Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Nate McVey

VHS

2 posts in this topic

Well, our efforts may not have gotten a response, but this is a step in the right direction:

As seen in the Tribune:

An environmental group filed suit in state district court today demanding that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency take action to stop the deadly fish disease VHS from entering state waters.

The Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy filed the suit in Ramsey County asking that the PCA be ordered to enforce the federal Clean Water Act and restrict VHS and other ecological pollution spread by ballast water from ships.

The group claims that, unless the state regulates ballast water, viral hemorrhagic septicemia will likely spread from the other Great Lakes through ballast water and infect fish in Lake Superior and, eventually, throughout Minnesota.

The disease causes severe bleeding and eventual death in the fish it infects, although it has not been known to affect people.

“So far Minnesota has been sitting around waiting for the federal government to do something and nothing has happened, while VHS gets closer and closer,’’ said Kevin Reuther, lawyer for the group. “Minnesota should be a leader in this, and the state needs to step up to the plate. If we do nothing, it’s just a matter of time.’’

Representatives of the group met with PCA Commissioner Brad Moore in April, but didn’t reach any agreement on ballast issues.

PCA officials wouldn’t comment on the suit Monday, but Moore, in a written statement, said the agency “recognizes the need for comprehensive, effective and practical regulations for vessel discharges.’’

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes a person think about where the heads of the dnr are at. Maybe this will just go away. NOT . they should be doing something about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • JBMasterAngler
      The DNR has tried introducing lake trout into several lakes in the past 10 years or so. Most attempts have been unsuccessful (hanging horn lake for example). DNR recently increased the number of lakers stocked in big trout, but numbers are continuing to decline. I would have rather seen them cut back on the numbers stocked into burntside as opposed to stopping it altogether. The heavy fishing pressure and the predation by smelt is a tough 1-2 combo for lakers to deal with.
    • JBMasterAngler
      Did anyone try holland on opener, or any day since? Just wondering if anyone had any luck.
    • monstermoose78
      My brother hammered walleyes and perch . Him and his friend ended up with 70 eyes caught and kept their limit and had 30 perch from 6 feet of water.
    • monstermoose78
      My old man met me on the lake today and I showed him I am a skilled angler! lol we had a great fish fry! My old man only added one crappie and 5 gills to the bunch
    • monstermoose78
      My old man and I had fun time today even though he only added 5 gills and one crappie. I schooled my old man but we enjoyed fresh fish No worries no gills over 8 inches kept or crappies over 12