Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
grousehunter

color vs. b/w fish finder

22 posts in this topic

What are some of the advantages to having a color fish finder versus using a b/w fish finder? I have been looking at the hummingbird 737 and was wondering if color would really be worth all the extra money. Limited on funds, but if color makes it alot easier to tell different structure/rock from tree from sand etc or to see fish easier it might be worth it. I guess im just looking for opinion from people who have experience with both. Thanks,

Blake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just posted this in the open water forum, but saw this would probably be a better place for it.

What are some of the advantages to having a color fish finder versus using a b/w fish finder? I have been looking at the hummingbird 737 and was wondering if color would really be worth all the extra money. Limited on funds, but if color makes it alot easier to tell different structure/rock from tree from sand etc or to see fish easier it might be worth it. I guess im just looking for opinion from people who have experience with both. Thanks,

Blake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also looking for a new locator this spring and like you I only have so much money I can spend. I'm leaning toward black and white because I can get a higher defination screen and a few extra features versus a color version for the same money. I think its more important to have a higher defination screen especially for walleye fishing when the fish are hugging the bottom. I wish I had an unlimited budget because I sure like how the HD color models look.

Nels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Color is the way to go. Much easier to spot bottom hugging eyes - they are a very different color than the bottom not a slightly different shade of gray. ALso much more visible screen night or day. The pixel counts on the color units are at least equal to or better than BW so defination is actually better on the color graphs. I made the switch 2 years ago and haven't regretted it. In fact, I will never go back to B/W. Worth the $$$ IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, color makes a big difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have noticed with my H20C gps that it is easier to distinguish between break lines with the color vs. B&W.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a color unit two years ago with the gps and mapping, and would never go back to b/w. In fact I got another one for the bow of my boat. Spend the extra money for color.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go for the color. I tested the Humminbird 737 and 777c2 over 5 days of fishing two summers ago. I alternated units each day. The color unit was used the extra day, because it was better and that's the one I kept. It is easier to see color changes than varying shades of gray. You won't regret getting the color. I suggest getting the Quad Beam transducer if you go with one of these.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The color is worth every penny. One of the best advantages' it holds is the abilit to easily distinguish the difference between bottom types. With a black and white it can be tuff because all it will show is a different shade of grey but with a color unit the transition will show up as an entirely different color.

Go color and you won't go back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

think he is talking about fish finders not gps's.as for fish finders i would say the coler 1 is way to.lot easier to tell what is what.instead of the black & white

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, go color. The colors do a better job of showing hard or soft bottoms, weeds, big fish or small fish, fish in the weeds, fish on the bottom, bait, bugs, etc. It makes a huge difference.

Another advantage to color is you can get by with lower screen resolution if you have too. I'd recommend getting the most resolution (pixel count) you can either way, but color is just that much better at showing you what's down there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 334c lowrance graph/gps. I had a b/w one before and can honestly say color is the only way to go..You can see contour and my track better than the b/w. Spend the extra money, you will be glad you did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was definatly going to get the quad-beam. That is the main reason im looking at them. Seems everyone likes color a lot more. I just need to convince myself its worth an extra 150 dollars i guess.....but then eventually i wanted to buy the gps add on, lol fishing stuff is too expensive when you want all the fancy features.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have the money to spare for the color that is the only way to go!

Much easier to see, shows bottom type changes much better, shows fish better. Just a much better way to go as far as I am concerned.

I had b&w for years and switched to color and cannot believe the difference!

Cliff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love my color unit. It is so much easier to see the difference between the stong and weak signals. I like the dark blue background, which really helps anything the unit sees to stand out like a sore thumb.

Color all the way, plus they aren't that much more $ these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more vote for color. World of difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have another question for everyone that recommeded color. If you had to choose between having the quadrabeam option from humminbird, which will enable me to see both sides of the boat as well as under(90 degrees), or a color unit with just single under the boat beam/transducer what would you choose and why? The more i look at it i dont think i can afford the color with quadrabeam and really wanted that option but if color will make that much of a difference it might be better to go with color without that option. thanks,

Blake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried the 737 (black and white) and the 777c2 (color) units with the Quadra Beam. Both of these have 640 vertical pixels. I would recommend the color unit without the Quadra Beam if you can't afford both. The color is that much better.

