Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Hammer Handle

Keeping bigger fish can create giant fish???

Recommended Posts

Hammer Handle

This article says that fish can grow faster if smaller fish are kept, but keeping only the "big fish" can cause some to grow into giants.

I think the article says that we don't know anything yet....

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20037483/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
polarsusd81

Reading the story, it says the data was produced by a computer model. I am thinking that I will trust what is proven to be by the biologists that deal with the ecosystems on a daily basis versus a machine that will not function in water up to its knees. It sounds like a bs story with results that had to be published to get paid for doing a study.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Questor

It sounds plausible until you start to factor in fishing pressure. The big ones are usually the most vulnerable, so they don't last long when fishing pressure is applied.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chrisduc

Very interesting thought. I have to believe each system is different and a lot of different factors will effect the outcome. Definately something to consider.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fishin Beast

Bigger panfish do eat different things than smaller panfish so there is one point. But you will kill the genes in the fish. What happens when those few trophys die? The young of the trophy fish will automatically become stunted as there are only small fish left. What you do is just control the overall population. That happens by having big predatory fish in the lake. They will weed out the weeker fish and keep only the strongest panfish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
slipperybob

Umm cannibals...giant fish eats big fish, big fish eats little fish.

Take big fish out of equation

Giant fish eats what? little fish...Ecosystem change/crash.... crazy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nofishfisherman

The logic just seems very flawed.

If you catch and keep the big fish what will be left to grow into giant fish?

There might be one or two elusive big fish that people couldn't catch which will probably grow into giants but they got that way becuase they couldn't be caught so from a fishermans perspective why would I want to manage a lake so that it maintains a very small population of giant fish that no one is able to catch?

I think the accepted method of releasing the bigger fish is working just fine and will continue to keep working.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
castmaster

I think whats best is a balanced population of fish in all year classes and sizes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HateHumminbird

Most likely, there's a reason that the research in question was not published in a well-respected, peer-reviewed fisheries science journal. Rather, it was published in a very broad-brush journal with a less notable track record than many of the more mainstream fisheries biology publications.

Along with questions regarding modeling vs. sampling real populations, some of the major concerns I have are:

1. Interactive effects amongst different game species - i.e. predator/prey relationships - Cannibalistic or not

2. Assumption that fishing pressure, size structure, and environmental variables hold constant

3. Long-term sustainability of this approach

It seems to me that this flies in the face of years of fisheries research regarding selective harvest, fishing opportunity, and pressure. In other words, it's far too soon to suggest that harvesting large fish help what's left become giant; especially when based on an untested artificial sample.

Joel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave B

I dont think that they are saying that the overall fishery will have big fish, but that there will be a handful of fish that will be much larger than what is in a typical lake.

I saw an example of this growing up in Eden Prairie. We caught a ton of very small fish from Round Lake (which is about 30 acres, just under one mile around). They killed it off 2-3 times and there would be HUGE fish in there each time it was killed off. We would also stumble into schools of 1lb+ sunnies where the rest were tiny. It was extremely rare to catch a "regular" size fish, they were huge or stunted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Muskiefool

Computer generated Mother Nature confused.gif Heres a abstract of a study that shows how that theoretical computerized management system fails

Source: Blackwell Synergy

Populations where large fish were selectively harvested (as in most fisheries) displayed substantial declines in fecundity, egg volume, larval size at hatch, larval viability, larval growth rates, food consumption rate and conversion efficiency, vertebral number, and willingness to forage. These genetically based changes in numerous traits generally reduce the capacity for population recovery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
papabear

It is intersting to try and theories fish size managemnet. We can guess and dream that wecan do things to produce trophies for us to catch. But genetics, lake classification, weather, overall fish population, development, and fishing pressure all have an effect on the lakes. We have lakes that will never grow trophies and lakes that consistently do. I wonder more of why must we produce trophies to catch. If that is your sole purpose of fishing you may be missing the boat. And we wonder why we are not recruiting as many young fishermen/girls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Borch
      For the 8 inch I've heard best result eith the Nils.
    • Wanderer
      @leech~~ I believe the permit does require those houses to be moved out of the contest area.  Not necessarily kicked off the lake. That’s what permits are for, eh?  Looks like a great day for you two - congrats!  Might’ve been the lake, the spot or the fisher.  But I’ll go with the lake too. 
    • Spartacus218er
      Ive been slaying 10-15 pound lake trout this year the government types must of messed up at the hatchery years ago. Been wondering why the China rainbow strain has been so wimpy the big lakers in tofte are muchin dem bows up!
    • Spartacus218er
      So what’s your point 612’er? Or metro-mallard?
    • Spartacus218er
      Foss what are you thinking 40 yards lmfao!!! I’d i reemed ya new one burntside advertiser! I’ll guide ya lol!
    • Rattle Reel
      Anyone come up with a good way to store the dinette table when fishing? My IC has two holes under the dinette and I put it outside to fish but it is sooooo cold when I turn it into a bed to go to sleep. Thinking of a bracket to hang it inside but I don’t really want to block a window? Any ideas? What do you guys do?
    • leech~~
      Went by there today and noticed a few house setup in the contest area.  What happens to them next weekend? They are told to move or get kicked off a public lake? Should have gone to a different lake there Wanderer. Just saying. My son and I today.
    • delcecchi
      There have been signs there for a long time,   maybe 30 years?
    • Spartacus218er
      Good for him making those signs I enjoy his views in a nutshell!
    • Wanderer
      Access is in good shape at Hole in the Day.  Ice is in good shape and travels MUCH easier than last year.  But that was due to slush getting rutted and refrozen.  These warm temps might play that way again.  But for now all is well. Fishing though... the evening walleye bite was short like usual but finicky for us.  1 - 14 inch eye iced and one other lost.  Set line and shiner was responsible for the 14.  The hooked and lost fish was on a spoon with minnow head but I had to let it hang still for the commitment.  I had several other lookers but they just wouldn’t eat it.  Two lines became one but no bump!  Nice day to be on the lake. 
  • Share & Have Fun