Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
wooly1

Real estate/development question

Recommended Posts

wooly1

I own 4 acres of land abutting 30+ acres bought by a developer. We are township land surrounded by city land. they want to be annexed. The city says one annex all annex (meaning me too). If I don't agree it probably won't happen.

Do I agree solely due to increased value? Or is it reasonable to request payment from my neighbor to go along with annexation and higher taxes.

It should be mentioned the former owners offered me mid-five figures to go along with annexation so they could get a better price for their land. Long story short they sold as "as good as annexed" to the developer, and I got nothing because annexation didn't go through before the sale.

Opinions please.

I would like to get something to cover expenses until it is developed where I can realize some profit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dozer

Should have taken the money while you had the chance IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wooly1

Didn't have the chance. It was structured to pay upon annexation. Annexation hasn't happened yet and now there is a different owner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dozer

I dont really know how all that stuff works but doesnt sound good for you! Good luck getting any $ out of anybody!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wooly1

Dozer,

I still have the land which is increasing in value due to the development next door. So the only time I have lost out was how the previous agreement was structured. That would have been "found money".

My question is rather simple to someone who is in the development or real estate biz, can I /should I request compensation from the developer, who wants annexation, for being annexed when I will have to pay more taxes (30%) after being annexed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jackpine Rob

Get all the money you can get as quickly as you can get it. Annexation can be a nasty deal - and most of us who have been annexed over the years had nothing to say about it. We just have the joy of paying higher taxes.

If you have a card to play, do so immediately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dozer

 Originally Posted By: Jackpine Rob
Get all the money you can get as quickly as you can get it. Annexation can be a nasty deal - and most of us who have been annexed over the years had nothing to say about it. We just have the joy of paying higher taxes.

If you have a card to play, do so immediately.

Thats exactly waht I am trying to say. There is nothing you can do about it and you are screwed. I really dont think the developer is going to care what you want and isnt going to give you one cent no matter what you think or say. Good Luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IFallsRon

Sadly, you're being squeezed out. Annexation equals assessments and higher taxes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparcebag

 Originally Posted By: wooly1
I own 4 acres of land abutting 30+ acres bought by a developer. We are township land surrounded by city land. they want to be annexed. The city says one annex all annex (meaning me too). If I don't agree it probably won't happen.

Do I agree solely due to increased value? Or is it reasonable to request payment from my neighbor to go along with annexation and higher taxes.

It should be mentioned the former owners offered me mid-five figures to go along with annexation so they could get a better price for their land. Long story short they sold as "as good as annexed" to the developer, and I got nothing because annexation didn't go through before the sale.

Opinions please.

I would like to get something to cover expenses until it is developed where I can realize some profit.

I'd talk to the new developer explain your past deal,try to deal saying you will go along with annexation for---$.*If not you'll oppose it.The city can force you in to annexation,and being surounded by city it WILL happen..BUT WHEN.Put it in front of the developer the way you did us.See what happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EJ

If they can't annex without your approval, then you have a lot of leverage and still ask for compensation.

I am working on a similar situation right now where a dvelopment is being held up because a neighbor will not sign off on a street where he currently has a non-exclusive easement for a shared gravel drive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lawdog

Is this land you want to retain? The developer may pay a huge premium to gain the extra acres and control over the annexation issue. Sell it to him at a huge profit if you don't need it. All kinds of people have gotten filthy rich just by having land in the right place at the right time when someone really wants/needs it for something else. Why not join them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rainylakefisher

Generally annexation cannot occur by 'leap frogging' over parcels. The City limits must be contiguous although that doesn't necessarily keep them from doing an 'end around' by just skirting the property while maintaining continuity to the current City limits.

I am a development consultant and deal with issues like this frequently. My general advice to landowners is that you don't want to be the first to sell, but you really don't want to be the last and left out in the cold. I'll find a way to work around you and it usually hurts you worse than the client. Playing ball, up to a point, is usually the best option.

Disclaimer: As mentioned, there are times when you truly have someone over a barrel and then the developer might pay large money to make you go away. It all depends on how big a deal it is and whether the other units can support the money being paid out.

Landowners have unrealistic expectations of value right now because they've heard numbers much higher than possible at this time given the current market coniditions. Hang onto your land for a while ... there aren't that many people willing to buy raw land when they can buy finished or 'entitled' lots at steep discounts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wooly1

Thanks sparcebag,

That is the direction I was leaning but needed to hear I wasn't off base. Annexation will happen at some point in the near term. Their land would have better value with city water and sewer. It is near downtown and schools so it would be idiotic for it to remain as is.

City allowable density would be greater than township creating more value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wooly1

EJ,

Annexation will be a slam dunk with my cooperation. Without they may lose another year on developing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wooly1

lawdog,

I intend to...at the best and most profitable time. But when is that time? Before dirt is pushed, After annexation or before?

Once phase one is done?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wooly1

Thanks rainy,

I am not looking to retire on the money my 4 acres will bring but reasonable windfall is what I seek.

I do not have anyone over a barrel, my acreages is in the corner.

