Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
fishingbuddy

British Labs

Recommended Posts

fishingbuddy

I am looking for information from forum folks on training British Labs. If you are a owner of such a dog would you please let me know so we could exchange some info.

Thanks

fishingbuddy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
duckbuster

I am not a British Lab owner but as far as the training goes it would not change any from a standard Lab.

The amount of direct or indirect pressure might change but certainly not the technigues.

GOOD LUCK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME

I concur. I've handled and helped train a few British labs. No difference in the training other than they tended to be softer and tended to be a bit more natural retrievers. Repetition and a lot of bird exposure is the key.

Forcing them was harder, and I feel you could get away without force fetching. The few I've been around, I felt took an extra year in the upland fields to reach their peak, but seemed to naturally work and quarter closer. Teaching long distance lining was very hard to impossible, we scrubbed 3 direct imports because they could not hold a line very long, nor handle on blinds well at longer distances. Now this was back in my trialing days... and those dogs were all super gun dogs in the end.

Also when you say "British" labs, are you talking 100% British blood. It is common for dogs now-a-days to be sold as "British" labs with only 30-50% of the pedigree British and the rest American lines... I doubt you'd see any difference in those dogs compared to straight American lines. Also, there are many who still breed the good ol' calm, tractible American Labs. They all came from Britain at some point. American 'trial' line dogs, as a group, tend to be higher strung and harder charging, but have a high intelligence quota and take a higher amount of pressure in training. These dogs are super athletes and with a very good foundation of obedience training and solid field training can be the dog of your dreams.

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GotOne

Channel 5 News did a segment on January 6th about British Labs from Royal Flush/Royalty British Kennels. Go to KSTP 5's website and go to "On The Road" with Jason Davis(Jan 6). It's pretty neat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dbl

I am a "pure" British Lab owner and did all of my own training. They are definitely softer as Ken mentioned. The British train and hunt their dogs completely different than American counterparts. Ken mentioned long distance lining being a weakness, I would concur with that but that has a lot to do with what is expected of them. If I may quote Vic Barlow from the book "British Training for American Retrievers" he states it much better than I can;

.

"British trials are primarily a test of the dog's skill as a game finder. Their training is simply a means of honing and developing that talent to its full extent. ...while British and American handlers were working for the same types of dogs, the events for which they are prepared for could not be more different. The Brits are teaching their dogs to find every bird, while American handlers are training for an event in which tracking cripples plays no part. As all hunters know, birds do not always fall into the open. Many plunge into dense woodland or drift into reeds where the dog has no sight of his handler and must work entirely on his own initiative. British trial dogs are schooled for exactly this type of situation, but you will rarely see such a retrieve in an AKC Field Trial or Hunt Test. That's why their respective training regimes are so fundamentally different and why Brit Dog is out in the field learning to use his nose on live game while his American cousin is "lining to a pile" or perfecting a "swim by."

There are a couple of resources out there that will give you more information on training specifically for British labs. Dennis Anderson of the Star and Tribune has been a British lab trainer and breeder for some time now. A search should yield you some information. And of course the book by Vic Barlow quoted above. It was published in 2003 so it has very up-to-date information. These were my primary guides to my training experience.

I will again quote Vic Barlow from his book;

"You will find no drills in this book involving e-collars, force fetch, force to a pile, or, come to think of it force anything. All are unheard of in British Retriever Training. For those of you brave enough to take the "path less traveled," the rewards for both owner and dog will be a revelation."

I went the British training route, it was a lot harder on me than the dog. Not doing things that I had done with previous dogs that worked on them was not easy. I stuck with these training methods and I could not be more pleased with my dog. Is he perfect? Nope, but he is by far the best dog I have ever owned. How you choose to train your dog is your business, I will not stand here and say you can't use traditional training methods on your dog, its your dog do what you must. Just understand there is another method that the British have been very successfully using for many years on this particular breed. Many of the current methods of training stem from training higher strung, hard charging, large dogs. It has become more of a necessity to achieve the results demanded of these dogs in trials.

So IMHO different dogs might respond better to different training methods. As a Brit owner I just happen to think that the British method worked well for myself and my dog. In the end I guess that is all that matters. If you want any further information on my experience feel free to look in my profile for my e-mail. Good luck with your dog, however you decide to do your training. I have no doubt you will have a companion that you will cherish for a lifetime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishingbuddy

WOW! Thanks for the quality responses. I have a pure lab and was concerned if I did use the traditional methods that I would screw up the dog. I have a great dog and we are in the 5th month of Obedience training. Actually puppy kindergarten graduation is tonight!!!! We are already enrolled in the next class and looking for some professional training but had concernes on the fundamentals. I hunt grouse and phesants more than waterfowl. Again thanks for the info and Dan I will be contacting you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME

Obedience, Obedience, Obedience! 80% of your day in the field!