Check out Nu Gadgets dot com for their price. Maybe you can get both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, color is the way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, now that I woke up and read all the recent posts about color fish finders I have another question. I have always had good luck with my Lowrance procucts. How do Lowrance color graphs stack up against Garmin or other the others?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get a Humminbird. Several of their graphs have 640 vetical pixels and I believe but haven't proven it, better target separation than Lowrance. On the 737 (black and white one that I tried) and the 777c2 (the color one that I kept) I can see two 1/4 oz. jigs tied 3 inches apart in 30 feet. If your thinking of a sonar/gps, Lowrance units can use Lakemaster and Navionics while Humminbird can't use Lakemaster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have and love my lowrance. I have used humminbirds too, but I do think the algorithms that Lowrance uses to display the sonar returns are more accurate than what I have seen using a humminbird.

Not so sure on the Garmins though, I have never used one.

All will meet your needs, I think Lowrance supports the widest variety of GPS chips, find the best value and decide what you really want, and set your budget. Like buying a new PC, get the best one you can afford.

Brand Loyalty is realatively worthless with these products.

I have the Lowrance 334c, and I love it. it is a really great unit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • IRISHSOBNO4
    • Chill62
      Decided to fish Big Detroit saturday with a buddy.  Had bites but my 24 v 75#  trolling motor couldn't keep me in place so that sucked.  When we left the access to go fishing I asked the young man how late they were open till so I could make it back in time to get washed since I was going to fish a different lake on Sunday morning with the nephews.  I will be here till 5:30!  Sounds good see you before 5!  Fishing sucked, Wind BLEW, RAIN SUCKED!  So we packed up at 4:30 drove to access get there around 4:40 and they are gone!  Hot on my heels is a local fishing guide and he wasn't happy also because he had the same game plan.  Was told that there would be one at Melissa till 5 pm religiously.  Got there by 4:55 and they were gone from that lake too.  I honestly don't feel comfortable enough to do a safe job washing since I don't have a pressure washer and I really don't want to spread the Zebra Mussels from lake to lake and I know it was only a few hours 5-6 but honestly whats the point of AIS being there if they don't stay till the house they are supposed to be?  There was an easy half dozen boat trailers still at the access so it wasn't like we were the only two left at the access.  
    • huskybass
      Had some fun Saturday morning crashing through the lily pads on a small metro lake.  2 fish over 5 lbs and every fish absolutely choked the bait.  All I want to do is throw top water now, haha.  Wish I had longer arms or a partner in the boat for a decent photo.  
    • TNtoMN_HuntFish
      I really hope they don't screw this place up. I love it out there and have done a lot of hunting there. I sure wish there were fewer horse trails. It shouldn't be so easy for hunters to access all the woods. That makes it harder to get away from the guys who want to hunt no more than 50 yds from a gravel road.    The dunes seems like a pretty special place to me. DNR does a lot of things that leave is scratching our heads, let's hope they manage this place properly. 
    • 12345
      Im staying at Arrowwood July 2-5 and looking to catch some 'eyes for a fish fry or 2. Never been to the area before so I dont have much to go by other than my overall knowledge of Walleye fishing elsewhere. Ill probably be fishing early mornings and dusk for obvious reasons, but also because my boat will be used for the majority of the days for entertaining the girlfriends family. Im open to fishing not only Darling, but Carlos and Le Homme Dieu as well. 

      From what ive read and can see on Google Earth, the lakes are pretty clear, and from experience, usually means tough walleye fishing for this time of year. -I grew up fishing Woman Lake in the Longville/Hackensack area and that lake is as clear as they come. The only way we can snag some 'eyes in the summer is to fish the deep weed lines. Is that the approach I should be taking on these lakes? Does dragging rapalas across mid-lake flats produce? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

      Thanks,

      Gavin.
    • TNtoMN_HuntFish
      Ha, I've read stories about that lake being filthy. And I know about those warnings on the link you posted I just wonder if this stuff is blown out of proportion. Reason being I can't find any confirmed cases of people having mercury poisoning from eating freshwater fish. I know mercury poisoning does exist but can we really get it from fish? You'd think if we could then there would be cases down south where folks are eating catfish from the Mississippi.    We ate a few 30+" Pike during the ice season, I ate more than my wife, and I only did that from lakes that are safer according to DNR and MDH fish tissue surveys. I kept it to once a week for her and I ate the rest. I went over the one meal a week rule several times for myself, but then went a while without taking home fish while the season was closed. I'm not glowing yet haha.    I also don't understand why walleye are always the riskiest fish to eat per those surveys when Pike are above them on the food chain. 
    • h8go4s
      Surely they have a Terrova on the floor. Doesn't matter what size THEY ALL LOOK THE SAME. Also, boat dealers have showrooms with all kinds of stuff mounted on boats.
    • BringAnExtension
    • monstermoose78
      Stopped in this morning and it looks like it should be good to go. 
    • ZachD
      http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/fish/eating/kidmom/index.html