Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
fire-in-the-hole

Cleaning Regulation

Recommended Posts

fire-in-the-hole

I know there was some conversation weeks ago as to whether or not you could clean fish on the ice. I couldn't find the discussion again and never did see the final rule. Can anyone confirm/deny whether you can clean fish on the ice?

Years ago we used to clean them out in the hut out of ignorance and we always brought the entrails back to land and discarded them. Then one day the nice conservation guy told us we were not to do that. I never saw anything wrong with it (because you could easily count and measure what we had) and was surprised to learn of such a rule, but I guess rules are rules. Anyhow, I sure hope we can do this again. Whenever I started to clean fish it always seemed to make them bite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mnhunter 3815

you mean clean or eat ????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
late night

Grab a copy of the regulations to be sure but I believe you can clean and eat fish on the ice but that counts towards your daily limit, like a shore lunch, and you must keep the guts so the DNR can measure them if you are checked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jerkbait

I believe if you go to the MN DNR web site you can find the new letter there explaining the new rule. Took effect 12/10/07.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
curt quesnell

Here it is from the DNR website

ICE FISHING MEAL PREPARATION

While on or fishing waters with size restrictions, all fish for which the size restriction applies must have their heads, tails, fins and skin intact and be measurable except when a person is preparing and using such fish for a meal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
muskyjim

Something else to remember, if you clean your saugers on the lake or for the drive home, they are counted as walleye. This is mentioned in the regs a couple of times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fire-in-the-hole

OK, thanks for the posts and advice, but it only elates more questions such as: Since every fish I clean is for a meal, does it depend upon "when" I eat the meal? For instance, we make the fillets in the the ice hut, keep all the measurable stuff and whatnot. Can I then discard the carcass once I get back to shore? Granted, I might not eat the fish until three weeks later, but it is prepared for a "meal" nonetheless. Does the rule only apply if I eat the fish in the hut? When would a person prepare fillets that would not be used for a meal? And if such a person exists, can I just have those fillets?

Secondly, this has always confused me the "sauger counted as walleye rule." We actually just gilled and gutted our saugers last year so you could definitely see that they were sauger. I believe that is appropriate with the regulations, or at least it was last year.

Maybe it's just me, but when I get to the "fleshy meat" of a perch, I can't tell the difference between them and walleye in the way the fillets appear. If I leave a patch of skin, you can see that I have a walleye, but if I remove the skin, it may as well be a perch? I abide by the rule, but it still doesn't make sense. With a eel pout, you can tell just by looking at the meat, it is an eel pout. Not to mention that it is usually still squirming and trying to metamorphisize itself back to life.

I don't eat fish in the ice hut and would only clean them to save on the nuisance of doing it when we get back to shore.

Sorry for the rambling, but sometimes I get the feeling that if I even think about fishing, I might be doing something illegal without even knowing it. Is there any rule that says I have to use vegetable oil to fry the fish? I prefer canola. Maybe I need to save the oil so they can check the DNA of the fish I just scarfed down.

I will go to the DNR website now. Thanks again for the posts. Anyone else confused by this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mnhunter 3815

if you eat your fish on the lake you must keep the reamins in your shack so they can be measured but they must not be frozen.the next mornin go to shore and get rid of the remains then you may catch another limit.as for saugers, you can keep 8 fish no more than 4 can be walleye.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fish Monger

 Originally Posted By: curt quesnell
Here it is from the DNR website

ICE FISHING MEAL PREPARATION

While on or fishing waters with size restrictions, all fish for which the size restriction applies must have their heads, tails, fins and skin intact and be measurable except when a person is preparing and using such fish for a meal.

What the regulation leaves out is whether specific fish that are protected can be eaten or not. For example, on L.O.W., can one catch,clean, and eat a 25 inch walleye, even though it is protected? One possible interpretation of the rule, I think, permits this.

A better writing (with my additions in brackets) of the rule would say: "While on or fishing waters with size restrictions, all [types of] fish for which the size restriction applies must have their heads, tails, fins and skin intact and be measurable except when a person is preparing and using such fish for a meal. [but one still cannot eat a fish if it is within a protected slot of that lake.]

I think the rule is ambiguous as it is written...What do you all think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GoFish4

For example, on L.O.W., can one catch,clean, and eat a 25 inch walleye, even though it is protected? One possible interpretation of the rule, I think, permits this.

