Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
friendlyfisher

Tresspassing ??????????????

Recommended Posts

friendlyfisher

I have a question for you guys that know the law. Can you walk in the water in waders where ever you want to? It is obvious that a boat can go where ever it wants to but in waders you are actually on the ground. If i am in a park and the property line stops right next to some posts that say no tresspassing, can I jump in the water and walk where ever I want in front of the private property? How about if im only standing in 6" of water? Just need to know so I can hopfully make a crabby land owner mad. And hopfully catch a few crappies others cant reach. thank you. ff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pikerliker

I'm not certain on this but I think their property rights end at the waters edge. Obviously you can't be climbing on their dock, etc. but I don't think they can legally raise a fuss if you are in the water with waders on. Hey friendly your not going to be like that commercial with the kid putting his finger about 1/2 inch from his sisters face saying "I'm not touching you! I'm not touching you!" are you? grin.gif Except your like an inch from shore going "I'm not on your property! I'm not on your property!"

~piker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
friendlyfisher

No im not that bad but I was infront of his property once and he came out and started throwing rocks in the lake, I left soon after.

Then today, i took the wife and kids down to the lake for a mothers day picnic and there was a one armed man fishing. He was in the lake up to his shins and standing in front of the private property. THe one armed man was a sight to see. Talk about a man not letting a major accident in life get in his way of enjoying what he loves. He would put the rod between his thighs and reel in with is one hand. Then like clockwork, here comes the land owner, starts yelling at him and pointing where he thinks the man should be standing. He was to far away for me to here but I know what he was saying. As far a I know the landowner does not fish, I have never seen a person fishing of his dock ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I'm pretty sure you can walk through that area of water. Unless the land owner owns all the land completely surrounding all the water.

For example, if a creek runs under a road and into a small pond where it is completely surrounded by land somebody owns you can legally get in the creek by the road and walk (in the water) all the way to the pond. As long as you are in the water you are just fine. The land owner does not own the water. The water in this case is public.

If there is a pond or small lake that somebody has in their yard, with no out/inlet (source) you can not just walk through the land and stand in the water.

I am fairly certain on this one. I just learned it in my class, lead by a conservation officer. smirk.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
friendlyfisher

thanks loebs, I would still want to know for sure before I get in a confrontation with this sour man pissed off at life and everyone around trying to enjoy it. I will be walking from a public park into the water and over in front of this guys land. ff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
icehousebob

You would be wading in navigable waters. The simplest description given by the DNR is if you can float a canoe on it, its public. Now, the old duffer yelling at or threatening you, or throwing rocks in the water, thats harassing a fisherman in pursuit of game. I think thats against the law. It would sure be funny to have him call the cops on you and get arrested himself. You could sell tickets to that. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LocalGuide

Lol, make sure you have a video camera a long for that! wink.gif

What loebs93 said is right I think. Im not 100% positive but I would bet a lot that it is right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
river rat316

I am 100% positive if you access the water through public land, you can go anywhere you want once in the water, you would be perfectly legal doing this, I also think you can use his dock if you need to as long as you dont access it from his land (you have to climb on it from the water) I believe a dock is considered public property also once its in the water. I maybe wrong but someone should check on that, it would really get him goin!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Grebe

If the water in front of the persons land is not theirs, how can they legally build a dock in water that belongs to everyone and then tell people to stay off of it?

Would'nt that be pretty much the same as erecting a deer stand in a a public hunting area and claiming sole rights to it?

If you are in the navigatable water, got into the water at a legal spot, how can you be kick out of it?

I think I heard somewhere that the lake shore property can only be owned to the traditional high water mark? Not sure on that, just something I heard?

It's all fine and good until I get enough scratch to own my own lake shore property, then I will battle hammer and tong to claim ownership to the middle of the lake! grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ryan Berger

where are you doing this ,,I may be able to help you out if it is in the Hutchinson area

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
friendlyfisher

Lund, whats your email address? I will drop you some mail. ff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SteveWilson

You can wade between the high water marks between the banks. If you're blocked from proceeding (i.e. a fallen tree) then you can climb the bank to go around the tree. Bridges are public and have an easment so you can access the stream there. But be respectfull. Don't go cutting fences (even if they put them up illegaly), carry out more trash than you brought, and consider asking for permission first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
friendlyfisher

How about if a dock is in your way? Can you go up onto shore to get around a private dock? ff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
magnumthunder

Hi there! I went though something kinda like this. My incident was for hunting. In which the warden told me as long as I was in the water and did not tresspass to gain access I could do it. He however warned me that since I was warned about this that for no reason could I go on his land even for retrieving wounded game. Hope this helps plus you may want to bring a camera if he does harass you. Just my 2 cents worth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
danfall

You are not allowed to trespass on the dock or the land. If you are wading, it is unlikely you'll get far on a populated lake, so most people don't tempt fate wading in front of pp. I was threatened ice fishing by a landowner for fishing in front of his place and I asked him to call the cops. He was carrying on about how he had to pay the taxes on lakefront property and I was using it.