DBL is right. A British trial is not even remotely similar to an American trial. ALl the dogs are worked at heel at the same time. As birds or hares are flushed and shot, the judge calls a dog's number and you are expected to make that particualr retrieve. Every retrieve is different as it is truly a hunting situation.

I remember a story of a dog in the British Nationals that was clearly the favorite to win. His number was called on a bird that was lightly "pricked" (their term for crippled). The bird sailed a couple hundred yards and the Queen called upon the dog to finish the retrieve. He did not come up with it on his initial cast, so the handler began to handle him back into the cover. They use a method called "rolling" in which the dog does not sit and face you on a cast, but rather continues toward the bird with rolling casts. He ended up getting the bird and high marks. It is judged on difficulty of the mark and shot etc. It is suppose to seperate the best gun dogs. In America that dog would be dropped, but so would probably every other dog in the trial that day as it was a near impossible mark. Their emphasis is on bringing game to hand, and manners, not on athletisism and the ability to be trained to do super natural field work.

If your dog flourishes with the British method by all means use it. If he doesn't, the American method is a proven method to get a finished gun dog. As far as your time line, stick with the obedience and really reinforce all those commands, they are your foundation for all future work. If I remember correctly, the Brits don't even begin field work till the age of one. Their feeling is, if it's bred in there, it will come out when the time comes.

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dbl

You are 100% correct on everything Ken. You absolutely summed up the British way to perfection, thanks! I did nothing but obedience work for ONE YEAR! Blasphemy by our normal training methods. That is why I said it was tough on me, not throwing bumpers and introducing retrieving. It was at times not the most exciting for ME. The dog sure didn't know the difference, he was just glad to be out doing something with me a few times a day. But, I now have a dog that is very easy to handle in the field with virtually no guidance from me. The retrieving part was the easy part of the training.

Ken is right on if the British way works for you fantastic, it may not work for everyone or every dog. Its your dog you can judge best what will work for both of you. Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PikeBayCommanche

Hey buddy,

I have a Brit too. I just dropped her off and the kennel for training last week. She is a fun little girl and was already wanting to retrieve birds at 5 months even though she was only about 30 lbs.

You can tell she is a natural hunter and has all the tools to be a great field dog.

If your looking for a pro-trainer that specializes in British dogs I would look no further than Old Oak Retrievers in Blooming Prairie. Rick McConico is very good trainer and knows how to handle the soft British dogs. He was featured in the December Gun Dog Magizine if you have a copy.

Good Luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LovenLifeGuy

I also own a Brit lab and can only tell you my experience because I am no pro. I did all my own hands on training but was directed step by step by a guy I work with, he is a police k9 handeler and a well known k9 trainer. I started from day 1 with the basics. At 5 months it was the start of the pheasant season and he did ok. At 7 months I force fetched him and soon after collar conditioned him. I was told by others that these dogs do not take well to this, I do not agree. My experience is that he took to it very well. He is a very smart dog and he figured out the concept very fast. I used the force to the pile as well as other force fetching drills and never had a problem. I have also been very pleased with his casting skills and blinds. Would he ever win a trial, NO! I have worked with his casting daily and I had problems early with him staying on a line past about 60 yards. I continued to work on it and I would say that I am very pleased. In canada this past fall at 17 months old he made at least a dozen blind retrieves and one that was so far that I had to walk towards him so he could see and hear me, 3 stops and casts and he had the bird. All dogs are different and like all owners I think he is the best. The american/force style training worked great for me and I would not be scared to use it again on a Brit lab that has a lot of drive.

Good Luck, LovenLifeGuy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishingbuddy

Thanks for all the view points. I am going to concentrate on obedence for now and explore my options. Thanks for all the varied responses.

fishnbuddy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rws77

Would anyone out there happen to know of and / or recommend some British Lab breeders in the metro and surrounding area? We are looking to get a British Lab this spring and would like to start looking into some breeders. We are going to visit River Valley Kennels down by LeSueur in a couple of weeks. Any info would be appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LovenLifeGuy

I used but he is not real close. He is located near Tracy. My dog is going to be two in April and I am very pleased.

LovenLifeGuy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PikeBayCommanche

Diamond J Labs in Atwater is where I got mine. They run a first class operation and have great dogs.

