Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      1st Please Post Your Fishing Report - Then Join the NEW - Private Fishing Report Clubs   01/24/2018

      Private Fishing Report Clubs - Click Here - Post Your Fishing Report Before Joining
      1st, be sure you post a fishing report in the forums, then ask to join after you post a fishing report in your area forum. The Private Fishing Report Clubs are where folks can share private fishing information with club members who have proven they know what's going on. Fishing Report Clubs Link also in Menu above. Apply to become a member today, while it's still easy. 
  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
wormburner

Suburban ---VS --- Expedition ?

Recommended Posts

wormburner

Looking for a used Vehicle with the third seat option for the kids, and also to pull my boat. Was just wondering if anyone has any input as far as Chevrolet Suburban versus Ford Expedition, which do yo prefer and why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lotalota

I grew up in 'burbs (once the Cherokee Chief went pansy). I am now on my 3rd suburban personally. We never really wore any of them out, just got a different one or wrecked the poor thing. My dad's last suburban was the 2500 and had the diesel in it. It was retired after 450K miles. My three 'burbs were in this order.

'86 1500 with a 350, sold with 190K miles and still going strong

'94 2500 with a 454, 280K but totaled it out when I rolled it going 80 mph on 35W (I was in a hurry...the steelhead were in)

'98 2500 with 454, 190K on it and no problems so far.

I've read that the new platform has a frame that is 400% stiffer than the '99 and older. They sure are nice and are definitely on my radar screen. My current rig tows my 20' CC like a dream. You really can't even tell it is back there. The gas mileage is crappy but it is the same crappy no matter what I'm doing or hauling. The '94 suburban I wrecked is the one that convinced me to keep on driving these rigs, even though they are rough on gas. It was pure stupidity on my part. I was digging in the back seat looking for directions (stupid). I went into the shoulder and came out sideways onto the highway. This truck slid sideways going 80 mph without rolling until I caught the shoulder with my right front tire. Over I went. And again and again and again. All the glass was gone from the vehicle and there wasn't a square inch of the truck that wasn't banged up. My injury??? I bumped my shin on the cab as I did a "Dukes of Hazard" to get out of the truck. The cab collapsed onto the dash but I could still sit upright in my seat. The wrecker guy said he couldn't believe that nobody died in the crash (even my dog came out unscathed...a little scared though).

If you can bear the $80 bill to fill the tank you'll like the 'burb...

Lota Lota...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wormburner

I'm glad that you surrvived, must have been a heck of a ride!

I am looking at a 1500 model with the vortec 350, they say the half tons aren't quite so hard on gas because of the gear ratios they run, I think if a guy can manage 16 on the hwy., it's not terrific, but you have a vehicle that will not be under powered, along with a lot of room, it's kind of a give and take kind of thing.

I have heard these people that tell you with the half ton version, they get almost 20mpg, I do not belive that for a second, but I guess it all depends if you drive 55 or 70!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mr Special

My family has own 3 suburdan's and all are still in use.

88 K2500 350TBI 268K and now is a plow truck

91 K1500 6.2L 228K still going strong

95 K2500 350TBI 178K still going strong

Nothing major just routine maintence

Buddy with 97 Expedition 132K and not happy with it

All our Suburban's get better MPG then his Expedition

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
moderation

What about the Dodge Durango? Three seats, big towing capacity, and decent gas mileage. We have owned two, and are very pleased with the performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GunDr

I had a Suburban as a company vehicle and an Expedition as my personal vehicle. The gas mieage was a killer. More so with the Expedition. The Sub could haul more. When I left the Co. About a year later an ex-girlfriend totaled out the Exp. I was looking at the time, to trade it off anyway. Not enough room for hauling and the mileage was terrible when towing. It was 3 1/2 years old, and the dealers wanted to only give me less than half what I paid. I took the money from the ins. co, (6 grand more than what I was offered from the dealers) and bought a Ford 250 Crew Cad Diesel. It was used with 35,000 miles. I now have 150,000 on it and never have regretted it. It seats three adults in the back very well, I get just shy of 20 mpg. I towed a Dodge Ram from Milwaukee to Pine River and still got 14 mpg. It's a short box, 6 1/2 ft.

