Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

USA Today: Santana going to Mets


IFallsRon

Recommended Posts

By Bob Nightengale, USA TODAY

The New York Mets have agreed to a trade for two-time Cy Young Award winner Johan Santana, giving up four prospects to acquire the left-handed ace of the Minnesota Twins, according to two high-ranking Twins officials with knowledge of the talks and a person close to Santana.

The deal is pending the Mets and Santana reaching agreement on a six- or seven-year contract extension and that Santana passes a physical; they have been granted a 48 to-72-hour window to do so. Santana has a no-trade clause that he will waive if agreement is reached on a contract extension.

The Mets paid a high price in prospects to land Santana, agreeing to send the Twins outfielder Carlos Gomez and pitchers Phil Humber, Deolis Guerra and Kevin Mulvey.

The deal would give the Mets the much-needed ace at the front of their rotation. Santana won the American League Cy Young Award in 2004 and 2006 and is 93-44 lifetime. He went 15-13 with a 3.33 ERA for the Twins last season. Santana has struck out at least 235 batters each of the past four seasons.

While the deal drains much of the talent out of the Mets' farm system, they did manage to hold on to top prospect Fernando Martinez, an outfielder. Instead, they headed the package with Gomez, who turned 22 in December and spent 58 games with the Mets last year.

Gomez is what scouts like to call a five-tool player, a combination of offensive ability that includes power and speed as well as an above-average defensive game and a strong arm. He has worked to cut down a strikeout rate that was high during the early part of a minor league career that began in 2004 after the Mets signed him out of the Dominican Republic. He made his major league debut last May and hit .232.

Humber, 25, is the Mets' 2004 first-round pick who has made five major league appearances, including one start, over the past two seasons. He won 11 games at Class AAA last season, his first full year after having Tommy John surgery in 2005.

Santana would give the Mets the best rotation in the NL East after they missed out on the division title by one game thanks to a historic September collapse. He'd likely be joined by Pedro Martinez, John Maine, Oliver Perez and Orlando "El Duque" Hernandez.

The Twins, meanwhile, would see yet another young star they produced leave the organization. Their Gold Glove outfielder, Torii Hunter, left for the Los Angeles Angels this offseason. Gomez would be a candidate to replace him in center field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • mnwild

    10

  • Windy City Walleye Hunter

    6

  • Scott K

    6

  • PierBridge

    5

The Minnesota Twins-Get to know em! (Before they're gone!)

Wow, amazing farm system we're running here. I think we can win AAA this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this trade actually happens it will be talked about, pro and con, for years.

Santana didn't want to play in Minnesota. Might as well get the best price you can for the dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So sad to see him go. He was a great piture. Looks like we'll be starting all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF the report is accurate it is crazy to see that at first we were looking for.... Phil Hughes, Ian Kennedy and Milkey Cabrera or John Lester, Jacoby Elsbury and a prospect..... and what do we get....a supposed 5 tool up and comer who hasn't proven himself in the big leagues and 3 pitching prospects! Its funny how the values change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not that he didn't want to play in sota it is that we can't pay him the 129 million over 7 years that the players union is pushing on him to get!!! The prospects that we are getting are all talked about as being "ok" not great so this trade is poor IMO.....I think I would rather put a 5 additional years at 100mil ( so 6 at 113) contract on the table and go into the season with him as your started and hopefully he agrees, a better trade comes up or he goes to free agency and you get 2 first round picks and go with them........They couldn't even get the Mets #1 outfield prospect??!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this was one of the worst offers the Twins had for him, but if he wanted out, there wasnt much we could have done. I hate to see him go, but I am glad he isnt a yankee!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cant be true, that would be against our rules of sending an all star to anywhere other than boston! just kiddin grin.gif..maybe he'll take the randy moss route and just get traded from the mets to there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont think they made a good trade. I have never heard of any of them guys, and i follow baseball for many years. I just hope that it will all work out for the twins. There losing a awesome pitcher, and i believe with the farm system that they are running, there going to be able to handle it well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the offers from the Yanks and the Red Sox may have been a bit better...but on the other hand...there is something to be said for trading him out of the American League...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best price we could have got for him was gone months ago when we sat on our hands and made no trade when the Yanks and the Red Sox were both drooling to beat each other to him. This is a very undervalued return for the best pitcher in baseball.

I'm just sick about this... We got less than value in this "blockbuster" than the Vikes got trading Moss for Williamson!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Dog, we recieved something but not what we might have been able to get.

