Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
ghotierman

Trophy Fish - Keep for mount or CPR and graphite?

Recommended Posts

ghotierman    0
ghotierman

The Miltona Muskie thread took a turn into this discussion, so I locked it and opened up this thread. Let's have a discussion on this issue...pro's and con's...WITHOUT making any PERSONAL judgments!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks    6
bigbucks

I'm definitely in favor of the real thing as opposed to the replica. The replica may even look better, but it's not the actual fish. In theory you wouldn't even have to catch the fish to get a replica, borrow a picture of your buddy's fish, pay your money, bingo. I realize you can probably buy mounted fish too, but to me it just isn't the same thing.

It's not like you're going to mount 100's of fish or anything, probably one or two. I don't know if I know anyone that has 5 mounted fish, although that would be fine with me if they had whatever number if they wanted to pay for it. In most cases the fish being mounted are big enough & old enough they're getting close to dying of old age anyway, so what are you really saving by releasing them? I suppose somebody else might catch it, but so what, they might not either. I do think it's a personal choice & people should do it how they want to, but I don't see it as a moral issue one way or the other. I guess I have bigger issue with people routinely cleaning 4-5+ lb walleyes, at least on most of the lakes that won't support that kind of harvest. In Lake Erie or some of those bigger fisheries it may have no affect on the population or it's structure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B420    0
B420

REPLICA 100%

Both mounted fish and replica's are painted renditions of fish. I guess it gives some guys woodies to know that they painted on the skin vs a mold, but replica's in my opinion are better for a number of reasons. The fish gets released,the replica looks better, lasts longer, if you aren't happy with the paint job they will get it done to your liking. Fins don't break as easy, easier to dust/clean (more durable), replicas don't look ancient in 5 years. I have two replica's in the house, not one person that has seen them thought they were replica's, all thought they were the real thing till I showed them the release shots cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pistol Pete    1
Pistol Pete

Iv'e got a couple of real walleye mounts and a muskie replica. I had a real muskie mount of a 44 inch fish that died after being caught. All my real skin mounts are starting to look tough. Tails and fins will all soon be in need of repair. My old muskie mount was getting in such bad shape I gave it to a taxidermy buddy to put in his show room. He repainted it and fixed up the fins, looks fine now. But if I would have had to pay for that service I'm not sure what it would have cost.The replica looks as good as the day I got it home. People who stop at the house all comment on the big muskie. They don't even realize its not a skin mount. Put a picture of the catch and release under it and I think they look great. Let my personl best go this year, hope to catch it again some day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
goose89    0
goose89

A well taken picture, or series of pictures, including the release have always stuck out in my mind. A fish on a wall never looks natural. A picture or pictures, with the background, water, boat, rods, lure, ect, seems to me the most natural way to show off a big fish.

I think, as evidenced many times on this site, CPR is catching on, and hope it continues to do so. Nothing wrong with keeping a few for the pan, but the "reproducers" are vital in sustaining natural reproduction in our lakes for the future, especially now days with all the technology and gear available to us. I get frustrated with people who keep EVERYTHING they catch, and then rip the DNR for not being able to sustain fish populations in the lakes they fish. I don't think keeping the fish of a lifetime is wrong, but I think there's a classier, and more awe inspiring way to show off that fish than a mount. Mounts, in my opinion, are not as impressive as pictures. You caught the fish, capture the moment, and let it go. Mounts can look cool, but you know you'll never have a shot a catching it again, or it's offspring, when they grow up.

A good camera, I think, should be a part of a fisherman's tools. Nothing like a good picture. Yeah, hold it out and make it look big, too, if you like. Exageration, to some extent, is a part of being a fisherman also. But, a picture can never lie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
monstermoose78    1,353
monstermoose78

A big fish is up to the person who caught it. My nephew who is 4 might get a 24 inch walleye and to him its huge but to most who fish its not big at all. Who really cares what others do as long as its within the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
elbinowalleye    0
elbinowalleye

Graphite is the way to go. I have caught many trophy fish and have 3 mounts. All are graphite and they look great!

