Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
ellevold

jigster

Recommended Posts

ellevold

Hey jigster get a load of this. Tom Ganske and the 2 Zarn brothers went to Rainy River a couple of weekends ago.They caught 20 some eyes over 25in 4 fish were 28in and 1 just shy of 30. They were there for 2 days and caught over 200 fish i guess. That would be alright hah. How long will you be at LOW for the opener? Where is your cabin maybe me and Ganske will stop in there if your there the following Friday . Thats when we will be on URL. If your not going to be there let me know where to go for some eyes on LOW because im sure we will try that to. Later

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JIGSTER

I believe it!!The Rainy is a awesome fishery in the spring.We usually fish it for a week in October and the fishin' is great.LOW should be good this year with the late ice out.The eyes should be in shallow and ready to eat!Been hittin the Missouri River at Chamberlain, SD it's closer than the Rainy but you don't catch the big slobs,mostly eater size.**** Luke even caught a 5 lber.Will be at LOW opener til Tues. Later
Jigster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

How many meals of walleye out of the Rainy River do you folks eat per week and how do you feel about the walleye status and the quality of fish being consumed? I guide quetico and the BWCA and the fish of smaller sizes are ok, but most of the Lake Trout and Larger Walleyes are loaded with toxins due to copper smelting in Ontario!

Here I am in Alaska doing research on Minnesota fisheries and food chain toxicity reports and I am very glad that I eat as many crappies as I do. I am just curious as to how many fish/week you consume from the Rainy River and how you feel about pulp mills and other sources of pollutants into our wonderful Rainy River? The fish for some reason seem to be doing very well???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ellevold

I personaly never fished the rainy,but I have friends that do and they eat the fish out of there but they only go up there once a year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

With a slot of nothing over 19.5in, there are not that many toxins built up in the fish. Also the fish you catch in the rainy during the spring are fresh in from LOW, this helps also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Katoman

The last time I was on the Rainy River I was checked by the local CO at the landing. I had heard persistant rumors for years about the toxins in the river. He told me that the Rainy and 1/3 of LOW have high levels of dioxin. It is from the paper mill at the Falls. He advised not to eat more than one meal of fish a month from either the river or the lower 1/3 of the lake. We never kept any fish.It was a very interesting comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tom Stay

Your right guys, the Rainy is an awesome fishery. I've been eating the walleyes out of the Rainy for over 25 years and I'm not glowing yet. I've got blonde hair though if that counts.
But all kidding aside, there are some specs on eating them for children and pregnant women, but for the most part, they are delicious!!!

------------------
Gonzos Guide Service
http//GonzosGuideService.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Katoman

Which brings to mind an interesting question. I do believe the paper mill was fined the largest penalty, like 7 mil at the time, in history of the PCA. Whatever happened to that money? Does anyone know?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JIGSTER

Eat the 15-18 inchers and they seem fine.Alaskander do you have any more info concerning our lakes seems pretty interesting?I don't know all the details on where the pollution in the Rainy comes from,but they claim it's a lot better than it was years back.I would assume this info isn't something the state and local interests want everyone to know about.What gets me is the people that won't eat the fish out of the Rainy,but will eat them out of the lake.Where the hell does the water in LOW come from I ask??If the walleyes won't kill ya the Beef & Pork will!!Have a good one, JIGSTER

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Katoman

I've also heard many lakes north and around the Iron Range have high levels of mercury. It has leeched into many watersheds from the mines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ellevold

I know people that eat fish out of the Minnesota river for years and that was suppose to be one of the highest toxic water in MN, at one time anyway.That ok though just keep throwing them back if you wont eat some. Just more for me to catch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigV

Katoman
It's true many fish in ne Minn. lakes have high levels of mercury but I think most of it is due to the natural levels in the lake. Many of the soils around these lakes have high mercury content and insufficient buffering capacity to bind the toxins.
Not all poisons are man made

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Katoman

I'm from the southern part of the state. You should see some of our lakes, especially during the hot months. It is unbelieveable. The run off from lawns, storm sewers,cess pools is tremendous. I agreed mercury is a natural toxin but the immense digging thru the dirt and the runoff surely deposited it a lot faster in the watershed than mother nature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Surface Tension

Didnt the mercury and pcb's found in our lake's come smoke stack's?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
swamptiger

I remember catching walleyes in the Gap up at Lake of the Woods in the spring 25-30 years ago that were so bad tasting we couldn't eat them. We didn't know for sure where it came from, but the obvious answer was from the mill upstream.