I ended up leaving, and then I called the county sheriff. The sheriff said I did the right thing and he was going to take a drive to the landowner's place to make sure he had taken his first strike.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JP Z

As long as you got on from a public spot and you stay in the water 100% you are completely LEGAL. I had an issue on a stream where a landowner had posted no trespassing. So I spoke with the DNR and he said as long as I stay in the water I am 100% legal. Just call the guy on it if he complains.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FOOT

Friendly, its true, as long as you can gain access to the water by either wading, boating, or gaining permission to cross the land you can legally wade in the water. You can not leave the water to walk on the land to avoid any obstruction, unless you have permission.

The State of MN owns ALL water. And yes if you are harassed by someone throwing rocks in the water or motoring too close you can call the warden and a ticket should be issued.

I ran into an individual some years ago that did not like us casting by his dock. He claimed it was his dockand his property so therefore it was his water as he owned the land under the water to a depth of 35 feet and to further make things ridiculous he owned the fish under his dock and in front of his property to that depth of 35 feet. A simple call to the warden ended the argument and set him straight. I don't know if that discussion/argument had a hand in it but a couple of months later he dropped dead of a heart attack.

I had occassion to fish the lake again the next year and was pitchin for bass when I came up to his dock. An elderly lady was laying on a lounge chair reading as I approached so I just passed the dock by and started to go to the next one. She spoke up and asked if I wasn't going to fish her dock. I said I'd liek to but didn't want to disturb her. Her reply was "nonsence, do you think I'm that grumpy old man that use to live here, go ahead and fish". I thanked her and starting pitchin. That's when I learned about her husband and his heart attack. She refused to come up to the lake because he was so ornery. She loves it up North now and I stop by and visit for a few minutes each time I fish the lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ice9

Docks are special...the state takes a kind of quasi-ownership of a dock once it's in the water so owners won't be liable for an accident. Usual high water mark is the upper limit of public ownership, and I've been told the same thing about using private property to make reasonable adn brief detours around obstructions.

Also "navigable" is even more liberally defined...if you can float a canoe on it at any time, not all the time, is the usual standard.

Some states out east (my home state of VA among them) recognize pre-Constitutional ownership and therefore older laws (ie old British laws) that do confer ownership of river bottom and water and fish in some cases. These are called "King's Grant" rights and are rare. It's obnoxious.

Remember that what is legal is not always what is right or reasonable. Many landowners are not interested in legal details and they make assumptions about their ownership (which is of course very important to people.) The assumptions can lead to unpleasant, even dangerous confrontations. And you may even be ticketed, and only be able to resolve the problem in court, or even on appeal (which happened to a legal-minded friend of mine)--way more expensive than just smiling and moving on.

Some law enforcement agencies and individuals are more interested in placating landowners, who remain, than enforcing unusual and little-known rights for people who don't live there and don't pay taxes. Again not common but I've had this experience before, especially when I was young and even though I knew my rights I was bullied by local cops and landowners. Ticket was thrown out but my day was spoiled.

ice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nthomps66

How about these people that buy the "swimming area" buoys and toss them out in front of their property. I have received many dirty looks for fishing near these. It's amazing that people think they can rope off a portion of the lake to call their own. See Turtle Lake in Shoreview for instance. There are many so-called private swimming areas.

I thought about setting up my own "swimming area" in the middle of a lake directly over a nice sunken island or something.

Any chance we can get a CO on this forum to clear these questions up. I also though docks were public property once placed in the water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

The swimming buoy topic made me think of something I saw on David Letterman a few months ago. An audience member told him she lived on this popular lake in New York where Letterman himself had a cabin. He said that many of the cabin owners had swimming buoys in front of their properties, way out into the lake, and that he and his buddy would take the canoe out late at night and cut the ropes to all of them. Isn't that illegal, the audience member asked? Sure it is, he said, and switched subjects. Thought it was pretty funny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ryan Berger

FF

ryan dot berger @us.army.mil

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JP Z

Actually Chucker, if the buoys are left for a period longer than 24hrs they pose a navigation hazard and are to be disposed of I believe. Same as if someone leaves their Marker Buoy on a spot for a week....snip snip.

