Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Twins


bassNspear

Recommended Posts

i agree. He was a huge part of the team in that way, but at the plate, i would think different.

But i do agree with you that he was a huge face towards the twins and the fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bassNspear

    12

  • Dahitman44

    8

  • Scott K

    7

  • Fishing_High

    5

There is one thing that does not get mentioned nearly enough. This whole thing is OUR fault. As in the Twins front office.

We had a lot of chances to trade for hitters and were unwilling to part with our "prospect" pitchers. Now we have zippo in the minors that are MLB-ready hitters. We still have five of the top 20 minor league pitching prospects, but zero hitters in the 1top 100.

Yikes.

The other MAJOR mistake we made was NOT signing these guys up when we had a chance. We could have signed Santana for a four year extention for about $13 million a year. What a deal that would have looked like. Sam thing with Hunter. I think it was like five years and $50 Million.

Whoops.

I remember what the Indians bid with Thome and Baerga back in the day -- those were good moves that kept their players longer.

Will we be smart enough to do it with Morneau and Mauer and Cuddy? hard to say, I hope we can learn from our mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: 4wanderingeyes
If the Twins go into the new stadium with a good team,and even a playoff year before opening the new stadium, Pohlad could see a sell out crowd all season long! Hopefully he sees it the same way I do.

The new stadium will be sold out for several years, even with a bad team on the field. Pohlad knows that. Say what you will about him, but he's no dummy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More then likely you are right about selling out, but I wont go sit in the staduim, when its 35 degrees and windy, or 100 degrees and sunny, to watch a poor team play! I dont know I would go to in them conditions to watch a good team play!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dahitman,

You are 100% right. TR was no proactive at all and it looks like it will cost us the 2 of the best players we've had here for a while.

Now they go and sign Morneau to a one-year gig, hoping that salaries will go down or that he will flop one year and be worth less.

How many times does this have to happen with them. LEARN FROM YOUR MISTAKES YOU CHEAP SUCKERS!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

willy --

Just saw that on the Strib --

That makes me angry. They really need to lock these guys up. What is the point if you don;t get these guys while they are still a little on the cheap side

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as the Stadium goes --

I live a long way out and I don;t know how often i will chance the weather and has anyone thought about the weather here in April May and September?

Especially April.

Love the stadium but we needed the roof.

BTW -- I thought we needed the Styadium so we COULD keep our big players.

Fat chance.

Thanks a lot, Smilin' Carl got us again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: Dahitman44
As far as the Stadium goes --

I live a long way out and I don;t know how often i will chance the weather and has anyone thought about the weather here in April May and September?

Especially April.

Love the stadium but we needed the roof.

It's you guys that live outstate that should have pushed for a statewide tax to pay for that roof. Those of us that live close will not be affected as much. If we get rained out, we go home and come back tomorrow. We don't have to worry about paying for the extra hotels and restaurants while in town and NOT seeing a game.

I agree a retractable roof would have been the best way to go, but you people outside the Metro kept your yaps shut when financing was discussed, when in my opinion you should have been the ones crying out to help pay for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I 'd like to cry "Foul" to DonBo. I think the outstate voices were not silent. They just were not listened to. All issues in this state are resolved with weighted opinions. The metro voice carries much more impact than the outstate opinions. Politics is all about satisfying the majority of the people. The majority of the people live in the cities. Now, on this issue, I won't say this is totally unfair. Think about it. The metro fan may buy two tickets a month. Those of us from outstate, especially from a fair distance, may be only able to afford to go once or twice a year. I usually go to one game a year and it is usually early if my sister is hosting Easter at their house. I don't expect the Twins, the govenment, or even my sister to alter their plans for a devoted fan that is a causual customer. I don't understand the thinking behind your comment that you agree the stadium should have been built with a retractable roof, but the responsibility of the failure of that happening was the fault of the outstaters. Apparently, your silence WAS heard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hitman, you're only looking at one side of the fence. Remember Rich Becker, Stahoviak? Pat Mears? Or perhaps the name Carl Pavano rings a bell?

