Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
HOOKUP

which pole do I really need?

Recommended Posts

HOOKUP

There is a lot of talk about ST Croix and other high end rods. Do I really need a 100-250 dollar fishing rod. I fish for bass mostly and have caught a lot of fish on my cheap Berkley rod. What makes a rod worth 100 plus dollars? I am going to purchase a new baitcaster and I am pretty sure that I am going for the new Pflueger but I am not sure which rod to put with it. Thanks!

Randy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
icehousebob

I've handled Loomis and St. Croix and they do feel good. But, I have a couple of Gander Mountain series rods that do the job very well at a third of the price. My favorite jig pitching rod is a 20 year old Berkley Stinger that I bought on sale. Three of my sons keep forgeting who owns it. I've never felt undergunned by using any of my lower buck rods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bobb-o

the new rapala series rods are really sensitive. For $25 they cant be beat in my opinion, paired with a daiwa samurai or a mitchell 300X and you have the best $60 combo you can find. A rod is only as good as you make it out to be, i have seen people outfished who were using everything high grade, G. Loomis rods shimano reels, by people who bought something cheap at Walmart. All a $200 does is give you $200 of confidence, nowadays you can find the same quality in a $50-$100 rod as you can inone that costs over $200.

------------------
Diplomacy - The art of saying "nice doggie" while you find a rock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ranckenstuff

I like the Gander guide series rods for $50(IM8 graphite) and the Cabelas TXS rods $90(XrIII graphite).

If you want to pay more than 100$, look into a custom rod. This would allow you to personalize the rod. Being able to pick the blank, the handle, the guides, the sensitivity, all the way you want it. This makes it a little easier to spend more money on a truly "special rod".

When you are out shopping dont forget to bring your reel to the store so you can balance the rod, in my opinion this as important as sensitivity.

Good luck


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Surface Tension

Understand that some of that high price is from R&D. Through marketing in with a store markup and you start getting the high price. Just like drugs, in time a generic version comes along at a lower cost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
delmuts

i have a g-loomis and a st croix. they are great rods, but i don't feel they are worth the extra money. most of my rods are BPS bionic blades. and there are other brands that give you great quallity , that are light, and very sensitive and cheaper. i do agree with picking out the reel you plan to buy and putting it on a rod that you are looking at to check balance and feel. del

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TUMBLEWEED

I have had good luck with the Ugly Stick
Lite series.($ 39 bucks)
I just got two of the Rapala rods
that look and feel great. One is the Long
Cast Model, the other a Tournament Series.
Cost was 50 bucks each

[This message has been edited by TUMBLEWEED (edited 03-01-2004).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
basguy31

One thing to remember about the higher priced St. Croix and the G-loomis is you are paying for a lifetime warranty on those rods (on the Avid series St. Croix anyways). There is nothing wrong with the generic series rods from Gander, Bass-pro, and Cabelas though. I've used them and I think they worked quite well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FishinFix

Hookup, I was having the same problem you are. I was looking for a new baitcasting rod and didn't know what to get. Those St. Croix looked real nice but the price tag didn't. I almost bought one yesterday at Cabalas but I thought I should check out some other options. So anyways I went to Gander and found a Rapala rod for 30 bucks and I really like it. Nice action with a good backbone. Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fisherdog19

Just remember that a wise man once said, "it's not the arrow, it's the Indian." High proced rods are nice, but are not what makes a good fisherman. Rods in the $30-80 range can be as sensitive and light as the high priced models. One thing I like to look for in a rod is one that has a good number of guides, is light, sensetive, and the action I'm looking for. The most expensive rod that I have ever bought was $99, I did win a G Loomis Muskie rod that was worth over $200, but I would have a hard time buying one that expensive.

Fisherdog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chris Haley

basguy hit it on the head. I use St Croix and love them. I also send 2+ back a year broken. and pay shipping to receive a new one. A broken $75 rod is just that! A broken $160 Avid is a new one in less than a week with $10 shipping!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fisherdog19

Another way to go would be a custom made rod. You could save a little money and get a high end rod that would be built to your exact specs. If your interested, Scoot's dad makes them and has great workmanship. Scoot is a moderator for the Red River forum.

