Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
hitthebricks

I finder Hunt vs H2O

5 posts in this topic

I understand the H2O with Navonics chips very well but know nothing about the Hunt model

Do you need to buy a topography type chip to get the best performance out of the Hunt? Would the chips for the hunt also work in the H2O and do Navonics lake chips work in the Hunt model? HTB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use my old chips from my h20 in my i hunt. I also have topo maps for I hunt. I think this is the best one it has the barometer and so many other features that h2o does not. Works awsome for any application.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the lake maps look the same as in the H20, Gteat!!!!!!!! Do the topo maps work in the Hunt?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had 4 i finder hunts and had nothing but trouble with them. They would work ok for awhile then they would start having problems aquiring postiong. Finally I had Lowrance send me a H20 and have had no trouble since. I have no idea what the problem was. Lowrance claimed there wasn't anything wrong but when it takes over 2 hours to get position something is wrong. My H20 if it takes over a minute I start wondering what is going on. Like I say I still shake my head over what the problem was. I believe it had to be in the software and maybe this isn't a problem anymore. The thing is you don't gain that much in options to make it worth the extra money in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

iff, thanks for the reply! I like to hear replys good or bad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Wanderer
      Considering how old a laker has to be before reaching reproductive maturity, a slot may help.  The only thing I'd worry about there is having to put a bleeder back down the hole because it wasn't legal.  Then if a person wanted to keep their limit, that would just mean a wasted fish should they be able to get two more.   When I first started laker fishing, catching and keeping "my two" was a given if I were to have that good of a day.  Then it changed to releasing pretty much everything over the mid - 20 inch range unless it bled.  Now 1 fish in the 24 inch range would be my perfect weekend limit if I could choose.   When a person gets introduced to these addictive ghosts, it's tough to put em back.  There's a lot of excitement and pride in earning such a prized fish.  And I really enjoy eating them.  But in the case of Burntside, I would support a 1 fish limit, no slot.
    • Horseshoe_Don
      I decided to go watch them pull it out.   Never seen that before.   While they are working on pulling it out, another car is driving at them down the riverbed.   The officer has to run over and shoe them away.   The DNR might need to close that to traffic since there are a lot of dumb people.   Don
    • JerkinLips
      Great article; very educational.  Thanks for sharing.  I would be interested to know if having a slot limit on lake trout would help populations like it has with walleyes.  If so, why hasn't the DNR implemented it yet?
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Mr. B, Welcome to FM! June is almost always a good tome to fish for bass on the shorelines! Plenty of good bass country on the whole lake too! I do not fish for bass much but there are plenty of people on this site that do so you should get some good info.! Cliff
    • Ref
      Evergreen Lodge  -  Big Sand Lake  -  Park Rapids   Clearest water and greatest sand beach in the area!   http://www.evergreenlodgemn.com/index.php