Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
bmc

Meadow Burns Duck nesting Habitat - Federal Forestry!!!

Recommended Posts

bmc

This is a bad pun, but this really burns my @$$. Every spring the Federal Forestry is out burning meadows and other areas with no consideration for the nesting waterfowl. As I'm typing this right now, a fire they started got out of control and according to radio traffic, has burned up 600 acres of woodland/wetland habitat northwest of Deer River, MN. Why in the heck are they burning right now when we have waterfowl nesting in these areas? Is there any legitimate reason for them to be doing these burns? I'm planning on writing the 3 local newspapers in my area and hope others will do the same. Now wonder the duck population is going down hill!

Brian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BDR

I have to say that makes me scratch the head wondering why also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sheepheadslayer

I think the reason they do it now is to get good growth this summer. Also a duck nesting right now will re nest for sure maybe 2 or 3 times if she has too. They are not just going to sit there and burn up. It is to bad that it got out of control, but it the burn will only help in the long run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Riverratpete

We could actually use more fires in this state. Fires are natures way of "housecleaning" makes things alot healthier. Somehow we have gotten it into our heads that all fires are bad and need to be squashed out immediatley, Before we settled this area fires were an annual event on the prairies started by you know who. In the long run it's the best thing that can happen for the ducks, creates better nesting enviroment. Remember the Yellowstone fire from a few years back and how people were just wringing their hands? how horrible! look at it now, looks magnificent, the plants and foliage came better than before. With that said I'm sorry to hear if anyone lost their homes..thats just bad management

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B. Amish

right on pete,

the fires make the habitat better in the long run, and the ducks will renest

the spring is the best time to burn, the fuel is still there, and the winds are strong enough to keep a burn under control, usually

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks

A friend of mine that burns parts of his place every year says it gets rid of all the ticks on that ground too, which is obviously a good thing. He has tons of wildlife on his property too, so I don't think it's hurt a thing. The fields he burned a few weeks ago are lush & green now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GullGuide

Yep, fire is mother nature's cleanser.

I wish they would burn all wildlife management areas at least once every 3 years or so. Would greatly enhance the habitat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishermann222

I just finished up a college class on forest fires in Alaska. I have a great article on wildlife and how buring helps 99% of all species. If you want to read it I can email it too you. Wildfire is also VERY important for certain kinds of trees to grow. Some pine cones do not even open up to let seeds out until they burn.

A mature stage forest is NOT the best kind of forest for wildlife. I agree on the wildlife management areas being burned as well. If the forest service would do more controlled burns, say in the fall, then it would not have as much an affect on wildlife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kpj5br

bmc, I agree with most everyone else here, we need these burns.

Spring is proven to be the best time to do it, as well.

We need to stop with being overly concerned with the "here and now" and be more concerned with long-term. Burns are a critical piece in the "long-term" health of praries, forests, and even wetlands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

The principle behind the native prairie burns is that it knocks back the cool season grasses about the time the warm season/native prairie grasses start growing. It also releases the (pot)ash and kills back a lot of the woody growth/young trees. If periodic burns are not done, the natural succession of plants is for grass to be replaced by trees. In the short term a few nests will be lost but the adult hens will get away and renest. In the long-term the native grasses will come back thicker and provide better nesting habitat in future years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
M.T. Bucket

The timing of a burn depends on several factors:

- the type of habitat burned (forest, wetland, prairie)

- the wildlife the burn is intended for (prairie chickens, sharptailed grouse, waterfowl...) and

- the time of year they nest (which isn't the exact same every year)

- the prevailing weather conditions (can't have fire without the right weather)

- whether or not it is still frozen under the wetland (if the burn is done early, burning personnel and equipment can get around the marsh with relative ease, if not...)

- green up (late in the spring, green vegetation makes it more difficult to burn, smokier for the personnel to work in, and more smoke may billow into highways and towns, upsetting the locals)

- presence of brush (if there is a lot of brush to knock back--which is usually the intent of the burn--different conditions are required...the fire needs to burn hot enough to kill the brush, but not so hot the burning brush presents a control problem)

Those are just a few of the factors I can think of that would influence the timing of a prescribed burn. Personally I think burning is a great management tool, but it won't always be perfect. Remember, when these fires naturally maintained wildlife habitat, they started whenever conditions were conducive--rather than being timed with waterfowl reproduction--and the ducks did just fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mechanictim

I recently walked through a waterfowl production area that had been burnt a couple of days earlier looking for antler sheds. There were no sheds to be found that day but I did find several duck nests. All of the nests I found had broken eggs that appeared to have been eaten by some type of nest raider(racoon, skunk, or possum.) Out of ten or twelve nests there was not a single intact egg. From the way the egg shells were darkened by the fire and the remaining yolk cooked it appeared to me that all of the nests were raided before the area was burnt.

