 or email at paul.purman@state.mn.us. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Big bay did not look to be completely frozen over yesterday afternoon. Broken up and refrozen by McKinley Landing. Cliff