Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
walleyemaster

stump lake

Recommended Posts

walleyemaster

has anyone fished stump lake this year if so has anyone had any luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

I have heard some rumblings of people trying Stump this year and caught a couple but a ton of bullheads as well.

Nothing great, but I did hear a little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
walleyemaster

thanks for the post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chuckster

How did they get in the lake? Two months ago the water level was too low to get any size boat in and I can only imagine how low it is now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

Chuck --

There is a guy that is one the lake and he may let people in -- I just don't know I have never gotten that verified.

BTW -- The MPCA reeport is out on Stump and it doesn't look good. I am guessing that most of the fish will die soon on that lake if they haven't done so already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mark n

hitman, are you talking about Stump / I think the lake is also called Sand?

Just south of hwy 10 on cnty 18?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

That is the one, my man.

Very icky water. That lake may be a DEAD LAKE down the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mark n

Now I fished that lake constantly the winter of 03,& 04.

The crappie bite was phenomenal after dark.

The last couple of years have been deader than... shocked.gif

If we are talking about the same lake, there are four or five deep basins (30+ feet), with a nice submerged rock pile straight out from the private residence. I think the lake also has some inlets and an outlet (?).

I remember catching nice size perch and small but clean sunfish. I also remember the water being nice and clear.

How is it possible that a lake like this kill out?

Cormorants couldn't possibly be that thorough.

Please advise..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

Yeah, I saw a report at the office and it has been screwed up by some local farmers and chicked poop runoff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mark n

Oh man. Now that is somthing I didn't think of.

Stands to reason though, the [Note from admin: Please read forum policy before posting again. Thank you.]

trucks go by on the road about every hour.

What highly paid state department is responsable for monitering this type of activity?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead

Quote:

What highly paid state department is responsable for monitering this type of activity?


don't even say what I think you were trying to say.....

BTW, not all State Agencies are highly funded.

The Agency resonsible for this activity is the MPCA, or Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mark n

Well there you go deadhead, you just answered the question.

I'll say what I want to say when I please. You are attacking an environmentally conscience taxpaying citizen before you have the facts.

Did something hit you personal?

Lighten up,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead

next time just say it then instead of beating around the bush. I was not attacking you, but I'm sick of the blame the gov't routine.

Instead of inferring that the MPCA is not doing their job, why not be fed up that people are still performing these environmentally degrading practices (manure spills)? Like any other agency, it is tough to be able to enforce every infraction, especially at current funding levels. Even with unlimited funding it would be impossible to catch every offender. But if an entire community does not condone these unnacceptable practices and the potential offender risks being ostracized and cutoff from the community, there would be some serious incentives for the potential offenders to practice environmentally sound methods.

It seems to me that when these types of hazards occur, the general public is quick to jump on the agency that "missed the call", rather than trying to resolve the problem and support sound practices that would have avoided the incident altogether.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fisherdog19

Yeah, what he said. Why is it that no one blames the people responsible for creating the problem, just the people that are supposed to catch them and fix it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mark n

Well I certainly understand your positions regarding violator responsibility, and I agree.

However an agency was set in place for a reason, otherwise why are we paying them at all?

The fact is, the agency responsible for monitoring and licensing needs to, at the very least, accept responsibility for the oversight. And not be defended by a couple of forum moderators

Looking back at it, I’ll admit my question was slightly tainted with blame, but I stand behind it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead

Quote:

an agency was set in place for a reason, otherwise why are we paying them at all?


part of an agencies responsibility is to develop and implement policy, not just to enforce policy and catch violators.

Quote:

The fact is, the agency responsible for monitoring and licensing needs to, at the very least, accept responsibility for the oversight. And not be defended by a couple of forum moderators


I'm not defending any of MPCAs actions, and neither was Fisherdog. I agree that the MPCA needs to step up to the plate and take some accountability for once. I just don't like to use the medium of an internet forum to make attacks on an agency or others. If you are so disgusted with the MPCA's handling of this incident, use your energy to contact the MPCA regional office in Detroit Lakes 1-800-657-3864. This forum was not designed for political discussion; let's keep it that way. If you're interested we can move the topic to the Outdoor Discussion forum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mark n

I'm not interested.