Give them a look.

Good Luck with the search.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishingbuddy

You got mail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishingbuddy

Sorry

Pikebay you got mail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
xHCxOutdoorsman

Royal Flush will do an amazing job it is up near hinckley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
huntmup

rws77,

Royalty British Kennals will takecare of all your needs. They have puppies in all colors, started dogs and do a great job of training. They are located 8 miles west of Hinkly or 11 miles east of HWY 65 north of Mora.

Dan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ldcoyle

I got my British Lab from Dennis and Janice Anderson just across the river from Stillwater, MN [Please read forum policy before posting again, Thank You]. I trained her myself using the British method. WildRose Kennels sells a great training DVD.

Couldn't be happier! She is small...about 60 lbs, hunts close and hard for grouse and pheasants and handles ducks and geese just fine. Have fun!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishingbuddy

Pike

I went with Rick...I have a great dog thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PikeBayCommanche

Nice. Post a pic of your pup. I would love to see what he looks like.

Rick does a wonderful job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      State wildlife chief addresses upcoming season and future challenges By Paul Telander, DNR wildlife chief When Minnesota’s deer season ends Sunday, Dec. 31, it is quite likely the harvest will be in the 200,000 range.  This Minnesota Department of Natural Resources projection is above last year’s harvest of 173,213, below the 2003 record harvest of 290,525 and similar to the most recent 20-year average of 205,959. Prior to 2000, deer harvests in excess of 200,000 occurred only four times. Deer harvest totals typically relate to the size of the deer population and to a lesser degree to weather conditions immediately before and during the hunting season. On the 2017 season
      This should be a good deer season barring any unforeseen unusual weather. Deer numbers are up following three years of conservative harvest regulations designed to rebuild the population, coupled with three relatively mild winters. As a result, more antlerless permits are available this year, and hunters in many parts of the state will have additional opportunities to harvest more deer because of other more liberal season framework changes. Unfavorable weather, like heavy snowfall immediately before or during the hunting season, is the main factor that would prevent a harvest increase. On putting 2017 in context
      The highest deer harvests occurred during the early to mid-1990s and from 2000-2008. During this latter period, the harvest topped 200,000 each year. The high harvests in the early 2000s occurred at a time when the over-riding harvest strategy was to reduce the deer population so it wouldn’t grow out of control, as had happened in certain eastern states, and to address certain environmental, economic and social concerns. Deer harvests in excess of 225,000 occurred only once in the 1990s. Going further back, the harvests in the 1970s never topped 100,000. The harvests in the 1980s were under 150,000. Today, there’s growing discussion in the hunting community as to what’s a reasonable harvest target, and that’s a good conversation to have. On managing toward population goals
      Our aim is to keep deer numbers at population goals identified during DNR’s periodically occurring public goal-setting processes. There are 130 different deer permit areas throughout the state, and nearly all permit areas have a numeric population goal range. Population goals range from as low as a handful of deer per square mile in intensively farmed areas to 20 to 25 deer per square mile in prime forested areas. A few permit areas are too small or have too low of a harvest to model the local population. Deer numbers are at or have exceeded population goals over most of the state. Some northeast and southwest permit areas are slightly below goal. Parts of central Minnesota and southeastern Minnesota are above goal. From an overall, statewide perspective, we’re not far from where we believe Minnesota should be. On DNR transparency
      Many hunters are curious as to how we make our decisions on antlerless permit numbers and season structure, and that’s something we are trying to more effectively communicate. The process starts immediately after the deer season closes. That’s when area wildlife supervisors and staff monitor deer harvest results in their local areas and collect informal feedback from hunters, conservation officers, foresters and others. In spring, after winter severity has been monitored and deer mortality losses have been estimated, research staff run population models for each permit area based on the last year’s harvest, winter mortality, anticipated fawn births, predation and other data. These calculations are the basis of research staff recommendations for season permit area designations (lottery, managed, intensive harvest, etc.) and the number of antlerless permits that should be made available to hunters in each lottery permit area in order to achieve population goals. Research staff recommendations are sent to all area wildlife supervisors, who then have the option of agreeing with them or modifying them based on their own local observations and informal input. Often, these recommendations agree with each other, but not always. When this happens, differences get resolved at the regional or St. Paul office level. Ultimately, the agreed upon season structures and number of permits to be issued for each area are communicated to hunters through the multi-colored deer map that is part of the hunting regulations booklet and a new, more informative interactive deer map on the DNR website at mndnr.gov/deermap. On managing expectations
