Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Shack

Public Land Permanent Deer Stands?

Recommended Posts

Shack    16
Shack

I know this is another call to the local CO question, but I have noticed a larger number of permanent deer stands going up on State forest and other public lands!

I have not heard of any law changes, but I have seen 3 newly constructed deer stands on Wild Life refuge, countess old stands that someone could use and one deer ladder stand on state forest land with no one in it (could have gone in for lunch).

What does one do when they encounter these stands? Do you do nothing, like I do? Do you tear down, like someone had done to a newly constructed one I had seen on a recent

grouse hunting trip? Do you call local CO and inform him/her of stand?

Also I wonder what would happen if CO caught someone sitting in a permanent stand

on public land during gun opener? What would you say to someone sitting in a permanent stand on public land during hunting season, if you came across someone!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vister    0
vister

I am not sure of whether or not one can construct a permanent stand in state land. However, permanent or portable, if the stand is left out and unused at the time you see it there, you may legally use it. By legally, i mean that while unoccupied the stand is fair game for all to use, not just the individual who placed it there. That is why sometimes you come across a ladder stand with the bottom 5 feet of the ladder sections removed, so they can bring the section back out with them. This way no one can use "their" stand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TroyMcClure    0
TroyMcClure

I grouse hunt on public land a bit and see a lot of permanent stands. The rule is you aren't supposed to build them, and once they are out on the land anyone can use them. I almost want to just go out and sit in one during the firearm season just to irk the person that built them. Why build a permanent anymore when the portables are so nice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
huntingmaxima    0
huntingmaxima

I think that they are just an eye sore. If I had my choice I would tear them all down. These guys that build the perms think that they have squatters rights now also. Clean up our wood and tear them down!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer    314
Wanderer

I posted with commentary of this on the trail cam thread. In Crow Wing Co. a week ago, we drove into a section that had a blaze orange sign at the entrance stating that you COULD NOT PLACE A PERMANANT STAND ON COUNTY LAND. Well we found plenty.

I've heard stories of CO's going around the week before season and tearing down as many as they can but they just can't get them all.

I have mixed feelings about it, but I really wish people would just play fair and obey the law. I would hate to hear about a disagreement gone bad over "Someone was sitting in someone elses stand".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jbdragon17    0
jbdragon17

It IS legal to build a permanent stand in a state forrest. Most other public lands require that everything be removable, but state forrest still DO allow it though it is discouraged, and you can not legally claim the stand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK    3
BLACKJACK

Aside from the fact that those stands are eyesores, the wood and junk usually gets left forever, is the fact that the builders of those stands are claiming that spot of public hunting land as theres. Who wants to go confront a gun toting $%$#@ on opening morning?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jbdragon17    0
jbdragon17

I guess you just have to go where no one else is.

My party has been hunting (from permanent stands) for years on state land. We know the other parties hunting in the same area, and all respect each others stands. I think it comes down to ethics. I wont sit in a stand not built by my hunting party, unless one of the neighboring parties gives the "ok". It just doesnt seem right to do that to someone.

Yes I call it "my stand" because I built it legally. I know I have no legal right to make someone else leave if they are in it, but I would have no problem asking them too.

Fortunately it has not been an issue, and I hope it never will be. We hunt a long way out, and have a good relationship with the neighbors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EXTREME    0
EXTREME

Why does this whine go on every year. The law states no permenant stands on National forests and WMA's. State and county land it is legal to have one. I personally use portables, but I don't really have a problem with permanents. Just leave those people alone...don't we all have the same purpose...have fun and hunt deer!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jbdragon17    0
jbdragon17

You are %100 correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shack    16
Shack

OK, you had me double take my post! I checked on regs and found this!

Quote:


State Forests

State forest lands are generally open for hunting and other types of

outdoor recreation. Hunting on private land within a state forest is subject

to state trespass laws. A partial summary of state forest use regulations

is included below. A complete listing is available from the DNR.