I wonder what the feedback would have been had I implicated the farmer

I come to this form as a temporary stress releaver. I'd like to keep it that way. I also used that lake frequently for that same purpose. That I took personal.

Lets drop this and focus on turning stump back into a great crapppie lake.

I Pass

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nluchau

Quote:

What highly paid state department is responsable for monitering this type of activity?


So this quote is what started this frenzy. I probably would have said the same thing. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Peace!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

Dead --

I do blame the MPCA quite often. With my job I hear about a number of things -- some are true some are not some are a combination of both.

My issue is this -- the MPCA takes too long to react and county officials are too weak or are not smart enough to think long term. We need to protect the the land and the water. I am not a Greepeace guy, but I think too many people got away with too much for too long.

As far as the DNR ... Don't get me started. Just kidding. They do a great job most of the time. A great job that has to be a tough job as well.

Hitman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fishin' Addict

I've just gotta chime in here. Hey I've lived in a couple different states and MN has still got the best Fisheries and Wildlife/Environmental standard of Living among them.

Currently I live in CO and let me tell you something about water rights - yes it suck's when people literally own the Recreational Rights to the resources that you wish to play on/in.

There are a lot of interests that the MPCA and DNR have to balance in their decision making processes in order to allow or keep the body of water or land you want to play on open.

All of these interests in addition to understanding the Science that goes into managing soil and water and damage to said resource - don't try to downplay the COMPLEXITY of their tasks. As a scientist I can tell you one thing science isn't always the hard part - politics and people are usually more difficult to deal with than the science.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mark n

A bureaucracy is inherently guilty of lack of responsibility, consistently guilty of blaming others. The fact that you people defend it (or one) is astounding.

This isn’t some little pool or swamp, it is a medium/large body of water.

Can anyone one define the licensing requirements of the “public”? How about the inspection duration, and control factors required by the farmer. Let’s here from the official or volunteers assigned to monitor water quality. As a fisherman I have noticed the decline in activity over the last couple of years. Who else either noticed or missed the apparent lack of activity. What can the public due to restore the fishery, short of stoning the farmers?

At this point all I’ve heard is it’s not our fault entirely, bla bla bla

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kingr

Addicts post is put very well. MN Is a leader in Water Quality protection. The Detroit Lakes area is known as one of THE toughest areas for water quality design and enforcement thanks to the local cooporation of the Pelican water shed district and the MPCA. However, unfortunately the MPCA is becoming an agency that reacts to, not prevents. This is due to the lack of manpower. If you disagree got to the is website:

http://www.pca.state.mn.us/about/regions/nw.html#staff

The DL office is responsible for 20 counties.

I'm guessing this is due to the snow ball effect due to rain runoff and not due to a catastrophic event. So yes, it is an enforcement (MPCA) and moral (farmer) issue, but my guess is that this farmer is small beans compared to the feed lots in the area which require frequent trips. Bottom line is, is that when you, (general public) notices that something's not right that they notify the proper agency to get their attention. The MPCA will respond, I've been on both sides of the response. I've called in, and have had our construction projects called in.

As with most of the regulations in the hunting and fishing world, it is self-governed. The DNR and MPCA, Corps of Eng. are all driven by politics, the "best" management is not always used.

Every body should take some responsibility for this. The frequent fisherman should called the DNR/MPCA when the lake got noticebly cloudy (not natural), the MPCA should be making more visits, and the farmer should've fixed the problem on his own. He knows that <*&%$ flows downhill too!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fisherdog19

Also well put.