From the MN DNR Water Safety book

TEMPORARY STRUCTURES, DOCKS AND

BUOYS

Temporary docks extending from shore generally

require no permit. There is no state limit on

length, unless the dock interferes with navigation.

(Note: There may be local restrictions as to dock

length or construction.)

Structures such as swimming rafts, boat lifts,

buoys, slalom courses, ski jumps, etc., which do

not extend from shore, cannot be placed in the

water between sunset and sunrise without first obtaining

a permit from the county sheriff. All structures

placed under a permit must have the permit

number painted on them. In addition, the structure

or buoy must either have a light visible in all directions

or be reflectorized so as to reflect light from

all directions.

And for the Swimming buoys

SWIMMING

Private Areas

The owner or lessee of shoreline property may

mark off up to 2,500 square feet, but not more than

50 feet along the lake frontage, for a swimming area

directly in front of his or her property. Markers to

designate a private swimming area must be white

with an orange diamond and cross on each side

(see illustration on top left, page 32). The markers

must extend out of the water at least six inches but

no more than 14 and should be spaced no more

than 15 feet apart. (Note: A white gallon plastic

bleach bottle with the orange markings painted on

each side fulfills this requirement.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

Yes. I know that's the way it is in Minnesota. Not sure about NY. But from reading the regs, it looks as if you have to get a permit from the county sheriff to leave a swim buoy in the water overnight and that you have to paint an orange diamond and cross on the sides. Yet I see lot of people just throwing those white tube shaped buoys in the water and leaving them there all Summer with no problem. Often times, they're at least 100 feet out in the water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BassManDuluth

Each year my class of 4th graders team up with the DNR and stock fingerlings in Duluth area streams within city limits.

One year we were stocking a stream 10 feet off a major Avenue ( the same one we stocked for the last 5 years) and a 30 year old lady (?) comes running out of her house waving a shovel and screaming that we needed to get off her property.

The DNR agent explained to her what we were doing and explained to her the domain laws off a street or Avenue allowed access to the kids to proceed. She went ballistic and swore (in front of the kids) about the **** trout fishermen in her stream and how she needs NO MORE Trout in it.

We comleted the job, but avoided that entry in the future. Too bad! frown.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2dalake

