Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
james_walleye

Outdoor News letter.........

Recommended Posts

james_walleye    77
james_walleye

So i'm reading the latest outdoor news and there is a letter to the editor about the walleye numbers being down in last falls test netting. This guy states its very clear to everyone whats going on, its all the females full of eggs being harvested in nets every spring. I guess hes suggesting that females are being taken in the nets and that the lake isnt sustaining its self properly anymore via the spawn. Any thoughts? I fish Mille Lacs a few times a year but i'd like to hear some thoughts of some people that are closer to the lake. I guess i thought the nets were designed so that bigger females didnt get caught in them? And this netting has been going on for years and all of a sudden just last fall this number shortage occured. Why havent we seen a decline in the past if the netting was impacting spawning? My question is this guy on to something or is he highly mistaken on the whole Mille Lacs situation? I have a pet peave with people who send in letters to the editors when they have no clue of the whole scope of the situation. But it very well may be that i'm far enough away from the situation to realize whats really going on also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MuskieSlayer    0
MuskieSlayer

Your skepticism of that letter is not unwarranted. The person who wrote the letter doesn't know what they are talking about. Here, read this thread but read it backwards because the important stuff is near the end.

http://fishingminnesota.com/forum/ubbthr.../gonew/1#UNREAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
james_walleye    77
james_walleye

Yeah that is interesting Muskie. Everything in that post near the end was kind of what i was thinking. You have to read the letter and how straight forward and almost hostile it was. It just bugs the heck out of me when someone writes a letter like that and has not one clue about what is really going on. And the thing is, you could explain to this guy everything in that thread you posted and give him the info on what is really going on and his opinion wouldnt change. He has a chip on his shoulder and thats that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Buck_Hunter04    1
Buck_Hunter04

I don't know much about the test fishery in the spring. But I do know a lot about gill netting. I fish in Alaska every year for Salmon. Just because the fish didn't come up in the net doesn't mean they weren't in the net possibly causing mortality due to the net. That net cuts through gills like its a hot knife through warm butter. Just a suggestion, but those females and males for that matter could be getting caught, thrash around a bit free themselves but their gills are already cut. Sockeye Salmon gill net mesh is considerably smaller than King Salmon mesh and I've seen 30+ pound Kings in a salmon mesh. Just because they say the larger Walleye's can't get caught in it doesn't mean they don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
james_walleye    77
james_walleye

Well if a net is designed so that a 25" walleyes snout won't even fit through it to even get to the gills, how are you suggesting that it happens? I'm sure it does somehow, but i'm also sure that mortality from people who catch and release a walleye after holding it out of the water for 5 minutes does more harm to the lake than the walleyes that may somehow get in the net and struggle free.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
late night    0
late night

I dont see whats so bad about that letter to the editor. You dont think taking 122,500 pounds of fish in one shot is hard on the fish population, male or female?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Scott M    3
Scott M

 Quote:
The tribal fishery is composed mostly of males. Last year 84% of the 52,000 fish they harvested were male. That means that they killed only about 4,000 females. Also, in the spring gill net fishery, 85% of the fish they harvested were between 15 and 19 inches. The reason their catch is so skewed to smaller fish and to males is due to the mesh size of net they fish with (they are limited to between 1.25 and 1.75 inch mesh), and to the behavior of the fish. Males come into spawn, and hang out in the area for the entire spawning season; whereas, females come in to spawn, do their business, and then head back out into outer lake areas where they are not vulnerable to the nets. The ratio of females is a little higher now than when they first started fishing, because we have such a good female spawning stock now.

The gentleman was referring to a biologist telling him that it took a lot of males to fertilize the eggs of one female, and then in armchair biologist fashion, noticing "the writing on the wall," linked the decline in fall test nets to the early spring tribal harvest of mostly males.

It does take a lot of males to fertilize the eggs of one female. But that's because she may produce up to 200,000 eggs. It's not unlike pheasants or ducks...females mean much more to the population than males. Females need, and get protection (in the form of the larger-size protected slots). Males are just swimming bags of sperm. Kill one and another will takes its place.

So no, the tribal netting of mostly males has little effect on the long term viability of Mille Lacs lake walleyes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
james_walleye    77
james_walleye

Chise, this was a different letter in an issue 2 or 3 weeks ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
james_walleye    77
james_walleye

I don't care for the netting, don't get me wrong i hate it. But taking that many pounds of fish out in one shot has never affected the lakes population before, why would it all of a sudden last year? Thats the problem i have with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Southern_IL_Boy
      I am headed to MN for my annual trip and wanted to target pike on leech. For the past 5-6 years I have been kayaking smaller lakes around the area but now I am back to having a decent boat for bigger waters. Used to fish the east side flats in Headquarters and Boy bay prior to my kayak days. Usual came earlier in the year as well. Bucktails on weedlines still my best bet or do you think crankbaits are the way to go just off weedlines? Better spots than others? Should be there a few days before / after Labor Day. 
    • Surface Tension
        I believe the  problem here is a hull with rocker.   At different trim and speed the hull does just that, rocks.   Normally you'd trim in, throttle up and once on plane, throttle back to cruise speed and adjust the trim out.    To be trimmed all in at WOT or even cruising speed would make must hulls plow water at the bow.   In the case with rocker you usually find the porpoise stops when you increase speed.   The fin might be enough to lift the transom up and stabilize it.   Let us know what you do and how it works.
    • Daniel Anderson
      Went and tried a new spot... 3 snacky cats. One of them took my rod straight into the river and I had to dive in after it. Good times.
    • mrpike1973
      I use the Daiwa ct r also have 2 of them best out there in my opinion.
    • FishinCT
      Pretty good for me from Monday through Wednesday. Found them from 14-24ft depending on the spot but most fish came from under 20ft. Trust the electronics and motor around til you find a good school. They are hitting pretty well when you find them
    • delcecchi
      A variety.   Abu 5500c3, abu 5600 mag, revo sx, several others.
    • delcecchi
      Best wishes for a happy retirement Ace.   I could never have done the guide thing even if I were a good enough fisherman.   It takes a special type of person to deal with all the different people... Congratulations on a job well done. 
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Terry, Sorry to hear that you have to retire after all of these years! I suppose It will be my turn to join you and Tommy before to many years also. See you on the water!! Cliff
    • TomWehler
      Congratulations on job well done sir. Your deserve time for yerself with Sandra an the whole younger crew. You have always been nice to me an a big help when I first seriously did the Muskie fish guide deal back summer 1996. We have had some fun times laughing online an in each other's boat over the years. Even boated a fish or three an coined a few major phrases still used in today's ever so silly online Muskie fish market.  Good stuff that I think only you n I could muster up and never take any of it seriously. Truely makes me smile clear to my middle all the junk we talked about an did. You are a good man Terry and welcome in my boat any time. Anytime. Ya done good and will not soon be forgotten. Thanks for being my friend on or off the water. The name fits as you really have been "The Ace"on our sweet Vermilion.   Still no fish round my docks but Bonnie, Polar Bear Boy an myself always have enjoyed your company. Yer the best in many ways my friend.  Thanks. Keep on Rocken!   Tommy.       PS.    I will continue to keep the Zombie Horde in check.    ; )
    • chaffmj
      I hope you enjoy your retirement!