I have fished, and eaten the fish right below the mill in the Falls in recent years, and could detect no bad taste whatsoever.

So, in my book, the Rainy is much cleaner now than it was in years past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fish-on

Remember that most of the walleyes in the Rainy this timeof the year migrated from the vast open areas of Lake of the Woods. Add that to the fact that you can possess only two with nothing over 19.5 and I think you can see why there's othing wrong with eating as many as you can legally keep. They're yummy.

Now if you want to talk about polluted fish, go the the fox river at Green Bay, WI. Yuck, they stink even when you start frying them.

------------------
Bernie Barringer's 10,000 Lakes Guide Service
http://fishingminnesota.com/bernie
Call toll free 800-890-FISH (3474)
fish.on@tds.net

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
minndonn

The DNR website has consumption advisories for lakes that have been tested. LOW is 1 meal a week for walleye over 15 inches for most of us and 1 meal a month for pregnant women. The wed page is
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/fca/index.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • leech~~
      Why do you think I come here everyday?  It's better then poking your eye with a sharp stick or slitting your wrists! 
    • gimruis
      I don't see any serious cold snaps in the next 2 weeks so its likely open water will still be in play for those brave enough to try it.
    • eyeguy 54
    • popriveter
      Now is tough time. I was watching bays ice over a week ago and they are wide open again this week. Could be ice fishing in 10 days, could be ice fishing in a month. Who knows? I have a work trip to North Dakota in 2 weeks and I've been clinging to the hope they might be iced over so I can fish a little afterhours. Probably a longshot. I've already spooled the reels, cleaned and organized the gear, charged the batteries. Trying not to fishing-shop myself into financial woe. Even tried to celebrate open water by wading in neoprene waders and trying to find some sunfish on wetflies. No dice. Ugh.
    • walleyeman1
      Miltona is wide open, there will be quite a few boats out there this weekend. Most lakes south of Miltona are fishable by boat.
    • leech~~
      Can the DNR or who ever reported this, never use this word again "presumptive" when dealing with Wildlife disease results again! It can be better used as, "We are awaiting the presumptive proof of Al Franken touching a boob." But not about Wildlife issues!
    • Jordan Manderfield
      It's all open...it's ready to go..But we won't see any big time cold for awhile..Still in better position then last year. I was open water fishing the first weekend of shotgun in a t-shirt last year. We'll be alright. 
    • Kettle
      Be careful in Vineland bay, even though the river runs out there, there is still some current. It's very sandy there. Find vegetation along a drop off and you'll find pike. If you are going on foot you can walk out of the East access at Father Hennepin and hit a drop off pretty close to shore. Let us know how you do!
    • eyeguy 54
    • Yellowstone
      Interesting on the common merganser. I want to go but I'm not sure either. I was hopeful our go to lake would be open. It is but locked up tight with ice from the landing (in a sheltered bay) several hundred feet out to the more open part of the lake. Haven't seen anything on it either. Our lake is wide open and bait shop owner says he remembers terrific late season hunting on the channel full of cattails into the neighboring lake,  and I've seen birds flying by, but will have to monitor the weather. Not launching the boat if its in the 20s and gale force winds. If it was warmer and a light wind, why the heck not? My wife is also saying no, don't go. We have a lot to do this weekend. I'm like, I would go right on our lake and likely be done and in the house by 9:30 Saturday morning. I would doubt you'll be up by then. lol.