The protected slot is always in effect....Reg also notes you must be actually prepairing the meal. So cleaing fish for home meals 3 weeks from now is also illegal. Only fish cleaning allowed on the ice is for prepairing a meal in a sleeper house type situation or shore lunch out on the lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fivebucks

I would go with GoFish4. You can clean fish on a lake with size restrictions unless you are in the process of eatting them at that time. Just leave them in the round, unfrozen if you are transporting them home and then you know you are safe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fish Monger

I agree with GoFish4's interpretation of the regulation, as I am sure this is what the legislature intended when passing it - however, the regulation is not clear whether one can clean protected fish on the ice and eat them or not. One conservation officer said the new law will encourage fishermen and women to eat the protected fish, then keep some outside-of-slot- fish to take home, and get away with it because they do not have to let the game warden in the fish house. One could easily do this except on one lake -- Upper Red Lake, where the legislature was diligent enough to require the entrails of any fish cleaned and eaten on Upper Red Lake to be kept for proof. From what I have read, other lakes do not have the requirement that one must keep the carcass of the fish just cleaned and eaten. The newspaper article printed on Jan. 8 in the Star Tribune seems to indicate this point. The rule of keeping the carcass goes into effect on Jan. 12, 2008. Here is an excerpt for it:

"Eating walleyes on Upper Red Lake? Save the carcasses

By DOUG SMITH, Star Tribune

Anglers fishing Upper Red Lake will have to keep the carcasses of walleyes and northerns they eat on the lake to prove the fish were legal size, beginning Jan. 12.

The change is in response to a state law passed last year by the Legislature allowing anglers fishing on waters with size restrictions, such as Upper Red Lake and Lake Mille Lacs, to cook a meal of the restricted fish while on the ice."

Doesn't "restricted fish" mean fish that are within the slot limit? If so, I am right, and a 25 inch walleye could be kept,cleaned, and eaten on L.O.W. in a sleeper house.

Hey, I am not trying to encourage anyone to be unethical or break the law, but from my reading, one can keep a fish that is protected for one meal on a lake with restrictions. Because conservation officers still have no right to enter a fish house, I say, "why not?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fish Monger

The following is the actual law, not a newspaper's interpretation of it. What follows contradicts what Doug Smith wrote in his article. He says it is only on Upper Red Lake that the carcass must be kept. Confused...Confused...

D. While OIl or fishing instate waters with size

10 restrictions that differ from statewide regulations, includlng

11 experimental waters, special management waters, boundary waters,

12 or any other waters with size restrictions, all fish for which

13 the different size restrictions apply must be undressed and

14 measurable when in a person's possession, regardless of where

15 taken, except when a watercraft is docked or moored to shore or

16 when on the ice and a person is .in the act of preparing and

17 using the fish for a meal. While a person is on the water or

18 ice, fish carcasses from fish with size limits must be retained

19 with head, spinal cord, and tail intact and maintained in such a

20 way that the carcasses may be readily unpacked, unwrapped, and

21 separated so that they may be examined, measured, and counted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CORL ICE CREW

confused.......so when we come up to millaces are we going to be able to clean and eat our catch? reading regs. can be confusing, why would'nt it be considerd a shore lunch? or can't you have a shore lunch on certain waters either? guess we could go to the local tav. to eat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mnhunter 3815

you CAN NOT eat protected fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fire-in-the-hole

 Originally Posted By: GoFish4

The protected slot is always in effect....Reg also notes you must be actually prepairing the meal. So cleaing fish for home meals 3 weeks from now is also illegal. Only fish cleaning allowed on the ice is for prepairing a meal in a sleeper house type situation or shore lunch out on the lake.

The shore lunch or sleeperhouse idea might be what was intended, but the way it reads is that "when a person is preparing and using such fish for a meal." In other words, I am preparing the fish to be used for a meal. It doesn't say for meals "only" consumed on the ice although I may do that.

I suppose the worst case scenario is that the officer stops in to check me and sees that I have cleaned part of my possession but do not have any hot oil going. He says "you can only do this if you are going to eat this as a meal on the ice." At that point, I will cut him off a little chunk and offer him part of my "meal." If he eats it, I guess then I will somehow try to follow suit.