This area also has several of the DNR's duck nesting platforms in the slough, all of which were occupied by canada geese. Between the nest raiders, the geese hogging prime nesting areas and the various predators(native and introduced) that kill those ducklings that do hatch it is amazing that any ducks do manage to survive.

We all know that more habitat will mean more ducks but it is apparent to me that we really need to thin out the skunk, racoon, and possum populations to protect the eggs in the nest. In the county I live the DNR has cut trees and brush to eliminate perches for birds of prey that eat the ducklings(This is causing more problems than it is worth.) As for the non native ditch predators(they are unprotected in Minnesota) a little common sense and discretion will go a long way to helping the ducks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
M.T. Bucket

Quote:

In the county I live the DNR has cut trees and brush to eliminate perches for birds of prey that eat the ducklings(This is causing more problems than it is worth.)


I have heard of other agencies/groups doing this as well, not just for waterfowl but for pheasants as well. In the case of pheasants, I really question this practice--reducing habitat for native raptor species to favor a non-native game species. I like the taste of pheasant as much as anyone, but I don't think that we should push against natural ecology for the benefit of hunters--we need to accept those natural conditions and recreate within them. Those hawks have value too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mechanictim

M.T.Bucket;

On one hand I agree with you that we should put a higher priority on our native species, on the other hand I am not going to bite the hand that feeds me so to speak. The money that pheasants bring in to this area through habitat stamps and pheasants forever buys a lot of habitat. When the DNR does their burns in the spring they used to go around the established stands of willows and plums, they would leave the trees along the sloughs and streams. This edge habitat is where I do most of my bowhunting for deer. Now with the elimination of a lot of this cover the pheasants have lost a lot of roosting cover and since most late season pheasant hunters will not try the open grasslands but will head straight for the willows and brushy edges this brings them and their dogs into the area I may be trying to bowhunt and it also pushes the pheasants into the tall grass to roost for the night. I have found in the last year or two alot more pheasants killed by fox and coyotes. Pheasants need to roost a good five feet or higher off the ground to be safe.