Fisherdog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jparrucci

I believe some of the higher priced rods are worth the price, depending on your skills and what type of fishing you are doing. Slow trolling and jigging for walleyes is a lot different than casting for bass. I think the added sensitivity makes all the difference when moving slow for walleyes. Being able to feel every tap and to be able to feel the bottom and keeping your jig inches off the bottom can be crutial to catching walleyes. Casting for bass is a whole different story. You want more power and backbone, and the sensitivity isn't nearly as important. I usually boat more fish than anybody else in the boat using a St. Croix with fireline (no stretch) in the deep water (40 feet) walleye bite. I definitly feel the fish well before they do, and get better hook sets. I see all of them missing lots of fish, while I miss very few.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I was one who probably used to think that cheaper rods were comparable to high end rods, but then I worked at Gander Mtn and had the opportunity to buy high end rods for low end prices. For lots of types of fishing I now am a believer in the precision that you get with a higher end product. I think the fishing experience is increased with a lighter, more sensitive, and tighter blank.

For instance, I have a Lighting Rod flipping stick and Two St. Croix Avid flipping sticks. The Lighting Rod is heavier and feels quite a bit more clumsy, so much so that I rarely pick it up and my fishing style is one where I will change rods constantly to try different lures.

Occasionally there are some lower priced rods that have an outstanding feel and action. Another thing about high end rods is that they teach you what to look for in lower end rods in terms of feel and action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Scoot

I think it depends a lot on the application you're going to be using it for. If you're a bass guy and want something to pitch spinnerbaits with, you certainly don't need the worlds most sensitive rod. If you're trolling with cranks for eyes, muskies, or whatever you definitely don't need the a super sensitive rod.
However, if you're jig fishing finicky eyes in the spring or fall and are using a cheap rod that's not sensitive, I wish you luck. I've seen some guys fish an entire weekend (in my boat) on the Rainy and "not have a bite" while we knocked the snot outta them. I'm sure they had as many bites as me, but they couldn't feel them.
So yeah, sometimes a good, sensitive rod is worth some extra money. Some applications let you can catch as many fish with a reel attached to a broomhandle. Gotta match the rod to the application.

------------------
Scoot

So I got dat goin’ for me… which is nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chief

Hookup,

There's no downside to buying the best rod you can afford. And there's no question that, for experienced anglers, a rod is a truly personal, subjective purchase. However, beyond a certain dollar range...oh, let's say...... $85 or $90 it becomes difficult to objectively describe true benefits. Having said this, here is my two cents:

1. If you look in boats at tournaments, in non-sponsored anglers' boats, what you'll see is an abundance of Cabela's Fish Eagle, Fenwick HMX, Berkley Lightning Rods, Bass Pro Bionic Blades, St, Croix Premier,and so on. All of these are well under $100.00 and are frequently on sale. Sponsored anglers, for the most part, pay nothing for rods--so of course they use top of the line models. But most tournament anglers use surprisingly modest tackle.

2. Like most folks using this website, you're probably a multi species, multi presentation angler. As such you use and need a variety of rods. A variety of Loomis, Avid, Techna AV, etc., etc., is a prohibitively expensive proposition. It's less painful to have a variety of solid, mid-range, rods in the boat.

3. There are certain finesse, cold water, deep water tactics that do demand great rod sensitivity. I agree with others that you should have one higher end spinning rod if you spend much time in these situations. But spinnerbait, crankbait, bobber, topwater applications don't really demand a great deal of rod sensitivity.

4. High end rods claim to contain very high modulus graphite, resulting in very high strength to weight ratios. However, if you read the fine print, the percentage of high modulus graphite in any one rod is usually less than 30%. Furthermore, despite advertising claims to the contrary, high modulus graphite is more susceptible to blow-ups as a result of nicks and dings to the rod wall. Yes, yes, there are lots of good warranties out there, but shipping fees and down time will always be an issue.

5. All things being equal. buy the lighter of any two rods. A too heavy rod, and the fatigue it causes, will cost you more fish than almost any other factor.