It's always nice to criticize from the sidelines & with perfect hindsight - but let's remember that there are plenty of players anyone could cite as example of "Gee, why'd that stupid team throw away all this money on a guy who turned out to be a stiff?"

That said, I think the Twins should have signed Hunter & Santana, two proven commodities, last season. But you seem to have it all figured out...in retrospect. And it's simply not that easy. I, too, think someone needs to explain to ole Carl that he really CAN'T take it with him, but bashing every dumb move & ignorning all the other dumb ones is the reason I don't listen to sports talk radio. \:\)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Max --

Good point on those stiffs but did we ever think they would be good? I hope not.

There was no doubt that theycould have singed Hunter and Santana a couple of years ago and even before last season. That was a mistake to wait.

Just my thoughts.

Hope we don't blow it Morneau

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cicada --

No question about it. We wanted a retractable roof stadium in outstate MN.

Nobody listens to us out here. I can tell you that the cities gets a tone of our money when we come down to visit.

It is tough to get down there a lot, but I know we help out the cities economy. Plus I am a HUGE MN sports fan, but the Twins are my pride and joy. I would be very upset if I miss a game do to poor weather, but I guess we will have to live with it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They called it "Structural Engineering problem" when the public wanted a retractabel roof. "We don't have enough land to support a retractable roof". Well, first off they should have listend to the public and what they wanted. Then designed the stadium and see where it could be built. They buy the land then plan. Stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't any engineering or space problems that cost us a retractable roof, it was the extra $100,000,000 it was going to cost. With mostly just Hennepin County footing the bill, that just wasn't going to happen. That is why I stated earlier that people in outstate Minnesota should have gotten involved and asked for a statewide tax. Don't even start with "We, tried, nobody listened to us." We listened loud and clear, what we heard was "Don't expect us to pay for YOUR facility."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can start with nobody listened because I did go to bat (sorry, bad pun) on this issue. I may have been in the minority in the outstate but for you to generalize and blame this on just outstaters is unfair. If you act this way at home, no wonder she says "go fish" \:\/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: Cicada
I can start with nobody listened because I did go to bat (sorry, bad pun) on this issue. I may have been in the minority in the outstate but for you to generalize and blame this on just outstaters is unfair. If you act this way at home, no wonder she says "go fish" \:\/

Now, now, be nice. I'm not holding you personally responsible. blush.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad there is no roof. Isn't that the reason we/you don't like the dome? I remember the Met, no roof and now global warming, heck it's gonna be 60 in April and October. Well April and Sept, doubt if we will see October bb for awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though it would be nice to have a roof in our April weather in Minnesota, I think a roof would take away from that authentic ballpark atmosphere. I'm an oldtime type of guy when it comes to baseball, and I don't mind the fact that they are building it without a roof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah great for you guys --

No it was meant to be outside, but we do live in MN and you just can't plan things without thinking about the weather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hockey was meant to be played outside also, but do to weather changes they put it in side in a controled envirorment!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Them not going with a roof is just plain stupid......now we will have rainouts/snowouts and who wants to sit in 40 degree weather to watch baseball when your team might not be so hot!! I can't understand it myself.....so lets say this would coast 125mil over ten years that is 12.5 mill.....that is less than Johan is asking for a year!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did they build it so it can be added later? That would have made sense, but I suppose they did not do it that way.

Personally I'm really psyched about outdoor baseball again. I'll probably avoid the April games, but rainouts are fine by me. The play-hookie-from-work-and-cold-beer-sunny-day-afternoon games and light-breeze-and-cold-beer-evening games will more than make up for them \:\)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could have had those great days at the ball park and still had a retractable roof for the not so great days!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, there is no provision for a roof being added latter. The problem I have is in buying tickets in advance. I doubt that I'll buy any early or late season games in advance and none in August. In the summer I like being able to take the familly to a cool Metrodome and escape the heat and humidity for awhile. I don't fancy bugs and muggy 95 degree weather to go watch baseball, might as well be fishing. I'm not renewing my season ticket package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dink, I'm right with you on that one. I'm sure some of the players aren't happy either, especially the pitures. It has been cold and snowed in Sep. I don't think there are gonna be many fans there then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

put a roof on it then so when it does get bad, you can close it. Everyone else is, why cant we

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is where they are building it, it wouldnt have worked out for a retractable roof. There wasnt enough room.

