Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
rippinlips

Thoughts on the new 30lb minimum draw weight

Recommended Posts

rippinlips    0
rippinlips

I think that is a little low and might cause more wounded deer to be running around. I know it will allow more kids to get into the feild hunting which is great, but unless the shot is perfect and meaning you don't hit any bones and don't try a shot over 20 yards there could be alot more wounded deer running around. Not to mention that at a young age wounding a deer can be very very hard on a youngster. I kinda have mixed thoughts on it but definitly leaning towards the side of not approving of the change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME    0
LABS4ME

It's already been approved... water under the bridge.

I'm O.K. with it.

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deitz Dittrich    4
Deitz Dittrich

Rip- there was a thread on this a while back...I'll try and find it and link to it...

My thoughts... Wi has had a 30 lb draw weight for quite a few years.. I have to admit, I hunt WI more than I do MN, and I dont see any more wounded deer over there than I do here. Keep in mind that bows have come a long way in the last few years. More power, faster ect... I would say a new bow set at 30 lbs may have more power and faster than a 6-9 year old bow set at 40 lbs.

I'm all for this new rule if it means more young adults and women can be involved in this great sport.

[found it, it was back on page 7--]

http://www.fishingminnesota.com/forum/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=1147231&page=6&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shogun    0
shogun

I agree with rippinlips - 30lb is just too low. Kids that young shouldn't be hunting anyway - they just aren't old enough to totally understand what they are doing when killing an animal of that size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deitz Dittrich    4
Deitz Dittrich

Just because the law says 30 lbs.. doesnt mean everybody is going to turn thier bows down to 30 lbs.. Lets say I was like 75/80 years old.. and loved to bow hunt... but could only pull 37 lbs with comfort?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shogun    0
shogun

I guess I'm not really sure how I feel about the 30lb limit - but on another note...

I have seen some hunting shows where the host has their 6 year old daughter killing animals with a cross bow. That just doesn't seem right to me. Sorry to change the subject here but that's just something that comes to mind. 6 years old is way too young. She doesn't understand?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deitz Dittrich    4
Deitz Dittrich

I can agree that 6 is a bit early in my opinion as well to be pulling the trigger. I dont think its too young to be along on the hunt. I dont think the law was put in place so that 6 year olds could hunt though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DonBo    101
DonBo

I would hope that a youngster who can only pull 30 lbs would be mentored by an adult who would sit right next to him/her, at least till an understanding of the hunt is instilled.

As for adults who can only handle 30 lbs, my mother at 71 years old shot the biggest buck in camp a few years ago. grin.gif I couldn't have been more proud. Do you want to discourage her from hunting?

As long as the hunter understands that you need to wait for the perfect shot at a reasonable range, I am all for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rippinlips    0
rippinlips

The legal age in MN to hunt whitetail is 12 years old, Just some kids 12 years old can't pull 40lbs I have seen it first hand. Ha if I knew my 4.5 tear old son would be quiet in the stand I would bring him out right now with me to watch. He loves to watch deer hunting videos over cartoons which is awesome. Back to the subject I just think it's a little low I'm not aganist getting kids out there I'm all for it and if anybody's grandpa or grandma want to go that is awesome also. This 13 year kid I know shoots 42 lbs and he has shot 3 deer with it killing 1 the other 2 were good shots because I saw the arrow sticking out of the vitals when tracking them just not deep enough penetration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gofishleech    13
Gofishleech

IMO it is too low. The less pounage you have the more arc in arrow flight meaning more precise aming and yardage judging is needed to make a good hit. When I was younger I used to shoot a 70+ pound bow and used one site pin set @ 20 yards and killed deer out 44 yards. Now I shoot 60lb and have 3 pins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Keeter    0
Keeter

I definitely could be wrong rippin, but I think the age 12 restriction to hunt deer is for rifles only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rippinlips    0
rippinlips

Keeter it 12 to hunt you have to go through hunter safety and that is only available starting when you are 12 years old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EXTREME    0
EXTREME

You guys that are against a 30lb draw weight obviosly have not seen any of the new bows. I will guarantee you that the new bows(last 5 years) set at 30lbs are at least 40 feet per second faster than the old Darton bow that I started hunting with. That one was set as high as it goes...probably 65 lbs. With that said; you still must practice your butt off. If your kid wants to go out hunting with a 30 or 70lb draw weight...you still must be able to make a killing shot. A gut shot with a 30lb bow is the same as a 70lb bow...I guarantee it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rippinlips    0
rippinlips

Pretty sure I stay up on the new bows extreme and the penetration from 30 to 70 is no comparing the 2. I'm not saying you can't kill a deer with 30lbs but not as efficently as a higher draw weight and speed. Do the math

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
snapcrackpop    0
snapcrackpop

Quote:

Kids that young shouldn't be hunting anyway - they just aren't old enough to totally understand what they are doing when killing an animal of that size.


