Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Keith_MN

Channel Cats in the Mississippi

Recommended Posts

Keith_MN

I was fishing the Mississippi a couple weeks ago with the very guy who first intoduced me to the river about 8 years ago. We caught a couple 2 - 3 lb catfish and got onto the topic of how frequently we catch catfish while fishing smallies. Anyway, my friend, who has been fishing the river most of his 44 years, said that years ago you rarely if ever caught a catfish. He says that channel catfish were intentionally intoduced to the upper Mississippi in the last 10 years. Can anyone confirm this? I had just assumed that they were always in the river, but I did notice the explosion of cats about 3 summers ago.

PS I caught two catfish in the 23" - 24" range on Sunday within 10 minutes of one another. They probably went 8 lbs or so. Those were the two best fighting fish I have caught all summer. They don't quite compare to Red River cats up by Winnipeg, but give 'em a couple years...... smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smallie_hawgin

Kieth,

In this area, they were stocked in the HS chain in the seventies and into the eighties and in a few lakes associated with the Crow about the same time frame. They were not found above St. Anthony Falls before that time.

Channels, like smallmouth have better recruitment on years when water levels and discharge are lower than normal during spawning time (Mid summer in the case of channel cat). What you are seeing is a few good year classes that have prevailed from the late nineties and even from a few years ago (2002). The channels up here grow verrrry slowly. Fish 29 inches are in the neighborhood of 18 yrs old!! Either way they are a blast to catch and will likely not ever overwhelm the fishery. There is way too much variability in habitat, flow conditions, and food availability to have consistent recruitment and growth to have any one species (aside from smallmouth) to really dominate the fishery. Keep in mind the largest portion of the biomass in rivers is made up of native redhorse, suckers, minnows buffalo, etc. Hope this helps. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Keith_MN

Smallie Hawgin,

Thanks for the background.

I go fishing on the river primarily to catch smallmouth, but one of the aspects of fishing the river that I realy enjoy is the number of species of fish that one can catch in a single day. You just never know for sure what's on the end of your line until you see the fish.

I've fished the big channel cats up on the Red River where it dumps into lake Winnipeg. But I haven't been up there in a few years and I had forgotten how much of a fight a big catfish can put up until I hooked into these two on Sunday.

Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
catman71

Does anyone ever get North of Sartell or North or Blanchard dam for cats? What to look for? I have got a few, and they run pretty nice size but I could use some help to increase the action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rivernut

Catman, I do know that there are nice cats to be had all the way up pastLittle Falls. So, I must assume that they are at least as far up as Brainerd. I have caught some nice cats up to 12.5 lbs. between St.Cloud & Clearwater. The bigger cats I've caught over the years have been in or very near serious current. Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Keith_MN

Catman71,

I'm no expert on Catfish fishing. As I stated earlier I generally catch the cats by accident when fishing for smallies. I do tend to catch them in serious current (as Rivernut also indicated). For example if I'm fishing a current break for the smallies and then throw my line out further into the current, that's when I am more apt to catch a cat.

However, just to prove that there are exceptions to every rule, the two nice cats I caught on Sunday both came out of slower current, next to shore, in the shade, by some trees that had fallen in the river, on leeches no less.

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
catman71

thanks guys. i catch a lot of cats on the Chain by logs or trees but they are no where as big as what i get out on the mississippi. When you are fishing the current, are you deep or shallow? My best spots seem to be mid river humps in the resevoir north of Blanchard in about 25 feet. The river between Sartell and Rice is closer to home but I have a harder time finding them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rivernut

Keith is right. There are exceptions to every rule. I have caught some nice cats in shallow,shoreline areas. I like the areas at the end of fast water where it transitions into a deeper hole or run. I like the tale end of fast water. But, like, Keith saia there are exceptions. Try every part of the fast water. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
polarsusd81

Any of you guys ever get the cats on artificial lures? When I fish down south, way south, in Arkansas, I hook into a lot of cats while bassin with minnow baits like rapalas and also while fishing Rattle Traps. I absolutely love fishing cats. The fight they put up is second to none pound for pound. They are very strong fish, one of the best fights I ever had was a 9 lb cat on my ultra-light with 2 lb. test, good 15 minute fight out of that one. It sounds like I am gonna have to make it up that way.