(Note from admin,please read forum policy before posting again,Thank-you.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishinphilth    0
fishinphilth

I have by no means caught a trophy fish, but always have the camera ready for that time. I personally would have a picture with a big grin and a replica made and release the fish so some day someone can catch it and laugh at how small my replica is. But to each their own. You put the work in and got lucky and caught the big one do with it what you will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hammer Handle    0
Hammer Handle

I have caught some trophy fish and have kept some and have released some. It depends on my mood and the timing.

I have no mounted fish or graphites in my house. I actually do not like the looks of either one.

I keep a disposable camera in my tackle box for the ones I do release. I learned this the hard way after catching several large fish I let go with no camera. I do keep and eat some large fish though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gotfish    0
gotfish

Keep in mind, that it's not always possible to release the fish. I caught a monster walleye ice fishing a few years ago and once out of the water, the eyes blew out of his head. It would have never gone back into the water, so the real mount is what I decided to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B@ssDoctor    0
B@ssDoctor

Quote:

I have caught some trophy fish and have kept some and have released some. It depends on my mood and the timing.

I have no mounted fish or graphites in my house. I actually do not like the looks of either one.

I keep a disposable camera in my tackle box for the ones I do release. I learned this the hard way after catching several large fish I let go with no camera. I do keep and eat some large fish though.


Just curious: if you kept some and don't have any on the wall, what did you do with them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
beer batter    0
beer batter

I believe he stated that in his entry.

Quote:

I do keep and eat some large fish though.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
schr0563    0
schr0563

About 5 years ago I caught a rainbow trout that exceeded my standards for getting a fish mounted. I definitely considered releasing her and getting a replica, but at the time the replicas weren't realistic so I opted for the mount.

For me, realism is everything. I want the fish to look exactly like the moment I pulled it out of the water. I didn't take 20 photos of the fish from different angles just to get a standard paint job. Sunfish that are too bright, spots on crappies that are too perfect, walleyes that are too brown or green all make me sick. Either way you go, the paint job is critical.