I do not have a particular manufacturer that I like, I looked for something to suit my needs. My guess would be that a used truck like this would be about the same as a SUV, price wise, for the same year?

Just my two cents, I'm happy with what I got.

Doug

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ely Lake Expert

Wormburner,

My mom has a 99 expedition and I really don't like it nor does she. It seems to have too stiff of a ride and 4.6 liter motor just doesn't have all that much torque for a vehicle that size. The 5.4 liter motor has plenty though and I am not sure how the new ones ride. Her next vihicle is gonna be a GMC Yukon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fisher Dave

I had a 96 suburban for a while with the vortec 350.. sounds like the same thing your looking at. I had no problems with the truck at all.. tons of room, very good ride and gas mileage. The milage on the highway was very close to 20 mpg at speeds of 70mph or less(highway).. at 75 the milage would drop to around 16 or so.. same at 85mph. The city street milage was about 12mpg the best I could tell... overall the suburban had better gas milage than my Jeep Cherokee that I had about the same time (16mpg average highway).

If you tow anything.. I dont think anything compares to a Suburban.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wormburner

Thanks to all who posted, nice to get some input from people who have had some experiance with the two!

Thanks, wormburner. laugh.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OUTDOORNUT

All of you guys are talking about the Suburban aren't you??

Everyone I know that owns a "Burb" must have gotten complete lemons, but their's are total junk.

I would mayby stay away from the late 90's rigs, they seem to have been the worse for Chevy. Kind of along the same lines as the problems with their trucks in that same time period. Motors and Tranny's ....Motors and Tranny's

Friend #1 1996 Burb (1) headgasket (2) Transmissions, (1) computer, (2) window motors, no response from rear controls, have to lift drivers side rear door to close it, whippers sometimes stay on, the motor sometimes still shuts off going down the highway. We had to take an alternate truck to CO Elk hunting because he didn't trust his Burb.

Friend #2 1995 (1) motor. (1) tranny, work on the rearend, almost a totally new dash (no radio, heat, etc.) Rides like a tank and has about 8" of play in the steering wheel.

Not to mention the amount of rust on the rear doors.

(this is his second and LAST Burb he said he'll ever own)

I'm not saying anything bad about the Burb, just letting you know there is not one single truck or SUV that will never have "any problems", reguardless of make!

Best of luck with you new rig!

Glad to see there is people that have had some good luck with the Burb. I dought it will make my friends feel any better though!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I have had both Sub and Expedions and would not go back to the Sub. 150,000 miles on it with out an break downs - I have the 5.4 T and it pulls my 25'with flybridge to and from the lake everyweekend. I'm getting 17 mph and have lots of room for three kid and dog. Can't say that about a buddy who's sub. blow the tranny in his twice but that was in the 1998/9 model subs that had that problem. There are a lot of both truck out there with gas prices where they are. I feel the ride is also nicer than the Sub, but IF you buy either don't get the smaller V-8 and you also lose some towwing # with the 18" rims ON BOTH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wormburner

