Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Barbelboy

Last weekend and Limits

12 posts in this topic

First I just want to thank Jonny and Kelly P. I know the fishing was slow, but we still had an awesome time. 20 walleyes and 3 crappies is plenty for me. Jonny, you should remember me. I had all the electronic rattle reels and Kelly forgot to collect my $. Thank you, we had a wonderful weekend.

Secondly, Is anybody else tired of explaining the limits and which fish you can keep and eat. I can't even begin to tell you how many people are confused about this. Is it really that hard to understand that ALL walleyes between 17"-26" must be immediately released?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes all walleyes 17-26 must be released immediately

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, but why do so many people find that hard to understand. Man it's frustrating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately 7 out of 10 people fall into the "confused" catergory.

I know I have my "special moments" and overall fall into the previously mentioned catergoy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, my dad is like that. You can tell him something a million times but when faced with an actual situation he freezes and second guess's himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i realy dont see whats so frustrating about the slot limits.just gotta read the rules of the lake that your going to and understand them.whats confusing is when the lakes have diff limits for summer and winter like lake of the woods for example, and red lake they both have diff limits for summer and winter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Barbelboy, those where some pretty slick rattle reels!

As for the limits it is confusing although I know the DNR, law enforcement and fisheries is working with local guides, business owners and assocations to try and simplify the regs and limits, trouble is most of thiss stuff comes straight from a polished desk at St. Paul.

It is a time of change for Upper Red Lake and change never comes easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UNFORTUNATELY, IT IS THE DNR AND THE LAWMAKERS THAT DO THE "CONFUSING." HERE IS THE REGULATION CHANGE CAUSING CONTROVERSY:

ICE FISHING MEAL PREPARATION

While on or fishing waters with size restrictions, all fish for which the size restriction applies must have their heads, tails, fins and skin intact and be measurable except when a person is preparing and using such fish for a meal.

NOW WHY COULDN'T THE STUPID LAWMAKERS MAKE THE LAW LESS-AMBIGUOUS BY ADDING, *NOTE* "FISH THAT ARE IN THE PROTECTED SLOT HAVE TO BE RETURNED. THE ONLY FISH THAT CAN BE EATEN ARE FISH OUTSIDE OF THE PROTECTED SLOT LIMIT."

THE WAY IT READS NOW, ONE MIGHT INTERPRET IT TO MEAN THAT "FISH FOR WHICH THE SIZE RESTRICTION APPLIES (17-26 WALLEYE @ URL) MUST HAVE THEIR...WHEN A PERSON IS PREPARING AND USING SUCH FISH FOR A MEAL." THIS WOULD SEEM TO INDICATE THAT ONE CAN EAT A PROTECTED FISH AS LONG AS YOU ARE ON THE LAKE AND IN THE PROCESS OF CLEANING OR EATING IT.

THIS, I THINK, IS WHAT IS CAUSING THE CONFUSION. THEN THERE IS THE RETIRED CONSERVATION OFFICER THAT HAS BEEN VOCAL ABOUT THE NEW REG CHANGE PUBLICLY CALLING IT A DUMB IDEA; DUMB BECAUSE ONE COULD STILL KEEP,CLEAN,EAT A PROTECTED FISH WHILE ON THE ICE, BECAUSE IF ANOTHER CONSERVATION OFFICER KNOCKS ON THE DOOR, ONE STILL DOES NOT LEGALLY HAVE TO LET HIM OR HER ENTER TO MEASURE THE ENTRAILS OF THE 25" WALLEYE JUST EATEN.

ANYHOW, SOME FOOD FOR THOUGHT...

FISHMONGER.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see where this is confusing. To me, common sense tells you that protected slot fish can't be kept wether you plan to eat them on the lake or not. What would be the point of the slot?