The land has not been leap frogged. It is an island of township surrounded by city, developed and undeveloped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Ranger62200
      Anyone have a recent water temp for Vermilion?
    • eyeguy 54
      heard that a fluflu and a waxie might work. will try if I get back.  
    • smurfy
      looks like cow bay!!!!!!!!!! nice fish.
    • eyeguy 54
    • Hoey
      I have not heard any reasons for the purported relocation.  Just thinking out loud here - Walker Bay has not had enough ice in many of the past years, so they have to hold the event on shore and not on the lake.  There is limited space for a shore event there.  Maybe Bemidji makes more ice and/or they have more on-shore accommodations.  Walker itself is more of a tourist and family town and the Pout Fest is not that.  
    • Rick
      Hunters are reminded to register deer before processing, before antlers are removed and within 48 hours after taking the animal, according to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.  “Deer registration provides information that is essential to our ability to manage deer populations,” said Steve Merchant, wildlife populations and regulations manager. “Hunters are required to register deer and it’s a fairly simple process.” Hunters register deer with a phone call, online or in person. Before registering a deer, hunters must validate their site tag. The validated tag must be attached to the deer when the deer is placed on a motor vehicle or an ATV, a vehicle or a trailer being towed by an ATV or brought into a camp, yard or other place of habitation. Phone registration
      Register deer via phone by calling 888-706-6367. Directions are printed on each deer hunting license. Have a pen or permanent marker ready. A confirmation number will be given; it must be written on the license and site tag. Internet registration
      Register deer via internet at mndnr.gov/gameregistration. Directions will be similar to phone registration, and a confirmation number must be written on the license and site tag. In-person registration
      When phone or internet registration is not possible, hunters must take their deer to a big-game registration station. The person whose name appears on the license must be present at the registration station with their deer. They will receive a big-game possession tag that must be attached to the hind leg, ear or antler where the site tag was attached. A list of all stations organized by city and county is available at any DNR wildlife office or at mndnr.gov/hunting/deer. During registration, the hunter must use the permit area number where the deer was harvested; using the wrong deer permit area for registration is illegal. Registration instructions for all methods are available at mndnr.gov/gameregistrationhelp. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • BrianF
      Hi Jim, the problem with channels on Tonka is not only the current, which keeps the ice thin all winter, but also due to the effects of road salt/chemicals.  Many of the channels have bridges over them which receive a lot of automobile traffic.  In the winter, road salt/chemicals are pour on the roads during adverse weather conditions.  Cars and especially snow plows cause the salt/chemicals to splash over the guard rails and onto the ice.  When you see new reports of cars going thru the ice on channels, it's usually right under a road overpass, for this reason.  Because of the road salts, channels are just a super dangerous place to be, even during our coldest winters.  
    • Hookmaster
      I'm pretty sure there is still a winter only access on Smith's bay just north of where hiway 51 intersects hiway 15 at the lake.  It's just before the North Shore Marina. You'd have to trailer to there but then you'd have the main lake to fish.
    • Rick
      Pheasants banded in Nobles and Redwood counties Pheasant hunters can voluntarily report roosters that were banded as part of a study being conducted by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.  DNR Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group workers captured and banded roosters during a research project. The two study areas involved in the project are the Lamberton Wildlife Management Area complex in Redwood County and the Worthington Wells Project Area south of Worthington, located in Nobles County. Although the study is focused on hen pheasants and their broods, roosters were also opportunistically captured in an attempt to collect survival information on males. A plain metal leg band with a unique identifying number was placed on the right leg of each rooster. Hunters are asked to contact the Farmland Wildlife Research Group to report harvest information. The band number, date of harvest, and location information (WMA name or GPS coordinates preferred) are requested. If hunters want information on when and where the bird was initially captured, they may also provide their contact information so that researchers can return their call. GPS locations and personal data will not be made public. Although Minnesota has a rooster-only hunting season, hunters who come across a dead radio-collared and/or banded hen are also asked to call with information so that researchers can refine their hen data. To voluntarily report birds marked as part of this study, contact Lindsey Messinger, 507-642-8478, ext. 224. Alternatively, people may contact Lindsey by email at Lindsey.Messinger@state.mn.us. This work is funded in part through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act. Additional details about pheasant hunting are available at mndnr.gov/hunting/pheasant. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, in conjunction with the Michigan and Wisconsin natural resources departments, will take questions about the Lake States Forest Bat Habitat Conservation Plan at 3 p.m., Tuesday, Oct. 31. The phone conference is for anyone interested in the integration of forest practices with conservation measures to support bat populations.  Forest bat populations are rapidly declining, and one or more species may soon be reclassified as endangered. If reclassified, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service provides the opportunity to develop a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). An HCP helps endangered species recover by setting out habitat conservation plans during land management activities. In preparation, Minnesota and neighboring states are developing a forest bat HCP that aims to maintain bat habitat and allow important forest management activities to continue. Input from forest land owners, forest managers, conservation groups and other stakeholders is essential to developing an effective HCP. An introductory video describing the HCP process and how to participate is available at https://youtu.be/46IAHTaqJQE. The DNR encourages participants to watch the video prior to the Oct. 31 question and answer session. To access the session, in the ten minutes prior to the call start time, participants should dial 855-802-6790 toll-free and, at the prompt, enter the conference ID code 93441291. Anyone requiring an accommodation to participate in the phone conference is asked to email bathcp.dnr@state.mn.us or call 651-259-5919 as early as possible. More information is available at mndnr.gov/bathcp.   Contact: Lindsey Messinger, wildlife research biologist, 507-642-8478, ext. 224.   Discuss below - to view set the hook here.