Tom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Aquaman01

My first big CC was on the Upper Missy, and it was the cat that hooked me! She was black and belly-big and gave me a workout unlike any other fish I'd caught before. I think she ran around 10-12lbs or so and 28". I upgraded my rod/reel the next paycheck!

It's my understanding, as well, that CC's were an introduced species this far north. I dunno if it was intentional, or if it was the result of the channelization, or both. Either way, the only catfish species listed as native up this far are bullhead.

I've noticed distribution as far north as Little Falls - both sides of the dam - and that's as far up as I've fished with any regularity.

I've also noticed that our CC's up here get black (reach maturity?) smaller than on the Metro stretches, and they prefer faster water than their 'city cousins'.

As for artificials, I've caught 'em on walleye-type jig/grub combos. Otherwise, it's always a crawler or cutbait.

In previous posts I've compared the CC to a heavy-weight boxer; they don't dazzle you with fancy footwork or acrobatics but instead getcha with body-blows and unexpected haymakers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rivernut

I have also caught them on both sides of the dam. My understanding is that thay were intentionally introduced into the river. That's just what i was told once by Dan Gapen several years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Keith_MN

polarusd81,

On the stretch of the Mississippi that I fish I do not recall ever catching a catfish on an artificial lure. However, until about 5 years ago I made an annual trip up to Winnipeg each fall to fish for walleye in the Red River, and inevitably someone in the group would catch a big cat (ie 20+ lbs) on a crankbait. But even up there the preferred method of catching catfish is cut-bait.

The very first time I ever fished for big catfish was up on the Red River by Winnipeg. The water was so high and fast that year that our resort host suggested that we try catfish fishing because the walleyes were not in a biting mood. All we had with was our walleye gear. You can well imagine how much fun we had catching 20+ lb catfish on our walleye rods and reels in very fast current. Good times in deed.

Man.....I really need to make another trip up there sometime soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      Applications due by Saturday, Dec. 16  The Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are seeking qualified applicants to serve on the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.  “The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee plays a critical role in helping us achieve the vision Minnesotans have for use of the Parks and Trails Legacy Funds and creates an accessible and equitable, integrated system of state and regional parks and trails in Minnesota,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. The purpose of the committee is to promote and coordinate implementation of the 25-Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Funding recommendations for individual projects is not a part of this committee’s work. The plan can be found at on the parks and trails legacy plan page. 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment by Minnesota voters. The committee is planning a series of regional events during the year to celebrate Legacy accomplishments and engage Minnesotans on the question, “Why Parks and Trails Legacy Matters.”  Information about the events will be available in January on Facebook (/PTLegacyMN) and on the committee website (www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac). The deadline for applications is Saturday, Dec. 16. The committee is made up of 17 members, including, to the practical extent possible, diverse geographical and demographic representation. The committee has a mixture of park and trail professionals and Minnesota residents. Committee members should have expertise in two or more of the four strategic pillars of the plan: Connect people and the outdoors. Acquire land and create opportunities. Take care of what we have. Coordinate among partners. Terms are two years with the option of being reappointed for a maximum of three terms. Meetings are scheduled every two months around the state, with an option to attend remotely. Interested individuals may complete the application form online at www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac/member-application or print it out and return it to Paul Purman, Department of Natural Resources, Box 39, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. Anyone with questions can contact Paul via phone at 651-259-5643 or email at paul.purman@state.mn.us. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Big bay did not look to be completely frozen over yesterday afternoon. Broken up and refrozen by McKinley Landing. Cliff
    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • opsirc
      Any new ice reports?  Looking For s something about Nicholas or strand
    • rundrave
      what if you pull a wheel house to Mn from out of state or are a non resident?