To get back to the original topic of this post the one thing I have not seen mentioned that is one of my favorite reasons for having the grasslands burnt on a regular basis is it really knocks back those miserable cockleburrs. Burning also gets rid of a lot knocked over grass and weed that can make walking so tough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      The commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has appointed 11 Minnesotans to three-year terms on citizen oversight committees that monitor the agency’s fish and wildlife spending.  The appointees are responsible for reviewing the DNR’s annual Game and Fish Fund report in detail and, following discussions with agency leaders and others, prepare reports on their findings. Appointed to the Wildlife Oversight Committee are Garry Hooghkirk, Duluth; Amanda Leabo, Fergus Falls; Mark Popovich, Welch; John Schnedler, Richfield; and Martha Taggett, Golden Valley. Appointed to the Fisheries Oversight Committee are Karl Anderson, Greenbush; Jess Edberg, Ely; Nicole Hertel, Shoreview; Benjamin Kohn, Hudson; Mark Owens, Austin; and Craig Pagel, Duluth. The new appointees join other members whose terms are continuing. The committees will resume work after the mid-December publication of the DNR’s Game and Fish Fund report for fiscal year 2017. “We look forward to working with these citizens,” said Dave Schad, DNR deputy commissioner. “The appointments continue our commitment to share detailed budget information, bring new participants into the oversight process and ensure revenue generated by hunting and fishing license sales is used appropriately.” The Fisheries and Wildlife oversight committees continue a citizen oversight function first created in 1994. Sixty people applied for oversight committee positions this time. Factors in choosing the new appointees included geographic distribution, demographic diversity and a mix of interests. In the weeks ahead, committee chairs and four members will be selected by each committee to serve on an umbrella Budgetary Oversight Committee chaired by another appointee, John Lenczewski. The committee will develop an overall report on expenditures for game and fish activities. Those recommendations will be delivered to the DNR commissioner and legislative committees with jurisdiction over natural resources financing for further consideration. Minnesota’s Game and Fish Fund is the fiscal foundation for much of the state’s core natural resource management functions. About $110 million a year is deposited into this fund from hunting and fishing license sales, a sales tax on lottery tickets, and other sources of revenue including a reimbursement based on a federal excise tax on certain hunting, fishing and boating equipment. Past DNR Game and Fish Fund expenditure reports and citizen oversight committee reports are also available at mndnr.gov/gamefishoversight. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Conservation grants awarded by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources will help restore, enhance and protect habitat throughout the state.  This latest round of 73 conservation grants is funded by the agency’s Conservation Partners Legacy (CPL) grant program. Now in its ninth year, the program has awarded over $50 million to nonprofit organizations and government entities for conservation projects. The DNR recently received $9.9 million in grant requests from 86 applicants during round one of the application cycle. The DNR has funded $7.5 million of these requests. “Projects include habitat improvements that benefit deer, turkey, pheasants and a wide variety of species,” said Jessica Lee, DNR conservation grants coordinator. “Oak savanna, wetlands and pollinator habitat are restored through this grant program, to give a few examples.” Conservation groups and others interested in applying in the future are encouraged to plan in the coming months so they can apply when funds are again available. The DNR’s CPL program provides grants ranging from $5,000 to $400,000 to conservation nonprofit organizations and government to help fund projects to restore, enhance or protect fish and wildlife habitat in Minnesota. The Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council recommended the grant program, which was approved by the Minnesota Legislature and has been in place since 2009. Funding has been provided annually from the Outdoor Heritage Fund, which is part of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment and funded by a voter-approved statewide sales tax of three-eighths of 1 percent. Round one of the proposals for fiscal year 2017 included the traditional grant cycle, the metro grant cycle and the expedited grant cycle. The expedited cycle for standard types of projects is currently open for another funding round, with the maximum grant award being $50,000. Applications are due online by 4 p.m. Friday, Jan. 19. More information on the program’s grant cycles, and a complete list of the most recent grant applications and past awarded projects are on the DNR website at mndnr.gov/cpl. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Sherburne County Geologic Atlas-Part B was recently published by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Part B covers groundwater conditions and sensitivity to pollution. It expands on Part A, the geology atlas previously published by the Minnesota Geological Survey. The atlases are a valuable resource for groundwater management and land-use planning. Sherburne County is characterized by sandy surface and subsurface conditions. This type of geology creates extensive and productive aquifers that are relatively sensitive to pollution. In addition to maps of pollution sensitivity, groundwater chemistry data are shown, highlighting areas with elevated concentrations of chloride and nitrate. The deeper bedrock aquifers of the eastern part of the county are less sensitive to pollution. The atlas can be acquired through the following sources: Online: PDFs of the report and maps, GIS files and program information are available by searching “Sherburne County Geologic Atlas, Part B.” The GIS folder includes GIS files and associated metadata for the water table, wells, and maps for groundwater flow and pollution sensitivity. The ArcMap file displays the data as shown on the published maps and includes hyperlinks to image files of the published cross sections. Paper copies: Part A and B atlases can be purchased from Minnesota Geological Survey Map Sales, 612-626-2969. Prices for each atlas package range from $12–$15. County geologic atlases provide geologic and hydrogeologic information to support regional planning and water resource management and protection. Partial funding for this project was provided by the Clean Water Fund and the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • IceHawk
      Good Advice Don . You are correct there was a wheeler on Horseshoe back by Krons bay.  Saw him Sunday when I was out on the ice. How he didn't go through is hard to believe.  The chain  is very spotty at best. Finding areas of open water to 4 1/2 5  inches tops. A lot of guys r pushing the envelope out there on Sunday there was at least 10 guys out on mud and the ice is 3-3 1/2 inches thick in that area, also saw a group out near Camerons Island, A lot of these areas were completely open on Thursday so be very very cautious. Tom is right you could see the different shades of freeze up before this snow now its a guessing game. Remember u put others at risk that have to try and rescue you if you break through so use common sense. On a side note there is a pocket of open water on the N end of Big, swans are keeping it open and it just froze over yesterday in front of the golf course on Schneider.  Shaumans bay has 5-6 inches on Rice main lake 2-3 inches.  Koronis is still open was fishing in the boat two weeks ago out there so it may be a while for that beast!
    • eyeguy 54
      can hardly see 3 pound test and tie on the 3mm let alone 1.5 mm and 3/4 pound test. yowzer!
    • leech~~
      Not really, I had that shock a year or so ago when I went out for a day fishing with a Ice Tournament guy. His rods had very light ends, as in you could almost blow on them and they would move. He bought them all on-line for some good cash $80-$100 each. But he did have on all his rods that little cheap in-line reels with like 1-2 lb line on them all! I had to actually borough one of his rods and reels just to keep up with him!
    • eyeguy 54
      zapped HT a note to see if the rod is available anywhere with bigger guides. Nope. 
    • iiccee63
      Sunday am. 3 inches of ice 12/9 with people fishing a few hundred yards out towards the west shore.
    • iiccee63
      Let me rephrase the topic.... Am looking for current ice conditions on this lake. Well aware how things were weeks ago. Any info on current conditions would be appreciated. Thanks
    • Lotharski
      Thanks for the report, Chill!  I went out for a few hours Saturday afternoon and set up on the first break in about 15 fow.  I had the camera down and only saw pike.  Not one gill or eye...  I had 7-7.5" ice where I checked.