Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
lunker-1967

Size of "keepers" ???

3 posts in this topic

Just wondering what everybody else considers to be keeper walleyes? I and the people I fish with will not keep any walleyes less than 15" or anything 20" or larger, unless they are hooked really bad. My thoughts are that the < 15" fish need to grow a bit and the 20" plus fish are the main spawners. Hope others use this mentality so there will be fish to catch in the future. I could have had my limit at times if I would keep everything I caught, but chose not to. I also would not mind if the state would reduce the daily limit to 4. What does everyone think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you pretty much hit it on the head, lunker, IMHO. At least I share a similar philosophy. If I am going to keep them, I take what I can use, and no more. I know the 'eyes on Lake Erie (where I am originally from) needed to grow up before they would spawn, so unless mortally wounded (it happens), my slot is somewhere between 16" and 20", though I will admit to keeping one that turned out to be 23" on a very cold early-ice evening that looked a heck of a lot smaller in the portable (how often do you hear THAT one?).

I had fillets from 5 in the fridge/freezer from our excursions on the ice this year, and cooked them up with my fishing buddy last night. After stuffing ourselves, I still have 2 left to cook up later this week.

If anything, being choosy gives me an excuse to get back out on the ice!

Have fun, be safe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah lunker I operate under a similar practice...my slot (unless the lake has special regs) is between 14 and 20 inches...I'd be fine with them lowering the limit to 4 as well. Even if you're fishing for a family you can get a meal for 'em with 8 fillets!

I think panfish anglers really need to suck it up and realize they don't NEED to take a pile of fish home every time they hit the ice. Just because the fish are biting doesn't mean you need to fill a bucket up. When the pannies are especially vulnerable (LATE ICE) I may catch my limit (and more) but send 'em all back down because I've already had a couple fish dinners that month...no need to get greedy!

Just something to think about. Good thread!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Skibo
      I may get a big ration of doodoo for this post, but here goes.  As a business owner (not food related) I guess I'm a bit confused by all of these negative posts.  The new owners (remember, they invested their money in the place) have evidently decided on a business model that they feel will work for them to be profitable.  I don't know them, don't know what their background or experience is, and it really doesn't matter.  It's their business, so they get to do with it whatever they choose.  If their model doesn't work, it stands to reason that they'll change their model, but that is entirely up to them.  There's likely a reason that the ownership of The Landing has changed several times in the last decade.  Trying to drive these owners out of business won't bring back 1980's priced cheap food and drink.   There are lots of places in many towns and cities that I choose not to eat at or visit because I don't want to pay the prices they charge.  But I don't go on the Internet and demean the owners and their places of business because I choose not to buy from them.  I'm a few times a year visitor to The Landing, and it is generally for lunch off the lake.  If I thought it was too expensive I simply wouldn't go back.  Vote with your dollars, not your posts on this forum.  Get a Trip Advisor or Yelp account and post a review if it's that important for you to vent.   The alternative for all of you of course, is that if anyone else has a model where they can charge half as much and still make a profit (not likely), well maybe that person ought to buy The Landing and give us all cheap food and drink.  We'll line up at the dock for you.  It's the old "put your money where your mouth is" adage.  The fact is, most of the old favorite local establishments you talk about have been in the same family for years or generations, and the owners make a living because of low overhead.  Someone investing in a new venture has lots to pay for, and as you all know, owning anything on a lake, and especially on Vermilion in Greenwood Township, is not a low-cost endeavor.   Let's support those who choose to invest in these expensive pieces of real estate on our lake (or at least not disparage them in these posts), and help them to keep them open.  Time to forget about getting $1 tap beers and $2.50 hamburgers, when the owners have to pay 2017 overhead costs.  Guys, the 80's want their lunch tab back.
    • Wanderer
      It's pretty driveable out there.
    • fishin4sum
      I must have missed it, but where are the fish pictures?  
    • Wanderer
      And when they do, they'll hire a guide. 
    • monstermoose78
      Sometimes them fish on the bottom are bass, suckers, or carp