Seriously though, I believe that in accordance with the regulations and good conscience that I can fillet the fish in the hut insofar as I do not separate the fillet from the carcass. I will leave a little piece of skin still attached and lay the fillets back in the fish. They will be identifiable, measurable, and countable which is what the law desires to apply. Such fish are being prepared for a meal and until I eat them, will be counted toward my possession and will be discarded apart from the fishing waters at the appropriate time.

But then again, when I finally go up to LOW in a couple weeks and don't catch nuttin it might just be a mute point. \:\(

Like everyone else the fishing is always the best a few days before I get there and right after I leave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eurolarva

This thread is confusing. Can I clean and eat a 17 inch walleye while in a rented fish house if I keep the skin and carcass? Or can I only do this with Sauger and Perch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mnhunter 3815

you can eat fish on the lake but you gotta keep the remains intact so the dnr can measue it if they stop in.((( depending n the lake)))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • JerkinLips
      Had another good weekend of fishing.  Fished Thursday evening to Saturday afternoon and found consistent action all hours of the day.  Caught 5 slotters 22-25", and was able to be picky on eaters, only keeping 15-17" walleyes.  Plenty of small eyes also, plus I caught 4 eelpout. I did learn a lesson on how to take eelpout off of the hook.  I tried to lift a 20" pout out of the hole by line and the hook pulled out and embedded the bobber in my styrofoam ceiling.  The next time I used the fish pliers to lift the slimy fish out. Had 10" of ice where I was, and a lot of large wheelhouses were being pulled out there.  Yesterday someone drove a Jeep out to a wheelhouse close by.  I think we will see a lot more vehicles driving out in the next week.  Fortunately the added weight hasn't pushed much water on top of the ice.
    • MrSchrute
      Thanks for the info guys.
    • Agronomist_at_IA
      I think the fourm would still be pretty strong....however when they split the fourm sites up & stuff and changed some things a few years ago it pretty much killed this site. Traffic is a crawl.....they blame it on new media like Facebook and other stuff......which is an excuse.....poor one at that.......the other ice fishing website I go to is stronger then ever.......This use to be my favorite site, today it's in sad shape & I only come because I remember what it once was hoping that it gets back to it someday.
    • Glockwinger
      Big Marine had 8" at the north access out to the weeds before the main lake.  Lots of walkers, a number of wheelers.  5 inches past the weeds above the ice before the island.   Access was crazy...very inconsiderate people tripple parking, a guy I was with got parked in, trucks behind and in front of him.  Luckily I was parked beside him and was able to move enough that he could get his truck out.   Fishing was very slow.  Couple panfish, a bass and snake northern.
    • Jari
      I'm definitely itching to get on the river.
    • Zachary Cisar
      I was out on Hiniker Pond last night. Had no luck with fish but I was after dark. Straight out from the pier about 30 yards you got a solid 3.75 to 4 inches. Duck lake has about 5 inches. Henry had 4 inches last week. Not sure about this week.
    • shaky legs2
        Doc was up there with a couple of his boys on Thursday fishing out of portables.  He gave me a call when he was on the ice.  I said, “. Let me guess what you got on”.  Red stripe Demon with a female fat head hooked through the pooper hole on the dead stick and a purple smelt rattling flyer with a minnow head on the other pole.  I nailed it.  He still uses a jiggle stick for his dead stick.  He had to sign off as a fish came in on the Vex.  Put it in the bucket Shaky.
    • traveler
      Not even a little kelly? Lol   Good to see a few of the old guard still checking in ...:)
    • JIvers
      Thanks for the reply. Ya, McNally's gets pounded right away. I looked at the ice in front of Schafer's in Onalaska yesterday; there was about 3.5" of ice near the docks, and then it got thinner in a hurry. Apparently someone got wet feet there earlier in the day.  I ended up at Lawrence Lake Marina just north of Brownsville yesterday. There was probably 4" of good clear ice, much better than what I found in  La Crosse. Will post pictures later, but I got one nice largemouth on a tip up at the Marina, one 10" perch, and a couple small perch.  Today I drove around Winona, and fished the backwater pond east of Latsch Island on the west side of the road. The ice there was...not real good.  I stuck close to shore on 3" of not-real-clear ice after my spud bar saved me from a cold bath a little farther out.  I caught a few small perch there, and a bunch of small bluegills. Nothing worth keeping, and nothing on the tip-up. Was expecting the ice to be a little better than what I found, but what do you do?    
    • leech~~
      No Lake Trout in the lake?