Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
ghotierman

Trophy Fish - Keep for mount or CPR and graphite?

Recommended Posts

ghotierman

The Miltona Muskie thread took a turn into this discussion, so I locked it and opened up this thread. Let's have a discussion on this issue...pro's and con's...WITHOUT making any PERSONAL judgments!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks

I'm definitely in favor of the real thing as opposed to the replica. The replica may even look better, but it's not the actual fish. In theory you wouldn't even have to catch the fish to get a replica, borrow a picture of your buddy's fish, pay your money, bingo. I realize you can probably buy mounted fish too, but to me it just isn't the same thing.

It's not like you're going to mount 100's of fish or anything, probably one or two. I don't know if I know anyone that has 5 mounted fish, although that would be fine with me if they had whatever number if they wanted to pay for it. In most cases the fish being mounted are big enough & old enough they're getting close to dying of old age anyway, so what are you really saving by releasing them? I suppose somebody else might catch it, but so what, they might not either. I do think it's a personal choice & people should do it how they want to, but I don't see it as a moral issue one way or the other. I guess I have bigger issue with people routinely cleaning 4-5+ lb walleyes, at least on most of the lakes that won't support that kind of harvest. In Lake Erie or some of those bigger fisheries it may have no affect on the population or it's structure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B420

REPLICA 100%

Both mounted fish and replica's are painted renditions of fish. I guess it gives some guys woodies to know that they painted on the skin vs a mold, but replica's in my opinion are better for a number of reasons. The fish gets released,the replica looks better, lasts longer, if you aren't happy with the paint job they will get it done to your liking. Fins don't break as easy, easier to dust/clean (more durable), replicas don't look ancient in 5 years. I have two replica's in the house, not one person that has seen them thought they were replica's, all thought they were the real thing till I showed them the release shots cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pistol Pete

Iv'e got a couple of real walleye mounts and a muskie replica. I had a real muskie mount of a 44 inch fish that died after being caught. All my real skin mounts are starting to look tough. Tails and fins will all soon be in need of repair. My old muskie mount was getting in such bad shape I gave it to a taxidermy buddy to put in his show room. He repainted it and fixed up the fins, looks fine now. But if I would have had to pay for that service I'm not sure what it would have cost.The replica looks as good as the day I got it home. People who stop at the house all comment on the big muskie. They don't even realize its not a skin mount. Put a picture of the catch and release under it and I think they look great. Let my personl best go this year, hope to catch it again some day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
goose89

A well taken picture, or series of pictures, including the release have always stuck out in my mind. A fish on a wall never looks natural. A picture or pictures, with the background, water, boat, rods, lure, ect, seems to me the most natural way to show off a big fish.

I think, as evidenced many times on this site, CPR is catching on, and hope it continues to do so. Nothing wrong with keeping a few for the pan, but the "reproducers" are vital in sustaining natural reproduction in our lakes for the future, especially now days with all the technology and gear available to us. I get frustrated with people who keep EVERYTHING they catch, and then rip the DNR for not being able to sustain fish populations in the lakes they fish. I don't think keeping the fish of a lifetime is wrong, but I think there's a classier, and more awe inspiring way to show off that fish than a mount. Mounts, in my opinion, are not as impressive as pictures. You caught the fish, capture the moment, and let it go. Mounts can look cool, but you know you'll never have a shot a catching it again, or it's offspring, when they grow up.

A good camera, I think, should be a part of a fisherman's tools. Nothing like a good picture. Yeah, hold it out and make it look big, too, if you like. Exageration, to some extent, is a part of being a fisherman also. But, a picture can never lie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
monstermoose78

A big fish is up to the person who caught it. My nephew who is 4 might get a 24 inch walleye and to him its huge but to most who fish its not big at all. Who really cares what others do as long as its within the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
elbinowalleye

Graphite is the way to go. I have caught many trophy fish and have 3 mounts. All are graphite and they look great!

(Note from admin,please read forum policy before posting again,Thank-you.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishinphilth

I have by no means caught a trophy fish, but always have the camera ready for that time. I personally would have a picture with a big grin and a replica made and release the fish so some day someone can catch it and laugh at how small my replica is. But to each their own. You put the work in and got lucky and caught the big one do with it what you will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hammer Handle

I have caught some trophy fish and have kept some and have released some. It depends on my mood and the timing.

I have no mounted fish or graphites in my house. I actually do not like the looks of either one.