[Note from admin: Edited. Please read forum policy before posting again. Thank you.]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am saying the law is ambiguous, that is why people are confused by it, respectfully. the only lake that the lawmakers say one has to keep the head and carcass of an eaten fish until one gets to shore is on Upper Red Lake. this came right from an article on jan. 12, 2008 from the star tribune. now why would they do this? the dnr officer said that the Upper Red Lake provision was the only one they had time and foresight to add to the law. now answer me this -- why what sense would it make to only have to keep the head and carcass of an eaten fish from one lake with length restrictions and not all of the lakes with restrictions.

it is not over-thinking, it was under-thinking by the people writing the law, and i think we all realize the loop-hole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While on or fishing waters with size restrictions, all fish for which the size restriction applies must have their heads, tails, fins and skin intact and be measurable except when a person is preparing and using such fish for a meal.

to me its not confusing.but its just common sense throw back the 1's that r over the slot size that simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any lake with a slot has to have the remains kept intact. LOW etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • osok
      Nice Fish ST! Loadmaster, I hope it was nothing major or serious that had you in the hospital.  I was just informed by the Chief of Staff that I get to do house projects this weekend..sigh..maybe Monday I'll get to go out. 
    • Barefoot
      I went yesterday.  Bite was good.  Saw lots of people catching fish.
    • bbfenatic
      Sorry...been posting a few pics in the Panfish section...I've been out a lot chasing crappies, started 10 days after ice out. I did the eye opener and we did good real shallow 4-6ft with jig and shiner but that one eye outing is it for me unless I go out late fall for them again.  Crappies bite has been real good...just not in normal spots...not many spawned in the shallow reeds but beds we deeper 5-7 ft in many lakes. I've been as far North as Little Bemidji to as far South as S. Lida and many lakes in between. Went out Saturday morning early and found them in 12.5ft suspended real high; used the smallest rap they make and just fan casted all around the boat and they were aggressive.  Cabbage is coming up and healthy in most lakes and they will be moving into the cabbage when it warms up. Water clarity has been unbelievable in every lake I've been on so far. Another yo-yo weather pattern makes it more challenging for sure....but search and you will find.
    • eyeguy 54
      WINDY today but got out for a couple hours.   30 inch northern looked all spawned out.  got a few dandy bass. The last smally looks like it ate a duck! LOL 
    • ANYFISH2
      Get'r it fired up Zelek.     Thanks.
    • steiger
      Just curious if anyone else was out on the chain braving the rain sat and sunday? 
    • Wanderer
      Contact the DNR if there are serious concerns.  Tournaments have to be permitted through them.  If they're not handling the fish correctly, they might lose their permit.
    • certified jumbo
      Trophy....
    • Rick
      A 6-mile section of the Glacial Lakes State Trail will be closed as contractors work on improvements, according to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
      Trail users will see intermittent closures until June 1 as workers remove trees and brush that are near the work area. The segment between the trailhead in Willmar and Spicer’s south side at Progress Way is scheduled to close on June 5 as workers begin mill and overlay work on the trail’s westernmost 6 miles. The project is scheduled for completion by Aug. 25. In addition to a smooth, new surface, trail users will enjoy new benches, improved accessibility, and paved crossings at gravel road intersections. The current 8-foot trail width will also be expanded to 10 feet. “We think our trail users will be pleased with these improvements,” said Jeremy Losinski, area supervisor for the DNR’s Parks and Trails Division. “The wider trail will provide easier passage. Plus, the smoother pavement replaces the trail’s oldest paved surface, which is now more than 20 years old. It had deteriorated and reached the end of its life cycle.” Contractors will also be replacing several culverts along the trail to provide better drainage. “While we want to make sure everyone is safe, there will still be opportunities to use parts of the trail during construction,” Losinski said. “The construction will start in Willmar and work its way toward Spicer, so small portions of the trail will have limited use. Our trail users may not be able to go all the way from Willmar to Spicer during times in the construction process. We just ask that our trail users obey the closure signs and avoid construction equipment.” Prinsburg-based Duininck, Inc., is the contractor. Construction updates will be posted on the DNR’s Glacial Lakes State Trail Web page. The 22-mile western segment of the Glacial Lakes State Trail links Willmar with the Kandiyohi/Stearns County line. The 5-mile eastern segment connects Roscoe to Cold Spring. Built on the former Burlington Northern railroad grade, a total of 27 miles is paved as the trail cuts across the border between Minnesota’s western tallgrass prairie and eastern deciduous forest. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • PRO-V
      Rebuilding the shoreline.