Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
tealitup

Baiting

Recommended Posts

tealitup

When I was bear hunting this weekend - I had the chance to read the laws booklet - cover to cover (what else to do in a bear stand). Please read the following about bait (general) and tell me what you think.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hunting Method Restrictions

Bait

• Liquid scents, salt, and minerals are not considered bait, unless they contain other foods defined below as bait.

• “Bait” is grain, fruit, vegetables, nuts, hay, or other food that is capable of attracting or enticing deer and that has been transported and placed by a person.

• This restriction does not apply to foods resulting from normal or accepted farming, forest management, wildlife food plantings, orchard management,or similar land management

activities.

• The restriction does not apply to a person hunting on their own property, when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person.

• Hunters are not allowed to use bait or hunt in the vicinity of bait that the hunter knows about or has reason to know about or hunt in the vicinity where bait has been placed within the previous ten days.

___________________________

• The restriction does not apply to a person hunting on their own property, when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person.

THis section seems to say that the section as a whole does not apply to landowners who do not conspire to feed animals on adjacent land. AM I WRONG IN READING THIS?

Maybe I am just stupid today, but... I looked in the 2005 rules/policy book and this written section was not there. (I could not find a 2006 book).

Also, emailed DNR today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

I think its saying that I could legally bowhunt behind my house, even though my neighbors may have feeders out for deer that I know about.

Basically its saying that if you conspire with someone else to feed deer on their property to benefit you, you are in the wrong. If you know somebody is feeding deer, and its all on their terms, you are fine to hunt the area. BUT, I'll use caution to not sit directly on a trail going to those feeders.

Definitely some gray in all this.

Thats a very high level analysis on my part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

It sure looks like that but remember the "smell test." If it smells wrong, even though you're following the letter of the law, the DNR can warn you and make an example of you in a gray area such as this. I'm not saying you, in particular, or that you would do it. Just saying people in general should consider this.

Consider the following. What if my neighbor has a farm where the deer visit the corn crib every night and I set up 100 yards from it on my own property that adjoins. Legal, perhaps, maybe not. He's not baiting for me, but I know that its pretty much smells like baiting. I don't want to find out the hard way that what I'm doing is going to get my hunting priveleges revoked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

I am not justifying the grayness of the issue, just stating thats what it pretty much means though.

Tealitup wanted to know what it meant, and basically thats what it means.

I completely agree with you chuck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lcornice

Quote:

I think its saying that I could legally bowhunt behind my house, even though my neighbors may have feeders out for deer that I know about.

Basically its saying that if you conspire with someone else to feed deer on their property to benefit you, you are in the wrong. If you know somebody is feeding deer, and its all on their terms, you are fine to hunt the area. BUT, I'll use caution to not sit directly on a trail going to those feeders.

Definitely some gray in all this.

Thats a very high level analysis on my part.


That's exactly why it was changed by the legislature. There were a few situations around the state where people couldn't hunt their own property because a neighor was feeding and they'd be hunting over bait. So, it was changed to exempt people IF they weren't involved in the feeding on the neighbors property.

It can definitely be gray (what isn't these days) but I did like the comment about passing the 'sniff test'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hossienda

Maybe you can also help me with this part of it:

• "The restriction does not apply to a person hunting on their own property, when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person."

Would this mean that if I am hunting private property and I have no ownership stake in it that I could get a ticket?

Thanks,

-Hossienda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lcornice

Quote:

Maybe you can also help me with this part of it:

• "The restriction does not apply to a person hunting on their own property, when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person."

Would this mean that if I am hunting private property and I have no ownership stake in it that I could get a ticket?

Thanks,

-Hossienda


The statute was specific to a landowner exemption. As indicated, unless you own the property, you are not protected by the exemption.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ufatz

Just a cautionary note fellas: remember that it does not matter what people in here "think" or "guess" the law means. It is the interpretation used by the COURT that will prevail. The "smell test" admonition was on point. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

I have firm belief that what lcorn says, is about as good as it gets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rancid Crabtree
      extended forecasts look good up north. We won't have fish-able ice in the metro until at least the 2nd weed in December assuming no dramatic temp changes. The big Expo is Dec1-3 but temps look promising ~1.5hrs north. I wonder if the ability to go fishing might impact the amount of traffic at the show!
    • Kettle
      There's preliminary testing then if flagged it gets shipped to a lab I believe in CO to verify the results.
    • Chill62
      10 day forecast doesn't show anything with low temps below 15 degrees.  It might make ice but it wont be making it necessarily fast.
    • Nix769
      Thanksgiving would be nice...but first week of December still works!   Rogers on Red is already allowing wheelers and sleds...no side by sides yet.
    • leech~~
      I'll be ok, as long as I got my daily HSO therapy!  
    • Rick
      A 30-foot-tall white spruce, selected as the state’s official Christmas tree, was cut down today in the General C.C. Andrews State Forest, near Willow River.  The tree will be set up at the governor’s residence, 1006 Summit Ave., St. Paul, around 9 a.m., Monday, Nov. 20. The tree will be lit Monday, Nov. 27. DNR staff and the Conservation Corps of Minnesota cut the tree on the Friday before Thanksgiving each year from one of 59 state forests. However, the search for just the right tree begins months before. DNR foresters keep an eye out for a tall tree that’s nicely shaped and well filled out. It also needs to be in a location where it will not be damaged when dropped and then easily pulled out and loaded onto a trailer. Minnesota’s state forests provide clean air and water, recreational opportunities, wildlife habitat, timber and special forest products. This year, small businesses are making 150,000 wreaths with balsam boughs harvested from state forest lands. The estimated annual sales for Minnesota companies producing holiday wreaths exceed $23 million and Minnesota’s public lands support a large share of this economic activity. Each holiday season, half a million Christmas trees are harvested from private tree farms in Minnesota, contributing about $30 million to the state’s economy. For each tree harvested, one to three trees are planted. Real Christmas trees store carbon during their lifespan. They can be chipped for mulch when the season is over, making them an environmentally friendly choice.
      More information and details on viewing the tree is on the state Christmas tree page. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • eyeguy 54
      if it ever comes down to those 2 choices for you, do the eye thing. Cant fish with you if yer dead. 
    • JerkinLips
      Looks like Big Bay is still open, so I don't think I'll be ice fishing Thanksgiving Day weekend.  I'm guessing the Big Bay will freeze this Sunday or Tuesday.  Lake should be walkable by December 2 when I plan to go up.
    • leech~~
      Why do you think I come here everyday?  It's better then poking your eye with a sharp stick or slitting your wrists! 
    • gimruis
      I don't see any serious cold snaps in the next 2 weeks so its likely open water will still be in play for those brave enough to try it.