Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
sparkyaber

mercury rev 4 vs mercury trophy plus

Recommended Posts

sparkyaber    0
sparkyaber

Does any one know the difference between these two props?

I need to replace my 3 blade tempest because of blow out issues, and was told to try a 4 blade before I think of a jack plate. Now I just need to figure out which one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Capt. Don*    0
Capt. Don*

I have rev 4's as well as 3 blade mirage plus. I run a heavy offshore boat w/twin 225's. The 4's give me more traction if you will and get on plane very quickly, very good lift on the stern, but I sacrifice fuel economy. I run 70-90 miles per trip so fuel consumption has to be factored in, I went back to the 3 blade mirage+ and get good results but need to run a little faster to hold on plane. Go to www.mercurymarine.com and use the prop selector tools, you can get a good start on what may work well for your needs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparkyaber    0
sparkyaber

I did try their prop selector tool and it really didn't work. It asks all of the information, and then I get an error saying that my pitch or top speed is out of expected range. My boat is very light so I can get away with running a high pitch prop and I think that is the problem with the program. I had to reduce my top speed 10 mph to get it to work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99    0
Whoaru99

What is the operating condition when it happens?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kjgmh    0
kjgmh

If blowing out with a tempest I would stay away from the trophy, it is a small hub and probably would not work better. The Rev 4 would probably work better for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparkyaber    0
sparkyaber

It does not matter where the motor is trimmed up down in the middle any corner with excelleration it will blow out. Really tough to pull a tuber or skier with this happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99    0
Whoaru99

Sounds more like ventilation than blow out.

How high is the engine mounted?

Is the anti-ventilation plate equal to, higher than, or lower than the bottom of the boat?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hydro    65
hydro

Your problem is cavitation (ventilation), caused by the prop sucking in air during turns. The suggestion above about engine height is a place to start since having the prop too near to the surface will cause what you have described. Try putting a straightedge on the bottom of the boat and measuring from the center of the prop to the straightedge. This is propshaft height and is the baseline to diagnose your problem. Post is back and we can help you fix things before you throw money at a new prop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparkyaber    0
sparkyaber

Yeh, that was the first thing I checked- I am 5 and one half inches below the pad with my prop shaft height. (center point of the prop shaft compared to the bottom of the boat.) I was informed that 3 inches is about the place to start and work from there. I can only go one hole farther down with the motor I am in the second to the top hole. With the addition of the 4 blade it stopped the blow out almost all together I had to try to make it blow out.

Thanks

Set up:

Triton fs190

mercury opti 200

23" tempest plus

66mph + running about 5300rpms

I could never get the boat all the way trimmed out beacause the boat would start to chine walk.

When I put the rev4 23" I could only get 60mph and running about 5200r's, but could get the boat all the way trimmed out.

I am trying the 21" rev4 tomorrow. I have heard you can get a "blowout ring" to use with the trophy to make up for the small hub.

Thanks for the help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hydro    65
hydro

Sparky,

This may give you a little info for comparison. I'm running a 20' Coral Fish and Ski hull, basically a pad vee hull similar to your boat and probably about the same weight. My motor is a 200EFI Mercury with a Tempest 23" three blade set to 3 1/4" below the pad. With this combination I get some cavitation on takeoff unless the motor is trimmed in but overall it runs very well. when I first got the boat the motor was set up like yours at about 5" below the pad and it chine walked bad. Raising the motor cured the chine walk completely. I still notice some cavitation on hard turns with the motor trimmed up but if I pull it down I can corner hard.

Keep up the experimenting and You'll get it figured out!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparkyaber    0
sparkyaber

how much of a differance is there between raising the motor vertically and trimming it up. if it is really important I think I will be investing in a jack plate.

I tried a 21" rev 4 tonight and also a enertia 22". The rev 4 was close, but chine walked at about 50 mph- I did get it to 60.5 mph @5600 rpms, I was by myself, and with just me in the boat, with the batteries on the same side it really leans to the right side.

The enertia was not good, hit the rev limiter very easily, and only got 60.7 mph out of it.

