Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
fishingforester

question re: 2 graphs running simultaneoulsy

Recommended Posts

fishingforester

OK, just a quick question here. I am upgrading my console locator (X51) with a nicer unit (LCM 332c) and moving the X51 to the front. My question is this: can I leave the X51 transducer mounted on the transom and mount the 332c transducer nearby on the transom without getting interference when running both simultaneously. I have my own gut feeling and have gotten conflicting advice from sporting goods stores (actually 2 different guys @ the same store confused.gif So if anyone has advice (based on experience, no speculation please), I would appreciate it. Thanks all!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
King Canada

Maybe, maybe not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

If the transducers are mounted close to each other they will interfer. If you put them on opposite sides of the boat you will probably be okay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fishin4Life

What kind of boat? Maybe you could use a shoot through hull style ducer. This way it would eliminate more holes in the transom. And also keep the two seperated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TUMBLEWEED

I run a X15 on the dash and an X85 at the kicker in the

back. Both transducers are on the transom on either side of the main motor. Sometimes they play nice and then at other times.. they don't. A simple power reset at both units

will usually correct it. I have found them to be more

picky in water less than 10 feet. You could probably

cut down on one or the other's level of sensitivity

or similar controls to help with the problem.

Another way is to get different KHZ levels for each

transducer/unit when you pair them up.

It looks like both units you are talking about use

the 200KHZ skimmer transducer. You might experience

some difficulty with two skimmers. A through the hull

is a lot more money too!! The "hockey puck" trolling motor

transducer is fairly cheap. If the X51's transducer cable will interface with the 332C , you could use the

already installed transducer for the new unit, and get a "puck" for the X51??? That way you can seperate the

two transducers and keep them from cross-talking...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

If you are mounting the X-51 at the bow, wouldn't you be happier if its transducer was also near the bow? If you have a bow mounted electric trolling motor you could strap the transducer to it. Ram makes a mount specifically for this and the transducer you have. That's what I did with my X-51.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishingforester

Thanks for all the responses. I was probably going to try mounting the transducer on the troller, but just wanted to see if it was necessary. I did see the diagram for the skimmer mount on a troller in my 332 manual, seems easy enough and then I don't have to worry about any issues. (I'll be on a week long trip starting tomorrow, so I don't want 'issues') Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

One other thing. The X-51 does have a filter that you can use if it picks up interference from your other sonar unit.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

My opinion - if you're turning down the sensitivity or turning up the noise filters to not show the interference, you're forcing the sonar to not show you a bunch of stuff you should be marking ---- so are you really getting any benefit from having the sonar on in the first place?

If you have one transducer on your bowmount and one on your transom you should not have any interference issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

So far, I haven't noticed any reduction in detail by taking advantage of the fitering features. I think the feature is going to be designed to filter certain frequency bandwidths associated with other sonar unit signals. My guess is, it's similar to tuning your FM radio to a particular frequency.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

I think the "filter" you're refering to is called "noise rejection" - by turning this on you are telling the unit to figure out what it thinks is real and what it thinks is noise, and to only display what it thinks is real. I leave my noise rejection off and decide for myself what I'm seeing - thermoclines, mayflies, small baitfish, suspended junk, noise, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • leech~~
      I remember that video, pretty darn cool! 
    • leech~~
      Man you can really see the standards of this site of have dropped.  A few years ago we were talking over $80-$100 Thorne Brothers Custom made Ice Rods.  Now a $9.99 dollar rod is the talk for the forum!  We need to bring back the Rich folks!
    • slammer
      I think we should start a Go fund me for Cropduster to take his plane up and give us some pics. lol  He did it a few years ago but not lately.  Its pretty cool veiws from above when ice is forming.  I wonder if he is still lurking around here?
    • EyeChsr
      was out tonight, 6-8 in out from the dnr landing. wheelers and a couple perms out. still open water out in front of Peters resort on the south shore. It starts out a couple hundred yards from shore and runs to the north- northwest for a long ways. some of the spots that were open earlier this week have skimmed, be careful out there if you see different looking ice stop and check!!
    • JIvers
      Thanks for the report--about what I figured, which is why I stayed down here in Iowa this weekend. I am fairly optimistic about getting on the ice in southeast or south central Minnesota next weekend; whether I am on a lake around Faribault or Waseca, or one of my old backwater haunts on the Mississippi remains to be seen. Maybe Clear Lake, Iowa. Whatever I do I will post my results.
    • JerkinLips
      9-11am was best time both days.
    • littlebear
      If you are willing to go a little further into Canada, I would recommend Hollinshead Resort, a few hours north of Thunder Bay.  The resort is the only one on the lake, and in June offers excellent Walleye Fishing, as well as some dandy Northern Pike.  It's somewhere you can drive to as well. 
    • monstermoose78
      Caught 20-23 gills and 6 crappies. Fun day on the 10 inches of ice. The whole lake was close to the same where I cut all the holes out and around
    • Wanderer
      I’m still seeing very random thicknesses all over.  In the past few days I’ve been from St. Cloud to Winnie and have seen vehicles on the ice and open water on the same lake. I’m in Little Falls.  Tonight I checked 2 lakes NW of town.  Both had people fishing.  One looked to be safe for wheeler travel and the other, very near it, still had an open lead and you could see the difference between the first sheet of ice and the second. I hope it doesn’t get covered with snow anytime soon so we can still tell where the changes are. Be safe. Bring floatation and picks.  And don’t drive yet! Ruh ro....
    • Bigfatbert
        Nice fish , great pics ,, what times of the day were best for you ?