My father has a 13 inch sunfish on the wall that is over 30 years old and looks like it was just pulled from a lake. My trout turned out OK. From a few feet away it certainly looks like it did the day I caught it. Up close you can tell it is painted. If I found a place that made replicas that didn't look fake, I would probably try that in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Mike89
      one of the  rivers will do ya...
    • jb bj
    • Guatican
      So a buddy and I are looking to see where we can get on some nice Pike action around the Kato area. We have no access to a boat so we'll be doing it from shore. Any insight on a good pike or any game fish bite would be awesome! Fall tends to be our Achilles's heel. 
    • Troy Smutka
      9/25/17     Hunted the hot, steamy MN duck opener on a public lake in central MN. Could see lightning to the west and north all morning until the sun came up. Must have been some serious lightning in those storms that were 100 miles away. Could still see the flashes, but of course could not hear any thunder. Saturday morning we saw the most bluewing teal I have seen on an opener since the 1980s. Must have seen a thousand teal and hundreds of mallards and wood ducks. Weren't in the best spot since we were the third boat on the lake, but still managed to shoot some teal and wood ducks. Busy watching ducks all morning. The teal I cleaned were migrators with quite a bit of fat--none on the wood ducks. Sunday morning was a different day--most of the teal were gone and the mallards and wood ducks were more wary. Managed two juvenile mallards. Think the shooting and the weather front moving in got a lot of the BWT on their way further south. All in all, a decent start to the MN waterfowl season, especially considering the temps were more like mid August. See what this weather and some cooler temps brings to the decoys this weekend. Good luck, and I will see you out there somewhere.
    • delcecchi
      Any thoughts as to which will hold up better, or be easier to fix?
    • Rick
      With 59 state forests that cover 4.2 million acres, Minnesota state forests are a great place to view fall color, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  “Forests with a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees offer a wonderful fall color experience,” said Jennifer Teegarden, DNR forestry outreach specialist. “The dark green needles of conifers accent the yellow, orange and red leaves of deciduous trees.” Here are a few routes to consider: Late September Bear Island State Forest From Ely head south on State Highway 1 toward Isabella for about 20 miles. Take a right on New Tomahawk Road toward Babbitt for about 17 miles. Turn right on County Road 21 for 15 miles back to Ely. Kabetogama State Forest From Orr head north on State Highway 53 for 4 miles. Turn right on County Road 180 to head east for 16 miles. Turn right on Forest Road 203 to head east for about 4.5 miles. Turn right on Vermillion Falls road to head east for 8 miles. Turn right on County Road 24/23 and follow to Orr for 26 miles. White Earth State Forest starting at Roy Lake head east on State Highway 200 for 1.5 miles. Turn right on Strawberry Mountain Road to head south for 5 miles. At Norris Trail turn left to head east for 3 miles. Turn left on Height of Land Road to head north back to Highway 200. For a longer loop follow Strawberry Mountain road to State Highway 113. Turn right on State Highway 113 to head east. Turn left on Height of Land Road to head north back to Highway 200. Early to mid-October Croix and Nemadji state forests loop. From I35, take Hinckley exit #183 and head east on State Highway 48 for 19 miles. Turn left to head north on County Road 24 and follow as it curves east and north for 7 miles. Turn right on County Road 25 to head east for 9.5 miles. At Markville, head north on County Road 31 for about 12 miles. Turn left on Park Forest Road/Park Truck Trail to head west for 13 miles. Turn right on County Road 171 to head north for 2 miles. Turn left onto County Road 154/Kerrick Road to head west for 5 miles. At Kerrick, head south on State Highway 23 for 18 miles to I35 exit #195. Richard J. Dorer Memorial Hardwood State Forest From downtown Red Wing head south on Highway 61 for 10.5 miles. At Frontenac take a right onto Country 2 to head east for 9 miles. Take a right onto County Road 3 to head east for 4 miles. Take a right onto State Highway 58 to head north for 1.5 miles. Take a left onto Hay Creek Trail to head north for about 4.5 miles. Hey Creek Trail turns into Twin Bluff Road at Pioneer Trail. Continue on Twin Bluff Road for 1.5 miles and turn left on East Ave to return to downtown Red Wing. Visit www.dnr.state.mn.us/state_forests/fall-colors.html for additional scenic routes and state forest information. Entrance into a state forest is free. State forest campsites are available on a first-come, first-served basis for $14 a night. Visit the Minnesota state parks and trails Fall Color Finder at www.mndnr.gov/fall_colors to find areas in Minnesota with peak fall color. The Fall Color Finder is updated every Thursday through the end of October.   Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Hunter success was just slightly below average the five-year average on three popular waterfowl lakes for the 2017 waterfowl hunting opener in the Grand Rapids area. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) wildlife staff conducted waterfowl bag checks on opening day September 23rd on Big White Oak Lake, Mud Lake (both near Deer River) and Big Rice Lake near Remer. Hunter success in terms of ducks bagged per hunter was 2. The average take the previous five years was 2.2 ducks per hunter. Blue-winged teal, wood ducks and mallard ducks were the most common birds in the bag with blue-winged teal the most commonly bagged bird at all three lakes. Based on vehicle counts at these lakes, hunter numbers were down about 25% from the five-year average. “Hunters had to contend with an early morning thunderstorm which may have kept hunter numbers lower than in previous years. Some hunters delayed going out or decided to try another day because of the rain and lightning from the storm,” said Mark Spoden, acting area wildlife manager. This year’s duck hunting season is 60 days in length. The duck bag limit is six ducks daily and may not include more than any combination of the following: four mallards (two may be hen mallard), three scaup, three wood ducks, one pintail, two redheads, two black ducks, and two canvasbacks. If not listed, up to six ducks of a species may be taken. The daily bag limit for coot and moorhen is 15. The daily bag limit for merganser is five, no more than two of which may be a hooded merganser. More information about waterfowl hunting in Minnesota including weekly waterfowl migration reports can be found at online at www.mndnr.gov/hunting/waterfowl. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Muskieman1977
      Thanks Rick, we will be launching out of Long Lake, so Becker may be our best bet.  I assume Schneider is a long haul from Long Lake?  Do you think we should just fish outside weed edges or do you think the fish will still be on the docks?  I'm a bit concerned with the lower temps this week. 
    • Rick G
      Cedar Island for smallies, Becker or Schneider for largies
    • Muskieman1977
      My partner and I will be fishing a 10 boat bass tournament this Sunday (Oct 1st) on the Horseshoe chain.  We have never fished this water, so we are at a loss right now.  Do any of you have any recommendations on what areas to fish, types of lures, etc..  No sure where the fish would be around this time of year, but any advice would be much appreciated!!!  Thanks so much