Yeah well, some people are miserable and feel better if you are miserable too. If you let them get under your skin they win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • monstermoose78
      Yeah Borden Can be good.
    • Rick
      By Kristi Coughlon, DNR information officer Minnesotans are a generous lot. For the past 40 years, they’ve made it possible for the Minnesota Nongame Wildlife Program to help thousands of native species survive and thrive – including animals that are threatened, endangered and rare.  The program is now wrapping up its 40th anniversary with hopes that supporters will wrap up an end-of-year donation to put under the holiday tree in celebration of the many wildlife success stories it’s helped create, like the comeback of bald eagles and trumpeter swans. Success comes with a price tag, and rare species don’t collect a paycheck. They rely on our help. Unlike other DNR programs, the Nongame Wildlife Program doesn’t get general tax money; it receives no fees from hunting or fishing licenses. It’s funded almost entirely by voluntary donations made by people who want to ensure that Minnesota continues to have healthy natural systems that support a wide diversity of wildlife. Many of those donations are made when Minnesotans file their state income taxes, designating an amount on the line with the loon to go to the Nongame Wildlife Program. But people can donate anytime, online or by mail. Donations fund critical habitat restoration work, research projects, surveys to assess the status of threatened and endangered species, and outreach and education such as the popular eaglecam that reaches into millions of homes and classrooms in all 50 states and at least 160 countries around the world. Donations are tax deductible and matched dollar for dollar by the Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) license plate fund. Donations also are used as match to federal grants and other outside funding sources, leveraging additional money to support nongame species conservation, research and habitat protection projects Looking for other reasons to donate? Here’s forty – one for each year of the program’s efforts: Monarch butterfly, bald eagle, forcipate emerald dragonfly, northern barrens tiger beetle, moneyface native mussel, Roger’s snaggletooth snail, tiger salamander, timber rattlesnake, jumping spider, common loon, red-tailed prairie leafhopper, wood frog, great plains toad, Blanding’s turtle, skipjack herring, tricolored bat, trumpeter swan, eastern bluebird, osprey, mudpuppy, golden-winged warbler, eastern hog-nose snake, pileated woodpecker, smoky shrew, wood turtle, American white pelican, piping plover, headwaters caddisfly, black tern, peregrine falcon, northern goshawk, slender madtom fish, boreal owl, rusty-patched bumble bee, red-shouldered hawk, yellow rail, plains pocket mouse, Juanita sphinx moth, northern bog lemming. And many more. During this season of giving, consider giving $40 for forty years to help Minnesota’s Nongame Wildlife Program continue its critical work to conserve wildlife species that aren’t hunted, from songbirds to salamanders, from butterflies to bats. Learn more at mndnr.gov/nongame. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Special fishing regulations will change March 1 on a number of Minnesota waters following an annual public input and review process, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  “Anglers need to know special regulations because they take precedence over statewide regulations,” said Al Stevens, fisheries program consultant with the DNR. “We have special regulations to improve fish populations and make fishing better or more sustainable.” Special regulations for individual waters are listed in a separate section of the Minnesota Fishing Regulations booklet and at mndnr.gov/fishmn, and are posted at public accesses. For this spring, new statewide northern pike zone regulations that take effect on inland waters will make it possible to do away with several previously existing special regulations that apply to individual waters and aim for similar outcomes as the zone regulations. The new statewide pike regulations go into effect in time for the fishing opener on Saturday, May 12. On waters that have a special fishing regulation, anglers are required to follow the special regulation and unless otherwise mentioned, all other regulations apply. Public process for special regulations
      Special regulations are put in place after fisheries managers write plans for the lakes they oversee and each provides objectives for achieving management goals. Before changes are made to special regulations, the DNR evaluates each regulation, shares what’s found in the evaluations and angler surveys, hosts public input meetings in the fall and reviews comments from the public about the regulations. Goals of individual lake management plans also are considered. “We need the public to tell us what they want for the process to work well, and we do value the input,” Stevens said. For this spring, 29 lakes and connected waters were reviewed. Changes detailed
      Pelican Lake in St. Louis County: A special regulation on bass will be made permanent, while a regulation on northern pike will be dropped. An evaluation of the regulations showed that the 14-20 inch protected slot limit with one over 20 inches in possession on bass maintained a quality bass fishery, while allowing for an opportunity to harvest smaller bass. The regulation was generally popular with anglers and will continue. The 24-36 inch protected slot limit on northern pike provided some benefit to the pike population; however, the benefits of the regulation are similar to the new statewide zone regulation, which provides the opportunity to drop the regulation and simplify regulations complexity for anglers. Sand Lake and connected waters (Little Sand, Portage, and Birds Eye lakes) in Itasca County: A special regulation for northern pike will be dropped, and the lakes will change to the statewide limits. The new statewide zone regulation for northern pike will likely be just as effective as the special regulation in encouraging harvest of abundant small pike while improving sizes of pike. Big Swan Lake in Todd County: A 24-36 inch protected slot limit with only one fish over 36 inches will be made permanent after the review showed sizes of pike have improved. Also, the regulation’s expanded possession limit of six, with only one fish over 36 inches, will remain in effect as the number of small pike has continued to remain higher than desired. Balm, Big Bass, South Twin and Deer lakes in Beltrami County; Portage Lake in Cass County; and Flour, Hungry Jack and Two Island lakes in Cook County: These eight lakes with restrictive size regulations (either a 12-20 inch protected slot or catch-and-release only regulation) on bass will be modified to a less restrictive, 14-20 inch protected slot with one over 20 inches to allow additional harvest of small bass while still protecting quality sized fish. Although the existing regulations were shown to be effective, the new protected slot is expected to provide a similar protection to quality fish and with the added benefit of allowing additional harvest of abundant smaller bass. Itasca, Ozawindib and Mary lakes in Itasca State Park: Special regulations on sunfish, black crappie and bass for three lakes in the park will be standardized among the lakes. While the existing regulations largely have been effective and have been generally popular with park visitors, the DNR will standardize sunfish and crappie possession limits to five, drop a minimum size restriction on crappie for Ozawindib Lake and modify the current restrictive bass regulations (catch-and-release on Mary Lake and the 12-20 inch protected slot on Ozawindib Lake) to a 14-20 inch protected slot with one over 20 inches for both lakes. The goal is to simplify regulations for park visitors while maintaining fishing quality. Sissabagamah and Long lakes in Aitkin County: Special regulations on northern pike will be dropped in favor of the new statewide zone pike regulation. Some benefits to the sizes of pike have been seen since a protected slot regulation was enacted; however, the north-central zone pike regulations may provide a similar or even better outcome and also serve to reduce regulation complexity. Bass Lake in Todd County and Cedar Lake in Morrison County: Trophy regulations (40 inch minimum length requirement, possession limit of one) on northern pike will be modified to a 26 inch maximum with a possession limit of three. While trophy northern pike still exist, growth rates of smaller pike in these lakes have declined. Allowing harvest opportunity on pike under 26 inches may help the population while still protecting medium to large pike. Kraut, Peanut, North Shady, Squash and Tomato lakes in Cook County: Catch-and-release regulations on trout in these five lakes will be dropped this spring. Additionally, the ban on winter fishing and special tackle restrictions for these lakes will go away. The catch-and-release with tackle restrictions and the winter fishing closure did not meet management goals for these stocked trout fisheries. They are remotely located and special regulations and the closed winter season did not provide quality fishing in these lakes. But the same special regulations will continue on three other lakes – Thompson, Thrush and Turnip lakes – that were reviewed at the same time. Moody Lake in Crow Wing County: This lake will reopen to fishing after having been closed to fishing since 2001. Entirely located within an aquatic management area, the lake has been used as a fisheries research lake and at times was used for rearing walleye. It no longer is needed for that purpose and plans are to reclaim the lake by using rotenone to remove undesirable fish and then restock with walleye, yellow perch and bass, and implement a catch-and-release regulation to maintain quality sized fish for anglers to enjoy. Little Boy and Wabedo lakes in Cass County: These lakes will have an 18-26 inch protected slot, with one over 26 inches, in a possession limit of four walleye – which will be in effect for 10 years and then re-evaluated. The regulation was proposed in response to local requests to improve and protect the walleye population, which will likely benefit from restrictions on harvesting walleye longer than 18 inches. Visit mndnr.gov/fishmn for more information on special fishing regulations. Special regulations that change March 1 will be listed in the 2018 Minnesota Fishing Regulations booklet. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Chill62
      We made our annual trip up to Red Lake Indian Reservation on Saturday.  Fished the whole day chasing rainbow and brook trout.  Before anyone tries to call me out it's legal to fish trout on the reservation during the winter and it's actually the only thing you can legally keep on the tribal waters during the winter.  We did have a guide and he was amazing and was cheap!  14 adults and 2 kids and we ended up keeping 65 trout out of 76 possible.  We left the ice by 2 so could have finished out the day and easily "Limited out" but we had enough to make us happy.  Its so weird being in 8' of water catching trout when you think they should be in 30-60'.  I'm done working for the year so its time to drill some holes locally and try to have some fun.  Local reports are hit and  miss but seeing friends catching stuff and a mixed bag.  Its awesome to see guys with 3-4 different species that they are catching.  Buddy was on Melissa last night and found 3" of ice.  So please be careful and I read an article today that someone went through on Mud Lake by Big Floyd and someone went through on Little Cormorant.  FYI those that fish Big Floyd a buddy reported to me that the deep hole just froze over end of last week and he was saying there was a 75 x 75 opening that wouldn't freeze up. Hopefully with cold air coming in over Christmas we can get lakes to be drive-able shortly. 
    • wallyeye
      My rod bag with 5 rods in it fell off my sled while walking out from the public access on Sat. afternoon.
      I didn't notice until I had walked out to a spot and drilled some holes and started to get set up to fish.
      By the time I walked back to shore the bag had been picked up.