Elevated Scaffolds

• The use of portable tree stands is recommended, especially those

which can be secured without driving nails into trees. Nails are a

safety hazard for woodcutters and harm the forest. Personal property

must be removed from State Forest lands. It is illegal to destroy state

property, including the cutting of trees of four inches or more in

diameter at four and one-half feet above the ground for shooting

lanes. Littering and erecting permanent buildings are prohibited.

• Any unoccupied stand or blind on public land is public and not the

property of the person who constructed the stand.


Still a little unclear, but it says personal property needs to be removed!

Click here to link to DNR Hunting regs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shack    16
Shack

I just leave the stands! I figured with the new perm's going up on Wildlife Ref. I seen when I was out on the other week, I though maybe regs changed! I see they have not!

Now for the Perms on state forest land, I let them go as well! I figure if some one wants to claim it as his own, the forest is big enough to find another place to sit!

IMO

My main point to this post was, has anyone been in a stand that was illegal, when a co or another hunter came by and what happened. I realy am not debating the issue!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jbdragon17    0
jbdragon17

Correct...Personel property like your thermos, pack, chair etc...The stand (once built) legally becomes public.

It is only "recomended" to use portable stands...not required. Nails are stated to be a safety hazard, but you can still use them (it doesnt say you can not). You can not cut trees more than 4 inches in diameter, and it is illegal to build a cabin out there. Other than that... build away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shack    16
Shack

JB,

You are correct!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jbdragon17    0
jbdragon17

I also agree that there should be enough woods for everyone. I will also say again I believe it comes down to ethics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
colonel42    0
colonel42

The funny thing about this is no one has issues with these stands other then the three weeks of deer season. I myself had permenant stands way back when but have moved on to ladder stands and climbers. In the area where I hunt I own 120 acres. In our party we have 12 people that hunt. Most of the State land and county land is land locked around mine. No road access what so ever. Some of the people in our party set up on state land and have done so for 25+ years. Another hunting party that hunts near us have been out there for 40+ years. Last week one of the land owners near by decided to lease a 40 acre field beyond our property. Last Saturday after hearing about this lease I drove out to see what was going to happen. Just to let you know this field is an over grown hay field that has not been cut in the 25+ years I have been hunting it. Lots of tagelder and not one possible tree to even think about putting a portable stand in. Nine guys from Hutchenson have leased this land with expectation of coming up the week before hunting and finding areas to hunt. No care factor of finding out who hunts the land or where deer stands have been established. My point is if you don't own land there are going to be issues to come down the line. Way back when people built permenant stands on state and county land in our group they have always been maintained and if they were falling apart they were tore down and hauled out. We as hunters have to take care of these lands like they were ours. I very well understand the concerns of the state and counties not wanting permenant stands on their property. It only makes sence. It's there land.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neiko    1
Neiko

I believe it is legal to build a permanent stand on state forest also as long as there wasn't walls and a roof. Reading the article in Outdoor News has me guessing who is right because I believe they wrote in there article they are not allowed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jbdragon17    0
jbdragon17

shackbash posted the rules right from the DNR in this string.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jbdragon17    0
jbdragon17

I just started thinking about this a little more. If I build a stand on state land, and some jack @ss cuts it down... he should (according to the rules) get in trouble for destroying state property grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neiko    1
Neiko

I'd try more for hunter harassment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer    314
Wanderer

jbdragon,

I had to chuckle.... grin.gif

I just want to offer this perspective and maybe it will help explain why this topic comes up every year.

As a "wanderer" type hunter, I hunt both public and private. I like to see new country. When I get introduced to a new area like by my friends 140 this year, I sometimes find areas on govt. land that I would REALLY like to hunt. Especially since his ground is already saturated with the original party.

When I explore the area I start getting that feeling that THIS would be a good spot. I start looking for a setup tree. Oh, crap, theres a stand frown.gif It looks new-somebody will be here but I would really like to hunt it. Dang, not worth the hassle. Find another spot. Another stand. It doesn't look new. I wonder if anybody will be in it? Should I chance it? Nah, keep looking.

Finally! A spot just on govt. land across the private property line. Looks great! NO STAND! Guess what?? I've looked long and hard for this so up goes my portable. Locked. 25 feet up. Tree pegs removed.