The rev4 was impossible to get air under the boat, if I tried I could get the enertia to blow out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hydro    65
hydro

Sparky,

A couple of thoughts on your last post. First, there is a BIG difference between vertical adjustment (propshaft height) and trim. The trimming the motor will act like a lever, lifting the bow and, to a point, reducing wetted hull area and friction. The result is you will go faster until the trim gets too high and you wind up just throwing water in the air. A good indication of trim is a rooster tail about 6' high at WOT. A vertical jackplate will allow you to raise the motor on the transom, reducing the frontal mass of the gearcase, and also getting the top of the propeller free of the water. If you are still having problems with chine walking this is the solution. Also, the prop must be designed to operate in a semi-surfacing condition. The Tempest works well here.

You have also mentioned that you are seeing RPM in the 5300 to 5600 range. What is the recommended WOT range for your motor?

Another detail I thought of this morning is that you started out with a Tempest Plus prop. Were the vent holes plugged or open? They are designed to allow the prop to ventilate during the hole shot and get the motor into it's power band quickly. If too much of the vent hole area is open there will be excess exhaust over the blades of the prop and you will see all sorts of ventilation problems.

Good Luck,

Hydro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99    0
Whoaru99

If you get a jack plate (or start raising the engine much), be sure to get a water pressure gauge if you don't already have one. The higher you raise the engine, the more chance to suck air into the water intake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hydro    65
hydro

If you start to lose water pressure you can plug the top water pickup holes to prevent air from getting in. Mine are plugged and it worked slick. To plug them just tap the hole for a 5/16" setscrew and be sure to use loctite when installing the plug.

Also, if you put in a water pressure gauge it will probably freeze during storage and be destroyed. A gauge isolator or simply removing it prior to storage will protect it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparkyaber    0
sparkyaber

Sorry to take to long to get back to this post- slayed the kings over in michigan this weekend.

WOT is supposed to be 5000-5750, but I would like to get close to the highest rpms possible.

Vent holes- Med holes in place now, kept them in in each prop that I tried.

I have never had a rooster tail with this boat.

I do have a pressure gauge on this boat, and I run 15-20 psi when flying across the lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hydro    65
hydro

With what you have posted, I suggest the following:

Raise the motor so that the prop shaft is about 3 ½” below the pad. Try the Rev 4 again and I bet you will pick up some RPM and MPH. (You mentioned that the 21” Rev 4 ran 5600 RPM and did not ventilate) Try the Tempest again at that motor height and evaluate the two props for the best OVERALL performance (not just speed).

