Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
deadminnowcatcher

Wolves 1st in Line for top pick

Recommended Posts

deadminnowcatcher

Lets hope the puppies keep losing and land the #1 pick. If they do who are some of the players out there with the potential to go #1. I know it is early but one has to be excited about something

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AWH

Assuming they come out after their freshman year, I think Derrick Rose and Michael Beasley will be the top two picks. Who goes first, I think will depend on that team's needs. But things could change, it's still early.

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lookincalifornia

don't forget OJ Mayo ans roy hibbert. i think i'd go with the "old" guy and take hibbert. i really amy not familliar with the wolves needs, but at 3-20, sounds like they could use help all over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AWH

Unfortunately, you can't draft a coach (the Wolves' biggest need!). I wouldn't mind seeing Hibbert in a Wolves jersey. They need a center so big Al can stay at power forward. Hibbert would be a nice fit, although I don't see him as a top pick. The Wolves with their lottery luck will likely have the number 4 pick, in which case, Hibbert might be a good pick. I'm going to stick to my guns that Rose and Beasley are the top 2 picks. Kind of like last year when you had Oden and Durant as the top 2 and then everyone else.

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
maros91

#1 pick, yeah right. How many times have the Wolves had the best chance to win the lottery, 2,3, maybe 4 times. I maybe wrong but didn't they have the best chance to get Shaq the year he came out and ended up with Laettner or J.R. Rider. I hope they get the first pick but with the Wolves luck they won't. mad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zamboni

Laettner was better in college than Shaq, weird, but true. Don't forget they took Longley one season with their top pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lookincalifornia

the only wolves game i've been to was a rookie year longly game. they beat the nuggets behind a big night from scotty brooks. the nuggets had mutumbo and chris jackson(he was still chris jackson then) cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mshs1
crazy.gifWolves don't need a first pick cuz they can't develop players-- look at the last couple top picks and their track record--KM doesn't have the mojo. Take #1 and trade for a proven player not a project -- crazy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hester

NO matter what they do they will screw it up. I say ask McHale what to do, then do the complete opposite. That should improve the team.

Hester

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Scott K

Quote:

I say ask McHale what to do, then do the complete opposite. That should improve the team.


It really couldnt make it much worse smirk.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
koonie

We seem tohave a problem drafting. We draft a very good pro ready player and then we trade them for some talented but not yet ready for prime time player. Draft Ray Allen and trade hime for Marbury. Draft Brandon Roy and trade him for Randy Foye. McHale is a moron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

Even if we get the first pick -- we have not had a lot of luck picking the right guy -- remember Eni Ebbbe or whatever his name was? Other than Garnett, we have not been "strong" in that area.

Maybe we can just throw a dart at the board?

What am i saying? If we had 99 chances for the ball and one team had one of the balls -- well i think we know how that would go. \:\(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fishing_High

It don't matter when Foye gets back and Ratliff with those to they'll still be really bad but will be able to win more games. As of last night Miami has lost 14 in a row and Seattle has lost 8 in a row I thought we were in line to have the most ping pong balls but I think Miami and Seattle might have something to say about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • JIvers
      Thanks for the reply. Ya, McNally's gets pounded right away. I looked at the ice in front of Schafer's in Onalaska yesterday; there was about 3.5" of ice near the docks, and then it got thinner in a hurry. Apparently someone got wet feet there earlier in the day.  I ended up at Lawrence Lake Marina just north of Brownsville yesterday. There was probably 4" of good clear ice, much better than what I found in  La Crosse. Will post pictures later, but I got one nice largemouth on a tip up at the Marina, one 10" perch, and a couple small perch.  Today I drove around Winona, and fished the backwater pond east of Latsch Island on the west side of the road. The ice there was...not real good.  I stuck close to shore on 3" of not-real-clear ice after my spud bar saved me from a cold bath a little farther out.  I caught a few small perch there, and a bunch of small bluegills. Nothing worth keeping, and nothing on the tip-up. Was expecting the ice to be a little better than what I found, but what do you do?    
    • leech~~
      No Lake Trout in the lake?
    • leech~~
      Thanks Guys.  Starting to feel better about may be getting the sled and porty out there.
    • kelly-p
      Miss the old days too shaky, we had some fun didn't we.  I don't miss working on the lake tho.
    • kelly-p
      Westwind, Roger's and JR's that I know of. Not sure of the cost.
    • Rick G
      Roughly 11inches... there were a few brave people who drove mini vans out
    • Wanderer
      @leech~~ There was all of 10 inches where I was but I’d say it was a tick more.
    • MNoutdoors99
      Thanks for your input, I got myself setup with braid and a fluoro leader and its working great!
    • MNoutdoors99
      Hey all, I am looking to catch a decent perch in the 7" or bigger range and soon because in my class at school we get to taxidermy a fish and I would like to do a yellow perch, I have fished little Pulaski for 2 days and Buffalo for one and caught nothing on Buffalo lake and some bluegills and bass on little pulaski. Anyone got advice on spots in little Pulaski or Buffalo lake or just another lake near by Buffalo as well for perch? Thanks - jim
    • tview
      Thanks Moose  Fun meeting up with the Group today Fun Day . Good times.. i