Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
KOTTKE

Daughters first rifle

Recommended Posts

KOTTKE

My oldest daughter will be joining me on her first deer hunt this year in northen MN. Just looking for some input for a first gun. I have been hearing about a new load for the .270 called a low recoil shell. Anyone have any experience with these?? Looking at a Browning BAR in the .270, this gun seems to fit her good but am concerened about recoil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Scott K

I would say a .243, would be best for her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigdog

I shoot a .270 but have not tried the low recoil loads. My brother and I started out hunting with .243's and .257's. They are very comfortable to shoot. Just have to be a little careful with shot placement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
101winchester

Remington Model 7 youth & ladies edition, 7mm/08. The one I bought for my wife is a tack driver, low recoil and an excellent gun to carry in the brush when she is back in town. Or Browning Micro Medallion is a very nice rifle too..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

I would agree with the 243 and the 257. The others will probably work but the first two will take down deer without turning her away from rifle hunting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lawdog

the low recoil or managed recoil loads as they call them are generally not to be shot out of autoloader rifles. At least the last I saw that was the story... That would leave you with a bolt gun for the .270 if you want to shoot the lower recoil loads.

I agree with others, the .243 is a viable whitetail gun for sure. I'm also very fond of the 25-06. I really want one of them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eye-lander

My daughter, who is 12, will be on her first deer hunt this year. After much homework, I ended up getting her a .243. She's still pretty small, so I didn't want to scare her off by the recoil, but yet wanted something that would still take down the animal . I found the .243 fit the bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Walleye Guy

One thing to keep in mind is that the recoil during the range shooting and practice shooting is "feels" much greater than the recoil during hunting. The adrenalin seems to take over and you don't feel the recoil. I would recommend a work up schedule. Have her shoot a low recoil rifle first and then have her work up towards the gun she will use during hunting. I doubt she will even notice the recoil when she is hunting. Getting her over the practice rounds will be the hardest part of the process. A .243 Roberts would be a good starting point. .257 is also a good choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bmc

My dad has a TC Encore rifle that my daughter has used for rifle season. It's a 25/06 caliber, but boy does it do a number on deer! We put a Simms Vibration Labs recoil pad on it and it's very comfortable for her to shoot! Whatever gun you decide on, get a Simms Vibration Lab recoil pad, you won't be sorry!

Brian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
New Yankee

I'd second the 07-08 - I've got one in a Tikka that I love to shoot. Dependant on the type of hunting - stand vs stalk etc those BARs can get pretty heavy. I can't tell the difference in recoil between a .243 and the '08 - they both are based on the .308 catridge - just different neck sizes (.24 vs .28) you can get a bit more umph from the '08. The .308 would also be a good choice, I believe that Hornady makes some managed recoil round in the .308, and it's a cartridge that can do just about anything, and availible in the BAR.

The .270 has a bit of a sharp punch that may be a bit much for a youngster IMO. The .243 Winchester or .257 Roberts are both fine rounds, but less versatile than the .08 or .308.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
roosterslayer

If deer is the only game that she will be havesting with the rifle then the 243 will do great. Most of the guys in my hunting party shoot them and all there deer last year were bang flops. But if she will be hunting any larger game I would go with the 308, there really isn't that much recoil in a 308. My Wife is 5'2" and 120, and she really likes the 308. And she is also buying the Browning Micro, If you daughter needs a youth gun or just a gun built for smaller frames i would look into it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jaydog

270 is great just take it to the gunsmith for around $45 u can have a nice limb saver pad put on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dukhntr

I think all of the suggestions are good. I am a BIG believer in the Sims pads.(Dislocated shoulder) Problem is they lengthen the length of pull at least an inch....so make sure you get a gun with that thought in mind. I am also a believer in "Managed Recoil Loads". They really cut down the recoil. If I am hunting in dense timber, (ie: 100 yd shots or less) I still use them, as I have some left over from when I started my youngest son. When my youngest was 12 he started shooting my WBY 7MM Rem Mag with the managed recoil loads. (about 11 lbs of recoil) It didn't take long before he stepped up to full tilt loads from that gun,( 22 lbs of recoil) and in fact took that gun on our last elk hunt. He is now 14, soon to be 15, and has been bugging me for a 300 Win Mag. (he's NOT getting my pre 64 Mod. 70 in 300 Winnie!) Point of all of this is, between the Sims pad, and the Managed Recoil Loads, you can (and I think should) start kids on guns you already have and let them grow into them. If you have to buy something, I am also a big believer in the Savage bolt rifles. They are much cheaper than the Tikkas or the BAR's.

Hope this helps! And good luck whichever way you go!

