Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
almostthere!

Hogging bear stations prior to legal bait setting opens

Recommended Posts

almostthere!

Went to set bait last Saturday and found out that the areas where I wanted to bait either has a nicely cut pile of logs or both a nicely cut pile of logs and bait signs. We where the only one in the parking lot at 7AM; it is the only way in to the hunting area. Finally, around 10AM, a group of baiters met up with us at one of the location which I hunt deer regularly and told us that they have already marked a station there: we did not see any log piles nor signs. Plus, they have marked all of the likely spots in that particular area two weeks earlier. We didn't want to argue so we left that area to them.

Later, after returning from a bait station which we have just made, there sits the other group. One of them claimed that we were too close to his station: one which has not been set yet. After asking where his station will be, I told him that the two stations are quite far; at least 5 times the legal limit.

We had a friendly conversation and here is the money maker statement from the guy: "why did you guys scout so late?" Why ask someone who knows the area like the back of his hand to scout early? What I think he meant to say was, "why didn't you come and mark your stations earlier like us?"

Is this legal to do? Mark your spots 2 weeks prior to legal baiting. Then show up late to set bait and when someone is in the process of making a bait station, tell them that you have already marked the area for your station or their bait station is too close to yours? mad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
roosterslayer

I am sorry to hear that you have run into so many dincks, that is the exact reason i stopped hunting public property near grand rapids. the last time i checked if it is public land that you hunting it is all public and you can hunt where ever you want to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Swamp Scooter

Maybe I read it wrong but if you were out on Saturday to begin you were a day late. It opened Friday at 12:01am. I agree that if you have an area planned out you do not need to go weeks in advance to scout. You also are alright to bait anywhere you want too.

Too bad that others cannot see the forest for their baits!

If they had stuff marked with a sign earlier than the opening day then just call the CO and let them know. The info is on the signs and it is all they need. They have to register the baits too within 24 hours of establishing them so the CO will know the scetion to watch.

Just make sure you have the better bait. Fresher, more unique and limited quantities will win them over. All you need to do is see the bear first one time, right?

Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CANOPY SAM

Scooter is exactly right. If there is any question just call the DNR. Every bait station must be legally registered with the DNR. Hunter name, and license number should be clearly written on the signage and must be within a given number of feet of the station. Each hunter is supposed to provide the GPS coordinates to each site that they run.

If you didn't know this, then I'd have to wonder what you were doing out making bait stations? It's all very clear in the regs - read em'! If you are unsure of others stations give the DNR a call with the info they have posted on their signs. If they aren't legal tell the DNR and they'll follow up on it, or at least they'll call the hunter. You can always start a station a couple hundred yards away - just do it legally.

There is tons of open land to hunt around GR, and tons of bear. It's just an animal. Don't get into a big twist cause someone else got to a good spot before you did. Stations could be legally marked, registered and started at 12:00 noon August 11th. It's another story if they claimed it two weeks ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neiko

That sucks. I know I had cut some logs for our bait sites 2 weeks earlier but knew that someone else could claim that spot on opening bait day. It was a chance I took and it worked out for me. I have the friday of baiting off so I usually get my spots. I would let the CO know but I am sure there isn't much he could do if it was after the baiting season started. He could keep an eye on them though because if they will break the law for baiting I am sure there is some other law they will break trying to get a bear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

Quote:

I know I had cut some logs for our bait sites 2 weeks earlier but knew that someone else could claim that spot on opening bait day.


I'm not a bear hunter/baiter but this sounds like the same argument concerning hunters erecting permanent deer stands on public land, once they erect a stand, they're claiming that spot. Yes, some other hunter could come along and hunt that stand but who wants an argument on opening of deer hunting. The same with this precutting of logs to cover your bait with, you're claiming that spot before the legal time to start baiting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
almostthere!

sam,

I know exactly what the law is. Stay cool. None of us has the time off from work on Friday to stake the claims. As for the other party, they were in the same situation and none of them made it out on Friday, either. The only thing the other party did differently was cut log piles and place the bear baiting sign on the atv trail: they did not place the name tag on the actual site. The problem is, they told us we could not make our stations because they had already marked, scouted, placed logs, or made claims to the area 2 weeks prior to legal baiting. And, I do know that it is first come, first served on public land: we were the first ones there. If we had follow that general rule, we would have been done making our stations and be long gone before the other party showed up.

There are a lot of lands and a lot of bears, but when 500+yards is not far enough, something is wrong. And to clear up the misunderstanding, they did not legally make the stations before we got there.

I am just ranting... I could have called the DNR, but I hunt in the area. Why create another hunting incident like the one in Wisconsin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gorrilla

Its illegal to cut, stack, or arrange logs or dig pits, or do "bait station preparation" ahead of last Friday. That includes hanging signs. I'm all for the DNR limiting hunters to 4 baits each and guides to 12 sites. The person who has there name on the sign should also be able to walk the CO to bait sight to ensure that he was the one who created it too.

