Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
troutlandr

Flyrod indentification

Recommended Posts

troutlandr

I raided my dad's garage this weekend and found his old flyrod (it's about 25 years old) It is in great shape but I cannot find anything on it to identify the manufacturer, line weight, action, etc. nothing except the numer "1225" written (by hand) on it by whoever made it. I know this is an original marking because it is encapsulated in the resin finsh coat on the rod. Its 8.5' and looks and feels like a good quality rod but it doesn't seem too heavy . I would like to set it up with a reel and line but I am unsure what to buy for it. Any suggestions on what weight line and reel to use would be very helpful. thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ice_shack

I guess it depends on how much your willing to invest. If you take the rod to a fly shop like Bob Mitchell's in Lake Elmo they have reels loaded up with many different weights. You can cast them and see what feels best. It would be good of you to buy from the shop if your going to use their stuff. I am sure other shops would offer the same but I have done business at Mitchell's.

Your other choice would be to find some lines people own to try.

BTW is this a graphite, glass or bamboo rod?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
troutlandr

I believe the rod is glass. The rod was made back before grahite was popular or so readily available. My dad has had the rod for about 25 years and he got it from someone who used for a couple of years before him.

Thanks for the ideas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ice_shack

I have a DT3F, WF4F, WF6F and a WF7F bass taper that I could let you cast sometime if the drives not to far.

The 6wt is on a reel I no longer use and would work out a sweet deal.

But I have a sneaking suspicion that you want to try a 5wt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ice9

I agree with Ice Shak. Older flyrods tend to load at a "standard" grain flyline, which is 4-5 weight by any modern measure, but which used to be called "flyline." And those old flylines were pretty inconsistent. Also slower glass and cane rods tend to be more forgiving in their load range. The "one number" rod designation--it's definitely a 7-weight!--is quite new. Older rods were a lot less definite. I still have a pretty good Eagle Claw glass rod that is listed as 4-5-6. Another consideration: try a level or DT line with your rod. Weight Forward is another comparatively modern innovation in flylines, and is in fact a "hedge" on line weight--since the weight forward configuration actually makes the line heavier than rating at a certain point, you have to average it across the whole front of the flyline to get the actual designation. All this comes from the "faster" graphite materials, that can "dial in" on an optimum weight-per-increment of length. When I worked for Orvis they actually had a corporate philosophy: single-weight rods sell more rods. Going up from two-weight designations instantly doubled the number of rods for sale. Some manufacturers, like Scott, have careful specs for each weight and actually admit that in some classes, especially the small end of the trout spectrum, there is no practical difference in rod action. The question I answered more than any other when talking rods to buyers: should I buy the (rod weight here.) I always suggested that they go definitely in one direction (that is, if you're hung up between a four and a six, don't split the diff and buy a five; it's just a four-plus or a six-minus. Buy the four, then if you really get into it you'll know when you need the six, or the two, and you'll come back and we'll both be happy. Buy the five and it'll work for all situations but be perfect for none. That was my usual reasoning.) Maybe that advice is why I'm no longer in the business.

It's also a function of the varying applications of flyrods. When it was all trout, with roll casting and short casts, the soft rod and more ambiguous line weights were not a serious problem. Now, though, the rods are heavier and the applications are much broader; I'd guess the weight of the average flyrod in the US has risen at least two full weights in the past 25 years as more and more people are double-hauling pike flies and throwing crabs at permit (and the permit are ignoring them, of course. Dang permit.)

Uh, can you repeat the question?

ice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
troutlandr

Hey, thanks for the short answer (just kidding). All the info you gave me is great, a little over my head, but great. I want to get into flyfishing more and thought I could use this old rod instead of investing money in a new one. I haven't done much with it since I got it because it has been so warm I figured I would let the fish alone. Now that fall is approaching though... I think I will set it up as a 6wt as best I can. Again, thanks for all the info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
upnorth

If you bring it in to a fly fishing shop they would probably have a real good idea of what weight would work best on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • wallyeye
      My rod bag with 5 rods in it fell off my sled while walking out from the public access on Sat. afternoon.
      I didn't notice until I had walked out to a spot and drilled some holes and started to get set up to fish.
      By the time I walked back to shore the bag had been picked up.


      Please let me know if you have any info.
      Thank you,
      Guy Walburn
      Owatonna, MN
    • crappie king 42
      Looked like a good time guys. Wish i could have been there unfortunatly i had to work. I hope i can make the next one. 
    • bjamin
      Got out Saturday afternoon and after putting in some time drilling holes finally found panfish in 20-24 ft, almost in the basin areas I'd look mid winter.  Crappie and sunfish were mixed and we caught almost all of our fish on a small jig and waxworm.  Tried minnows and only caught a couple fish that way, even when we were catching fish on waxworms in a hole 3 ft away.  They seemed to want something to chase so keeping the jig moving and pulling away from them helped quite a bit.  Had 10" of ice where we were fishing and was pretty consistent, but there's lots of reports of extremely varying ice thickness so keep checking ice thickness on your way out. 
    • Chill62
      WARNING a buddy was on  MELISSA and was aiming towards the crappie hole in the NE Corner/First break to fish out there last night.  He was checking ice and was having 10" of ice then hit 3"!  Please be careful out there.  Needless to say he turned around and went back to the access.
    • JTeeth
      Best use I can think of for a selfie stick. Great fish. 
    • Rick G
      I will second what Icehawk said.... some good lakes around you. Briggs chain is close, some very nice fish in that system. I tend to fish fairly shallow(under 10ft) most of the time 6-8 right in or on the edge of the weeds for the gills.
    • Rick G
      Eyeguy and I are going to be out today if you would like to hook up for a bit... #320 2675909,  shoot me a text
    • Holy carp
      6in on O’Dowd- fish are biting to
    • HoleHoppingGills
      Looking for some folks in the area. Have you guys ever fished Borden lake near Garrison? I fished Maple lake last week with a lot of small crappie caught.  I let them all go, biggest was 9". Fished few lakes in that area with no luck. Even went to my little honey home with little succes Looking take the GF out tomorrow morning.  Any ideas? Seen someone posted about crappie in Pearl. 
    • HoleHoppingGills
      I was out last Sunday and there was solid 3.5 black ice. It's been s week now so guessing around 6 inches in northeast bay.  All crappie I caught were small besides on 9 incher I let go.