Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Stan7600

transporting filets

6 posts in this topic

Is anyone familiar with a new rule regarding labeling cleaned fish as to lake of origin and length of the fish? This would be if the fish came from a lake with a slot restriction. I heard it was in Outdoor News lately but missed it. Thanks, Stan C.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not even go out on Upper Red Lake with out the regs in my hand and checking at the water before going out.JMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I understand the regs is that on Red (or LOW) you can only have fillets if you are in the process of cooking them and then you have to have the whole carcas intact (and not frozen) and available for the CO to inspect. Of course eatten fish count against ones daily limit. I haven't heard of any rule about labeling the size of fish once you have left the water and cleaned them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On LOW fish filleted need to have a patch of skin left to identify walleye from sauger. Any fish without the patch is considered walleye. The resort does this for us, labeling and shrink wrapping any fillets that will be transported. Good luck and hang on. Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked the DNR and got a very fast response. The new regulation is only for fish packers and took effect 12-10 2007. It sounds like if a resort is a licensed fish packer, as some are on LOW, they will have to include more information on the packed fish as to length and origin. Rules are unchanged for the rest of us except for the eating of fish on the lake as has been discussed. The new regulation reads "when packing fish" so I got confused. Not hard to do. Stan C. tongue.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to know the new rule is only for fish packers. One less rule to remember!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • SkunkedAgain
      There are two main spawning spots on Vermilion that I know of. I'm near the one on the west end of Vermilion. The walleye haven't been as good on this end yet they don't pull any fish out from here. They've been pulling walleye out of the east end spawning spot in Pike Bay, and for some reason walleye have been doing better over there.   I have no doubt that there are many variables that go into the equation, but you can't ignore that the end they put the 10% back into has been doing better than the one where they leave it alone.
    • TrueNorth
      Are there any updates for the area?  It sounds like crappie fishing is good in the shallows on Fishtrap.  I heard Sham is fighting high waters with no end in sight....
    • TrueNorth
      Trolloni - Do you write it that way to actually troll us?  Creel/lake surveys show Vermilion is very healthy and the DNR continues to use new technology.  It's only going to get better.  If we listened to old, arm-chair QB's, fishing would be as shi#TY as the West side.  
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      At least10% of all eggs hatched at the Pike River Hatchery are returned to Vermilion waters every year. According to DNR statistics that percentage is usually a much higher survival rate then if they had let the walleyes spawn naturally! I consider that a good trade off! Cliff
    • trolloni
      They should not be  going  back to area waters or traded to  other dnr  districts they should go right back into LAKE VERMILLION !!!  Don't ya think its time the dnr   should start to listen  to the paying public, us ! [trappers, hunters,  fisherpeople ,boaters and snowmobilers ]