6. Purchase decent, brand name tackle--then spend the difference on actually being on the water.

GOOD LUCK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Northlander

I have lots of rods. Lots are in that $55 to $85 range. Some are real nice rods. The more I fish the more I like certain rods. As stated above if you fish a lot go with a light rod that feels good in your hand. After years of fishing with a lot of rods my favs. are St. Croix Avids, Fenwick HMG or HMX, Shimano V sreies and a certain lightning rod that just has some history to it. I also like those new Rapala rods for the $ and certain Diawa rods are nice too.
If you have the extra $ get a nice rod with a great warranty like St. Croix. As stated above a $10 shipping is much better than buying 2 or 3 $50 rods.
Can you catch fish on cheaper rods? Of course. But once you try a high end rod you have a hard time using anything less. Even my wife prefers my St. Croix sticks and she fishes about 3 times a year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chris Haley

I feel your pain northlander!! Everytime I get a great new rod or reel the wife claims it as her new favorite!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      State wildlife chief addresses upcoming season and future challenges By Paul Telander, DNR wildlife chief When Minnesota’s deer season ends Sunday, Dec. 31, it is quite likely the harvest will be in the 200,000 range.  This Minnesota Department of Natural Resources projection is above last year’s harvest of 173,213, below the 2003 record harvest of 290,525 and similar to the most recent 20-year average of 205,959. Prior to 2000, deer harvests in excess of 200,000 occurred only four times. Deer harvest totals typically relate to the size of the deer population and to a lesser degree to weather conditions immediately before and during the hunting season. On the 2017 season
      This should be a good deer season barring any unforeseen unusual weather. Deer numbers are up following three years of conservative harvest regulations designed to rebuild the population, coupled with three relatively mild winters. As a result, more antlerless permits are available this year, and hunters in many parts of the state will have additional opportunities to harvest more deer because of other more liberal season framework changes. Unfavorable weather, like heavy snowfall immediately before or during the hunting season, is the main factor that would prevent a harvest increase. On putting 2017 in context
      The highest deer harvests occurred during the early to mid-1990s and from 2000-2008. During this latter period, the harvest topped 200,000 each year. The high harvests in the early 2000s occurred at a time when the over-riding harvest strategy was to reduce the deer population so it wouldn’t grow out of control, as had happened in certain eastern states, and to address certain environmental, economic and social concerns. Deer harvests in excess of 225,000 occurred only once in the 1990s. Going further back, the harvests in the 1970s never topped 100,000. The harvests in the 1980s were under 150,000. Today, there’s growing discussion in the hunting community as to what’s a reasonable harvest target, and that’s a good conversation to have. On managing toward population goals
      Our aim is to keep deer numbers at population goals identified during DNR’s periodically occurring public goal-setting processes. There are 130 different deer permit areas throughout the state, and nearly all permit areas have a numeric population goal range. Population goals range from as low as a handful of deer per square mile in intensively farmed areas to 20 to 25 deer per square mile in prime forested areas. A few permit areas are too small or have too low of a harvest to model the local population. Deer numbers are at or have exceeded population goals over most of the state. Some northeast and southwest permit areas are slightly below goal. Parts of central Minnesota and southeastern Minnesota are above goal. From an overall, statewide perspective, we’re not far from where we believe Minnesota should be. On DNR transparency
      Many hunters are curious as to how we make our decisions on antlerless permit numbers and season structure, and that’s something we are trying to more effectively communicate. The process starts immediately after the deer season closes. That’s when area wildlife supervisors and staff monitor deer harvest results in their local areas and collect informal feedback from hunters, conservation officers, foresters and others. In spring, after winter severity has been monitored and deer mortality losses have been estimated, research staff run population models for each permit area based on the last year’s harvest, winter mortality, anticipated fawn births, predation and other data. These calculations are the basis of research staff recommendations for season permit area designations (lottery, managed, intensive harvest, etc.) and the number of antlerless permits that should be made available to hunters in each lottery permit area in order to achieve population goals. Research staff recommendations are sent to all area wildlife supervisors, who then have the option of agreeing with them or modifying them based on their own local observations and informal input. Often, these recommendations agree with each other, but not always. When this happens, differences get resolved at the regional or St. Paul office level. Ultimately, the agreed upon season structures and number of permits to be issued for each area are communicated to hunters through the multi-colored deer map that is part of the hunting regulations booklet and a new, more informative interactive deer map on the DNR website at mndnr.gov/deermap. On managing expectations