I keep a disposable camera in my tackle box for the ones I do release. I learned this the hard way after catching several large fish I let go with no camera. I do keep and eat some large fish though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gotfish

Keep in mind, that it's not always possible to release the fish. I caught a monster walleye ice fishing a few years ago and once out of the water, the eyes blew out of his head. It would have never gone back into the water, so the real mount is what I decided to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B@ssDoctor

Quote:

I have caught some trophy fish and have kept some and have released some. It depends on my mood and the timing.

I have no mounted fish or graphites in my house. I actually do not like the looks of either one.

I keep a disposable camera in my tackle box for the ones I do release. I learned this the hard way after catching several large fish I let go with no camera. I do keep and eat some large fish though.


Just curious: if you kept some and don't have any on the wall, what did you do with them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
beer batter

I believe he stated that in his entry.

Quote:

I do keep and eat some large fish though.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
schr0563

About 5 years ago I caught a rainbow trout that exceeded my standards for getting a fish mounted. I definitely considered releasing her and getting a replica, but at the time the replicas weren't realistic so I opted for the mount.

For me, realism is everything. I want the fish to look exactly like the moment I pulled it out of the water. I didn't take 20 photos of the fish from different angles just to get a standard paint job. Sunfish that are too bright, spots on crappies that are too perfect, walleyes that are too brown or green all make me sick. Either way you go, the paint job is critical.

My father has a 13 inch sunfish on the wall that is over 30 years old and looks like it was just pulled from a lake. My trout turned out OK. From a few feet away it certainly looks like it did the day I caught it. Up close you can tell it is painted. If I found a place that made replicas that didn't look fake, I would probably try that in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Spearing Machine
      I figured I would start up a new thread for us to use for the winter now that things are starting to set up and guys may be starting to creep out on the bays and smaller water.   I did some more poking around on Pike Bay this morning and I don't have anything much new to report. We've got less than an inch of fluffy snow on the ice and things healed up after the warm front this week. I worked my way from shore out into the middle of the bay and ice was relatively uniform between 5.25 and 5.5 inches of nice clear ice. Earlier this week I checked all landings on the Tower end and everything was iced up except for open water way out in Big Bay appearing to mostly be all West of Birch/Ely islands. Not sure if all the recent strong winds from North and South have changed that status though. I'm still sticking with my original guess of December 2 for my first trip off McKinley on 5 inches.   Good luck this winter to all and Be Safe!
    • monstermoose78
      Bummer 
    • eyeguy 54
        click below to check different areas. there are maps to click on also.  just scroll to find. pretty neat tool.    http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/cwdcheck/index.html
    • ANYFISH2
    • Rancid Crabtree
      extended forecasts look good up north. We won't have fish-able ice in the metro until at least the 2nd weed in December assuming no dramatic temp changes. The big Expo is Dec1-3 but temps look promising ~1.5hrs north. I wonder if the ability to go fishing might impact the amount of traffic at the show!
    • Kettle
      There's preliminary testing then if flagged it gets shipped to a lab I believe in CO to verify the results.
    • Chill62
      10 day forecast doesn't show anything with low temps below 15 degrees.  It might make ice but it wont be making it necessarily fast.
    • Nix769
      Thanksgiving would be nice...but first week of December still works!   Rogers on Red is already allowing wheelers and sleds...no side by sides yet.
    • leech~~
    • Rick
      A 30-foot-tall white spruce, selected as the state’s official Christmas tree, was cut down today in the General C.C. Andrews State Forest, near Willow River.  The tree will be set up at the governor’s residence, 1006 Summit Ave., St. Paul, around 9 a.m., Monday, Nov. 20. The tree will be lit Monday, Nov. 27. DNR staff and the Conservation Corps of Minnesota cut the tree on the Friday before Thanksgiving each year from one of 59 state forests. However, the search for just the right tree begins months before. DNR foresters keep an eye out for a tall tree that’s nicely shaped and well filled out. It also needs to be in a location where it will not be damaged when dropped and then easily pulled out and loaded onto a trailer. Minnesota’s state forests provide clean air and water, recreational opportunities, wildlife habitat, timber and special forest products. This year, small businesses are making 150,000 wreaths with balsam boughs harvested from state forest lands. The estimated annual sales for Minnesota companies producing holiday wreaths exceed $23 million and Minnesota’s public lands support a large share of this economic activity. Each holiday season, half a million Christmas trees are harvested from private tree farms in Minnesota, contributing about $30 million to the state’s economy. For each tree harvested, one to three trees are planted. Real Christmas trees store carbon during their lifespan. They can be chipped for mulch when the season is over, making them an environmentally friendly choice.
      More information and details on viewing the tree is on the state Christmas tree page. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.