I guess we recieved something. The Twins are a farm system for the majors as we seem to lose so many because of cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha...nothing can be worse then williamson. the prospects could be really good, or could suck. We will have to wait and see. I think Gomez(1 year)he will be a good leadoff hitter and is the fastest player in mlb right now, aslo very good deffensive. and Guerrer(in about 5 years) will end up being good. humber was the number 3 overall pick and is just getting healthy from tommy john season, but i dont have that much faith in him... We do have really good scouts for the twins, so i think they somewhat knew what they were doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully it will work out like the Viola to the Mets trade. I think we got Aguilera, Tapani,and David West.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harvey, I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. The Twins have done a decent job retaining it's players over the years(Puckett, Hrbek, now Morneau/Cuddy/Mauer. Ya sure we lost a couple of our "core" guys from the previous decade but these guys did not want to play for the Twins anymore. Both Hunter and Santana went to teams in a huge market. You didn't see teams knocking the door down for Hunter's services at 90 million asking price. The Angels were one of a select group of teams that could and would actually pay him this kind of $$$. I'm glad the Twins didn't make much of an effort to resign him---he's not worth anything close to this at this point in his career. Santana turned down a 5 year/100 million offer from the Twins recently. That's why they had to move on this deal. It was either now or never. I don't think losing a player after offering him 100 million is acting like a minor league team. You can't sign someone who doesn't want to be here. Let's give the Twins a chance on this trade. They have a pretty decent history of making trades work out and competing in their division long into the season. That's not bad when you start to look at some of the other teams payrolls and rosters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this trade reminds me of a quote from the movie major league. " who are these f@!?ing guys?" the new gm looks like an einstein doesn't he. i know they weren't going to sign santana, but they panicked when the sox and yanks flexed their muscles and stepped out of negotiations, so they GIVE santana to the mets. merry christmas mets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Zep here. The Twins have a pretty good recent history of doing the best they can with what is available to them with regards to their payroll. They do have a great scouting system and always seem to find great players that no one else could spot. Sure, it would be nice to spend a ton of money and stock up on a bunch of big name, big value players, but that is just not going to happen here.

I don't believe they had much of a shot at this 2008 season anyway, lets see what these prospects can do and hope for 2009 and beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new word is Johan gave the Twins an ultimatum yesterday that if they did not get the deal done right now he would invoke his no trade clause and the Twins would possibly been stuck with getting nothing for him after this year.

The new GM got the poker stare down from Johan and his agent and didn't have what it took to call his bluff and took what he could get

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has been evident that Santana would not have signed with us anyway. I believe I heard that the twins offered him 4 years and $80 million. That was a great offer for this organization, but not quite what he wanted. So basically we lost Santana for the 2008 season (he'd be gone after that anyway) and we got 4 prospects in return. We're really not going to know for 2-3 or more years on how these prospects turn out, but this organization has done a great job in the past bringing young players up, so we'll see.

I guess I don't have an opinion either way. I hated to see both Johan and Torri go, but hopefully it'll all pay off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will also free up money for Nathan and possibly down the road of signing Francisco if he stays healthy to a long term deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding his poker stare down...we could have countered and started him every 4 games and pitched him 250+ innings and wore him out...that is called a re-raise!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Quote:
there is something to be said for trading him out of the American League...

Exactly. The Twin's are notorious for making deals this like one... trading talent for prospects. Raising studs out of their farm system and getting rid of them when they can't afford them is what they do. You knew it was coming. I think Gomez is a 5 star guy which the Mets brought straight up from single A. The Twin's might season him up a bit in AAA for awhile but I think in a few years (new stadium era) we can look back and see it as a worthwhile trade. At least Morneau and Cuddy are locked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: ozzie
Regarding his poker stare down...we could have countered and started him every 4 games and pitched him 250+ innings and wore him out...that is called a re-raise!!!

Absolutly, tell him to sign our offer or start him every 3 days and make him throw complete games every time out. If he blows up he wrecks his free agency worth, if he tries he blows up his arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From ESPN

Greediest owners in sports

Here's a list we believe you'll have some fun with: Page 2's top 10 greediest owners in sports.

Carl Pohlad

The Twins win despite Carl Pohlad.

After taking a look at our list, check out our readers' choices for the greediest owner in sports. And be sure to vote in the poll to crown the No. 1 greedy owner in sports.

1. Carl Pohlad (Minnesota Twins)

Make no mistake ­-- the Twins are winning these days despite Pohlad, not because of him. Ever since the Twins won the 1991 World Series, it's been downhill, largely because Pohlad, who has an estimated net worth of $1.8 billion, has kept his wallet clamped shut. When the Minneapolis City Pages asked readers to send in epitaphs for the aging owner's stone, one fan suggested, "In memory of the man who gave us Kirby Puckett, (and who took a treasured team and did his best to (ruin) it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: ozzie
Regarding his poker stare down...we could have countered and started him every 4 games and pitched him 250+ innings and wore him out...that is called a re-raise!!!

