Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
fisherman-andy

Keeping bigger fish wrong?

Recommended Posts

fisherman-andy    0
fisherman-andy

There seems to be alot of debate about how fish is being kept, what size, kind, etc...

So I thought I bring up this long overdue issue of what to keep and not to keep.

I guess all of us can agree keeping less than your limit is good. We can also say keeping the legal size limit is good to. But what about undersize and oversize?

I believe in letting undersize fish go, and should'nt be kept in the first place due to regulation. Those smaller fish is definately going to help out in the future fishing. But what about the larger fish?

Is keeping a larger fish wrong? I think yes and no. I think a fish that is way too large should always be let go, for instance a 35+inch walleye or 50+inch muskie or an 8-10lb bass. The downside to these fish is they are way too old and in many cases unable to compete in breeding. There are people that are going to keep one, and it's not going to hurt.

Okay here comes the hard part. Fish that are in their prime.. like say a 20+inch eye, or 5lb bass can still be a very strong contender & breeder. We can easily say this is where the fish population can be hurt if too much is kept.

For example my theory is if we are keeping the 15-18inch eyes and letting the rest go could mean a very good fishery for years to come. It's not rocket science that larger fish produce stronger & bigger offspring. That means plenty of trophy fish in the 19-30inch range. Here is where my theory will sound kinda off-beat or fishy, but I think eyes over 30inches can be taken for trophy if one wants. Anything above 35inches should be released simply because it is just way too old and big.

I know not everyone will agree with me and that this is just my opinion that I am sharing with everyone. You could say different species will have different results. You also have to consider the size or type of body of water, or river.

But really letting all the big ones go isn't all that great when you really think about it. It's letting the great big ones go that make it such a desire or sport.

Anyone feel free to add comments or info...
I would like to know how this issue stands among us.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ozzy    0
ozzy

For myself I keep smaller pan fish instead of larger ones, let the large ones spawn.(unless it is red lake crappies}
Walleyes any thing over 4 pounds goes back.
I only keep fish if there going to the table that night.
this year I will keep some northern to learn how to get the y bones out and see if they taste as good as everyone says.

sometimes not keeping fish does more harm than good, to many fish not enough prey.
just my 2 cents.

------------------
crazy about fishing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trailblazin    0
Trailblazin

You state: For example my theory is if we are keeping the 15-18inch eyes and letting the rest go could mean a very good fishery for years to come. It's not rocket science that larger fish produce stronger & bigger offspring. That means plenty of trophy fish in the 19-30inch range. Here is where my theory will sound kinda off-beat or fishy, but I think eyes over 30inches can be taken for trophy if one wants. Anything above 35inches should be released simply because it is just way too old and big.

Not a bad theory. Here are Mille Lacs Regs:

May 15, 2004: Anglers may keep walleye up to 20 inches, with one trophy over 28 inches in the four fish limit. All walleye from 20 to 28 inches must be released.

July 15, 2004: Anglers may keep walleye up to 22 inches, with one trophy over 28 inches in the four fish limit. All walleye from 22 to 28 inches must be released.

This topic will be debated for many years.
I agree that you must take some fish out and you also must leave some. Use good judgement! Bring home a meal.....Better yet - let the trophies grow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
little buddy    0
little buddy

ozzy... why the exception for red lake crappies? just curious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ozzy    0
ozzy

Little buddy
The exception for red lake crappie is most of the large crappies are from the 1995 year class and I read that 75% will die from old age, and they are the best tasting fish I've ever had.

------------------
crazy about fishing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Abyss    0
Abyss

I also believe in catch and release, but I always keep a couple panfish for dinner. I can understand letting a trophy go, but for me and others like me who are not great fishermen by any means, catching a trophy is a once in a lifetime deal. I can understand some people keeping them, but I personally would let the trophy go (after many photos hehe) since its not really healthy to eat and I dont feel stuffing it and putting it on my mantle would do any good. In my opinion, keeping it or letting it go really wouldnt affect fishing in general since it is a rare occurance to catch a trophy.

Taking your limits all the time will hurt the fishing in the future, but really nothing can be done to the people who do that since its perfectly legal. All we can do is help educate everybody about the problem of doing it and maybe lobby to have tighter regs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mnwild    0
mnwild

I was going to ask a similar question about what size fish are ok to keep. I catch alot of Northern's all in the 16"-20" range maybe a few lbs 2 or 3, would you consider this a small fish to keep. Panfish and Bass I have a general idea of what is small, the Northerns are what I have in question.
Any info is appreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pikemania    0
pikemania

In my opinion the 2-3lbs pike is the perfect size to keep. If you know how to take the y bone out it is a great fish to eat and you are keeping the population of pike in the lake strong by releasing the breeding stock. Most lakes I have been to in Canada the slot limit on pike is 25-36 inches with one over 36. So the 5lb to 12lb (approximately) pike are beeing allowed to spawn and keep anglers from Minnesota coming back year after year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Juan Grande    25
Juan Grande

I actually caught the biggest bass of my life yesterday morning (almost 6lbs) and I threw it back. I didn't even consider keeping it. I took a few pictures and released it.

