Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
chucker34

Treated wood on dock

Recommended Posts

chucker34

We were going to buy a new aluminum roll-in dock this year but my wife's car gave out so we bought a new one of those instead. : ) Anyway, I'm looking to put new decking on the old wood and steel sectional dock we have right now because many of those boards feel weak (frame seems fine). Not looking to put cedar on it as it is pricey and I'm thinking we'll only use this dock for this summer and maybe next. I looked into the new aresnic free treated lumber at menards and figured I would only have to spend about $100 to do this.

Does anyone have any thoughts on if this type of lumber is safe for the environment or for kids to play on? I see its made of mostly copper based chemicals, none of which the EPA says is supposedly dangerous. The EPA also lists it as an acceptable alternative to the old arsenic based wood and Menards is selling it for docks. Of course, they also once sold the old arsenic based wood for docks too!

Just interested in any thoughts. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
burl

Just remember you have to carry this in and out of the lake each season.The treated wood gets very heavy when wet and dry.We made ours out of cedar and have 14 sections to put out,i am sore for a week after.Burl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eric Wettschreck

The new treated lumber, I believe it's AC2, is being made to replace the old arsinic treated lumber. It's safe for your kiddos and such.

Like what was said earlier, it's heavy. Eat your Wheaties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yukon Don

Chucker,

My parents have a dock like this with treated lumber and when it gets wet it's very slipery and dangerous should little kids be running on it. I know that dock company's have different composit decking as a replacement but very expensive ($100.00) for a 4X8 foot section. If it were me I would not put down the treated wood. Some people will tell you to glue on skid resistant sheets but they come loose as soon as it gets wet. Just my 2 cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

Thanks for the responses. Yukon Don, that's a very valid concern about it being slippery when wet. My father-in-law, who parks his boat and boat lift there, had the same concern. I'm guessing a cheaper type of wood given a coating of deck stain would be slippery too. I just don't want to spend a lot on something we might have for a season or two more. It's an old dock that I'm guessing I'll have to give away when it's time for it to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Walleye Guy

If you are only going to use it a year or two who have many options. You could go with untreated pine with a couple coats of outdooor poly. You could go treated or cedar as well. One thing I would think about is you next dock. I would buy a roll in with fixed aluminum decking. However you MAY be able to make removable decking (planks) that you could put on some of the new aluminum frames that are available. My neighbor has a dock where he removes the top sections each fall before he pulls out the roller frame. Granted I don't know the dimension of your dock sections, but it may be something you want to think about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tashit

My uncle has the same dock where he removes the top sections. I like it a lot. It looks really nice and it's easy to put in and take out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leechlake

Chucker, for over 50 years my folks have had a 135 foot long dock on a lake up north. The deck has always been non treated 2X10's and the last ones we put on 12 years ago. The dock stays in the lake year long. For one or two years you do not need treated (or 5 or 6). We do not stain or treat it in any way. The only maintenance is to sometimes replace or straighten the end posts if the ice has done any damage.

On a seperate note the old treated CCA (copper, chromium, arsenic)is about as dangerous as any stain you use to finish wood. I agree the cca sounds like a lethal cocktail but it isn't and I wouldn't worry about the new treated compounds either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

Thanks. I will think about the unfinished pine, though I would probably still put a coat or two of poly on it. Would that make it slippery? As for the dock itself, it sat unused in the corner of my father-in-law's garage - hence dry rot sat in on the planking last summer. But the frame still seems fine. In any case, it has 3 eight foot sections that are 40 inches wide. I actually had a dock picked out - a 32 foot hewitt roll-a-dock with a solid alumninum deck. I think I will go with that next year (if everything goes right) when boat show prices kick in again. There was actually a dock for sale in the local paper the other night for $600 - aluminum, roll-in with cedar paneling, 32 foot long with 8 foot L on the end and an 8 foot ramp. We don't get the paper until evening and you guessed it. I'm sure it sold that morning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gus

When you poly the wood sprinkle some fine sand (sandblasting or such sand) and it should give you some grip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bottomdweller