I bet by 2015 they will be whinning they want a new stadium with a roof!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most retractable roofs are not air tight, are they? The roof would only keep you dry, not warm. You might say that at the very least the game would go on. But the very least is what you would get. I've been to few Redhawks games in less than perfect weather. It's still fun if you're prepared. But even as short a trip as DL to Fargo, I don't go if it may be rained out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • jparrucci
      Very low, probably 2 feet lower than last year at ice out.
    • mbeyer
      what do they look like this spring?
    • SkunkedAgain
      I might have missed a guess, but here are the ones that I noted:   JerkinLips – March 27th, then April 7th Brianf. – March 28th Bobberwatcher – April…. MikeG3Boat – April 10th SkunkedAgain – early April, then April 21st   Definitely a tough year for guesses, as it seemed to be a no-brainer early ice out. Then it got cold and snowed again.
    • mbeyer
      MN DNR posted April 13 as Ice out date for Vermilion
    • Brianf.
      ^^^45 in the morning and 47 in the evening
    • CigarGuy
      👍. What was the water temp in Black Bay? Thanks....
    • Brianf.
      No, that wasn't me.  I drive a 621 Ranger. 
    • CigarGuy
      So, that was you in the camo lund? I'm bummed, I have to head back to the cities tomorrow for a few days, then back up for at least a few weeks. Got the dock in and fired up to get out chasing some crappies till opener!
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Lots of ice on the main basin, but it is definitely deteriorating.  Some anglers have been fishing the open water at the mouth of the Rainy River in front of the Lighthouse Gap.  The rest of the basin is still iced over. Pike enthusiasts caught some big pike earlier last week tip up fishing in pre-spawn areas adjacent to traditional spawning areas.  8 - 14' of water using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring has been the ticket.  Ice fishing for all practical purposes is done for the year. The focus for the basin moving forward will be pike transitioning into back bays to spawn,  This is open water fishing and an opportunity available as the pike season is open year round on Lake of the Woods. The limit is 3 pike per day with one being able to be more than 40 inches. All fish 30 - 40 inches must be released. With both the ice fishing and spring fishing on the Rainy River being so good, many are looking forward to the MN Fishing Opener on Saturday, May 11th.  It should be epic. On the Rainy River...  An absolutely incredible week of walleye and sturgeon fishing on the Rain Rainy River.     Walleye anglers, as a rule, caught good numbers of fish and lots of big fish.  This spring was one for the books.   To follow that up, the sturgeon season is currently underway and although every day can be different, many boats have caught 30 - 40 sturgeon in a day!  We have heard of fish measuring into the low 70 inch range.  Lots in the 60 - 70 inch range as well.   The sturgeon season continues through May 15th and resumes again July 1st.   Oct 1 - April 23, Catch and Release April 24 - May 7, Harvest Season May 8 - May 15, Catch and Release May 16 - June 30, Sturgeon Fishing Closed July 1 - Sep 30, Harvest Season If you fish during the sturgeon harvest season and you want to keep a sturgeon, you must purchase a sturgeon tag for $5 prior to fishing.    One sturgeon per calendar year (45 - 50" inclusive, or over 75"). Most sturgeon anglers are either a glob of crawlers or a combo of crawlers and frozen emerald shiners on a sturgeon rig, which is an 18" leader with a 4/0 circle hook combined with a no roll sinker.  Local bait shops have all of the gear and bait. Up at the NW Angle...  Open water is continuing to expand in areas with current.  The sight of open water simply is wetting the pallet of those eager for the MN Fishing Opener on May 11th.   A few locals were on the ice this week, targeting pike.  Some big slimers were iced along with some muskies as well.  If you like fishing for predators, LOW is healthy!  
    • Brianf.
      Early bird gets the worm some say...   I have it on good authority that this very special angler caught no walleyes or muskies and that any panfish caught were released unharmed.        
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.