One problem that grows in this country is the lack of responsibility people take for thier actions, especially when those actions are not good. Why is it that more people cannot inherently do what is right, and good? We would then need less agencies to make sure everything is "kosher". Why do people look the other way more and more (more so on the eastern and western shores of the US). If someone does something wrong, turn them in, period. Why should every little farmer or rural property owner HAVE to be policed? Is it that hard to do the right thing? If you mistakenly do something that may hurt the environment on a large scale, make a call so that the impact is not so great and can be remedied, instead of trying to cover it up. There are not enough tax dollars to pay the man hours for this policing. Tax dollars are needed elsewhere, most importantly, for schools so that our younger generation can be well educated! I realize that some people make mistakes when it comes to these types of things, but most of the time they are caused by carelessness or done on purpose to save an almighty dollar. There will never be a perfect remedy for the problems, but if we all work together, and try to make their jobs easier by helping instead of bashing, things may get a little better. I would imagine that everyone agrees that these agencies are understaffed for the territory they cover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ScottND

Quote:

I would imagine that everyone agrees that these agencies are understaffed for the territory they cover.


This is not researched facts, but my opinion.

The funds are probably there, but skimmed off in to the pockets of one or a couple of the highest officals in the agencies as with most companies/agencies now days.

I'm not sure if irresponsible fits as the biggest culprit. I think it is pure GREED! It will probably be the demise of mankind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • gunner55
      There were 5 maybe 6 boats over at the resort Thursday - Sunday. Heard they were doing some hunting too. Pretty quiet on the bay, most of the docks & lifts are out. Probably going to get real quiet after you show up.
    • jayway
      1) Lumen (lm) Lumen is the international(SI) unit of luminous flux, a measure of overall light emitted by a light source. 2) Candela (cd) Candela is the international(SI) unit of luminous intensity, a measure of light emitted by a light source in a particular direction.
      Any given light source will have different luminous intensities in different directions considered.
      [candela = lumen/solid angle] 3) Beam Angle [Unit : degree] Beam angle is the angle between two directions for which the luminous intensity is 50% of the maximum intensity as measured in a plan through the nominal beam center-line. The beam angle of a lamp gives an idea of how the light beam spread away form the beam center. 4) LUX (lx) Lux is the international(SI) unit of illuminance, a measure of light arriving at a surface, 1 lumen per square foot equals 1 foot-candle, while 1 lumen per square meter equals 1 lux.
      [lux = lumen/m2] 5) Color Temperature / Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) A black-Body radiator will have different color when it is heated up to different temperature(in kelvin). The temperature at which the heated black-body radiator matches the color of the light source is the color temperature of the light source. 6) Color Rendering Index (CR) Color rendering index, ranged from 0-100, measures a light source's ability to reproduce the color of various objects being lit by reference light source, black body radiator (CRI=100) 7) Efficacy (lm/W) Efficacy is the efficacy of a light source to convert electricity power to light expressed in lumen output per unit power input (watt)
      [Efficacy = lumen / wattage] 8) Dimming Not all lighting products are designed for dimming function. None-dimming LED lighting product will cause unpredictable result and may affect the life time of the products. The below figure shows the typical input current variation while adjusting the DC voltage input to dimming and none-dimming product.
    • Smoker
      I will check it out a little latter. It looks like a good idea. I do a small diamond wrap on a lot of my ice rods.
    • gimruis
      I'm gonna go but not before some of these crops get harvested.  It may not be until Thanksgiving but at least I'll increase my odds if I wait for a better chance of success.
    • monstermoose78
      I have not seen a bird during season yet but I will get one or two I hope
    • monstermoose78
      Looks like you got one woodcock and a snipe but I could be wrong but great job shooting.
    • walleye29us
      This is the insulated model. 8x8. If anyone wants it this week I'll let it go for 240.00. Won't  find a better deal!   
    • JB18
      Saw over 10 birds on opener....all before legal shooting hour....Only 1 after before the rain started.
    • JB18
      i went out for a couple hours yesterday looking for grouse.  The buddy i was with never has been hunting for grouse or woodcock.  We only saw 1 grouse with no chance for a shot but got both woodcock that flushed. 
    • Stick in Mud
      As MB said, high water tends to spread fish out and push them tighter to the banks in any slower water they can find.  A "normal" year with low water in October can be ridiculously, almost unfairly good in the river when you find the smallies. There's a reason it's mandatory catch and release now, as they pile up in deeper, slower water and can be quite vulnerable if/when you find them.   That being said, the difference in high vs. low water is not as pronounced above the dams (either the 10th St, Sartell, Little Falls, Blanchard, etc.) as it is below them.  At least in my experience, anyways.