Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
MedicDan

Little Rock- St. Cloud Times

Recommended Posts

MedicDan    0
MedicDan

Just thought I would post this-

Lake suffers another algae-based blow as toxins kill fish

By Jami Marquardt, St. Cloud Times

Published: July 29. 2007 12:30AM

RICE — One more thing can be added to the combination of blue-green goo and rotten-egg smell at Little Rock Lake to make an altogether unpleasant situation — dead fish.

Phyllis Post, who has lived on the lake for three years, said about 60 dead fish popped up Friday.

And within 24 hours, that number had increased to hundreds.

"It's crappies, walleye and bass — not just the icky fish," she said.

When she looks out over the lake, the white spots aren't whitecaps. They're fish bellies.

"It's a sad situation," she said.

She said there were previously some dead fish floating in the bays, but Friday marked a huge increase.

Post bought a cabin on the lake in 1997, a few residences down from where she now lives year-round on the south end of the lake.

She said she has never seen the lake so bad.

But she said she is still a strong advocate for the lake — she has spent summers swimming there with her grandchildren.

"It's our home and we're hoping something can be done about it," she said.

Benton County was informed Friday by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency officials that air quality testing showed elevated levels of hydrogen sulfide gas near the lake.

The gas is emitted by decaying algae, producing a rotten-egg smell.

State officials said hydrogen sulfide can be harmful to people with asthma or other respiratory conditions, and those people should avoid exposure to the gas if possible.

Original reports of toxicity came in Wednesday.

The toxic algae called microcystin was found at levels considered dangerous — about 120 parts per billion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Borch    313
Borch

It's been pretty nasty all summer. I was wondering when a die would occur with the water quality issues, low water levels and warm water temps. It truely was just a metter of time. frown.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
riverwalker    0
riverwalker

Ok so with another few summer like this how long will it take that lake to recover from a situation like this. When I was a kid we had a lake like this in our town. The fishing was good before the "bloom". Now it's considered a "dead lake". It's just a downhill trend from here if the summers keep up. It took about 15 years in my town to have the lake be able to NEVER recover....SAD situation....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
YummiYammis    0
YummiYammis

Agreed! What a shame. What are the causes of such a bloom and what is the combative measures for such a situation? Is the water hypoxic...or does the bloom introduce toxins? What does temperature do to make it worse?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IFallsRon    0
IFallsRon

Lake suffers; what an understatement. There's not enough fresh water coming in to push out all the runoff and runout.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MedicDan    0
MedicDan

It also makes me re-think the idea that just 2 weeks ago, I was still fishing the lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NELS-BELLS    36
NELS-BELLS

I saw something on the news a while back about how they have treated some of the small lakes and ponds in the cities by putting bales of straw in the water. It cleared the water right up. Apparantly something in the straw reacts with the algae and kills it. It would probably take a lot of straw to treat Little Rock. I don't recall if they have to repeat the procedure every year.

Nels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson    0
Mark Christianson

And this dumps into the Mississippi River......

That news report last night was unreal. The water literally looked like green paint lapping up on shore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MSRiverdog    5
MSRiverdog

If this is or has been a recurring problem as it sounds like it has, maybe it's time to stop that water from going into the Miss. Twenty loads of sand, clay and rock, problem solved, at least for the Mississippi River. mad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CaptainMusky    2
CaptainMusky

Quote:

If this is or has been a recurring problem as it sounds like it has, maybe it's time to stop that water from going into the Miss. Twenty loads of sand, clay and rock, problem solved, at least for the Mississippi River.
mad.gif


All that would do is raise the water level of Little Rock Lake, flood out hundreds of homeowners and it would still flow into the Mississippi. I agree, they better do something to clean up the water that goes IN to Little Rock, then you have cleaner water coming out.

I wouldn't eat anything out of that lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MedicDan    0
MedicDan

Quote:

I wouldn't eat anything out of that lake.


I don't either, I just fish for carp, catfish, suckers, etc... in the beginning of the year, I never fish later in the year on the lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ASMOLEY    0
ASMOLEY

I think we need to do a lot about the rivers and creeks that flow into our lakes in this area. Little Rock is especially bad due to how shallow it is and the agriculture that surrounds the lake. All of central MN needs to a better job controling their run off.

Remember the Sauk River a year or too ago.....

Not to blame the farmers or anything but our lakes sure take a beating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CaptainMusky    2
CaptainMusky

The strange part is there is a trout stream within 1/4 mile of Little Rock lake. I have to imagine that the same runoff flows into the stream as it does into Little Rock.