      That’s perhaps the hardest part of deer management, and it’s often a function of scope and scale. Our agency’s focus is on the big picture and a half million hunters. Conversely, the individual hunter is most interested in what’s happening within their immediate hunting area, which is often as little as 40 acres. It’s not well-known but among 13 Midwestern states, only Missouri manages deer populations at a finer spatial scale than Minnesota. We are serious about managing expectations and deer numbers in small geographic areas. Still, it is common to have a wide variety of opinions in each area on whether there should be more, fewer or different sized deer. To that point, we recently conducted a hunter satisfaction survey and one of the findings is that today’s hunters have higher expectations than those who hunted just 10 years ago. On communicating with hunters
      When I began my career it was common to interact with hunters at deer registration stations and local field offices. Today with the ease, convenience and popularity of phone and internet game registration, the DNR no longer has staff at deer registration stations. And people don’t visit DNR offices like they once did because so much information is available on the DNR website. Our challenge is finding new and efficient ways to have two-way conversations with hunters. This past winter we received more than 1,400 comments during a three-month long deer management plan public input effort. We were pleased with the response yet those 1,400 comments from an engaged and important audience represent only a minute fraction of the hunting public. There’s an irony in the fact that even though it is easier to be connected to one another these days because of smartphones and other technology, many people feel less connected than they once did. Figuring out how to maintain strong relations with hunters and other stakeholders is something on which we need to keep working. Minnesota’s first-ever deer plan will outline key concepts and crucial, ongoing work needed to manage deer, one of the state’s most popular and economically vibrant natural resources. An important aspect of the plan is how DNR will reach out and communicate deer management needs, necessary actions and reasons for those actions. A draft plan will be available in early 2018. I encourage everyone to read the draft plan, consider DNR’s suggested approach and give us your feedback and ideas through the public input opportunities we’ll make available. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Hunters looking forward to higher deer numbers this season Hunters will have additional opportunities to harvest deer this season thanks to a series of mild winters and conservative hunting regulations, which have resulted in rebounding deer populations across Minnesota.  Firearms deer season opens Saturday, Nov. 4, and there are 130 permit areas in 2017. Information about each permit area can be found on the DNR’s interactive deer map at mndnr.gov/deermap, and includes wildlife manager reports, regulations, and statistics about deer harvest and populations on a local scale. Northwest deer report
      John Williams, northwest region wildlife manager More deer on the landscape in the northwest region should help hunters better enjoy the season and have good prospects for a successful hunt. Another mild winter on top of the previous two mild winters has largely enabled deer populations to be at or near goal levels in most permit areas. Fawn production was also good this year; another indication of does coming through the winter in good health. Recent rains have filled basins that were previously dry due to drought-like conditions in late summer, and water levels are up on many of the marshes and lakes in the region. Hunters should be prepared to deal with wetter than average conditions if they are hunting in or need to cross lowland areas. In general, hunters will be able to harvest more deer. In several permit areas the designations changed to allow more overall harvest. Some permit areas moved from a designation of lottery, which requires hunters to apply in advance to shoot an antlerless deer, to a hunters choice designation that allows a hunter to use one license to shoot either a buck or antlerless deer. Other permit areas changed designations from hunters choice to managed. In permit areas designated as managed, hunters can harvest two deer through use of a regular license and a bonus antlerless permit. Permit areas that did stay in the lottery designation this year may have more permits available than in previous years. Northeast deer report
      Dave Olfelt, northeast region wildlife manager Three consecutive, relatively mild winters have contributed to good fawn production and high numbers of twin births. Snow depth was moderate throughout much of the region and a relatively early green-up of forage has supported deer that appear to be in excellent physical condition. Where good habitat exists, deer populations are approaching or are at established population goals. While deer are not evenly distributed within permit areas because of habitat differences and varying levels of hunting pressure, harvest regulations have relaxed in many northern Minnesota permit areas to allow more deer harvest. Duluth, several Iron Range cities and some state parks continue to hold special hunts to reduce deer numbers. Rain and wet conditions have persisted throughout much of the fall season. Hunters may find water in areas that are typically dry this time of year and forest road access may be difficult or impassable in some locations. Hunters in far northeastern Minnesota’s primary moose range should review the new deer permit area maps for boundary and numbering changes. Central deer report