My uncle was with and couldn't believe I put it back. He was keeping every bass he caught including several nice fish over 3 lbs. I tried to convince him that those 3 pounders are important spawners and that the smaller fish taste better. To him, bigger fish=bigger fillets.

I guess it's just a matter of personal preference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pjfweb    0
pjfweb

I used to always think... bigger fish = bigger fillets... which of course is completely true. Personally I don't keep the fish I catch that often, but when I do.. it's going to be based completely on taste and almost always, bigger fish = nastier taste... especially when it comes to bass.

For instance, I caught three bass Saturday morning, I kept two (first two fish I kept this year) and they were both 12"... the 3 pounder went back in the lake.

~Patrick

[This message has been edited by pjfweb (edited 06-07-2004).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beef46    0
Beef46

I disagree that taking your limit is a bad thing. The DNR is constantly doing surveys and limits are set based on these surveys. If taking your limit was a "bad thing", the limits would be reduced. That being said what about the size within those limits? Let's talk walleyes. Every lake is different. Personally, I only like to keep walleyes from 15-18 inches. Let the smaller ones grow, let the bigger ones make more babies.

Everyone has their opinion on this and this is just my .02 cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Roosterslayer05    3
Roosterslayer05

andy- you say release the fish between 19-30 inches. Thats good for some lakes but other lakes its fine and wont hurt the population like Mille Lacs, LOW, Superior, Michigan, Erie ect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • SkunkedAgain
      Jeez no. I can barely remember the netting discussion, let alone which side that I was arguing! Yup, you can see us cruising past quite often probably intent on satisfying the little one's quest for some ice cream at Moosebirds. She loves Sue and Ron. I'll definitely wave or stop by if I see you. I'll be up the next two weekends.
    • Wakemup
      How do you guys like to fish the west end as we transition into September and early fall? My next planned time at the cabin will be Labor day, I'm sure it'll be plenty busy on the lake but hoping to find a few quiet spots in the mornings and evenings to do some walleye fishing.
    • leech~~
      Plus+1  The size seems to drop off late in the year. Last year bait shops I went to were selling Large as Jumbos and small as large!
    • RuddyDuck
      Reminder, meeting tonight at 7:00pm in Annandale and written comment period runs til August 28th. The email addresses for comment are on pages 18-19. Comment now or the days of fishing your favorite lake anytime you want, will be over! I’m sure this is coming to a county near you if this goes thru out here.
    • gimruis
      Not uncommon at all for this time of year.  I used to try and find some regularly around Labor Day and always ran into problems.  I think its just the nature of the bait business.
    • BringAnExtension
      Does anyone know where I can get some jumbo leeches between the Twin Cities and Mille Lacs?  I would even settle for large.  There seems to be a shortage of supply. Thanks!
    • proguide
      Our prayers were answered from the south with some river flow. For now the river is back to easier and safer boating so we can get around.
        The catfishing has held steady, same as the past two weeks. The fish have moved to the shallow off current sides of the river since the nights have recently become cooler.  Sits have become longer to 25-35 minutes per spot to allow the fish to find the bait.  Mid-Day don't be afraid to find some current or move back to the middle to see if the fish have moved out to feed.
        Bait has been frozen suckers and frogs.  All other baits just don't seem to have the same effectiveness.
        We are entering into some transitions to fall and things will be changing over the next week or two.  The new flow should get the fish moving a bit more and that fall feed should ramp up over the next couple weeks.
    • PRO-V
      Also check for water in the fuel filter. At higher rpms water droplets travel to carbs and causes poor combustion. Happened to me some years ago. Had to drain water out of tank.
    • CigarGuy
      Skunked, It was nice meeting you.  I've seen you,  your wife and little one a few times, but you never waved-thought you might be mad at me after we had a little debate on netting.  Sounds like were good!  Stop by if you see me on the dock.  That was my wife and sister in-law assembling the bench. That pinch area on the river is tight and some folks tend to fly right thru.  Also, people fishing on that dock in the pinch down area in the spring, don't like to reel in their bobber when you try to navigate through the boats in the spring.  I used the fish the St Louis River a lot and fellow fisherman were terrible flying by you.  I too follow the no-wake policy when going through tight areas.
    • delcecchi
      Yep, done for the year.  Not much for heat or insulation in the cabin.  It's a real, honest to goodness cabin.   So, as of Thursday, adios.  Until next year, etc.