A sign of poor water quality is lack of weeds. Weeds need oxygen to survive, there are not very many "quality" weeds in Little Rock. Unfortunately with all of the cuts made over the last few years in enforcement at the MPCA, situations like this will become more commonplace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
uphill    0
uphill

If I am not mistaken I believe the stream flows into Little Rock not out of it. But I might be wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MedicDan    0
MedicDan

Experts: Algae fix to take time

By Mackenzie Ryan- St. Cloud Times

Published: July 31. 2007 12:30AM

RICE — The amount of toxin in the thick layer of blue-green algae in Little Rock Lake has risen, prompting continued health warnings and more intense testing.

"The advice is still the same," said Shannon Lotthammer, a manager for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency water monitoring section. She spoke to more than 50 people gathered Monday in the Watab Township Hall.

People should avoid contact with water from the lake, including water droplets that may be propelled into the air, until the algae scum is no longer visible. Animals also should be kept away from the water.

Residents with allergies or those particularly sensitive such as the young or the elderly should take more caution. Some residents have reported respiratory problems to the MPCA. In rare cases, if there is enough toxin, it can cause larger system failure or more serious side effects, Lotthammer said.

The MPCA found toxins in samples taken July 12 that are considered to be dangerous and high risk by the World Health Organization.

More tests July 25 found toxin levels in the WHO's very high risk category, the highest of four levels. The finding prompted an extension of the initial warning to residents.

"Unfortunately, we've had perfect conditions for growing algae," Lotthammer said.

Finding the causes

Hot temperatures, sunny skies, little rain, a windy spring and nutrients in the lake helped cause what could be the worst blue-green algae bloom in the lake's history.

The MPCA plans to install a monitoring system today that will average measurements over each half-hour, Lotthammer said.

Within a few days it will have preliminary data, which may shine more light on the problem.

But officials told the group the algae problem did not appear overnight, and said it will likely take time to solve.

"This isn't the first time this has happened; it may be the worst," said Dave Soderholm, a biologist from Monticello whose family has a cabin on the north shore.

"You have to look at this systemically," Soderholm said. "What is the problem? Why is this happening?"

That answer may come if Little Rock Lake is considered an impaired water in 2008, Lotthammer said. The Clean Water Act requires the MPCA to identify and restore impaired waters.

That's done through a three-year study and reduction plan called the Total Maximum Daily Load.

The TMDL will determine the causes of pollution and the maximum amount of a pollutant the lake can receive.

But residents don't have to wait three years to take action. Officials suggested becoming involved in the lake association, applying for grants through the association and considering independent studies.

The association is hoping to raise money to improve the lake through a raffle, member Jeff Soderholm said.

Residents may buy a $1 ticket at some businesses in Rice.

Individual property owners also can take steps by investigating how they could reduce nutrients running in the lake.

"You've taken the first step," said Maggie Leach of the MPCA. "Be here tomorrow. Be here next week. Be here three years from now. Make the commitment."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • delcecchi
      Wasn't sure, but I found it. looked like  you were cooking something on the grill.  
    • CigarGuy
      We were out near Taylors.  Couple boats and us and a pontoon and a pleasure boat cut right between us "sight seeing".  Blows my mind how they cut right between boats that are fairly close to each other fishing an area and cruise right through without a care in the world!  Del, I thought last year you figured out which place I had?
    • h8go4s
      Fuses are for fire protection. If you're willing to risk a fire in your boat if something goes awry, have at it. Your insurance company would be happy to have a good reason to keep all the premiums you've paid and refuse your claim. Hopefully no one will get injured or die in the fire.
    • TNFL
      Are fuses necessary on an on board charger?  Manual chargers do not have them,  is there a reason for them on the on board charges. I was given a system with a bank that may not have been working correctly, possibly blowing the fuse repeatedly.  My system would not be hooked up to an alternator on the engine so I'm wondering if it is fine to use the charging bank without the fuses.  The orange charging light comes on when I hook the wires directly up to a battery. I'm asking because I don't want to go through the bother of wiring this thing in my boat if I can't get it to work right. Also, I would technically only need 2 of the 3 banks to work, but I like the idea of repairing it to its potential.
    • monstermoose78
      My thumb was covered in slime and I could not get the phone to turn on most of the time
    • eyeguy 54
      its not camera shy  
    • ac777
      Looking to get on some walleye and crappie this week, looks like mayflies were out in full force last night when I was on the lake. First year fishing this lake, where does a guy start?
    • monstermoose78
      Caught some gills this was the first one 
    • guideman
      Thank you one and all, especially you Tommy. Some very kind words and ditto to you my friend. "Ace" "It's just fishing man"  
    • tacklejunkie
      Picked up some nice crappie and a couple eater walleyes on Allouez Bay the other day before the rains. Trolled crawlers with one light split shot and others with bottom bouncers. I was surprised at how big the crappie were