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparkyaber    0
sparkyaber

I think I will be getting that jack plate. I don't want to take the boat to the dealer to move the motor up and find out I have to move it back down. $$$$ mad.gif I was thinking that the rev4 would be the one, now I have to decide if it will be the 23" or the 21". I am pushing the upper limits of the recommended r's with the 21, and if I raise the motor I am afraid I will go over the 5750 that is recommended. How many rpms do you think I will gain buy raising the motor with a jack plate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Wanderer
      I've massaged the trigger finger this summer by shooting the sporting clays league at Rice Creek.  Good way to make sure I got out! Started a little rough as to be expected but got back the groove toward the end.  Finished the summer at a charity shoot with 39/40.  That felt good. 
    • mrpike1973
      Same here saw on another site I will be taking off work and letting them know my opinion.
    • Rick
      Through a federal grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ has awarded more than $450,000 in local grants to protect and enhance inland coastal resources. The annual grant program is managed by the Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program, which is a voluntary federal-state partnership distributing federal dollars to projects along the inland coast of Lake Superior. This year, grant funding is being awarded to nine projects in the coastal area: Researchers at the University of Minnesota will monitor and analyze measures designed to reduce erosion of bluffs adjacent to North Shore streams. Results will inform guidance on design criteria for future projects. $35,900. The Arrowhead Regional Development Commission will conduct an economic impact assessment of paved trails within the coastal area; determine the number of users of four popular trails (Duluth Lakewalk, Willard Munger State Trail, Gitchi-Gami State Trail, and St. Louis River Trail), and simultaneously conduct large-scale survey of trail-user habits and impacts on coastal economy. $11,500. Laurentian Resource Conservation and Development is planning to host a two-day conference for academia and coastal managers to bridge a gap between research results and practices of watershed assessment, protection and stream restoration. $23,000. Researchers at the University of Minnesota will increase scientific understanding of success rates of coastal forest seeds. Results will inform coastal managers for improved adaptive management and help determination whether coastal trees should be protected and treated as a unique seed collection zone. $98,875. Duluth Children’s Museum in collaboration with Positive Energy Outdoors will create a year round, innovative outdoor science, technology, engineering, and math active learning experience for children, particularly those in low-income households with limited access. $33,100. University of Minnesota Duluth – Natural Resources Research Institute and several partners will develop protocols for assessing the biomass of periphyton (algae attached to rocks) in Duluth area trout streams for use by professional aquatic and citizen scientists. $77,440. City of Duluth will improve public safety and access to the St. Louis River estuary through upgraded wayfinding signage and amenities on the Western Waterfront Trail.  $89,080. Lake County will develop engineering designs and construct trailhead for Lake County Mountain Bike Trail System, a planned 100-plus mile mountain bike trail system. connecting both beginner and advanced cyclists to nature and physical activity in the coastal area. $70,000. City of Carlton will replace an outdoor restroom facility at the Willard Munger trailhead in city of Carlton. The updated structure will meet current sewer requirements and meet compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act. $11,225. For 18 years, the DNR and NOAA have worked together to better Minnesota’s inland coast. Together, the agencies have granted $12.6 million in pass-through funding to more than 550 local projects and provided thousands of hours of technical assistance. Projects are selected for funding through an annual competitive grants process. For more information about Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program, visit www.mndnr.gov/mlscp. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • delcecchi
      Second the guide.  Fishing a lake in the north is totally different from fishing Mississippi or lake Zumbro or other lakes in the southern half of the state.  Otherwise you should look at the best place to launch your boat to be close to good fishing.  Rainy is a very big lake.. Ask in http://fishingminnesota.com/forums/forum/98-rainy-lake-fishing-reports-hunting-events/ the rainy lake forum. 
    • leech~~
      Unless they find a way to stop all the kinds of waterfowl from swimming, diving, eating and pooping from lake to lake. It's never going away.
    • RuddyDuck
      I saw this on the Wright County website today: http://www.wrightswcd.org/Water_Mana...e_species.html
      There's a link in Blue on the home page.


      Sounds like they are having a meeting about it on AUG 23. From talking to the DNR, I believe they didn't allow the initial dates for this to happen. Mostly because there was really no comment period on it. Sounds like they are gonna have it now. Guess if your against it, now's your chance to speak up. You can also send in written comments. Not sure exactly to who, at least I didn't see that part clearly. Maybe to Alicia O'Hare.


      Like others have said, I believe their ultimate goal is to have this implemented county wide at some point. When you look at the committee info, most groups are lake associations. Hopefully it still can be stopped. Here is the DNR person I called on this, she was helpful: Heidi Wolf - 651-259-5152

      Anyone else have new info on this?
    • guitpic
      Tx all
    • BobT
      I resisted converting to braided lines. I liked my TrileneXL. Then, one day about four years ago I decided to spool up with fireline and at first I didn't think I could really feel much difference. Skeptical me, I always held on to that spool loaded with my trusty Trilene. One day I decided to put that mono back on and immediately could feel the difference. It felt like I was fishing with a rubber band. I went back to braided and haven't looked back. 
    • monstermoose78
      Last night a flock of geese buzzed the house and Finn went nuts! I think he wants to get out hunting as much as I do.
    • Rick
        Anyone with a 2017 Minnesota fishing or hunting license can receive a free St. Paul Saints logo baseball cap and discounted tickets though a special Saints ticket offer online at mndnr.gov/saints.  The offer is good for the 7:05 p.m. Monday, Aug. 21, game vs. the Wichita Wingnuts. Tickets are $17 and all ticket holders under this partnership will pick up their cap at the game. Instructions for purchasing tickets are at mndnr.gov/saints. Buy licenses at any Minnesota Department of Natural Resources license agent, online with a mobile or desktop device at mndnr.gov/buyalicense, or by phone at 888-665-4236. Mobile buyers receive a text or email that serves as proof of a valid fish or game license to state conservation officers.   Discuss below - to view set the hook here.