Kids are ready at different ages. My oldest was 6 last year and he was with me when I took a doe.

hunterdeer.jpg

I know he will be ready any time he is legal to do so. He "gets it". (My younger son on the other hand might not be ready until he is much older.) I have told him (the older one) as soon as he can pull 30 pounds or shoot a 20ga. he will be going turkey hunting.

The sooner they get involved with hunting, the better.

And I believe the DNR wouldn't approve the 30 pound limit if they didn't feel confident with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DRH1175    0
DRH1175

I have no problem with it as long as you know your limits. Mostly it is there to help people who can't pull back a 40 lb bow an oppourtunity to still hunt. A well placed shot from any bow will do the job with a razor sharp head!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EXTREME    0
EXTREME

'rippinlips maybe we should ban recurves then...they are not fast enough. If you are worried about penatration use a heavier arrow. Like someone else posted...hit them in the right spot and you shouldn't have to worry about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EXTREME    0
EXTREME

alright. I felt guilty after that last post. I respect everyone's opinion...because that is what it is..and opinion. I know they already passed the law; so let's not worry about it. Sorry Rippinlips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bobb-o    0
Bobb-o

I was very excited to hear aboot the reduced draw weight requirements, as was my g/f who went out and immediately bought herself a bow. Due to a shoulder injury in an accident when she was younger she has a hard time drawing heavier bows. Her new bow is set at a 32 lb draw weight, which is perfect for her, yet it still shoots faster than my 10 year old PSE set at 55 by aboot 50 FPS!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mike Steckelberg    0
Mike Steckelberg

i think it is a great that they dropped it to 30lbs...it hopefully means that more kids will get involved in bow hunting, not only the harvesting part of it but also all the time in the woods, putting in the work to get to that harvest..like a lot of you have said not everyone can pull back 40lbs, does that mean they shouldn't be able to hunt because they aren't strong enough, a good shot with 30lbs will kill a deer every time, and as for some thinking kids don't get it how very wrong you are..if you teach kids everything you can about the whole package of hunting then they will get it and appreciate how special it is to get that harvest...

just my .02

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fatty07    0
Fatty07

I love the new law. I just bought a bow for my wife. She is a tiny girl and when we were shopping she could only pull back 30 pounds about 6 times. She has been shooting a month and now her bow is set at 37 pounds. It is shooting 205 fps and her kenetic energy is just shy of 40. Anything over 25lbs is considered good. Sure my bow has kenetic energy in the 80's but most of that force is ate up in the dirt after a pass through. Hopefully she can get a chance at a deer this year so I can let you know how it went.

I do beleive if your using lower draw weights you need to be very carefull of the shoulder, but with practice and patience she will be able to harvest a deer ethicaly. By the way I am way more excited than she is about being able to bow hunt. My only fear is she is gonna want a more powerful bow next year, because women and children can gain alot of muscle in a very short time when they get to shooting. My wife could probably shoot a 45lbs bow now after shooting for just a month. Good luck all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rippinlips    0
rippinlips

That's fine extreme. I want more people to pick up bowhunting even youngers kids it benefits evrybody in the sport by interducing more people. My real concern is that I don't want more wounded deer because you all know that will only give the anti-hunters and peta more fuel for there fire, that's really all that I was concerned about. I know 30lbs is enough to kill a deer it just has to place in the right spot and there really is no room for error. If everybody that shoots 30lbs really knows the right and wrong situations for the shot and they practice like there suppose to then there won't be any problems, but we all know that there are alot of people and parents that don't do that practicing and coaching of there kids like all of us do or will do to keep the sport fun and enjoying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UMDSportsman    0
UMDSportsman

Fatty07- do you have any units on the kinetic energy? where did you get the numbers from? Did you get them from a chart, from a test? If you got it from a chart, what were the inputs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fatty07    0
Fatty07

Just go into google and search for kenetic energy calculator for bow and arrow. A few will pop up. Also at archerytalk (Contact Us Please) com you can get a link to kenetic energy calculator. You need to know your arrow speed (not the advertised ibo speed) and the weight of the arrows plus tips. It will give you your kenetic energy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UMDSportsman    0
UMDSportsman

I was curious becuase I am going to school for mechanical engineering and i was going to do a couple calculatoins on my own to compare to the calculators, and the one i looked at did not have units on it. To make a comparison you have to have the same units. I have also gotten to the point where numbers without units are useless. i don't mean to anger anybody by that, just what i have gotten used to.

