Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
ArcticCat21

Walleye limit change!!!

Recommended Posts

ArcticCat21

Notice of Upper Red Lake Walleye Possession Limit Change

As required by the Expedited Emergency rule published in the State Register February 5,

2007 (Volume 31, pages 986-987; Part 6264.0400, Subp. 59, Item B), the walleye daily

and possession limit will change as specified below because the cumulative walleye kill .

estimate from December 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007, is less that 134,000 pounds.

As of 12:01 am on July 14, the walleye regulations for state waters of Upper Red Lake

and associated tributaries will be as follows:

While a person is on or fishing Upper Red Lake and it's associated tributaries, the daily

and possession limit of walleye is four fish, of which not more than one walleye may be

over 26 inches in length. All walleye in possession must be less than 17 inches or greater

than 26 inches in length. All walleye that are 17 inches to 26 inches in length, inclusive,

must be immediately returned to the water.

This regulation continues until midnight November 30, 2007. The walleye daily and

possession limit will revert to two fish at 12:01 am on December 1, 2007. All other

fishing regulations on Upper Red Lake not inconsistent with this regulation remain in

effect.

Date: July 9, 2007

Dave Schad, Fish and Wildlife Director

This came directly from the MN DNR website and will take effect towmorrow. How sweet is that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hayseed

Great news indeed.

Perhaps it's just me, but I have a bit of issue with the timing of this change. With the reports I've heard/read and experienced, a person will catch and release several dozen fish to catch two for dinner. This would indicate to me that now a fisherperson would catch double the amount of fish and during the time of highest hook/release mortality. Wouldn't Sept. 1st to Jan. 1 have been more practical? Just my thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ozzie

I think they should have kept the 2 fish limit and opened the slot to 18 or even 20 inches.......just a thought as it is tough to get 17 and under fish.....or even making it 4 fish but also relaxing the slot to 18-20 inches........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sheephead24

so if I understand correctly this winter we can only keep 2 but right now its 4? with the crappies dissapearing how are they going to get people to drive long distances to keep 2 small walleyes? we drive 5 hours every winter to ice fish up there, but if there are no crappies left and we can keep 2 16 inch walleyes, I would rather drive 10 minutes to the nearest lake and catch a couple walleyes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Random guy

What I think you will see is they meat hogs or "grumpy guys" that have to fill a bucket every time they go fishing will not make the trip and head for the next hot bite to fill buckets. What we will continue to see is the true sportsmen that understand only Upper Red Lake can easily produce a trophy crappie, a trophy pike, numorous walleye along with several trophy class walleye all in one day of fishing. Red lake may slow down in numbers but the qaulity will continue to grow.

As for the question as to why they changed the limit when they did; It is my understanding that many factors play into this, everything from data gathering, laws and bi-laws, prevoius fishing pressure peaks and stacks and stacks of politics. To be honest I wouldn't want to be one of the guys in the meeting trying to make that decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Powerstroke

SO, you could catch any walleyes 2 years ago and you'd be fine keeping 4 but not 2? As far as I'm concerned I'm there to CATCH fish. If I keep a couple for the pan than fine. Its about having a quality, dare I say TROPHY fishery. You can't have trophies without numbers and you can't have numbers if you let a newly recovered lake get fished until the fish are gone. They used to say that wasn't possible until Red Lake did.

The fishing on URL is great. Read a Johnny P update and you'll see all your opportunities on this huge lake. Its not just about getting a few eaters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hayseed

I agree, it's about quality and change from 2 to 4 is not going to alter any plans for those who appreciate a quality experience. I do not make the four hour drive for two fish or four fish, but for the experience. We have all seen those who just don't seem to get it.

I'm hopeful it will make no or little difference in the mortality. It seems to me that warm water has some effect on stress levels for hooked fish.

I know I've seen some effect it recouperation time for fish I have never even lifted from the water to release. Perhaps this could be used as an opportunity to study the effect for shallow, warm water lakes. My two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pikester

I make the 4 hour drive just for all the excitement up at WestWinds on a Sunday night. Right Kelly and Jonny? grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Random guy

We may have a awesome lake and a great area but we still live in the small burg of Waskish, sometimes you have to stir the pot just to get a little something going. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kgpcr4

Thats a pretty arogant post in my opinion. Why am i a meat hog because i want to feed my family some fish? 2 walleyes doesnt feed the 4 of us when they are under 17". I mean why when we feed hundreds of dollars into the local economy would i want a meal of fish to bring back. we buy all our supplies up there as well as stay in black duck. also the true sportsman thing is a bunch of bull in my opinion. i have seen guys sit out there and catch 75 walleyes in a morning and then hear them tell me what great sportsmen they are killing who knows how many and they look down thier nose at me for taking 2 and quiting. Its a great lake and i want to see it do well. I just dont think i am less of a sportsman because i eat a few fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelly-p

"Looks like i need to cancel then. I just wont drive that far for two walleyes. Not worth it. I think (Contact Us Please) will be where i go this year."