Thanks to all for the information, buying a used one is a guessing game at best, was just looking to see who (which model) has had the least problems!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • cat44
      We have Hoey, but it's easier to go off the Warroad access to get to where we normally go.
    • Rick
      Nice video. Thank you @papadarv NOTE:We will be updating the forums and all videos uploaded here will go straight to a player that folks can just click and watch instead of downloading and watching.
    • papadarv
      Out Saturday afternoon doing some sight fishing with my camera on one of Chisago County lakes. Water was a bit dirty and with 26 inches of ice camera clarity was a bit lacking. Did get some nice video of the afternoon. Battery augers failed after a couple of holes so went with the Eskimo gas. Lots of fish above the weeds in 10 FOW.  EazyCam site fishingHB.mp4
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      Weather forecast looks to be consistent starting Wednesday with average temps in the  mid 20's. Consistency typically good.  Right now anglers are working fish hard and putting fish in the pail. Electronics are playing a huge roll as some walleyes suspended as far as 10 feet below the ice. Most resorts are out in 31' with some in a touch shallower. More saugers in deep mud with walleyes shallower. Reefs to the west also productive with a few perch being pulled in as well. Rattle and flutter action spoons doing well. Gold, pink, and other glow colors best.  Pike already active in shallow water.  Auger extension needed if fishing on your own with 3+ feet of ice in most areas.  Snowmobilers stay on marked trail, big ice chunks off of trail. Ice houses allowed to be left on lake through March 31st, walleyes open through April 14, pike all year.   Rainy River pushing out some bigger walleyes in the morning/evening with an occasional sturgeon.  Local fish houses along the snowmobile trail from Wheeler's Point to Baudette Bay.  Morning, evening bite most effective.   The NW Angle continues to put nice fish in the bucket. Walleyes and saugers in good numbers.  20-24' early and late, 26-30' during day.  In Ontario waters, crappies in deeper holes of 28-32' on light tackle set ups. Mortality rate is high for released crappies in 25' or deeper, catch fish and move on.  Walleyes all over!  Snowmobile trails on and around the lake are marked and groomed.  
    • mrpike1973
      Hi all hope to make it this Saturday. Depending on the snow coming we should be able to drive on correct?
    • Hoey
      This past weekend, only two were caught by our group of three fishermen and they were small, in the 10" range.  
    • Hoey
      Why not go out of Swift?  I nothing about the Warroad access, sorry.  
    • Hoey
      OK - we made it back!!!  Every trip is different with it's own potential perils.   I finally got into my house on Friday around 11am.  My guests were rookies, so i spent time with each of them, getting setup, heaters started, Vexilars set, houses banked, lines prep'd and set, bait, etc...  The bite was somewhat slow and many small ones.  The day got better 3 to 430pm.  Ended up with 6 nice eyes (19, 18x3, 17x2), 13 jumbos (most ever for a day), 12 small sauger which we ate for dinner.   On Saturday we headed up to the south shore of the Angle, longer ride, so again did not get started too early.  Ended up with our 6 eyes for our limit, these ranged from 15 to 16 inches and a 4-pack of sauger.  Again the bite seemed to pickup at 3 or so and was done by 430pm.   Ice as 3 foot or so.  Snow depth varied a lot, depending on the condition of the ice.  Smooth areas were blown off to crusty 6 inches or so.  Rough ice surely held a lot of snow.   The drive back on Sunday was somewhat tough from Baudette to Emily, winter storm warning.  Slow go, low visibility, and icy roads, sometimes down to 15 mph.   Next scheduled trip is with my wife, son, and three of his Gopher swim teammates for spring break in three weeks.  
    • Naturboy
      Those were caught from a shallow lake (17’) in 9 feet of water at the bottom of the first shoreline break. I was using a UV buckshot and minnow head since the water was murky. The crappie is still swimming the walleye not so much. I didn’t get the exact location. Sorry  
    • Sunset Lodge
      Hello from the NW Angle!

      Minnesota fishing has been most productive in 20-24 feet of water.  Guests are bringing home their limits of Walleye and Sauger with the occasional Perch and Northern mixed in. Fish have been most active early and late in the day and the bite has been terrific. The use of electronics continues to be very beneficial with fish taking jigging spoons, jigg’n raps or rattle baits.  Snowmobile ttrails on the Minnesota side continue to be maintained and are in great shape. We are still making ice, with most spots at over 30 inches. 

      North and East of us in Canada, big Crappies are coming in on light tackle setups out of 30 feet. If you are looking for walleye, they are everywhere!

      Until next week, 

      Sunset Lodge
  • Share & Have Fun