      That’s perhaps the hardest part of deer management, and it’s often a function of scope and scale. Our agency’s focus is on the big picture and a half million hunters. Conversely, the individual hunter is most interested in what’s happening within their immediate hunting area, which is often as little as 40 acres. It’s not well-known but among 13 Midwestern states, only Missouri manages deer populations at a finer spatial scale than Minnesota. We are serious about managing expectations and deer numbers in small geographic areas. Still, it is common to have a wide variety of opinions in each area on whether there should be more, fewer or different sized deer. To that point, we recently conducted a hunter satisfaction survey and one of the findings is that today’s hunters have higher expectations than those who hunted just 10 years ago. On communicating with hunters
      When I began my career it was common to interact with hunters at deer registration stations and local field offices. Today with the ease, convenience and popularity of phone and internet game registration, the DNR no longer has staff at deer registration stations. And people don’t visit DNR offices like they once did because so much information is available on the DNR website. Our challenge is finding new and efficient ways to have two-way conversations with hunters. This past winter we received more than 1,400 comments during a three-month long deer management plan public input effort. We were pleased with the response yet those 1,400 comments from an engaged and important audience represent only a minute fraction of the hunting public. There’s an irony in the fact that even though it is easier to be connected to one another these days because of smartphones and other technology, many people feel less connected than they once did. Figuring out how to maintain strong relations with hunters and other stakeholders is something on which we need to keep working. Minnesota’s first-ever deer plan will outline key concepts and crucial, ongoing work needed to manage deer, one of the state’s most popular and economically vibrant natural resources. An important aspect of the plan is how DNR will reach out and communicate deer management needs, necessary actions and reasons for those actions. A draft plan will be available in early 2018. I encourage everyone to read the draft plan, consider DNR’s suggested approach and give us your feedback and ideas through the public input opportunities we’ll make available. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Hunters looking forward to higher deer numbers this season Hunters will have additional opportunities to harvest deer this season thanks to a series of mild winters and conservative hunting regulations, which have resulted in rebounding deer populations across Minnesota.  Firearms deer season opens Saturday, Nov. 4, and there are 130 permit areas in 2017. Information about each permit area can be found on the DNR’s interactive deer map at mndnr.gov/deermap, and includes wildlife manager reports, regulations, and statistics about deer harvest and populations on a local scale. Northwest deer report
      John Williams, northwest region wildlife manager More deer on the landscape in the northwest region should help hunters better enjoy the season and have good prospects for a successful hunt. Another mild winter on top of the previous two mild winters has largely enabled deer populations to be at or near goal levels in most permit areas. Fawn production was also good this year; another indication of does coming through the winter in good health. Recent rains have filled basins that were previously dry due to drought-like conditions in late summer, and water levels are up on many of the marshes and lakes in the region. Hunters should be prepared to deal with wetter than average conditions if they are hunting in or need to cross lowland areas. In general, hunters will be able to harvest more deer. In several permit areas the designations changed to allow more overall harvest. Some permit areas moved from a designation of lottery, which requires hunters to apply in advance to shoot an antlerless deer, to a hunters choice designation that allows a hunter to use one license to shoot either a buck or antlerless deer. Other permit areas changed designations from hunters choice to managed. In permit areas designated as managed, hunters can harvest two deer through use of a regular license and a bonus antlerless permit. Permit areas that did stay in the lottery designation this year may have more permits available than in previous years. Northeast deer report
      Dave Olfelt, northeast region wildlife manager Three consecutive, relatively mild winters have contributed to good fawn production and high numbers of twin births. Snow depth was moderate throughout much of the region and a relatively early green-up of forage has supported deer that appear to be in excellent physical condition. Where good habitat exists, deer populations are approaching or are at established population goals. While deer are not evenly distributed within permit areas because of habitat differences and varying levels of hunting pressure, harvest regulations have relaxed in many northern Minnesota permit areas to allow more deer harvest. Duluth, several Iron Range cities and some state parks continue to hold special hunts to reduce deer numbers. Rain and wet conditions have persisted throughout much of the fall season. Hunters may find water in areas that are typically dry this time of year and forest road access may be difficult or impassable in some locations. Hunters in far northeastern Minnesota’s primary moose range should review the new deer permit area maps for boundary and numbering changes. Central deer report