Now I'm guilty of being on both sides of the fence when I would really just rather get up earlier than the next guy and be where I want to be first. Otherwise I don't EVER get to equally share public land on a first come first served basis.

One guy has that public deer funnel locked up for 25 years because he nailed up some 2x4's. Thats why its a sore spot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Craig_S    0
Craig_S

Quote:

One guy has that public deer funnel locked up for 25 years because he nailed up some 2x4's. Thats why its a sore spot.


And that's why I predict that on all public land, all perms will be illegal in a few years. Maybe 5 at the long end. Crow Wing County, Cass County, and the National Forests already ban perms on thier lands. A few other Counties will tumble in soon. The more conflict there is, the sooner they will go.

Plat books can be confusing, make sure you know what type of public land you are on. Sometimes County owned land is listed as State of Minnesota Tax Forfeit. I've seen confusion about that.

Craig

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
warrior    0
warrior

BUMP!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Craig_S    0
Craig_S

Quote:

I'd try more for hunter harassment.


And if somebody gets a little rough with me asking me to leave "his" stand on public land, I'd do the same.

I'm out there to have a good time. Really could care less if I shoot a deer today or not, but I have as much right to public land as the guy that built that stand. The law and my ethics tell me so.

Craig

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lip_Ripper Guy    7
Lip_Ripper Guy

I'm having some of these same issues. This will be my first year hunting public land, and quite frankly, I'm scared ****less. I have no idea where people are hunting, how many there are, etc. I've seen how people act at boat launches, on the lakes at 'their spot', on the roads and such. I'm going into the woods for the first time on Friday morning, in hopes that people will have marked out their areas, or will have their stands up, but I really won't know all the details until well after sunrise on Saturday morning.