Back to the origional topic. I kind of like the idea of dropping the draw weight to 30 lbs. My sister has said she would like to get into bow hunting and she doesn't know how much she can draw back. This weekend when we are getting to gether, we are going to go shoot a couple and see what she can do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      City may apply for DNR pilot project treatment The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed zebra mussels in Lake Marion, in the city of Lakeville, in Dakota County. Five adult zebra mussels were found at the public access by a lake consulting business, as part of an early detection monitoring program conducted for the city of Lakeville. The city may apply for a pilot project treatment after a more thorough search of the lake is completed. As boat owners begin taking boats and equipment out of the water for the season, the DNR reminds them to carefully check for aquatic invasive species and contact the DNR with any suspected new infestations. Look on the posts, wheels and underwater support bars of docks and lifts, as well as any parts of boats, pontoons and rafts that may have been submerged in water for an extended period. Minnesota law requires that docks and lifts be allowed to dry for at least 21 days before being placed in another body of water, whether aquatic invasive species are present or not. Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Extensive multi-agency search showed no other zebra mussels The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed that a single zebra mussel was removed from Lake Harriet in Minneapolis. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) staff reported one adult zebra mussel on a boat cover recovered from the bottom of the lake. No additional zebra mussels were found during 67 hours of diving, snorkeling and wading searches involving the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPRB, two MPRB contractors and the DNR. Lake Harriet will be added to the Infested Waters List for zebra mussels, with the provision that it may be removed from the list if future surveys continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake. “We’re grateful that no zebra mussels were found during the extensive dive, snorkel and wading search of Lake Harriet,” said Heidi Wolf, DNR invasive species unit supervisor. “Strong partnerships and interagency cooperation are key, and we thank the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their ongoing efforts. “While we regret that Lake Harriet will be added to the Infested Waters List because one zebra mussel was confirmed, we’re hopeful that the lake may be removed from the list if future searches continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake,” Wolf said. DNR invasive species specialist Keegan Lund said Lake Harriet will be carefully monitored the rest of this season and next year, but no treatment is necessary at this time. Lund said individual zebra mussels sometimes die after they are brought into a new lake, before they become established. “There is a common misperception that zebra mussels are everywhere and that their spread is inevitable. The reality is, of Minnesota’s 11,842 lakes, fewer than 250, about 1.8 percent, are listed as infested with zebra mussels. More Minnesotans than ever before are following our state’s invasive species laws,” Lund said. “People spread zebra mussels, and people can prevent their spread.” Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Meterman
      I fish the big water of Minnesota side of Lake of the Woods almost exclusively and purchased my boat with what I will call "truck suspension" shock absorbing seats at the helm (first row).   In the waves of LOW, these will bottom out and your back still takes a pounding.   I am planning to replace the helm seats (will need seats, pedestal and base) with one of the above mentioned shock absorbing pedestals next spring.   My boat does have high sides so will need a taller pedestal. Looking for others to comment on their experiences with these.   Thanks.
    • Meterman
      I have typically used the back reeling feature more for letting out line when trolling or jigging.   When fighting a fish, I let the drag take care of business.   I guess it is just a pain to now get used to no back reeling on a new reel . . . may have to switch to another brand?
    • JBMasterAngler
      Well, fishing wasn't very good. But the weather certainly didn't help. Fished caribou the first day, marked lots of cisco and lakers, but no bites. Planned on bluewater on Monday, but because of the wind, we took the channel to trout instead. Caught several nice bluegills and a 30 inch pike. No lakers, but I did get stuck in weeds in 35 ft of water, never had that happen before. Was going to launch at same access on wabana on Tuesday, and go to bluewater, but wind was even worse. We took a drive and went up to Larson lake. Lost a nice pike, but nothing else. Thought for sure I'd at least catch 1 splake! Survived the storm that night. Stopped at pokegama on way home and fished for a couple hours. Lost a muskie, and had a big pike break my line. My son was really excited to catch his first rock bass. It would be nice to come back someday, but it might be awhile. Caribou could be good in the winter, maybe. Oh well. Final camping trip of the year is in the books!
    • BSLNORTH
    • BSLNORTH
      Hi, I am selling my 2012 Polaris Ranger 800 XP camo. Very low miles, 1200. Full hard cab, flip out glass windshield, windshield wiper, almost like new still. Great for ice fishing, hunting and work around the house.  I also have this ad on C.L.  10,000 b/0 text me for pics, thanks.  I am located in west metro 763-two34-0837
    • partyonpine
      Any bass reports?  Have the walleyes been moving in shallow at night?  South wind I am guessing their is fish on the south side of pine? 24-32 feet sounds like right in front of the cabin.  Any in crawlers or have they transitioned to minnows.  Did well in 18 feet last weekend.  No matter what cannot wait for 3 solid days of fishing!!!
    • BisoNation
      1st time ever I've seen zebra mussels in ottertail on west side   this SUCKS!!!!   had a red solo cup in the water... apparently they love RED.     at least 5 of them    it sucks
    • Wanderer
      From someone who grew up as a back reeling aficionado, I've learned to appreciate a quality drag on a reel.  It's the one thing I'll gladly pay for. Modern drag systems are so much better than they used to be.  Not taking advantage of them is leaving a lot of the value of a quality reel on the table.  Unused and wasted. So, is that the kind of opinion you were looking for?