Dukhntr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UMDSportsman

I shoot a Rem model 7400 in a .270 win. I have shot it every year i have deer hunted. the .270 is a great rifle, but i will admit that the first year or two sighting it in i would flinch, and i had a few problems with recoil, put a deer in front of me and i never felt a thing. now i have no problems with the recoil. I would second the recoil pad, or a smaller gun for the first couple years. i would have her shoot a couple different guns that have noticabilly different recoils and let her decide. I know there used to be a girl that hunted with us when she was in high school and was 120 lbs soken wet and she had absolutely no problems with a 30-06.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jaydog

i hav 7400 in 270 i put the limb saver on it makes good brench rest gun with little kick makes it fun to shoot i had the gun smith shorting the gun to make up for the pads thickens

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
big drift

Just remember if your going to use a BAR you will have lower pressures and velocity then other rifles add to the fact of reduced loads your point of aim will change so if you do go that route shoot it before season to adjust the point of aim, also if your looking at more recoil management look at a decelerator pad. Similar to Simms but I have had better results with it. If it is out of your price range look at a PAST shooting pad for her shoulder smae results less cost and no gun work required just slip it on. In conclusion a Butler Creek Neopreme style sling is one of the best for hunting it aborbs shock better while carrying and allows for tighter gun control when used in off hand firing.

Just some tips from another dad going thru the whole setting up kid thing and self described gun looney.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
woody1975

.243 - Definately the way to go.

Low recoil - Plenty of power

Been using them from here to Wyoming with nothing but good results.

My .02

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • leech~~
      Fun for some folks that went exploring early ice from a few years ago. 
    • tfin
      Hi Cookie,  a buddy and I are going up this weekend.  Will they bite much after dark or is the water too mucky this early.  I appreciate any info.  Thanks
    • papadarv
      Yesterday the MN DNR announced a license requirement change effective NOW for this ice season. All Wheel House and other fishing structures which cannot be folded / collapsed must be licensed even if you remove the house when you get off the ice. 
    • Rick
      Harvest climbs 16 percent from 2016 Minnesota firearms hunters registered 161,057 deer through the third weekend of deer season, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  Preliminary results through the third weekend show that the number of deer registered was up 16 percent from 2016. Of the deer harvested, 53 percent were bucks, compared to 63 percent during the same period in 2016. In Zone 1, in northeastern Minnesota, total firearms harvest was up 36 percent. In Zone 2, which covers the majority of the state and runs from Canada to Iowa, harvest was up 10 percent and Zone 3, in southeastern Minnesota, was down 5 percent. “The conditions were generally good for hunters participating in the last week of the Zone 1 season and for the start of the 3B season in the southeast,” said Erik Thorson, acting big game program leader, “which provided a boost to the statewide firearms harvest.” Based upon the number of antlerless permits available and the number of permit areas that allow multiple deer to be taken, the DNR is projecting the 2017 total deer harvest to be around 200,000. The 2016 total harvest was 173,213 and to date firearms and archery hunters have harvested about 180,000 deer this year. In much of Minnesota, the firearms deer season ended Nov. 12, and the northern rifle zone season ended Nov. 19. The late southeast firearms deer season is open through Sunday, Nov. 26. The muzzleloader season begins Saturday, Nov. 25, and continues through Sunday, Dec. 10. More information on deer management can be found at mndnr.gov/deer. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Applications due by Saturday, Dec. 16  The Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are seeking qualified applicants to serve on the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.  “The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee plays a critical role in helping us achieve the vision Minnesotans have for use of the Parks and Trails Legacy Funds and creates an accessible and equitable, integrated system of state and regional parks and trails in Minnesota,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. The purpose of the committee is to promote and coordinate implementation of the 25-Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Funding recommendations for individual projects is not a part of this committee’s work. The plan can be found at on the parks and trails legacy plan page. 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment by Minnesota voters. The committee is planning a series of regional events during the year to celebrate Legacy accomplishments and engage Minnesotans on the question, “Why Parks and Trails Legacy Matters.”  Information about the events will be available in January on Facebook (/PTLegacyMN) and on the committee website (www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac). The deadline for applications is Saturday, Dec. 16. The committee is made up of 17 members, including, to the practical extent possible, diverse geographical and demographic representation. The committee has a mixture of park and trail professionals and Minnesota residents. Committee members should have expertise in two or more of the four strategic pillars of the plan: Connect people and the outdoors. Acquire land and create opportunities. Take care of what we have. Coordinate among partners. Terms are two years with the option of being reappointed for a maximum of three terms. Meetings are scheduled every two months around the state, with an option to attend remotely. Interested individuals may complete the application form online at www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac/member-application or print it out and return it to Paul Purman, Department of Natural Resources, Box 39, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. Anyone with questions can contact Paul via phone at 651-259-5643 or email at paul.purman@state.mn.us. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Big bay did not look to be completely frozen over yesterday afternoon. Broken up and refrozen by McKinley Landing. Cliff
    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.