On 3-22-07 you posted that a 2 fish limit was not enough for you to drive that far. I would think you would be happy about the 4 fish limit. My gut feeling tells me that you never came here in the 90's when it was a 0 walleye limit. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JollyT

There are four of you, if you all fish, the legal limit will be 8 fish, 16 now. No, one person can't catch them all and haul them home, but everyone can go fishing. If you just want walleyes to eat, Cub sells them much cheaper per pound than what it would cost to catch them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Random guy

Well as little as I feel I need to defend my post I will say this;

I spend everyday speaking and working with anglers from across the state and nation, from this daily contact I can tell you that the general census is split down the middle. 1/2 will stop coming to Red lake because they might not fully fill a bucket the other 1/2 could care less if they caught a fish or not, they just like to go fishing.

..and just so you know I keep fish, heck just got done cleaning my four fish at Westwinds cleaning house not to mention I let some go because they either fell into the slot or to small to keep. So where am I, sportsman or not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
traveler

Hey Jon, you missed a half:) I'm in the half that loves to catch fish (the heck with that "just getting out thing!) but I don't need to keep a bunch (or any) to have had a great day. BTW, I'm gonna call you up one of these days and come over and fish with you. Do you usually have some openings weekdays this time of year on short notice? My work schedule flucuates, and I get the occasional day off and can't think of a better way to spend it! Oh, and I think you probably slip into the "sportsman" catagory...:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kgpcr4

No defense needed John. I have alot of respect for people like you and Kelly. I truly do. You guys are living the dream weather you know it or not and Kelly i have fished out of your houses and you are a real class act and run a quality operation. I say that after working for resorts on the big pond and having been to alot of resort fish houses. Kelly you are the best i have seen and i truly mean that. when we were up the crappies quit at 11:00 so we wound up the lines as we did not want to keep catching them and having problems getting them to go back down the hole. some were hooked deep. we dropped the lines back in at 5:30 and picked up some more crappies. I am not a meat hog. i too care very much about the lake. I just like to eat fish as well. whats better than a plat of broiled or fried walleyes, maybey a crappie sandwich, a nice slab on a piece of bread fried to a golden brown. keep the steak give me the fish. My only points are just because you want to keep some fish does not make me a meat hog and just because you catch 100 walleyes and dont keep any does not mean you are a "true sportsman" You just killed many more than the two i kept and quit fishing. I hate to see dead walleyes floating and know that there are guys catching them by the fistfull and not keeping any and they are killing alot of fish. i am the only one in my family that fishes as my son loves to but with collage it tight for time. My family loves fish and two does not feed them. if i get a few slabs in then we are good to go. i have no fished Mille Lacs this year after May as i did not want to contribute to the fish kill once the water warmed up. John and Kelly i in no way meant to slam you. Sorry if i implied that! I too love URL. enough to quit when i have my two walleyes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelly-p

No problem. The real question we all should be thinking of and puzzling about is this: Now that the limit is 4,,,, will "haled" ever get his limit again?????? grin.gifgrin.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
halad

Kept 1/2 a limit this morning for supper probably go out tonight for the other half. Fishing keeps me out of trouble if i can get past happy hour. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
walleye101

Wow, times really have changed on the Big Pond!

In the old days it would have been going out for the morning limit, then back in the evening for the second limit. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kgpcr4

Walleye there are still some that do and it sucks. I do struggle when i throw back a fish that is going to die and i cant revive it and i just have to let it float away. I was taught not to kill it unless you are going to eat it and never to waste a fish or any part of an animal that you killed. taking over your limit like that is a waste and then some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Donk

When the topic of fishing up there comes up, I tell people that haven't been up there to only keep the keepers you don't think are going to make it. When the bite is on, you can catch dozens of fish that are in the slot, and if you keep the first two you lip hook, you feel pretty bad when you throw back the 15th one you gut hook. People look at me funny when I say that, but there are plenty of fish in there, just have patience and the want to catch fish and you will end up with a limit if you want it. As far as what the limit is, I could care less; as long as I am sitting on a lake and having fun... smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stan7600

I thougt being able to keep 2 walleyes was pretty good since it had been 0. Everything is relative. We always have a little more fun when we can keep some fish. If you fish with a spinner and minnow on a 3-way rig you will almost never gut hook any fish. Sometimes it drives the walleyes nuts but doesn't work too good in the winter. laugh.gif Stan C.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chris Haley

Yeah Kelly, You're living the dream.