I'm not sure how or if their would be a better way of doing the current system, nor do I know if the current one works. I can almost guarantee that someone will have the "I've been here for x years" mentality, but according to the regs, it all resets come shooting time on Saturday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      Court ruling would place unnecessary burdens on more than 500,000 White Bear Lake area residents Judge’s ruling would immediately halt important development within 5 miles of White Bear Lake, stalling road construction, utility improvements, and residential construction Ruling not supported by scientific evidence, creating precedent that could restrict development and impose new burdens on residents across Minnesota  The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources today announced it will appeal a Ramsey County District Court ruling regarding water management of White Bear Lake and its surrounding groundwater. Without appeal, the court’s ruling would place unnecessary burdens on more than 500,000 White Bear Lake area residents, and immediately halt important development within 5 miles of the lake – stalling road and utility improvements, business growth, and residential construction. The judge’s ruling – which is not rooted in the best available science – would not significantly help the lake reach the court’s desired water level, and would likely set a new statewide precedent imposing similar burdens and restrictions on residents, businesses, and communities across Minnesota. “The DNR is strongly committed to protecting Minnesota’s many precious water resources, including White Bear Lake and its surrounding aquifers. We take that responsibility very seriously,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. “But responsible, effective water management must be supported by sound science. The decisions we make must balance the needs of all Minnesota residents and businesses to ensure everyone has reliable access to clean, affordable water. That important balance, and the quality of life we all enjoy, are at stake in this ruling, which merits a thorough review by the Minnesota Court of Appeals.” Under the District Court’s ruling, if water levels remain below 923.5 feet above sea level in White Bear Lake, new irrigation and development restrictions would be imposed on area residents and businesses. DNR data show, however, that White Bear Lake’s water levels have registered below this proposed 923.5-foot trigger level in 48 out of the past 58 years. And according to the best available science, the DNR has concluded these new restrictions would have little impact on raising or maintaining the court’s desired water levels in White Bear Lake. Nonetheless, if the District Court’s ruling is not overturned, residential watering would be banned for 500,000 area residents by early 2018, and could not resume until the lake rises above 924 feet. Under the court’s ruling, this expansive residential watering restriction would remain in place for multiple years during dry periods, and would have likely been in place for the past 10 years had the court’s order been in effect. Additionally, all temporary water permits for construction within 5 miles of White Bear Lake would be immediately prohibited under the court’s ruling – a change that would stall road construction, utility, and residential development projects in area communities. In the last five years alone, 31 construction projects within 5 miles of the lake required such a permit. “The DNR is firmly committed to protecting our lakes, rivers, and aquifers. But unnecessary water restrictions can be profoundly disruptive to people, our economy, and communities,” Landwehr said. “The science does not support such a broad irrigation ban, nor these extremely restrictive development prohibitions. More importantly, these restrictions would do little to achieve or sustain desirable water levels in White Bear Lake.” Landwehr said, however, that the agency does believe some changes to water use may be needed and it is developing an enhanced water model to better understand the impact of pumping from specific wells near White Bear Lake. “This is information that we have only recently been able to develop,” he said. “With this new tool, we are committed to working with local communities, businesses and residents to make carefully targeted, well-informed modifications to water use in the area.” DNR water experts and local government leaders have serious concerns about the precedent the court’s ruling could establish. If applied elsewhere in Minnesota, this restrictive approach to water management could severely curtail new and amended groundwater appropriation permits for all types of uses, beyond what is needed to ensure water sustainability. The DNR has until Oct. 30 to appeal the court’s decision, but is announcing its decision now because many area communities are concerned with the ruling and want to know how the DNR will proceed. During the appeal process, the DNR will work with permit holders in the White Bear Lake area to implement some elements of the ruling. The agency will be talking soon with communities about how it will approach this in as collaborative a manner as possible. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • blindluck
      I wouldn't let length or hp determine that, just the wind.  I saw a boat that lost a rivet this last year and have heard about a weld cracking out there.  The wind is no joke out there and any boat can take a hit.    If it is really windy I just swing into Kabekona Bay.   Otherwise, just count on it taking a while to get out to spots.
    • monstermoose78
      I do, never thought about it. I will ask my buddy and I will have to work on blind retrieves. I never have done blind retrieves with Finn. I will have learn up on it now. If you have any tips or tricks it would help. Thank you Dave 
    • FishinCT
      Didn't catch a ton of fish this weekend but the ones we got were beauties. Just a bunch 15-17 inch fish with a 25" mixed in there. Last 2 days have been tough after the storm Sunday night. Marking tons of fish still and getting a good amount of bites on both spinners and lindys but most are biting short and tough to hook on the big minnows. Don't really want to throw on a stinger hook but that might be the way to go. Maybe should try pulling some cranks too. Looks like the rest of the week should be stable weather and good fishing!
    • Sunset Lodge
      Hello from the NW Angle of Lake of the Woods!

      Water temps are hovering in the low 60’s despite the very fall like weather we are experiencing. 

      The scenic Canadian shore lines are coming to life with various critters. Otter, bear and more making preparations for the coming winter.

      Walleye fishing in Canada is excellent with a jig and minnow or shiner. The most productive environment has been gaps at 15-18’ with plenty of current present. Good numbers of perch are being caught off deep edges or reefs at 30’ or more. Crappies are a little more difficult this week, the best chances are on a light set up.

      Around Minnesota, walleyes can still be had with a crankbait but favored methods are switching over to a jig tipped with a shiner on main lake points between 20 and 24’. 

      Muskies are moving deeper with anglers transitioning from casting to trolling. There is still time to boat a big fall fish!

      We hope to see you soon!
      Sunset Lodge
    • leech~~
      Welcome to the forum. Give it a month and throw it on C/list, it should go then.
    • rundrave
        Im not a waterfowl guy and dont do a lot of it. But isn't that why you retriever guys do blind retrieves? My GSP's dont always mark down birds either and I just send them with hand signals. I think its just something we have worked on over time. Do you know anyone that has access to a zinger winger launcher etc. That's about the only other way to replicate it with out doing the real thing.
    • monstermoose78
      Thanks Dave this seemed to help with grouse, woodcocks,and ducks.  How does a guy get a dog to stay focused on the sky watching for birds? Finn did great at sitting or laying down for ducks but he does not watch for them so he does not mark the birds then. Any ideas to get him to do this?  
    • Mike89
      one of the  rivers will do ya...
    • jb bj