      Jami Markle, assistant central region wildlife manager “Deer are everywhere” is a common refrain across the central region this fall. Deer populations seem to have bounced back from a decline following the severe winter of 2013-2014. In fact, many deer permit areas in the region have met or are above population goals, meaning more permits will be available this fall. With rebounding deer populations and ample hunter opportunities, wildlife managers are anticipating a strong harvest in 2017. Deer look healthy as they shed their reddish summer coats for the more muted gray-brown tones that will carry them through the winter. Summer habitat conditions were ideal with an excellent growing season and plentiful native forage and cover. Does with twin fawns seem to be the norm rather than the exception this year. Wildlife managers and landowners have noted an abundant acorn crop in the central and southeast portion of the region this fall which will keep deer feeding and browsing in the oak woods. Wet conditions in late September and early October have postponed agricultural harvest so hunters may see standing crops well into the firearms season. Fall leaf drop is reported to be later than normal in the southern part of the state, but by early November sightlines should be opened up and the forest floor will have a new layer of fallen leaves. Buck scrapes and rubs are starting to appear and hunters can expect to see deer movement and patterns change as the rut approaches. Many permit areas in the central region are designated as managed this year, allowing harvest of two deer through the use of a regular license and a bonus antlerless permit. Five permit areas are designated as intensive, which allows for harvest of three deer using additional bonus permits. There are additional harvest opportunities in the 601 metro deer management area and the 603 chronic wasting disease management zone, both of which offer harvest of an unlimited number of antlerless deer. Southwest deer report 
      David Trauba, southwest region wildlife manager Two consecutive mild winters coupled with past conservative harvest strategies have allowed deer numbers to increase throughout southwestern Minnesota. In addition, wildlife managers reported good fawn production. As a result, more antlerless permits were provided for this fall’s hunting season. However, permits numbers continue to be low in select permit areas, mostly in extreme southwest, due to the loss of Conservation Reserve Program acres. Managers in these permit areas are having a difficult time increasing deer numbers due to limited habitat availability. Conversely, hunters need to be aware that permit areas 281 and 290 moved to a hunters choice designation for the first time due to an abundance of deer along the Minnesota River corridor. Two wild cards for hunters will be the amount of standing crops and river flooding. Historically the amount of standing crops drives opening weekend hunter harvest along with weather conditions. Large rainfall amounts in mid-October have resulted in flooded fields and river flooding. Crop harvest is behind schedule but this can change very quickly so it is too early to predict what amount of crops will be in the field, if any, before opening day. However, hunters should prepare for high water in select river corridors; the high water can influence deer use of these habitats. Many deer have been forced out of the river valleys into the surrounding uplands. As always, hunters need to scout and adapt to conditions. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • muskie-mike
      Caught an 18 inch walleye on a crank bait and a 48" muskie grabbed it..Got it up to the boat a few times but rolled and cut my line,the walleye was dead and I had it for supper...got 2 muskies on walleyes,1 on sunfish and 1 on a crappie..
    • Toasty
      Still for sale?
    • gimruis
      I would avoid them if I were you.  All season.  There's often at least some current flowing through there and with these warmer winters, its just a bad idea.
    • gimruis
      If your getting some pretty close shooting (and gauging by your photos you are in those setups), you might want to use an IC (improved cylinder) choke instead.  Spread that pattern out a little more and switch to some smaller shot size with more velocity, especially if you're mostly just shooting as small ducks like woodies. I almost exclusively use an IC until the calendar turns November, for ducks, pheasants, and grouse.  Later on when you get more shooting at bigger, smarter birds that are on the edge of range you could go back to a modified.
    • Sunset Lodge
      Hello from the NW Angle!   Water temps are hovering around 48 degrees and fall fishing is phenomenal! Walleyes are biting anywhere from 14 to 30ft with jigging being the most effective method. Crappies are continuing to bite around sunken trees and deep holes with a good amount of perch mixed in. Anglers have had success trolling for large pike and muskies with jigging also bringing some to the boat.    We are getting fish houses ready for the 2017-18 ice fishing season and are very excited for hard water!   We recommending checking availability for winter ASAP!   Sunset Lodge
    • fishingdad
      Thank you for the responses everyone. You are correct Del I do not have the Fiber option.  We do use the Hot spot from AT&T at times but to be honest the Data does not last all that long, Even though we are right by Moccasin point & the tower is at the end of Frazer our signal is not the best at times.  We could also do DSL but according to one neighbor we may be faster sending up carrier pigeons & waiting for a response.
    • gunner55
      It's been a 1/32 oz. unpainted jig head & a small split shot along with a crappie minnow for me most of the time. Still barely see the rod tip load or wiggle a little on the bite. Even tougher with the wind lately & 20' or more down.
    • h8go4s
      Any channel on any lake is dangerous.