New business idea. Advertise for all to come up and live the dream with you! For a mere $100 one can live the dream with Kelly P! You will get to pull fish houses around the lake, shovel snow against houses, drill a million holes, move the house in five hours after it's piled in on!! And all for $100. grin.gif

Sound like a plan?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME

You forgot: haul 'poo' bags!

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KMR85

the slot is set at that certain size because that size of fish can better withstand catch and release. think about it...when a human gets injured at age 13 to let's say 55 yrs old, they can take it way better than a small child or elderly person. i would never not go to URL due to what the fish limit is either. and yes i am aware that i used a double negative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
halad

Kelly's dreams!!! "frightening thought"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Fishing Frenzy
      Yeah looks like the 2nd weekend in December if we're lucky before you can ice fish this area. Going to be another late year on the ice.
    • PRO-V
      Next year you will have to buy one for wearing long underwear or pac boots.
    • fish_hunt_guy
      Love the reports Smuts. Looks like another great season. Keep it going!
    • slammer
      It just never ends in this state.  Tax, tax, tax.  Where does this money go?  Whats next?   A tag for your vehicle to drive on the ice?
    • leech~~
      Fun for some folks that went exploring early ice from a few years ago. 
    • tfin
      Hi Cookie,  a buddy and I are going up this weekend.  Will they bite much after dark or is the water too mucky this early.  I appreciate any info.  Thanks
    • papadarv
      Yesterday the MN DNR announced a license requirement change effective NOW for this ice season. All Wheel House and other fishing structures which cannot be folded / collapsed must be licensed even if you remove the house when you get off the ice. 
    • Rick
      Harvest climbs 16 percent from 2016 Minnesota firearms hunters registered 161,057 deer through the third weekend of deer season, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  Preliminary results through the third weekend show that the number of deer registered was up 16 percent from 2016. Of the deer harvested, 53 percent were bucks, compared to 63 percent during the same period in 2016. In Zone 1, in northeastern Minnesota, total firearms harvest was up 36 percent. In Zone 2, which covers the majority of the state and runs from Canada to Iowa, harvest was up 10 percent and Zone 3, in southeastern Minnesota, was down 5 percent. “The conditions were generally good for hunters participating in the last week of the Zone 1 season and for the start of the 3B season in the southeast,” said Erik Thorson, acting big game program leader, “which provided a boost to the statewide firearms harvest.” Based upon the number of antlerless permits available and the number of permit areas that allow multiple deer to be taken, the DNR is projecting the 2017 total deer harvest to be around 200,000. The 2016 total harvest was 173,213 and to date firearms and archery hunters have harvested about 180,000 deer this year. In much of Minnesota, the firearms deer season ended Nov. 12, and the northern rifle zone season ended Nov. 19. The late southeast firearms deer season is open through Sunday, Nov. 26. The muzzleloader season begins Saturday, Nov. 25, and continues through Sunday, Dec. 10. More information on deer management can be found at mndnr.gov/deer. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Applications due by Saturday, Dec. 16  The Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are seeking qualified applicants to serve on the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.  “The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee plays a critical role in helping us achieve the vision Minnesotans have for use of the Parks and Trails Legacy Funds and creates an accessible and equitable, integrated system of state and regional parks and trails in Minnesota,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. The purpose of the committee is to promote and coordinate implementation of the 25-Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Funding recommendations for individual projects is not a part of this committee’s work. The plan can be found at on the parks and trails legacy plan page. 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment by Minnesota voters. The committee is planning a series of regional events during the year to celebrate Legacy accomplishments and engage Minnesotans on the question, “Why Parks and Trails Legacy Matters.”  Information about the events will be available in January on Facebook (/PTLegacyMN) and on the committee website (www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac). The deadline for applications is Saturday, Dec. 16. The committee is made up of 17 members, including, to the practical extent possible, diverse geographical and demographic representation. The committee has a mixture of park and trail professionals and Minnesota residents. Committee members should have expertise in two or more of the four strategic pillars of the plan: Connect people and the outdoors. Acquire land and create opportunities. Take care of what we have. Coordinate among partners. Terms are two years with the option of being reappointed for a maximum of three terms. Meetings are scheduled every two months around the state, with an option to attend remotely. Interested individuals may complete the application form online at www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac/member-application or print it out and return it to Paul Purman, Department of Natural Resources, Box 39, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. Anyone with questions can contact Paul via phone at 651-259-5643 or email at paul.purman@state.mn.us. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Big bay did not look to be completely frozen over yesterday afternoon. Broken up and refrozen by McKinley Landing. Cliff