Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
sticknstring

Big Muskie on Tonka Post?

12 posts in this topic

Saw a post a week or so ago re: a big muskie that reportedly was caught on Tonka and everyone was wondering if it was released or not. Some pictures were shown of a large fish being released through 5 or 6 drilled holes. I was looking at Cuffs & Collars in today's outdoor news and apparently the 52"er in question was kept and later seized by a local CO. So evidently those pictures were of someone else... fake pictures on the internet! HA yeah right!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oh jeesh...here we go again....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good job dnr! love to hear about poachers getting caught

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure the guy neccessarily knew he was "poaching" as the regulation changed this year, during the middle of the season. I would think the DNR would have some discretion in punishing a guy who caught a fish out of season, when it was changed as stated. Now if it was released, kept, whatever...the true story will be difficult to nail down. We might just have to put it to bed as a big fish caught without knowing what happened after that. If it was released, great, if it was kept unknowingly and the DNR seized the fish and went easy on the guy, great. Lets not jump to conclusions and automatically assume the guy was targeting a musky out of season because that wouldn't be fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was emailed a picture of this huge muskie that was caught on Minnetonka, I dont know how to post pictures on here so if you would like to see it post email and I will send. its a 54" and he said it took 20 minutes to bring it up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sure it is the same fish we are talking about. The other thread said any and every number between 50 and 54.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was out with my buddy round the holidays and saw a 46" not tail pinched Muskie caught out of Crystal bay.. The guys took cellphone pics and put it back in the hole.. Didnt hardly fight coming up, looked like a leg coming out of hole... Grabbed a tip up set up. NICE FISH!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw the picture and also heard the the DNR fined the guy. I also heard the season had changed so I went to the DNR website to find the regulation. I looked all over for a statement that the muskie season ended on a date other than 2/24/2008 and I found nothing. I looked a the special regulations page for lake Minnetonka and found nothing. The website even says that these are the most current regulations. How can they ticket a guy if their own rules state that the season ends 2/24/2008. I believe the story is probably true because the DNR's weekly activity posting mentioned a guy catching a 52" muskie on Minnetonka and getting ticketed. Personally I don't think Muskie should be taken through the ice but if the guy was within the rules you can't give him a ticket. The fishing reulations are starting to look like the tax code.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I stand corrected. It is on the website under this enlightning title:

12/10/07 - Some fishing regulations to change on Dec. 10

It was posted on the site on December 4th. The regulation took effect on December 15th. So you had 11 days to find out, seems kind of bush league by the DNR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree about the fishing regulations. Some are written so ambiguously, and so inconsistently, that reasonable mistakes of interpretation can easily be made. I think the DNR has out-sourced its regulation-writing to drunks housed in the Detox Center of the Ramsey County Jail!

If I was the angler that caught the Muskie, I would would fight the ticket much like fighting the big Muskie itself -- by applying steady upward pressure. I would have told the CO to kiss my @#s! The Muskie that the man caught is his property, and should be fought for by him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: Macattack
I stand corrected. It is on the website under this enlightning title:

12/10/07 - Some fishing regulations to change on Dec. 10

It was posted on the site on December 4th. The regulation took effect on December 15th. So you had 11 days to find out, seems kind of bush league by the DNR

I agree. Most people are not like us who post and spend a lot of time on the internet. A "normal" guy who reads the regulations booklet is not going to know about reg's changes 11 days after they're announced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like it or not those are the rules. If you catch a musky and then release it no problem. Rumor has it this guy kept the fish and that's against the regs. It may sound unfair with the Dec 10 change but how many fishermen really read the reg's anyway? I know a lot of guys would haven't read them in over decade and just assume everything is still the same. No reason to bash the DNR here and it would also be unfair to bash the guy who caught the fish either. So let's move on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Stick in Mud
      Thanks for the ice report, Sculpin.  With the weather forecasted for the upcoming week, I'm sure I'll be up there next weekend, hopefully walking out from the northwest side.   van, yeah, I hear you.  I've been up to LOW a few times, and it is very fun to know there's the chance of catching a monster....but driving all that way for a bucket full of 12'' fish?  Not my cup of tea. I'll save the money and buy three dozen T-bones to make it through the winter. I'm sure people who know the lake better than I do have done better on the weekends I'm up there, but the reports at the resort we used were pretty similar.    I like the northwest side on ML because it's where we've been for almost 20 years, but it also has close access to sand, rocks, whatever weeds remain, mud flats, transitions, etc. The only thing we don't have up there is extensive gravel.
    • BassThumb.
      I'm curious to see how this works out. Do you plan to keep the battery warm while not is use on the water? 
    • Vitreus
      How much ice??????
    • Vitreus
      Picked up a couple of these (jigging rap with wings!):  
    • eyeguy 54
      didnt need hair dryer,  it went back to normal on it's own. paint chipped also.  nice idea the flat tip, just not for me I guess.