chucker heres my input, we have a steel rollin dock. replaced the deck with treated plwood and stapled on outdoor carpet. been good for 12 years now. the aluminum docks are very nice and light, but they do crack in places and are not as strong. just my two cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      The commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has appointed 11 Minnesotans to three-year terms on citizen oversight committees that monitor the agency’s fish and wildlife spending.  The appointees are responsible for reviewing the DNR’s annual Game and Fish Fund report in detail and, following discussions with agency leaders and others, prepare reports on their findings. Appointed to the Wildlife Oversight Committee are Garry Hooghkirk, Duluth; Amanda Leabo, Fergus Falls; Mark Popovich, Welch; John Schnedler, Richfield; and Martha Taggett, Golden Valley. Appointed to the Fisheries Oversight Committee are Karl Anderson, Greenbush; Jess Edberg, Ely; Nicole Hertel, Shoreview; Benjamin Kohn, Hudson; Mark Owens, Austin; and Craig Pagel, Duluth. The new appointees join other members whose terms are continuing. The committees will resume work after the mid-December publication of the DNR’s Game and Fish Fund report for fiscal year 2017. “We look forward to working with these citizens,” said Dave Schad, DNR deputy commissioner. “The appointments continue our commitment to share detailed budget information, bring new participants into the oversight process and ensure revenue generated by hunting and fishing license sales is used appropriately.” The Fisheries and Wildlife oversight committees continue a citizen oversight function first created in 1994. Sixty people applied for oversight committee positions this time. Factors in choosing the new appointees included geographic distribution, demographic diversity and a mix of interests. In the weeks ahead, committee chairs and four members will be selected by each committee to serve on an umbrella Budgetary Oversight Committee chaired by another appointee, John Lenczewski. The committee will develop an overall report on expenditures for game and fish activities. Those recommendations will be delivered to the DNR commissioner and legislative committees with jurisdiction over natural resources financing for further consideration. Minnesota’s Game and Fish Fund is the fiscal foundation for much of the state’s core natural resource management functions. About $110 million a year is deposited into this fund from hunting and fishing license sales, a sales tax on lottery tickets, and other sources of revenue including a reimbursement based on a federal excise tax on certain hunting, fishing and boating equipment. Past DNR Game and Fish Fund expenditure reports and citizen oversight committee reports are also available at mndnr.gov/gamefishoversight. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Conservation grants awarded by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources will help restore, enhance and protect habitat throughout the state.  This latest round of 73 conservation grants is funded by the agency’s Conservation Partners Legacy (CPL) grant program. Now in its ninth year, the program has awarded over $50 million to nonprofit organizations and government entities for conservation projects. The DNR recently received $9.9 million in grant requests from 86 applicants during round one of the application cycle. The DNR has funded $7.5 million of these requests. “Projects include habitat improvements that benefit deer, turkey, pheasants and a wide variety of species,” said Jessica Lee, DNR conservation grants coordinator. “Oak savanna, wetlands and pollinator habitat are restored through this grant program, to give a few examples.” Conservation groups and others interested in applying in the future are encouraged to plan in the coming months so they can apply when funds are again available. The DNR’s CPL program provides grants ranging from $5,000 to $400,000 to conservation nonprofit organizations and government to help fund projects to restore, enhance or protect fish and wildlife habitat in Minnesota. The Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council recommended the grant program, which was approved by the Minnesota Legislature and has been in place since 2009. Funding has been provided annually from the Outdoor Heritage Fund, which is part of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment and funded by a voter-approved statewide sales tax of three-eighths of 1 percent. Round one of the proposals for fiscal year 2017 included the traditional grant cycle, the metro grant cycle and the expedited grant cycle. The expedited cycle for standard types of projects is currently open for another funding round, with the maximum grant award being $50,000. Applications are due online by 4 p.m. Friday, Jan. 19. More information on the program’s grant cycles, and a complete list of the most recent grant applications and past awarded projects are on the DNR website at mndnr.gov/cpl. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Sherburne County Geologic Atlas-Part B was recently published by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Part B covers groundwater conditions and sensitivity to pollution. It expands on Part A, the geology atlas previously published by the Minnesota Geological Survey. The atlases are a valuable resource for groundwater management and land-use planning. Sherburne County is characterized by sandy surface and subsurface conditions. This type of geology creates extensive and productive aquifers that are relatively sensitive to pollution. In addition to maps of pollution sensitivity, groundwater chemistry data are shown, highlighting areas with elevated concentrations of chloride and nitrate. The deeper bedrock aquifers of the eastern part of the county are less sensitive to pollution. The atlas can be acquired through the following sources: Online: PDFs of the report and maps, GIS files and program information are available by searching “Sherburne County Geologic Atlas, Part B.” The GIS folder includes GIS files and associated metadata for the water table, wells, and maps for groundwater flow and pollution sensitivity. The ArcMap file displays the data as shown on the published maps and includes hyperlinks to image files of the published cross sections. Paper copies: Part A and B atlases can be purchased from Minnesota Geological Survey Map Sales, 612-626-2969. Prices for each atlas package range from $12–$15. County geologic atlases provide geologic and hydrogeologic information to support regional planning and water resource management and protection. Partial funding for this project was provided by the Clean Water Fund and the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • IceHawk
      Good Advice Don . You are correct there was a wheeler on Horseshoe back by Krons bay.  Saw him Sunday when I was out on the ice. How he didn't go through is hard to believe.  The chain  is very spotty at best. Finding areas of open water to 4 1/2 5  inches tops. A lot of guys r pushing the envelope out there on Sunday there was at least 10 guys out on mud and the ice is 3-3 1/2 inches thick in that area, also saw a group out near Camerons Island, A lot of these areas were completely open on Thursday so be very very cautious. Tom is right you could see the different shades of freeze up before this snow now its a guessing game. Remember u put others at risk that have to try and rescue you if you break through so use common sense. On a side note there is a pocket of open water on the N end of Big, swans are keeping it open and it just froze over yesterday in front of the golf course on Schneider.  Shaumans bay has 5-6 inches on Rice main lake 2-3 inches.  Koronis is still open was fishing in the boat two weeks ago out there so it may be a while for that beast!
    • eyeguy 54
      can hardly see 3 pound test and tie on the 3mm let alone 1.5 mm and 3/4 pound test. yowzer!
    • leech~~
      Not really, I had that shock a year or so ago when I went out for a day fishing with a Ice Tournament guy. His rods had very light ends, as in you could almost blow on them and they would move. He bought them all on-line for some good cash $80-$100 each. But he did have on all his rods that little cheap in-line reels with like 1-2 lb line on them all! I had to actually borough one of his rods and reels just to keep up with him!
    • eyeguy 54
      zapped HT a note to see if the rod is available anywhere with bigger guides. Nope. 
    • iiccee63
      Sunday am. 3 inches of ice 12/9 with people fishing a few hundred yards out towards the west shore.
    • iiccee63
      Let me rephrase the topic.... Am looking for current ice conditions on this lake. Well aware how things were weeks ago. Any info on current conditions would be appreciated. Thanks
    • Lotharski
      Thanks for the report, Chill!  I went out for a few hours Saturday afternoon and set up on the first break in about 15 fow.  I had the camera down and only saw pike.  Not one gill or eye...  I had 7-7.5" ice where I checked.