So if you were selling a rare sports care in mint condition, couldn't afford to keep it, and couldn't sell it for what it is worth, you would then stop parking it in the garage, stop changing fluids, run it off road and let your kids eat and spill in it so no one else would get it in mint condition, and then have to sell it cheap.....

Or would you just sell it for what you could get for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wit you Fish,

As a Pale Hose fan I am glad to see him go but the notion of "making him" pitch every 3 days, complete games, my question would be this. How many "get me over" change ups or BP fastballs would it take in the first two innings of each game to get the management to change their minds? Fielders would get tired of watching taters fly into the baggie. I think the Twinks may have overplayed their hand and decided to get out of the game with a few free tickets to the all you can eat buffet. They did not get the championship poker braclet and look whose wallet gets fatter. The player. It's always the player, that's the way the deck is stacked these days when you get owners who will flinch.

Windy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • SkunkedAgain
      I might have missed a guess, but here are the ones that I noted:   JerkinLips – March 27th, then April 7th Brianf. – March 28th Bobberwatcher – April…. MikeG3Boat – April 10th SkunkedAgain – early April, then April 21st   Definitely a tough year for guesses, as it seemed to be a no-brainer early ice out. Then it got cold and snowed again.
    • mbeyer
      MN DNR posted April 13 as Ice out date for Vermilion
    • Brianf.
      ^^^45 in the morning and 47 in the evening
    • CigarGuy
      👍. What was the water temp in Black Bay? Thanks....
    • Brianf.
      No, that wasn't me.  I drive a 621 Ranger. 
    • CigarGuy
      So, that was you in the camo lund? I'm bummed, I have to head back to the cities tomorrow for a few days, then back up for at least a few weeks. Got the dock in and fired up to get out chasing some crappies till opener!
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Lots of ice on the main basin, but it is definitely deteriorating.  Some anglers have been fishing the open water at the mouth of the Rainy River in front of the Lighthouse Gap.  The rest of the basin is still iced over. Pike enthusiasts caught some big pike earlier last week tip up fishing in pre-spawn areas adjacent to traditional spawning areas.  8 - 14' of water using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring has been the ticket.  Ice fishing for all practical purposes is done for the year. The focus for the basin moving forward will be pike transitioning into back bays to spawn,  This is open water fishing and an opportunity available as the pike season is open year round on Lake of the Woods. The limit is 3 pike per day with one being able to be more than 40 inches. All fish 30 - 40 inches must be released. With both the ice fishing and spring fishing on the Rainy River being so good, many are looking forward to the MN Fishing Opener on Saturday, May 11th.  It should be epic. On the Rainy River...  An absolutely incredible week of walleye and sturgeon fishing on the Rain Rainy River.     Walleye anglers, as a rule, caught good numbers of fish and lots of big fish.  This spring was one for the books.   To follow that up, the sturgeon season is currently underway and although every day can be different, many boats have caught 30 - 40 sturgeon in a day!  We have heard of fish measuring into the low 70 inch range.  Lots in the 60 - 70 inch range as well.   The sturgeon season continues through May 15th and resumes again July 1st.   Oct 1 - April 23, Catch and Release April 24 - May 7, Harvest Season May 8 - May 15, Catch and Release May 16 - June 30, Sturgeon Fishing Closed July 1 - Sep 30, Harvest Season If you fish during the sturgeon harvest season and you want to keep a sturgeon, you must purchase a sturgeon tag for $5 prior to fishing.    One sturgeon per calendar year (45 - 50" inclusive, or over 75"). Most sturgeon anglers are either a glob of crawlers or a combo of crawlers and frozen emerald shiners on a sturgeon rig, which is an 18" leader with a 4/0 circle hook combined with a no roll sinker.  Local bait shops have all of the gear and bait. Up at the NW Angle...  Open water is continuing to expand in areas with current.  The sight of open water simply is wetting the pallet of those eager for the MN Fishing Opener on May 11th.   A few locals were on the ice this week, targeting pike.  Some big slimers were iced along with some muskies as well.  If you like fishing for predators, LOW is healthy!  
    • Brianf.
      Early bird gets the worm some say...   I have it on good authority that this very special angler caught no walleyes or muskies and that any panfish caught were released unharmed.        
    • smurfy
      got mine done........for the cabin.....ready for summer festivities!!!!!!   there was still frost in the ground...........but good gawd are the lakes low!!!!!
    • CigarGuy
      Just 1, 50" muskie🫣
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.