I've heard of unethical slobs and wannabe guides who just rocket around public forest roads on opening day of baiting just hanging signs as fast as they can to claim all the area possible. If you are one of these slobs and can even read, then just know your a reason for the dwindling number of hunters. Lets look at our ethics guys, do we really want to lose hunting because of low recruitment rates, and frustrated hunters giving up? If we all enjoy hunting so much then we need to be less greedy, rude, and stupid if we want it to continue...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neiko

Gorilla, I am not trying to be a jerk here but more for my own info could you show me where it says that in the regs? I know you can not post a site prior to Friday. I also know you can put out test bait prior to the season but when the season comes you have to be atleast 100 yds away from the test site. Unless they changed that this year. Cutting logs of down trees is perfectly legal I believe but I am not perfect. Remember it is what you learn after you know everything that counts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BIGBORE

I HAVE TO GIVE GORRILLA A HAND, HE HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD IN HIS SECOND PARAGRAPH. PEOPLE RUNNING AROUND LIKE FOOLS P/O'D THAT SOMEONE ELSE GOT THE EASY SPOT THEY WANTED GET OUT THERE AND LOOK EVEN IF YOU HAVE TO GO IN A LITTLE BIT FARTHER. YOU WILL FIND A BETTER SPOT.

AS A GROUP WE HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL OF THE WONDERFUL THINGS THAT WE HAVE, THE RIGHTS TO EXPERIENCE THE OUTDOORS, IF WE DONT WATCH IT THE ANTI GROUPS WILL COME RITE IN AND USE THE VERY STUFF WE PUT IN THESE PAGES AGAINST US. WE ALL NEED TO STAND TOGETHER AND FOLLOW THE REGULATIONS, IF WE HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THEM THE DNR IS MORE THAN WILLING TO CLAIRIFY IT UP FRONT TO SAVE THEM THE HASTLE OF HAVING TO BE A REFAREE IN A DISPUTE BETWEEN TWO HUNTERS.

ITS NOT ABOUT THE LIMIT ALL THE TIME IT IS ABOUT THE EXPERIENCE OF IT ALL.

BIGBORE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • papadarv
      Yesterday the MN DNR announced a license requirement change effective NOW for this ice season. All Wheel House and other fishing structures which cannot be folded / collapsed must be licensed even if you remove the house when you get off the ice. 
    • Rick
      Harvest climbs 16 percent from 2016 Minnesota firearms hunters registered 161,057 deer through the third weekend of deer season, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  Preliminary results through the third weekend show that the number of deer registered was up 16 percent from 2016. Of the deer harvested, 53 percent were bucks, compared to 63 percent during the same period in 2016. In Zone 1, in northeastern Minnesota, total firearms harvest was up 36 percent. In Zone 2, which covers the majority of the state and runs from Canada to Iowa, harvest was up 10 percent and Zone 3, in southeastern Minnesota, was down 5 percent. “The conditions were generally good for hunters participating in the last week of the Zone 1 season and for the start of the 3B season in the southeast,” said Erik Thorson, acting big game program leader, “which provided a boost to the statewide firearms harvest.” Based upon the number of antlerless permits available and the number of permit areas that allow multiple deer to be taken, the DNR is projecting the 2017 total deer harvest to be around 200,000. The 2016 total harvest was 173,213 and to date firearms and archery hunters have harvested about 180,000 deer this year. In much of Minnesota, the firearms deer season ended Nov. 12, and the northern rifle zone season ended Nov. 19. The late southeast firearms deer season is open through Sunday, Nov. 26. The muzzleloader season begins Saturday, Nov. 25, and continues through Sunday, Dec. 10. More information on deer management can be found at mndnr.gov/deer. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Applications due by Saturday, Dec. 16  The Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are seeking qualified applicants to serve on the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.  “The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee plays a critical role in helping us achieve the vision Minnesotans have for use of the Parks and Trails Legacy Funds and creates an accessible and equitable, integrated system of state and regional parks and trails in Minnesota,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. The purpose of the committee is to promote and coordinate implementation of the 25-Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Funding recommendations for individual projects is not a part of this committee’s work. The plan can be found at on the parks and trails legacy plan page. 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment by Minnesota voters. The committee is planning a series of regional events during the year to celebrate Legacy accomplishments and engage Minnesotans on the question, “Why Parks and Trails Legacy Matters.”  Information about the events will be available in January on Facebook (/PTLegacyMN) and on the committee website (www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac). The deadline for applications is Saturday, Dec. 16. The committee is made up of 17 members, including, to the practical extent possible, diverse geographical and demographic representation. The committee has a mixture of park and trail professionals and Minnesota residents. Committee members should have expertise in two or more of the four strategic pillars of the plan: Connect people and the outdoors. Acquire land and create opportunities. Take care of what we have. Coordinate among partners. Terms are two years with the option of being reappointed for a maximum of three terms. Meetings are scheduled every two months around the state, with an option to attend remotely. Interested individuals may complete the application form online at www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac/member-application or print it out and return it to Paul Purman, Department of Natural Resources, Box 39, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. Anyone with questions can contact Paul via phone at 651-259-5643 or email at paul.purman@state.mn.us. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Big bay did not look to be completely frozen over yesterday afternoon. Broken up and refrozen by McKinley Landing. Cliff
    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.