Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
so haaad

Southeast trout?

10 posts in this topic

I'm afraid to even think about the damage that the flash floods did to our trout streams and trout populations. I'm sure many trout were pushed downsteam or out of the banks entirely. I'm also guessing the aquatic plant and insect life really took a beating, either blown away or silted in. I know of a smaller stream over on the Wisconsin side that had major damage this spring due to similar (although much smaller) flash floods.

Does anyone have any comments or possibly an updated stream report?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any stream report would be great. I'm not looking to fish just get a feel for how bad it is. In my mind it's a total loss. frown.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Southeast Minnesota Flooding

Some streams will not be fished this year, some have a new look, while others are in an entirely different location. Many fish were killed, but of course some will make it. If it makes any sense, the western portions of southeast Minnesota will be fishable yet this season (pending no more flooding), but portions of Winona, Fillmore, and Houston counties are absolutely hosed...as if a bomb went off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there's a little overreaction happening as far as the stream conditions go. Granted this was a major flood event in places, but streams have been flooding to varying degrees since the beginning of time.

Nature doesn't deal out devastation with malice aforethought. Nature creates change, sometimes in what appears to us mere humans as spectacular or terrible fashion.

Some trout will be displaced or killed, but the species will survive. Hopefully the hatcheries will ramp up production a bit to compensate if the DNR finds that numbers are down severely on some streams.

This too shall pass, and we may find in a year or two (or three, or five) that the fish and the fishing on the affected streams are better off after nature's "pressure washer" did it's work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is what I was thinking as well while trying to find the silver lining in this situation. Some of the streams I fish needed a good dredging and scouring for sure. In a few years this event may be better for some streams. It certainly is not good right now but we have to deal with nature as it happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sodajerk, I think you're right on. If there's any overdrama, it's in the immediacy of the situation, and the fact that some streams may not be fished any time soon. Rush Creek, Garvin, and some of the Whitewater do indeed look horrid.

However, the streams that suffered major fish kills, as Rush and Garvin in particular did, will (or should) eventually recover nicely with lots of silt-free spawning gravel and a lack of competition.

In the short term, access to select streams will be more difficult than the fishing due to blown bridges and highways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting to your favorite fishing hole may prove more difficult than actually fishing it...

tracyrandall_houstoncounty3.jpg

tracyrandall_houstoncounty1.jpg

bradhorn_wwsp16.jpg

andreachurch_garvinbrook1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you could fish from the road in the 3rd one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

smile.gif

I think the water may have receded quite a bit by now, but not a bad idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in all seriousness, I wish the best for those folks who lost their homes and such. I spend quite a bit of time walking streams from whitewater to Mable. Take care fellas and may good times be back in your future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • AlwaysFishing23
      Be cool if there was such a thing. Being people are getting so much more interest in pout it wouldn't be a bad thing I'd say.
    • AlwaysFishing23
      I don't personally own a smmity sled but I've herd many great things about them.
    • loadmaster
      Thats what I thought.  But I am sure that is what the guy said
    • AlwaysFishing23
      I think some people are obligated to keep what they catch. Me I'll keep fish but not very often at least in the winter. (Not on Mille lacs) Mille lacs you have the chance at catching a trophy sure maybe it would be cool to keep it but for a lot of us letting a trophy go is as good as keeping it at least IMHO.
    • Stick in Mud
      Very disappointing for the resorts as well as anyone else with a financial interest in the lake.  Me?  I release 99% of what I catch anyways, so the rule doesn't affect me much at all....well, I suppose it means I'll have my favorite flats all to myself for at least one more year.  I just really, really wish they'd let us troll after dark in the fall.    Why walleye fishermen aren't more amenable to catch and release, especially on a lake like Mille Lacs that's been on fire for, what, three years now, is beyond me.  Who wouldn't want to go and catch dozens of fish a day even if you have to let them go?