      Please let me know if you have any info.
      Thank you,
      Guy Walburn
      Owatonna, MN
    • crappie king 42
      Looked like a good time guys. Wish i could have been there unfortunatly i had to work. I hope i can make the next one. 
    • bjamin
      Got out Saturday afternoon and after putting in some time drilling holes finally found panfish in 20-24 ft, almost in the basin areas I'd look mid winter.  Crappie and sunfish were mixed and we caught almost all of our fish on a small jig and waxworm.  Tried minnows and only caught a couple fish that way, even when we were catching fish on waxworms in a hole 3 ft away.  They seemed to want something to chase so keeping the jig moving and pulling away from them helped quite a bit.  Had 10" of ice where we were fishing and was pretty consistent, but there's lots of reports of extremely varying ice thickness so keep checking ice thickness on your way out. 
    • Chill62
      WARNING a buddy was on  MELISSA and was aiming towards the crappie hole in the NE Corner/First break to fish out there last night.  He was checking ice and was having 10" of ice then hit 3"!  Please be careful out there.  Needless to say he turned around and went back to the access.
    • JTeeth
      Best use I can think of for a selfie stick. Great fish. 
    • Rick G
      I will second what Icehawk said.... some good lakes around you. Briggs chain is close, some very nice fish in that system. I tend to fish fairly shallow(under 10ft) most of the time 6-8 right in or on the edge of the weeds for the gills.