      Jami Markle, assistant central region wildlife manager “Deer are everywhere” is a common refrain across the central region this fall. Deer populations seem to have bounced back from a decline following the severe winter of 2013-2014. In fact, many deer permit areas in the region have met or are above population goals, meaning more permits will be available this fall. With rebounding deer populations and ample hunter opportunities, wildlife managers are anticipating a strong harvest in 2017. Deer look healthy as they shed their reddish summer coats for the more muted gray-brown tones that will carry them through the winter. Summer habitat conditions were ideal with an excellent growing season and plentiful native forage and cover. Does with twin fawns seem to be the norm rather than the exception this year. Wildlife managers and landowners have noted an abundant acorn crop in the central and southeast portion of the region this fall which will keep deer feeding and browsing in the oak woods. Wet conditions in late September and early October have postponed agricultural harvest so hunters may see standing crops well into the firearms season. Fall leaf drop is reported to be later than normal in the southern part of the state, but by early November sightlines should be opened up and the forest floor will have a new layer of fallen leaves. Buck scrapes and rubs are starting to appear and hunters can expect to see deer movement and patterns change as the rut approaches. Many permit areas in the central region are designated as managed this year, allowing harvest of two deer through the use of a regular license and a bonus antlerless permit. Five permit areas are designated as intensive, which allows for harvest of three deer using additional bonus permits. There are additional harvest opportunities in the 601 metro deer management area and the 603 chronic wasting disease management zone, both of which offer harvest of an unlimited number of antlerless deer. Southwest deer report 
      David Trauba, southwest region wildlife manager Two consecutive mild winters coupled with past conservative harvest strategies have allowed deer numbers to increase throughout southwestern Minnesota. In addition, wildlife managers reported good fawn production. As a result, more antlerless permits were provided for this fall’s hunting season. However, permits numbers continue to be low in select permit areas, mostly in extreme southwest, due to the loss of Conservation Reserve Program acres. Managers in these permit areas are having a difficult time increasing deer numbers due to limited habitat availability. Conversely, hunters need to be aware that permit areas 281 and 290 moved to a hunters choice designation for the first time due to an abundance of deer along the Minnesota River corridor. Two wild cards for hunters will be the amount of standing crops and river flooding. Historically the amount of standing crops drives opening weekend hunter harvest along with weather conditions. Large rainfall amounts in mid-October have resulted in flooded fields and river flooding. Crop harvest is behind schedule but this can change very quickly so it is too early to predict what amount of crops will be in the field, if any, before opening day. However, hunters should prepare for high water in select river corridors; the high water can influence deer use of these habitats. Many deer have been forced out of the river valleys into the surrounding uplands. As always, hunters need to scout and adapt to conditions. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • muskie-mike
      Caught an 18 inch walleye on a crank bait and a 48" muskie grabbed it..Got it up to the boat a few times but rolled and cut my line,the walleye was dead and I had it for supper...got 2 muskies on walleyes,1 on sunfish and 1 on a crappie..
    • Toasty
      Still for sale?
    • gimruis
      I would avoid them if I were you.  All season.  There's often at least some current flowing through there and with these warmer winters, its just a bad idea.
    • gimruis
      If your getting some pretty close shooting (and gauging by your photos you are in those setups), you might want to use an IC (improved cylinder) choke instead.  Spread that pattern out a little more and switch to some smaller shot size with more velocity, especially if you're mostly just shooting as small ducks like woodies. I almost exclusively use an IC until the calendar turns November, for ducks, pheasants, and grouse.  Later on when you get more shooting at bigger, smarter birds that are on the edge of range you could go back to a modified.
    • Sunset Lodge
      Hello from the NW Angle!   Water temps are hovering around 48 degrees and fall fishing is phenomenal! Walleyes are biting anywhere from 14 to 30ft with jigging being the most effective method. Crappies are continuing to bite around sunken trees and deep holes with a good amount of perch mixed in. Anglers have had success trolling for large pike and muskies with jigging also bringing some to the boat.    We are getting fish houses ready for the 2017-18 ice fishing season and are very excited for hard water!   We recommending checking availability for winter ASAP!   Sunset Lodge
    • fishingdad
      Thank you for the responses everyone. You are correct Del I do not have the Fiber option.  We do use the Hot spot from AT&T at times but to be honest the Data does not last all that long, Even though we are right by Moccasin point & the tower is at the end of Frazer our signal is not the best at times.  We could also do DSL but according to one neighbor we may be faster sending up carrier pigeons & waiting for a response.
    • gunner55
      It's been a 1/32 oz. unpainted jig head & a small split shot along with a crappie minnow for me most of the time. Still barely see the rod tip load or wiggle a little on the bite. Even tougher with the wind lately & 20' or more down.
    • h8go4s
      Any channel on any lake is dangerous.